Elsevier

Infection, Genetics and Evolution

Volume 29, January 2015, Pages 146-155
Infection, Genetics and Evolution

Hantaan virus can infect human keratinocytes and activate an interferon response through the nuclear translocation of IRF-3

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meegid.2014.11.009Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Hantaan virus replicates in HaCaT cells.

  • Hantaan virus induce antiviral IFNβ is IRF3 dependent.

  • Hantaan virus induce CXCL10 independent of IFN activation in HaCaT cells.

Abstract

Hantaan virus (HTNV) is a rodent-borne virus that causes hemorrhagic fever with renal syndrome (HFRS) in Asia and can be transmitted to humans through bites or the inhalation of aerosolized urine, droppings, or saliva of infected rodents. Keratinocytes predominate in the epidermis and reportedly serve as a replication site for multiple vector-borne viruses, little is known about the susceptibility of human skin cells to HTNV infection. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate whether human keratinocytes support HTNV replication and elicit an immune response against HTNV infection. We found that a human keratinocyte cell line, HaCaT, supports HTNV replication. In addition, retinoic acid inducible gene-I (RIG-I) and melanoma differentiation associated gene-5 (MDA5) play key roles in the detection of HTNV infection in HaCaT cells and in the up-regulation of interferon (IFN)-β expression, which subsequently leads to the production of a large amount of antiviral interferon-stimulated genes (ISGs) and other chemokines used for immune cell recruitment. Furthermore, we suggest that interferon regulatory factor (IRF)-3, as opposed to NF-κB/p65 or IRF-7, is translocated to the nucleus to induce IFN-β. However, the early induction of chemokine CXCL10 was a direct result of HaCaT cells counteracting HTNV infection and was not due to the induction of IFN. Overall, our data demonstrate, for the first time, the permissiveness of human keratinocytes to HTNV infection.

Introduction

Hantaviruses, from the family Bunyaviridae, are trisegmented, single-stranded, negative-sense RNA viruses. The genomes of hantaviruses consist of L, M, and S segments, which encode RNA-dependent RNA polymerase, glycoprotein, and nucleoprotein, respectively (Hepojoki et al., 2012, Vaheri et al., 2013). In nature, hantaviruses are mainly carried by reservoir animals, such as rodents, shrews, moles and even bats, with infections in such reservoir animals being mostly chronic and asymptomatic (Easterbrook and Klein, 2008, Vaheri et al., 2013, Zhang, 2014). Hantaviruses cause two types of infections when transmitted to humans. Hemorrhagic fever with renal syndrome (HFRS) is primarily caused by Hantaan virus (HTNV) in Asia, Seoul virus (SEOV) worldwide, and Puumala virus (PUUV) and Dobrava virus (DOBV) in Europe; these viruses are harbored by Apodemus agrarius, Rattus norvegicus, Myodes glareolus and Apodemus flavicollis, respectively (Jonsson et al., 2010). Of these, PUUV causes a mild form of HFRS that is termed nephropathia epidemica (NE) and results in reduced mortality compared to other forms (Mustonen et al., 2013). Hantavirus pulmonary syndrome (HPS or HCPS), which is caused by Sin Nombre virus (SNV) and related viruses in North America and by Andes virus (ANDV) and related viruses in Latin America, is harbored by Peromyscus maniculatus and Oligoryzomys longicaudatus, respectively (Jonsson et al., 2010, Schountz and Prescott, 2014). All of these pathogenetic hantaviruses are rodent-borne, and the pathogenicity of newly discovered hantaviruses that are harbored by insectivores or bats requires further investigation.

Due to their impact on human health, rodent-borne hantaviruses have been widely studied (Kallio et al., 2009, Pedrosa and Cardoso, 2011, Schountz and Prescott, 2014). As rodents and insectivores infected by hantaviruses always maintain significant levels of virus, which can be transmitted to humans, in vivo, these animals are termed reservoir hosts. Percutaneous transmission within an animal reservoir is highly prevalent (Wesley et al., 2010).

