Elsevier

Leukemia Research

Volume 36, Issue 8, August 2012, Pages 990-997
Leukemia Research

Adverse impact of IDH1 and IDH2 mutations in primary AML: Experience of the Spanish CETLAM group

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leukres.2012.03.019Get rights and content

Abstract

The study of genetic lesions in AML cells is helpful to define the prognosis of patients with this disease. This study analyzed the frequency and clinical impact of recently described gene alterations, isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 (IDH1) and isocitrate dehydrogenase 2 (IDH2) mutations, in a series of homogeneously treated patients with primary (de novo) AML.

Two-hundred and seventy-five patients enrolled in the CETLAM 2003 protocol were analyzed. IDH1 and IDH2 mutations were investigated by well-established melting curve-analysis and direct sequencing (R140 IDH2 mutations). To establish the percentage of the mutated allele a pyrosequencing method was used. Patients were also studied for NPM, FLT3, MLL, CEBPA, TET2 and WT1 mutations.

IDH1 or IDH2 mutations were identified in 23.3% AML cases and in 22.5% of those with a normal karyotype. In this latter group, mutations were associated with short overall survival. This adverse effect was even more evident in patients with the NPM or CEBPA mutated/FLT3 wt genotype. In all the cases analyzed, the normal allele was detected, suggesting that both mutations act as dominant oncogenes. No adverse clinical impact was observed in cases with TET2 mutations.

IDH1 and IDH2 mutations are common genetic alterations in normal karyotype AML. Favourable genotype NPM or CEBPA mutated/FLT3 wt can be further categorized according to the IDH1 and IDH2 mutational status.

Introduction

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is caused by somatic mutations in genes that control normal cell proliferation and differentiation. Characterization of these genes has allowed a more refined classification of AML, enabling the identification of potential therapeutic targets and the definition of prognostic subgroups [1].

Genetic lesions of isocitrate dehydrogenases 1 (IDH1) and 2 (IDH2) have been identified as early steps in the progression of gliomas to high-grade tumors [2], [3]. Whole DNA genome sequencing has revealed that IDH1 and IDH2 may also be mutated in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) samples [4]. Additional studies in large AML cohorts have confirmed this finding and have demonstrated that these lesions may also be present in myelodysplastic and myeloproliferative disorders. In the AML setting, and in sharp contrast with findings in gliomas, IDH1 and IDH2 mutations are frequently associated with blastic transformation or aggressive forms [5], [6], [7], [8].

Ongoing studies indicate that the mechanisms of leukemogenesis associated with IDH1 and IDH2 mutations involve functional shifts in metabolic pathways with generation of 2-hydroxyglutarate [9], [10], [11], increases in the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS), cooperation with other oncogenes [12] and hypermethylation that disrupts TET2 function [13], [14]. Findings about the possible adverse prognosis of these mutations in normal karyotype AML have aroused great interest because they could provide additional prognostic stratification and guide post-remission treatment.

In this study, the Spanish CETLAM group analyzed the frequency and clinical impact of IDH1, IDH2 and TET2 mutations in a large series of adults with primary AML.

Section snippets

Materials and methods

Patients included were between 17 and 73 years of age. They were all treated according to the CETLAM-03 protocol and had a stored DNA sample for molecular study.

Induction therapy consisted of 1 or 2 courses of idarubicin 12 mg/m2 IV days 1,3,5, cytarabine 500 mg/m2/12 h over 2 h IV days 1,3,5,7 and etoposide 100 mg/m2 IV on days 1, 2 and 3. This was followed by a consolidation phase with mitoxantrone 12 mg/m2 IV from days 4 to 6, and cytarabine 500 mg/m2/12 h IV from days 1 to 6. Patients also received

IDH1 and IDH2 mutations are commonly found in de novo AML

From a cohort of 685 consecutive cases enrolled in the CETLAM protocol between 2004 and 2010, the present series included the 275 AML patients for whom a DNA sample was available. Patients’ characteristics are summarized in Table 1. There were 161 (59%) males and 114 (41%) women. Cytogenetic groups according to the MRC classification were: favorable, 25; intermediate, 179; and adverse, 35. No cytogenetic study was available in 36 patients. A normal karyotype was identified in 120 (43%)

