Elsevier

Medical Image Analysis

Volume 18, Issue 7, October 2014, Pages 1143-1156
Medical Image Analysis

Multi-shell diffusion signal recovery from sparse measurements

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.media.2014.06.003Get rights and content

Highlights

  • We present a novel method for reconstruction of the diffusion MRI signal from sparse measurements.

  • A novel function to model the bi-exponential decay of the signal in the radial q-space.

  • Novel algorithmic derivation for spatially smooth signal reconstruction.

  • Extensive experiments done on phantom and in vivo data.

  • Our results show very low error in the recovered signal using at-least 60 samples.

Abstract

For accurate estimation of the ensemble average diffusion propagator (EAP), traditional multi-shell diffusion imaging (MSDI) approaches require acquisition of diffusion signals for a range of b-values. However, this makes the acquisition time too long for several types of patients, making it difficult to use in a clinical setting. In this work, we propose a new method for the reconstruction of diffusion signals in the entire q-space from highly undersampled sets of MSDI data, thus reducing the scan time significantly. In particular, to sparsely represent the diffusion signal over multiple q-shells, we propose a novel extension to the framework of spherical ridgelets by accurately modeling the monotonically decreasing radial component of the diffusion signal. Further, we enforce the reconstructed signal to have smooth spatial regularity in the brain, by minimizing the total variation (TV) norm. We combine these requirements into a novel cost function and derive an optimal solution using the Alternating Directions Method of Multipliers (ADMM) algorithm. We use a physical phantom data set with known fiber crossing angle of 45° to determine the optimal number of measurements (gradient directions and b-values) needed for accurate signal recovery. We compare our technique with a state-of-the-art sparse reconstruction method (i.e., the SHORE method of Cheng et al. (2010)) in terms of angular error in estimating the crossing angle, incorrect number of peaks detected, normalized mean squared error in signal recovery as well as error in estimating the return-to-origin probability (RTOP). Finally, we also demonstrate the behavior of the proposed technique on human in vivo data sets. Based on these experiments, we conclude that using the proposed algorithm, at least 60 measurements (spread over three b-value shells) are needed for proper recovery of MSDI data in the entire q-space.

Introduction

Diffusion MRI (dMRI) is an imaging modality that is sensitive to the neural architecture and connectivity of the brain. Consequently, it is increasingly being used in clinical settings for investigating several brain disorders such as, Alzheimer’s disease, stroke, schizophrenia and mild traumatic brain injury (Thomason and Thompson, 2011, Shenton et al., 2012). Apart from more traditional Diffusion Tensor Imaging (DTI), it is nowadays standard to use High Angular Resolution Diffusion Imaging (HARDI), which involves acquiring diffusion signals at a single b-value (single q-shell) in several gradient directions spread over the unit sphere in a quasi-uniform manner (Tuch et al., 2003, Assemlal et al., 2011). While this protocol allows for resolving the complex angular structure of the neural fibers, it does not provide information about the radial signal decay, which is known to be sensitive to various anomalies of white matter (Cohen and Assaf, 2002).

To obtain accurate information about the neural architecture, diffusion spectrum imaging (DSI) was proposed by Wedeen et al. (2005). This dMRI technique involves acquiring multiple measurements over a Cartesian grid of points in the q-space, followed by application of discrete Fourier transform to obtain an estimate of the ensemble average propagator (EAP). Unfortunately, a large number of measurements required by DSI makes it impractical to use in clinical settings. Accordingly, to speed-up the acquisition of dMRI (and DSI) data, two complementary approaches have been proposed, namely: (i) the use of compressed sensing (CS) to reduce the number of measurements (Candès et al., 2006, Donoho, 2006), and (ii) the use of multi-slice acquisition sequences for faster data acquisition (Setsompop et al., 2011, Feinberg et al., 2010). This work focuses on methodology (i), i.e., CS-based reconstruction of diffusion signal from critically undersampled measurements.

Several imaging and analysis schemes, which use fewer measurements than traditional DSI, have recently been proposed in the literature (Wu and Alexander, 2007, Jensen et al., 2005, Assemlal et al., 2011, Merlet et al., 2012, Barmpoutis et al., 2008, Descoteaux et al., 2010, Zhang et al., 2012, Ye et al., 2011, Ye et al., 2012, Hosseinbor et al., 2013). Each of these techniques captures a different aspect of the underlying tissue organization, which is missed by HARDI. Traditional methods of EAP estimation that account for the non-monoexponential (radial) decay of diffusion signals, require a relatively large number of measurements at high b-values (greater than 3000 s/mm2) (Assaf et al., 2004, Mulkern et al., 2001). Consequently, their associated scan times are deemed to be too long for non-cooperative patients, which is the main motivation for reducing the number of measurements in dMRI scans.

