Investigating the spatiotemporal pattern of urban vibrancy and its determinants: Spatial big data analyses in Beijing, China
Introduction
In the last two decades, China has undergone dramatic increase in both urban population and built-up areas (He et al., 2018, Huang et al., 2017, Wang et al., 2012). Such rapid urban development causes scholars to worry about the disorderly urban sprawl in some areas might lead to inefficiency of creating vibrant urban spaces (Batty, 2016, Jin et al., 2017, Xia et al., 2020). The government has also noticed the potential problems in the process of urbanization and proposes to improve urban vibrancy as an important strategic task in the 13th Five-year Plan. Since Jacobs (1961) put forward the concept of urban vibrancy, it has attracted extensive scholarly attentions from different disciplines, such as urban planning, social sciences and geographical information sciences (Delclos-Alio et al., 2019, Gehl, 1971, Klemek, 2007, Maas, 1984, Montgomery, 1998, Sung and Lee, 2015). Researchers generally believe that urban vibrancy reflects the interaction between the various daily human activities and existing urban facilities, which plays a critical role in promoting comprehensive, coordinated, and sustainable urban development (Kang, 2020, Li et al., 2020b, Mouratidis and Poortinga, 2020, Wu et al., 2018a). Vibrant urban spaces tend to support diverse human activities and facilitate social interactions, bring a diversity of benefits, such as improving the people’s subjective feelings of urban life, attracting investment and talents, enhancing economic competitiveness, and achieving social sustainability (Meng and Xing, 2019, Pinquart and Sorensen, 2000, Zhang et al., 2020). On the contrary, the lack of urban vibrancy may lead to a series of socioeconomic issues and become serious impediments to urban development (Jin et al., 2017, Li et al., 2020b, Woodworth and Wallace, 2017). The studies on urban vibrancy will help urban planners and decision-makers make effective plans to achieve sustainable urban development (Laman et al., 2019, Meng and Xing, 2019). Hence it is imperative for urban scholars to understand the patterns of urban vibrancy and identify the factors that affect urban vibrancy, especially at finer spatial scales.
Data availability used to be the primary issue for quantitative analysis of urban vibrancy (Sung and Lee, 2015, Ye et al., 2018). Most scholars conducted their investigations of urban vibrancy at the scale of the neighborhood through qualitative methods, such as field observations and interviews (Filion and Hammond, 2003, Powe, 2012, Ravenscroft, 2000). However, with the rapid development of information and communication technologies, many data sources emerge to provide previously unavailable information about urban dynamics and open up new opportunities in the studies of urban vibrancy (Garcia-Palomares et al., 2018). In the era of big data, internet users are not only recipients of information but also producers of vast amounts of data. With the permission of users, many social media apps can collect tremendous amount of information along with accurate locational information when they post a message, leaving so-called “digital geographic footprints” (Garcia-Palomares et al., 2018, Tu et al., 2020). The digital geographic footprints are intermingled with their offline daily life and provide new ways of investigating the interaction between human activities and urban environments (Blanford et al., 2015, Garcia-Palomares et al., 2018, Shelton et al., 2015). Compared with traditional data derived from statistical census and surveys, these geo-tagged big data show significant advantages for us to further investigate urban vibrancy because it contains large sample size and have high penetration with strong timeliness (Li et al., 2020b, Xia et al., 2020, Ye et al., 2018). With geo-tagged social media, large-scale and fine-grained datasets become more readily available. These datasets open a new chapter in urban studies in the big data era that could advance the theoretical understanding and practical management of sustainable urban development through the investigation of the highly dynamic but ultimately consistent urban vibrancy. Many recent studies have tried to analyze spatial big data from different sources to further explore urban vibrancy (Delclos-Alio et al., 2019, Lu et al., 2019, Meng and Xing, 2019, Tang et al., 2018, Wu et al., 2018a, Zeng et al., 2018). Our current study follows suit the trend of scholarly work but attempt to provide a more in-depth analysis of urban vibrancy with advanced spatiotemporal analytical techniques to contribute to the scientific understanding of sustainable urban development.
This article aims to further the understanding of the spatiotemporal variation pattern of urban vibrancy at subdistrict level and explore the relationship between urban vibrancy and its determinants. In addition to explore the potential mechanisms of urban vibrancy, this study also proposes that such mechanisms might vary in space. Specifically, this study attempts to make contributions to urban studies in several ways. First, we analyze and distinguish the physical features and socioeconomic attributions of spatial big data from different sources based on our own investigation and reference to previous studies (Huang et al., 2020, Li et al., 2020a, Tu et al., 2020). This is the foundation to choose more reliable indicators to represent urban vibrancy. Because urban vibrancy is a people-centered rather than material-centered concept, the indicators used to measure urban vibrancy should be able to reflect the intensity of human activities directly. Social media data serves the purpose well. Second, dynamics and variability are two prominent features of urban vibrancy, and the spatial and temporal snapshots of human activities show the varied aspects of daily life in cities. The distinct feature of this study is that we divide 24-hour into 12 slots (2 h per slot) rather than simply regarding a whole day as a snapshot of cities, which could accurately reflect the complex and changeable urban vibrancy from a more subtle time scale. Third, we try to summarize the influencing factors of urban vibrancy into a more systematic research framework and take into consideration both spatial autocorrelation and spatial heterogeneity in empirical analysis so that the analytical paradigm can be applied to other urban settings as well. In this study, we propose that the determinants of urban vibrancy might include four aspects: land function, socioeconomic conditions, accessibility, and location. In terms of empirical research, spatial autoregression model is applied to control the influence of potential spatial autocorrelation. To deal with possible spatially varying relationship between urban vibrancy and its determinants, we employ the multiscale geographically weighted regression (MGWR) to address both the scale effect and locational effect of influencing factors. MGWR could improve the estimation efficiency and accuracy, and its result gives the influence scale of different explanatory variables (Fotheringham et al., 2017, Li and Fotheringham, 2020, Yu et al., 2020). The application of MGWR will deepen our understanding of influence mechanism of urban vibrancy in a more holistic way.