Discussion

In this multicentric study in the Spanish population we found that IDH mutations are common in AML, since they are present in 22.5% of patients with a normal karyotype. Outcome was poor in patients with IDH mutations and normal karyotype and also in those with IDH mutations and the favourable genotype (NPM or CEBPA mutated/FLT3 wt genotype). This is a relevant finding because these patients with the favourable genotype are usually treated less intensively sparing BMT. Significantly, most

Conflict of interest statement

There is no conflict of interest to disclose.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the following grants: Fundación Mutua Madrileña to JN 08/FMMA, PI 10/0173 and JS FMMA 2006-168; ISCIII PI052312, PI 080672, RD06/0020/0101 and EC07/90065, 2009-SGR-168 from Plà de Recerca de Catalunya, Marató de TV3 (100830/31/32) and a grant from Fundació Cellex, Spain. We are grateful to the CETLAM participating hospitals.

References (36)

  • C.L. Green et al.

    The prognostic significance of IDH2 mutations in AML depends on the location of the mutation

    Blood

    (2011)
  • R.F. Schlenk et al.

    Mutations and treatment outcome in cytogenetically normal acute myeloid leukemia

    N Engl J Med

    (2008)
  • D.W. Parsons et al.

    An integrated genomic analysis of human glioblastoma multiforme

    Science

    (2008)
  • E.R. Mardis et al.

    Recurring mutations found by sequencing an acute myeloid leukemia genome

    N Engl J Med

    (2009)
  • A. Green et al.

    Somatic mutations of IDH1 and IDH2 in the leukemic transformation of myeloproliferative neoplasms

    N Engl J Med

    (2010)
  • A. Pardanani et al.

    Recurrent IDH mutations in high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome or acute myeloid leukemia with isolated del(5q)

    Leukemia

    (2010)
  • S. Soverini et al.

    IDH2 somatic mutations in chronic myeloid leukemia patients in blast crisis

    Leukemia

    (2010)
  • A. Tefferi et al.

    IDH1 and IDH2 mutation studies in 1473 patients with chronic-, fibrotic- or blast-phase essential thrombocythemia, polycythemia vera or myelofibrosis

    Leukemia

    (2010)
  • Cited by (35)

    • Nonmyeloablative Allogeneic Transplantation With Post-Transplant Cyclophosphamide for Acute Myeloid Leukemia With IDH Mutations: A Single Center Experience

      2022, Clinical Lymphoma, Myeloma and Leukemia
      Citation Excerpt :

      Specific point mutations in the IDH1 and 2 genes result in the production of mutant enzymes that convert isocitrate to (R)-2-hydroxyglutarate (R-2HG), an oncometabolite that competitively inhibits α-ketoglutarate dependent processes, including epigenetic regulation. Clinical outcomes for patients with IDH-mutated AML (mIDH AML) have generally been shown to be comparable to those of patients with wildtype-IDH AML (wtIDH).3-12 Accordingly, the presence of an IDH mutation has historically had little impact on clinical decision-making.

    • Preclinical efficacy against acute myeloid leukaemia of SH1573, a novel mutant IDH2 inhibitor approved for clinical trials in China

      2021, Acta Pharmaceutica Sinica B
      Citation Excerpt :

      However, the prognostic impact of R140Q may be dependent on co-occurring mutations. For instance, AML patients harboring the mIDH2 R140Q in conjunction with NMP1 gene mutation in have been identified as having a worse overall survival16. In other words, mIDH2 R140Q also maybe result in a poor prognosis.

    • TET2 exon 2 skipping is an independent favorable prognostic factor for cytogenetically normal acute myelogenous leukemia (AML): TET2 exon 2 skipping in AML

      2017, Leukemia Research
      Citation Excerpt :

      TET2 mutations confer favorable outcomes in high-risk MDS treated with hypomethylating agents [18,19]. In intensively treated AML patients, several studies have investigated the impact of TET2 mutations at the time of diagnosis on outcomes, and have yielded conflicting results as mutations have both been reported to exert unfavorable [20,21] or neutral effects on patient outcomes [22–24]. Recently, fluctuations in TET2 exon 2 expression have been detected in leukemic cells [25].

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text