Although not new in application to MRI, CS-based methods of signal reconstruction has gained significant attention in the diffusion imaging community over the last few years. Several works have proposed CS-based algorithms for recovering HARDI, MSDI as well as DSI data from undersampled (aka incomplete) measurements (Ye et al., 2011, Merlet et al., 2012, Landman et al., 2012, Gramfort et al., 2012, Duarte-Carvajalino et al., 2012, Freiman et al., 2013, Scherrer et al., 2013, Assemlal et al., 2011, Michailovich et al., 2011, Rathi et al., 2011). To this end, various types of signal representation bases have also been proposed, each having different sparsifying properties. For example, for HARDI data, spherical ridgelets were proposed in Michailovich et al., 2008, Michailovich and Rathi, 2010, and for MSDI data, spherical polar Fourier (SPF) and its variants (SHORE) were proposed in (Assemlal et al., 2008, Ozarslan et al., 2008, Cheng et al., 2010, Merlet et al., 2012). In the case of the SHORE basis, to optimize the accuracy of signal reconstruction, one has to choose an appropriate scaling parameter, which could potentially be different for different types of tissue. To address this issue, (Merlet et al., 2012) used a dictionary learning technique to learn the scaling parameter and the appropriate polynomial to represent the radial decay term. On the other hand, in Özarslan et al. (2013), this scaling parameter was adaptively obtained in a data driven fashion by computing the eigenvalues of a tensor at each voxel. However, at a fundamental level, both these methods extend the original SHORE basis to sparsely represent the diffusion data. In this work, we will compare our technique with the SHORE-based reconstruction (Cheng et al., 2010, Merlet and Deriche, 2013), where sparsity is enforced through the standard l1-norm minimization. In our earlier work (Rathi et al., 2011), we had also proposed a basis that combined the spherical ridglets with a radial term. However, the cost function used in that work was non-convex, making it quite susceptible to local minima. In this work, we propose significant modifications and address the limitations of our earlier work, as discussed in the next section.

Section snippets

Our contributions

The framework of spherical ridgelets (SR) proposed in Michailovich et al. (2011) was used to recover HARDI data on a single b-value shell from highly undersampled set of diffusion measurements. In this work, we propose a novel extension of this basis for recovering multi-shell diffusion data. Towards this end, we incorporate a novel radial decay term which is a monotonically decreasing function with its range bounded between 0 and 1. This property is quite desirable, since it is known that the

Diffusion MRI

Under the narrow pulse assumption, the diffusion signal S(q) in the q-space is related to the EAP P(r) via the Fourier transform as given by Stejskal and Tanner (1965)P(r)=rR3E(q)exp(-i2πq·r)dq,where E(q)S(q)/S(0):R3[0,1] is the normalized diffusion signal, with S(q) and S(0) being the measured diffusion signal and its corresponding b=0 value, respectively. Alternatively, E can be written as a function of b-value and a unit vector uS2, such that E(b,u):R+×S2[0,1], where b=γ2δ2(Δ-δ/3)g2s/

Methods

In this work, it is assumed that the dMRI data is measured along the same K gradient directions {uk} at several b-values. This allows for estimating the signal attenuation with increasing b-values along each gradient direction. In particular, we propose to model the radial signal decay of E(q) (E(q)=S(q)/S(0), where the signal S(q) is assumed to be normalized by the signal at b=0 i.e. S(0)) using a monotonically decreasing function given byfα,β(b)=1+bα-β,α0,β0,which is related to the

Experiments

To evaluate the proposed algorithm, we constructed a physical phantom with diffusion properties similar to that of human brain tissue. The phantom consisted of a spherical spindle wound with 15 μm polyfil fibers to obtain a 45° crossing angle. A detailed description of how the phantom was made is given in (Moussavi-Biugui et al., 2011). The phantom was scanned using a Siemens 3T scanner at a spatial resolution of 2mm×2mm×7mm, so that the crossing region lay in the center of the axial slice. We

Discussion

In this work, we proposed a novel framework for recovering dMRI data in the entire q-space from very few measurements. In particular, the proposed method is designed to use diffusion samples acquired at multiple q-shells by extending the spherical ridgelets basis to be used within a MSDI framework. We proposed a new monotonically decreasing radial decay function to be used within the estimation framework, which allows accurate modeling of single and multi-exponential attenuation of diffusion

Acknowledgements

This work has been supported by NIH Grants: R01MH097979 (Rathi), R01MH074794 (Westin), P41RR013218, P41EB015902 (Kikinis, Core PI: Westin), and Swedish research Grant VR 2012-3682 (Westin).