HFRS/HPS infection can be acquired after exposure to aerosolized urine, droppings, or saliva from infected rodents or after exposure to dust from their nests (Hardestam et al., 2008, Jonsson et al., 2010, Xu et al., 1985). Transmission may also occur when infected urine or other biological material is directly introduced into broken skin or onto the mucous membranes of the eyes, nose, or mouth. One study described that transmission could occur through the ingestion of infected rodent-contaminated food or water (Mesic and Almedin, 2008); however, further evidence to support this finding is lacking. Additionally, individuals who work with live rodents can be exposed to hantaviruses through bites from infected rodents. Transmission from one human to another may occur, e.g., ANDV has been reported to be directly transmitted from person to person (Martinez et al., 2005), but this is extremely rare. Moreover, PUUV is reportedly able to be transmitted via the transfusion of platelets or other blood products (Sinisalo et al., 2010).

Type I interferons (IFNs) are proteins with antiviral activity, with IFN-α and IFN-β typically being produced in leukocytes and fibroblasts, respectively (Havell et al., 1975). IFN-β is considered to have a significant role against RNA viral infections. Host pathogen pattern receptors (PRRs) recognize viral RNA or other pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs), including Toll-like receptors (TLR), retinoic acid-inducing gene I-like receptors (RLRs) and NOD-like receptors (NLRs) (Akira and Takeda, 2004, Lupfer and Kanneganti, 2013, Yoneyama et al., 2004). RIG-I and MDA5 are involved in the assembly of mitochondrial antiviral signaling protein (MAVS or IPS-1, Cardif, VISA) complexes at the mitochondrial membrane (Hou et al., 2011, Seth et al., 2005, Yoneyama et al., 2004). Subsequently, MAVS binds tumor necrosis factor receptor-associated factor 3 (TRAF3) and recruits TBK1/IKKε kinases, which activate nuclear factor κB (NF-κB) and phosphorylate IRF-3 and IRF-7 (Hacker et al., 2011, Oganesyan et al., 2006). IRF-3 and IRF-7 are then translocated to the nucleus to initiate IFN-β mRNA synthesis (Hiscott, 2007). Secreted type I IFNs bind to receptors on neighboring cells; and IFN-stimulated gene factor 3 (ISGF3) translocates to the nucleus, via the JAK-STAT pathway, to initiate the expression of ISGs by binding to IFN-stimulated response elements (ISREs) (Au-Yeung et al., 2013). Previous studies have indicated that TLR3, TLR4 and RIG-I are responsible for sensing HTNV infection and then inducing IFN expression in A549, EVC-304 and Huh7 cells, respectively (Handke et al., 2009, Lee et al., 2011, Yu et al., 2012). Cells pretreated with IFN can prevent pathogenic hantaviruses from establishing successful replication, which indicates that IFN plays a role in controlling hantavirus infections (Matthys and Mackow, 2012). Moreover, the Gn tail of hantaviruses (NY-1V, ANDV and TULV) has been reported to bind TRAF3, thus blocking IRF-3 phosphorylation and inhibiting RIG-I/TBK1-directed IFN-β transcription (Alff et al., 2008, Matthys et al., 2011, Matthys et al., 2014). Thus, the relationship between the IFN system and hantaviruses is complicated.

As a first line of defense, the skin possesses different types of cells and molecular mediators of innate and adaptive immunity (Nestle et al., 2009). Keratinocytes, comprising the majority of the epithelial layer of the skin, have been found to serve as a replication site for a number of vector-borne viruses, including West Nile virus (WNV) (Hoover and Fredericksen, 2014, Lim et al., 2011), dengue virus (DENV) (Bustos-Arriaga et al., 2011, Surasombatpattana et al., 2011) and Chikungunya virus (CHIKV) (Puiprom et al., 2013), which were previously thought to be transmitted by direct infestation into subcutaneous veins via ticks, mosquitos, mites and other arthropod vectors. Although members of the Hantavirus genus have not been proven to be transmitted by vectors, viruses from other genera of Bunyaviridae have preferential relationships with the arthropods of only one or two families, such as Bunyavirus with mosquitoes (Culicidae), Uukuvirus and Nairovirus with ticks (Ixodidae and Argasidae), and Phlebovirus with sand flies (Psychodidae) and mosquitoes (Labuda, 1991). Furthermore, hantavirus-specific RNA was detectable in mites (Houck et al., 2001) but not in ticks (Wojcik-Fatla et al., 2011, Wojcik-Fatla et al., 2013). Hantavirus can infect many different cell types, such as endothelial cells, epithelial cells, dendritic cells (DC), mast cells and monocytes (Manigold and Vial, 2014). As keratinocytes may play important roles in dermal viral transmission, we addressed whether keratinocytes, which can serve either as a replication site for viruses or in the recruitment of macrophages and DCs to the site of infection, are able to support hantavirus replication. As normal immortalized keratinocytes, HaCaT cells are widely used in research associated with keratinocytes (Aksoy et al., 2014, Maas-Szabowski et al., 2001, Puiprom et al., 2013). In this study, we first demonstrated that HTNV is capable of infecting the HaCaT keratinocyte cell line. We then explored the innate immune responses against HTNV in these cells and found that HTNV can induce the secretion of high levels of interferon (IFN)-β and the nuclear translocation of IRF-3. The levels of a large number of ISGs, including Mx1, OAS1 and IFIT2, were found to be correlated with the level of IFN-β. Moreover, the nuclear translocation of STAT1 was also detected in HTNV-infected HaCaT cells.

