Dosimetry Contribution:The relationship between dosimetric factors, side effects, and survival in patients with non–small cell lung cancer treated with definitive radiotherapy
Introduction
Standard treatment of locally advanced non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is definitive radiotherapy (RT) with concurrent chemotherapy (CHE).1 Delivery of high “biologically effective dose (BED)” using different dose and fractionation (fx) schedules has been shown to improve local control (LC) and survival.2 However, it is known that increase in radiation dose may have unfavorable effects on survival owing to treatment-related side effects.3, 4 Severe radiation pneumonitis (RP) is the most important treatment-related complication seen at a rate of 10% to 20%, and it has been reported that half of the cases die of this complication.5
Lung tolerance dose has been estimated from patients receiving only RT with 2-dimensional techniques, and normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) has been calculated using the Lyman-Kutcher-Burman (LKB) model until the 2000s.6, 7 With the advances in RT techniques, dose-volume histograms (DVH) have been started to be used to define normal tissue doses.1 The specific DVH parameters to assess risk of RP include relative volumes of lung that receive more than a threshold dose (Vdose) (i.e., V20, V30) and mean lung dose (MLD). NTCP is calculated by converting the physical dose derived from DVH to an equivalent dose by using the linear-quadratic model.8 However, Rodrigues et al. reported that an ideal parameter for DVH has not been identified yet.9 Cutoff values for V20, MLD, and NTCP were found to be 30%, 20 Gy, and 10%, respectively, and positive and negative predictive values for identifying RP risk have been reported to be 50% to 71% and 85% to 89%, respectively.1, 10, 11
The Quantitative Analysis of Normal Tissue Effects in the Clinic study has raised the question of how many doses will be given to where, and it has been emphasized that large volumes should be taken into consideration, as the lung is considered as a parallel organ.12 Studies on biomarkers and genetic variations are ongoing, and the use of individualized cutoff values for toxicity will be possible in the future.1, 13
In the light of these studies, we aimed to evaluate the clinical and dosimetric factors and their relationship with treatment-related side effects and survival in patients with NSCLC who received definitive RT with or without CHE and survived for at least 6 months.
Section snippets
Methods and Materials
A total of 68 patients treated between January 2009 and May 2012 were evaluated retrospectively. The study was approved by the ethics committee.
Eligibility criteria for this study were as follows: age ≥ 18 years; inoperable patients with histopathologically confirmed NSCLC; a Karnosfky performance status (KPS) ≥ 60; no previous RT or CHE; received at least ≥ 50 Gy; and written informed consent.
Staging had been performed based on computed tomography (CT) scan of the chest and abdomen or positron
Results
The median age was 59 (range: 36 to 81) years, and 60% of the patients had squamous cell carcinoma (Table 1). Staging was carried out according to the American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system v.7, 2010. Tumor and nodal maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) was recorded in 54 cases diagnosed with PET/CT.
One patient with postoperative relapse also received definitive RT. The median total dose was 63 Gy (range: 54 to 70 Gy). Except for 1 case, neoadjuvant, concurrent, and adjuvant
Discussion
The goal of definitive RT in patients with locally advanced NSCLC is to provide the highest tumor control without complication. Individualized treatment will be possible with the identification of predictive factors.5
The relationship between NTCP model, symptomatic RP, and dose distribution in 3-dimensional planning was first defined by Martel et al.15 Hernando et al. reported the probability of RP with 64% accuracy with dosimetric factors.16 Kong et al. demonstrated that the incidence of RP
Conflict of interest
None declared.
References (29)
Oncology scan—promising strategies for the treatment of locally-advanced non-small cell lung cancer
Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys
(2013)- et al.
Clinical dose-volume histogram analysis for pneumonitis after 3D treatment for nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC)
Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys
(1999) - et al.
Calculation of complication probability factors for non-uniform normal tissue irradiation: the effective volume method
Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys
(1989) - et al.
Prediction of radiation pneumonitis by dose-volume histogram parameters in lung cancer—a systematic review
Radiother. Oncol
(2004) - et al.
Final toxicity results of a radiation-dose escalation study in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC): predictors for radiation pneumonitis and fibrosis
Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys
(2006) - et al.
Dose volume histogram and 3-D treatment planning evaluation of patients with pneumonitis
Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys
(1994) - et al.
Radiation-induced pulmonary toxicity: a dose-volume histogram analysis in 201 patients with lung cancer
Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys
(2001) - et al.
Dose-volume analysis of radiation pneumonitis in non-small-cell lung cancer patients treated with concurrent cisplatinum and etoposide with or without consolidation docetaxel
Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys
(2010) - et al.
Initial evaluation of treatment-related pneumonitis in advanced-stage non-small-cell lung cancer patients treated with concurrent chemotherapy and intensity-modulated radiotherapy
Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys
(2007) - et al.
Dose and volume reduction for normal lung using intensity-modulated radiotherapy for advanced-stage non-small-cell lung cancer
Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys
(2004)
Intensity-modulated radiotherapy for locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a dose escalation planning study
Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys
Influence of technologic advances on outcomes in patients with unresectable, locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer receiving concomitant chemoradiotherapy
Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys
Predicting pneumonitis risk: a dosimetric alternative to mean lung dose
Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys
Lung
Cited by (6)
Pneumonitis Risk After Chemoradiotherapy With and Without Immunotherapy in Patients With Locally Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
2024, International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology PhysicsRelationship between pet/ct response and survival in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer treated with definitive chemoradiotherapy
2021, UHOD - Uluslararasi Hematoloji-Onkoloji DergisiA mathematical model for predicting the changes of non-small cell lung cancer based on tumor mass during radiotherapy
2019, Physics in Medicine and Biology
This study has not been previously presented elsewhere.
Author contributions: Concept—D.O., S.S.; Design—D.O., S.S.; Supervision—S.S.; Resource—D.O.; S.S.; Materials—D.O., S.G.; Data collection and/or Processing—D.O., S.G., S.S.; Analysis and/or Interpretation—D.O., S.S., D.S.; Literature Search—D.O., S.S.; Critical reviews—S.S.; Writing—D.O., S.S.