References (57)

  • H. Zhang et al.

    NODDI: practical in vivo neurite orientation dispersion and density imaging of the human brain

    NeuroImage

    (2012)
  • Asif, M.S., Romberg, J.K., 2009. Dynamic updating for l1 minimization. CoRR...
  • Y. Assaf et al.

    New modeling and experimental framework to characterize hindered and restricted water diffusion in brain white matter

    Magnet. Reson. Med.

    (2004)
  • Assemlal, H., Tschumperlé, D., Brun, L. 2008. Efficient computation of pdf-based characteristics from diffusion mr...
  • Barmpoutis, A., Vemuri, B., Forder, J., 2008. Fast displacement probability profile approximation from hardi using...
  • A. Beck et al.

    A fast iterative shrinkage–thresholding algorithm for linear inverse problems

    SIAM J. Imag. Sci.

    (2009)
  • Becker, S., Bobin, J., Candes, E., 2009. NESTA: a fast and accurate first-order method for sparse recovery. Arxiv...
  • P. Blomgren et al.

    Color tv: total variation methods for restoration of vector-valued images

    IEEE Trans. Image Process.

    (1998)
  • S. Boyd et al.

    Distributed optimization and statistical learning via the alternating direction method of multipliers

    Found. Trends® Mach. Learn.

    (2011)
  • E. Candès et al.

    Robust uncertainty principles: exact signal reconstruction from highly incomplete frequency information

    IEEE Trans. Inform. Theory

    (2006)
  • E. Candes et al.

    Enhancing sparsity by reweighted L1 minimization

    J. Fourier Anal. Appl.

    (2008)
  • A. Chambolle

    An algorithm for total variation minimization and applications

    J. Math. Imag. Vis.

    (2004)
  • Cheng, J., Ghosh, A., Jiang, T., Deriche, R., 2010. Model-free and analytical EAP reconstruction via spherical polar...
  • C.A. Clark et al.

    Water diffusion compartmentation and anisotropy at high b values in the human brain

    MRM

    (2000)
  • Y. Cohen et al.

    High b-value q-space analyzed diffusion-weighted MRS and MRI in neuronal tissues – a technical review

    NMR Biomed.

    (2002)
  • Deng, W., Yin, W., 2012. On the Global and Linear Convergence of the Generalized Alternating Direction Method of...
  • M. Descoteaux et al.

    Multiple q-shell diffusion propagator imaging

    Med. Image Anal.

    (2010)
  • D. Donoho

    Compressed sensing

    IEEE Trans. Inform. Theory

    (2006)
  • Cited by (44)

    • The sensitivity of diffusion MRI to microstructural properties and experimental factors

      2021, Journal of Neuroscience Methods
      Citation Excerpt :

      In this section, we consider various experimental factors typically observed during the acquisition that affect the diffusion signal and subsequent quantitative studies. Among them, the most significant ones are thermal noise, deviations from the prescribed b-value, a variable number of diffusion-sensitizing gradients and acquisition shells In terms of signal recovery from a sparse set of gradient directions, there is the SPARC-dMRI challenge (Ning et al., 2015a) as well as relevant methods for sparse recovery (Rathi et al., 2014; Ning et al., 2016). We conclude the section by reviewing alternatives to previously mentioned approaches to quantitatively evaluate the diffusion, which, by definition, should be independent of one or multiple experimental factors.

    • Angular resolution enhancement technique for diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) using predicted diffusion gradient directions

      2018, NeuroImage
      Citation Excerpt :

      Compressive sensing (CS) and sparse regularization techniques were proposed to reduce the MR data acquisition time. The CS technique in HARDI was used to construct highly sparse representation using the basis of spherical ridgelets ((Michailovich and Rathi, 2010; Rathi et al., 2014)). Scattered data interpolation methods, which have been an active area of research in statistics and many fields of engineering during the past half of a century, have been applied to MRI to increase the spatial resolution ((Peled and Yeshurun, 2002; Van Reeth et al., 2012)).

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text