Section snippets

Cells and viruses

HaCaT cells were purchased from the China Center for Type Culture Collection (CCTCC) at Wuhan and cultured in DMEM/F-12 medium (HyClone, Logan City, UT, USA) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (HyClone), 100 units/ml penicillin and 100 μg/ml streptomycin at 37 °C with 5% CO2. The HTNV 76-118 strain was stored in our lab, and the HTNV virus stock was prepared by infecting monolayers of Vero E6 cells in 75-cm2 flasks at a dose (0.5 ml) of approximately 5 × 106 LD50 of HTNV. At three days

HaCaT cells are susceptible to HTNV infection

Due to a paucity of historical data regarding whether the human keratinocyte cell line HaCaT is permissive to hantavirus, HaCaT cells were challenged with Hantaan virus (HTNV) strain 76-118 at an MOI of 1. Subsequently, the amount of intracellular viral nucleoprotein (NP) was assessed by western blotting at different time points post-infection. As shown in Fig. 1A, HTNV NP was detected in HaCaT cells challenged with virus at 6 h and 24 post-infection (hpi), whereas it was not detected in

Discussion

Endothelial cells are considered a primary site of viral replication and the major target of hantavirus infection in vivo. However, hantaviruses can also infect monocytes, macrophages, mast cells, dendritic cells (DCs), epithelial cells and vascular smooth muscle cells (vSMC), which demonstrates their remarkably broad cell tropism (Guhl et al., 2010, Markotic et al., 2007, Marsac et al., 2011, Raftery et al., 2002, Temonen et al., 1995, Zaki et al., 1995). As HaCaT cells are a widely used

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the study: W.Y., Y.L., and F.Z. Performed the study: W.Y., Y.X., Y.W., Y.D., Q.X. and M.C. Analyzed the data: W.Y. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: L.Y., L.Z., L.C., X.W., and Z.X. Wrote the manuscript: W.Y. Edited the manuscript: Y.L. and F.Z.

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to Dr. Steve Goodbourn for providing the IFN-β promoter reporter plasmid, pIFΔ(−116) lucter, and to Dr. Wu Min for the pISRE-luc-cis reporter plasmid. This work was supported partially by grants from the Major State Basic Research Development Program of China (No. 2012CB518905), the National Major Infectious Diseases Prevention and Control Special Issues (2013ZX10004609-002), and the National Natural Science Foundation General Program of China (No. 30970148, 30972590 and 31370193

References (86)

  • R.B. Seth et al.

    Identification and characterization of MAVS, a mitochondrial antiviral signaling protein that activates NF-kappaB and IRF 3

    Cell

    (2005)
  • M. Sinisalo et al.

    Headache and low platelets in a patient with acute leukemia

    J. Clin. Virol.

    (2010)
  • P. Surasombatpattana et al.

    Dengue virus replication in infected human keratinocytes leads to activation of antiviral innate immune responses

    Infect. Genet. Evol.

    (2011)
  • M. Temonen et al.

    Effect of interferon-alpha and cell differentiation on Puumala virus infection in human monocyte/macrophages

    Virology

    (1995)
  • L.G. Xu et al.

