Elsevier

Maturitas

Volume 79, Issue 2, October 2014, Pages 196-201
Maturitas

Review
Sex and gender differences in the causes of dementia: A narrative review

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.maturitas.2014.05.008Get rights and content

Abstract

This is a narrative review of new ideas and concepts related to differences between men and women in their risk of developing dementia or Alzheimer's disease (AD). We introduce the concept of dimorphic neurology and the distinction between sex and gender. We then provide three examples of risk factors related to sex and gender from the literature. Apolipoprotein E genotype is equally common in men and women but has a stronger effect in women. Apolipoprotein E genotype is a biological factor that cannot be modified but interacts with sex or gender related factors that can be modified. Low education has a similar harmful effect in men and women but has been historically more common in women. Education is a social factor related to gender that can be modified. Finally, bilateral oophorectomy is a factor restricted to women. Bilateral oophorectomy is a surgical practice related to sex that can be modified. Consideration of risk and protective factors in men and women separately may accelerate etiologic research for neurological diseases in general, and for dementia and AD in particular. Similarly, future preventive interventions for dementia should be tailored to men and women separately.

Introduction

We have observed two important conceptual trends in the last 20 years that will contribute to our future understanding of the risk of developing dementia or Alzheimer's disease (AD). First, there is increasing attention to differences between men and women in the causes, manifestations, response to treatments, and outcomes of neurological diseases (dimorphic neurology) [1], [2], [3], [4], [5]. This attention to dimorphic medicine has historically been stronger in fields like cancer, cardiovascular diseases, and endocrine diseases [1], [6], [7]. However, there is now a growing awareness of differences in brain structure and function between men and women throughout the entire life course (early childhood development, adult life, and aging) [2], [3], [8], [9]. Second, there is increasing recognition of the distinction between sex and gender. Sex is biology: chromosomal, hormonal, or reproductive differences between men and women [1], [4], [5]. By contrast, gender refers to psychological, social, political, and cultural differences between men and women [4], [5], [10]. These two conceptual trends are likely to transform our approach to identifying risk factors for dementia or AD.

Dementia is one of the most common diseases related to aging, and its impact on society is growing with time because of the rapid aging of populations worldwide [11], [12]. It remains unclear whether women have a higher risk than men to develop dementia or AD at a given age [12], [13]. Several European studies have suggested that women have a higher incidence rate of dementia or AD than men. However, studies in the United States have not shown a difference, or the difference has varied with age [12]. Regardless of this difference in risk (in incidence rates) across continents, all studies consistently showed that more women than men have AD at any given age, possibly because women survive longer [11], [14], [15]. However, the higher number of women affected by dementia may not be true for other types of dementia such as vascular dementia or Lewy body dementia.

It is important to distinguish sex and gender for the understanding of risk and protective mechanisms of disease. The US Institute of Medicine clarified the difference between sex and gender in a 2010 report: “Sex” refers to the classification of living things as male or female according to their reproductive organs and functions assigned by chromosomal complement, and “gender” refers to a person's self-representation as male or female or to how that person is responded to by social institutions on the basis of that presentation [5]. Thus, sex refers to biological characteristics of men and women, such as chromosomal differences (e.g., XX vs. YY chromosomes), hormonal differences (e.g., effects of estrogen or testosterone), or reproductive differences (e.g., pregnancy or menopause) [1], [4], [5].

Limited attention has been given to the sex chromosomes in relation to the etiology of diseases in general and of dementia or AD in particular [16]. Women have two copies of chromosome X, one of maternal origin and one of paternal origin. The X-chromosome carries approximately 1600 genes (approximately 155 million base pairs), including genes encoding the androgen receptor and several proteins involved with mitochondrial function, adipose tissue distribution, apoptosis, and response to hypoxia [16], [17]. To avoid a genetic overdose, most of the genes encoded on one of the two X-chromosomes are inactivated in female cells [17], [18], [19].

We are now discovering that women are not only complex mosaics of cells with paternal X or maternal X chromosome expressed, but that this mosaic pattern varies from organ to organ (e.g., liver vs. retina vs. brain) and within organs (e.g., hippocampus vs thalamus vs cerebral cortex). Of particular interest to brain functioning, the mosaic pattern of X-chromosome inactivation may vary on a spatial scale from neighboring cells to the left versus the right side of the brain. For example, the right and left hippocampi of a mouse brain (and probably of a woman's brain) may have different amounts and patterns of paternal and maternal X-chromosome inactivation [20], [21]. Therefore, patterns of X-chromosomes inactivation may give a new perspective on the concept of laterality of brain functions in women compared with men. This mosaic pattern of X-chromosome inactivation varies from woman to woman. In addition, the mosaic pattern has been shown to change over the lifespan of female mice [22], and could, conceivably, change also in women.

In contrast to sex, gender includes both a subjective component of self-representation (or sexual identity) and societal components related to the social, cultural, and legal contexts in which women live. For example, a woman may rate herself higher or lower on a masculinity vs. femininity personality scale [23]. However, her right to drive a car, vote for political elections, or own property will depend on the legal system of the country in which the woman lives in a given point in history (e.g., Sweden vs. Saudi Arabia). The personal aspects of gender (e.g., psychology, personality, or behavior) are linked with the social and political aspects (e.g., legal system, religious practices, or local traditions), and it is sometimes difficult to determine to which extent the self-representation of gender is the determinant or the consequence of cultural, political, or religious norms. Thus, sex and gender are tightly related and interdependent; however, they are not the same. Each variable should be studied independently [7], [23].