    VISA is an adapter protein required for virus-triggered IFN-beta signaling

    Mol. Cell

    (2005)
  • Y. Zhang et al.

    Hantaan virus infection induces CXCL10 Expression through TLR3, RIG-I, and MDA-5 Pathways Correlated with the Disease Severity

    Mediat. Inflamm.

    (2014)
  • S. Akira et al.

    Toll-like receptor signalling

    Nat. Rev. Immunol.

    (2004)
  • P.J. Alff et al.

    The NY-1 hantavirus Gn cytoplasmic tail coprecipitates TRAF3 and inhibits cellular interferon responses by disrupting TBK1-TRAF3 complex formation

    J. Virol.

    (2008)
  • J. Andrejeva et al.

    ISG56/IFIT1 is primarily responsible for interferon-induced changes to patterns of parainfluenza virus type 5 transcription and protein synthesis

    J. Gen. Virol.

    (2013)
  • N. Au-Yeung et al.

    Transcriptional regulation by STAT1 and STAT2 in the interferon JAK-STAT pathway

    JAKSTAT

    (2013)
  • N. Bourne et al.

    Early production of type I interferon during West Nile virus infection: role for lymphoid tissues in IRF3-independent interferon production

    J. Virol.

    (2007)
  • J. Brownell et al.

    Direct, interferon-independent activation of the CXCL10 promoter by NF-kappaB and interferon regulatory factor 3 during hepatitis C virus infection

    J. Virol.

    (2014)
  • J. Bustos-Arriaga et al.

    Activation of the innate immune response against DENV in normal non-transformed human fibroblasts

    PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis.

    (2011)
  • L. Cheng et al.

    Induction of specific humoral and cellular immune responses in a mouse model following gene fusion of HSP70C and Hantaan virus Gn and S0.7 in an adenoviral vector

    PLoS ONE

    (2014)
  • S. Daffis et al.

    2′-O methylation of the viral mRNA cap evades host restriction by IFIT family members

    Nature

    (2010)
  • J.X. Deng et al.

    The highly conserved 5′ untranslated region as an effective target towards the inhibition of Enterovirus 71 replication by unmodified and appropriate 2′-modified siRNAs

    J. Biomed. Sci.

    (2012)
  • M.S. Diamond et al.

    The broad-spectrum antiviral functions of IFIT and IFITM proteins

    Nat. Rev. Immunol.

    (2013)
  • J.D. Easterbrook et al.

    Immunological mechanisms mediating Hantavirus persistence in rodent reservoirs

    PLoS Pathog.

    (2008)
  • V. Fensterl et al.

    The ISG56/IFIT1 gene family

    J. Interferon Cytokine Res.

    (2011)
  • K.A. Fitzgerald et al.

    LPS-TLR4 signaling to IRF-3/7 and NF-kappaB involves the toll adapters TRAM and TRIF

    J. Exp. Med.

    (2003)
  • M. Frese et al.

    Inhibition of bunyaviruses, phleboviruses, and hantaviruses by human MxA protein

    J. Virol.

    (1996)
  • S. Guhl et al.

    Infection of in vivo differentiated human mast cells with hantaviruses

    J. Gen. Virol.

    (2010)
  • M. Habjan et al.

    Processing of genome 5′ termini as a strategy of negative-strand RNA viruses to avoid RIG-I-dependent interferon induction

    PLoS ONE

    (2008)
  • H. Hacker et al.

    Expanding TRAF function: TRAF3 as a tri-faced immune regulator

    Nat. Rev. Immunol.

    (2011)
  • W. Handke et al.

    Hantaan virus triggers TLR3-dependent innate immune responses

    J. Immunol.

    (2009)
  • J. Hardestam et al.

    Puumala hantavirus excretion kinetics in bank voles (Myodes glareolus)

    Emerg. Infect. Dis.

    (2008)
  • E.A. Havell et al.

    Two antigenically distinct species of human interferon

    Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.

    (1975)
  • J. Hepojoki et al.

    Hantavirus structure–molecular interactions behind the scene

    J. Gen. Virol.

    (2012)
  • L.I. Hoover et al.

    IFN-dependent and -independent reduction in West Nile virus infectivity in human dermal fibroblasts

    Viruses

    (2014)
  • M.A. Houck et al.

    Hantavirus transmission: potential role of ectoparasites

    Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis.

    (2001)
  • C.B. Jonsson et al.

    A global perspective on hantavirus ecology, epidemiology, and disease

    Clin. Microbiol. Rev.

    (2010)
  • B.N. Kalali et al.

    Double-stranded RNA induces an antiviral defense status in epidermal keratinocytes through TLR3-, PKR-, and MDA5/RIG-I-mediated differential signaling

    J. Immunol.

    (2008)
  • T. Kawai et al.

    IPS-1, an adaptor triggering RIG-I- and Mda5-mediated type I interferon induction

    Nat. Immunol.

    (2005)
  • Cited by (16)

    • Innate Immunity to Orthohantaviruses: Could Divergent Immune Interactions Explain Host-specific Disease Outcomes? Innate immunity to orthohantaviruses

      2022, Journal of Molecular Biology
      Citation Excerpt :

      Early work studying transcriptional upregulation of ISGs in HTNV infection demonstrated a strong induction of innate immune signaling in A549 type II alveolar epithelial cell line.33,38,39 Subsequent studies have recapitulated these results in various cells including hepatocytes,40 astrocytes,41 macrophages,36,42 endothelial cells,43,44 31,38,45,46 and keratinocytes.32 Activation of both IRF3 and NF-κB following infection with New World and Old World viruses has been observed.43,44,47–52

    • STING positively regulates human ORMDL3 expression through TBK1-IRF3-STAT6 complex mediation

      2018, Experimental Cell Research
      Citation Excerpt :

      In contrast, IRF3 and STAT6 binding sites played critical roles in promoter activation following stimulation of STING expression. These findings are similar to the results of prior studies on IRF3 binding to chemokine promoters during viral infection and IRF3 binding to ORMDL3 promoters during RSV infection [33,34]. Additionally, these results are consistent with the data from another study indicating that STAT6 binds to IRF4 promoter during spring viremia of carp virus (SVCV) infection [35].

    • Taking the lead – how keratinocytes orchestrate skin T cell immunity

      2018, Immunology Letters
      Citation Excerpt :

      For example, TLR3-signaling drives IRF6-dependent mRNA-expression for interferon-β (IFN-β), the interleukin-12 (IL-12) family member IL-23p19 by keratinocytes[36]. Similarly, IRF1 and IRF3 expression by keratinocytes regulate anti-viral immunity and MHC class I expression by keratinocytes[37,38]. IRF5 and NF-κB, downstream of TLRs are known to target pro-inflammatory cytokine transcription [39] (Fig. 2).

    • Mechanisms and roles by which IRF-3 mediates the regulation of ORMDL3 transcription in respiratory syncytial virus infection

      2017, International Journal of Biochemistry and Cell Biology
      Citation Excerpt :

      In contrast, the proximal IRF-3 binding site played a pivotal role in promoter activation following exposure to RSV. These findings are similar to prior studies that have reported the binding of IRF-3 to chemokine promoters during virus infection (Imaizumi et al., 2015; Koetzler et al., 2009; Ye et al., 2015). However, IRF-3 requires the coactivator CREB-binding protein (CBP)-p300 to mediate transcriptional activation of target genes during virus infection (Suhara et al., 2002).

    • DDX21 translocates from nucleus to cytoplasm and stimulates the innate immune response due to dengue virus infection

      2016, Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications
      Citation Excerpt :

      Plasmids used for luciferase assays were as follows: The pRL renilla luciferase reporter vectors (pRL-TK) was purchased from Promega, the reporter plasmids for the IFN-β promoter, pIFΔ(−116) lucter was a gift from Steve Goodbourn [19], pISRE-luc-cis reporter plasmid (Stratagene) was a gift from Dr. Wu Min [20]. Luciferase reporter assays was then performed according to a standard protocol, as previously mentioned [21]. In brief, 293T cells with 70% confluence were transfected with 10 ng of pRL-TK (internal control), 100 ng of pIFΔ(−116) or pISRE-luc-cis (experimental reporter) plasmid, as well as either 1 μg of pD21 or vector as negative control.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    1

    All authors contributed equally to this work.

    View full text