Gender-related factors have also varied over history. For example, women in the United States were not allowed to vote until the passage of the Nineteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution in 1920 (Women's Suffrage). Similarly, women in the United States have been less likely than men to smoke cigarettes during most of the 20th century. The gap in smoking behavior is now narrowing [12], [24].

Section snippets

Methods

This is a narrative review of new ideas and concepts that are developing regarding the etiology of dementia in men and women. Unfortunately, because different studies used different diagnostic categories, the data available specifically refer to AD in some studies and to dementia as a syndrome in other studies. More recently, the definition of dementia has expanded to include pre-clinical stages, such as mild cognitive impairment [25], [26], [27]. As a result, we are forced to use narrower or

APOE genotype and Alzheimer's disease

Traditional genetic studies that examined the association between single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and AD, have normally considered sex as an adjustment variable. For example, case-control studies of individual SNPs, or their extension into genome-wide association studies of thousands of SNPs, have matched cases and controls by sex to avoid confounding. These analyses have not emphasized the role of sex as an effect modifier (interaction effect) because many studies did not have adequate

Conclusions

At this point in the history of research on the etiology of dementia or AD, we need new concepts, new theories, and new points of view rather than simply additional data. An impressive number of individual papers, monographs, books, literature reviews, and meta-analyses on the etiology of dementia or AD have been written [12]. It may be time to take some distance from the existing literature and see whether there are new lines of investigation to be explored.

We hope that this review will

Contributors

Walter A. Rocca drafted the manuscript. Michelle M. Mielke conducted an extensive literature review and reviewed the manuscript from an epidemiological perspective. Prashanthi Vemuri reviewed the manuscript from a brain imaging perspective. Virginia M. Miller reviewed the manuscript as an expert of sex and gender issues in medicine.

Competing interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Funding

The authors receive funding from several NIH institutes (AG034676; AG006786; AG037526; AG044170).

Provenance and peer review

Commissioned and externally peer reviewed.

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Ms. Carol J. Greenlee for her assistance in typing and formatting the manuscript.

References (65)

  • W.A. Rocca et al.

    Trends in the incidence and prevalence of Alzheimer's disease, dementia, and cognitive impairment in the United States

    Alzheimers Dement

    (2011)
  • W.A. Rocca et al.

    Oophorectomy, menopause, estrogen treatment, and cognitive aging: clinical evidence for a window of opportunity

    Brain Res

    (2011)
  • Exploring the biological contributions to human health: does sex matter?

    (2001)
  • C.L. Carter et al.

    Sex and gender differences in Alzheimer's disease: recommendations for future research

    J Women's Health

    (2012)
  • L. Cahill

    A half-truth is a whole lie: on the necessity of investigating sex influences on the brain

    Endocrinology

    (2012)
  • N.F. Woods et al.

    Editorial: epidemiologic approaches to women's health

    Epidemiol Rev

    (2014)
  • Women's health research: progress, pitfalls, and promise

    (2010)
  • C. Ober et al.

    Sex-specific genetic architecture of human disease

    Nat Rev Genet

    (2008)
  • V.M. Miller

    Why are sex and gender important to basic physiology and translational and individualized medicine

    Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol

    (2014)
  • B.M. Nugent et al.

    Hormonal programming across the lifespan

    Horm Metab Res

    (2012)
  • M. Ingalhalikar et al.

    Sex differences in the structural connectome of the human brain

    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A

    (2014)
  • N. Krieger

    Epidemiology and the peoples health: theory and context

    (2011)
  • Alzheimer's Association

    Alzheimer's disease facts and figures

    Alzheimers Dement

    (2014)
  • M.M. Mielke et al.

    Clinical epidemiology of Alzheimer's disease: assessing sex and gender differences

    Clin Epidemiol

    (2014)
  • S. Gao et al.

    The relationships between age, sex, and the incidence of dementia and Alzheimer disease: a meta-analysis

    Arch Gen Psychiatry

    (1998)
  • F. Mangialasche et al.

    Dementia prevention: current epidemiological evidence and future perspective

    Alzheimers Res Ther

    (2012)
  • A. Solomon et al.

    Prevention of Alzheimer's disease: moving backward through the lifespan

    J Alzheimers Dis

    (2013)
  • A. Spatz et al.

    X-chromosome genetics and human cancer

    Nat Rev Cancer

    (2004)
  • C.J. Brown et al.

    A gene from the region of the human X inactivation centre is expressed exclusively from the inactive X chromosome

    Nature

    (1991)
  • M.T. Ross et al.

    The DNA sequence of the human X chromosome

    Nature

    (2005)
  • C. Zimmer

    Seeing X chromosomes in a new light

    (2014)
  • J.B. Berletch et al.

    Escape from X inactivation in mice and humans

    Genome Biol

    (2010)
  • Cited by (127)

    • Prevalence and incidence of cognitive impairment and dementia in heart failure – A systematic review, meta-analysis and meta-regression

      2022, Hellenic Journal of Cardiology
      Citation Excerpt :

      Even though it is established that patient education level affects the MMSE and MoCA scores, few studies considered this aspect, and this could potentially have resulted in under- or overestimation of the prevalence of cognitive impairment. In addition, lower education is recognized as an established risk factor for dementia142. Thus, there is a need for greater standardization in the scoring of tests used.

    • Sex and sleep disruption as contributing factors in Alzheimer's disease

      2024, Handbook of Prevention and Alzheimer's Disease
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text