The remainder of this article is organized as follows. Section 2 reviews the relevant literature of urban vibrancy and introduces the research framework. Section 3 gives a detailed description of the study area, data sources and empirical methods. Section 4 reports and analyzes the study results, with specific attention to spatial and temporal variation of urban vibrancy and the impacts of its determinants. The last section concludes this study and discusses future work.
Section snippets
The definition and measurement of urban vibrancy
Urban vibrancy, also known as urban vitality, describes the attraction, diversity and accessibility of a place and it is recently used in city performance assessment (He et al., 2018, Wu et al., 2018a). It is regarded as a broad and complicated concept with rich meanings (Long and Huang, 2019, Xia et al., 2020, Ye et al., 2018, Zhang et al., 2020). In her book The Death and Life of Great American Cities, Jacobs (1961) was the first to provide a synthesized view on urban vibrancy based on her
Research area
As the capital city of China, Beijing is a highly developed cities with high urban vibrancy. Since the late-1970 s, Beijing’s population and economy have been growing rapidly, and great changes have taken place in the urban layout. Beijing often serves as a role model for other cities in China, particularly in the processes of urban development, urban planning and policy making (Huang et al., 2017). Due to data availability, in this study we focus on the central urban area in Beijing. The
Spatiotemporal distribution of urban vibrancy
Using the Weibo check-in data, the study first explores the 24-hour’s variation of urban vibrancy between different ring roads since Beijing has a distinctive ring-road defined center-periphery spatial structure (Fig. 2). By converting the discrete Weibo check-in data using kernel density estimation (KDE) to continuous smooth surfaces, we can detect potential urban vibrancy “hot spots.” The results are in Figs. 4 and 5.
The urban vibrancy in the different subdistricts varies quite a lot in
Conclusions
Promoting urban vibrancy can bring great benefits to the healthy and sustainable development of cities. The rapid development of communication technologies enables us to utilize multi-source urban datasets to conduct more detailed and in-depth studies on urban vibrancy. In this study, we use the Weibo check-in data to represent the urban vibrancy at subdistrict level in central Beijing. Since similar geo-tagged social media data become increasingly available across the globe, similar studies
Declaration of Competing Interest
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Acknowledgements
The research is sponsored by a major grant from the National Office for Philosophy and Social Science of China (grant number 18ZDA131).
References (73)
- et al.
Simple diagnostic tests for spatial dependence
Reg. Sci. Urban Econ.
(1996) - et al.
The urban vitality conditions of Jane Jacobs in Barcelona: Residential and smartphone-based tracking measurements of the built environment in a Mediterranean metropolis
Cities
(2019) - et al.
City dynamics through Twitter: Relationships between land use and spatiotemporal demographics
Cities
(2018) - et al.
The impact of urban growth patterns on urban vitality in newly built-up areas based on an association rules analysis using geographical 'big data'
Land Use Policy
(2018) - et al.
Emerging polycentric megacity in China: An examination of employment subcenters and their influence on population distribution in Beijing
Cities
(2017) - et al.
Evaluating cities' vitality and identifying ghost cities in China with emerging geographical data
Cities
(2017) - et al.
Exploratory spatial data analysis of the distribution of regional per capita GDP in Europe, 1980−1995
Pap. Reg. Sci.
(2003) - et al.
Spatiotemporal distribution characteristics and mechanism analysis of urban population density: A case of Xi'an, Shaanxi, China
Cities
(2019) - et al.
Urban Morphology Promotes Urban Vibrancy from the Spatiotemporal and Synergetic Perspectives: A Case Study Using Multisource Data in Shenzhen, China
Sustainability
(2020) - et al.
Social media and the city: Rethinking urban socio-spatial inequality using user-generated geographic information
Landsc. Urban Plan.
(2015)
Residential built environment and walking activity: Empirical evidence of Jane Jacobs’ urban vitality
Transp. Res. Part D. -Transp. Environ.
Check-in behaviour and spatio-temporal vibrancy: An exploratory analysis in Shenzhen, China
Cities
Urban form breeds neighborhood vibrancy: A case study using a GPS-based activity survey in suburban Beijing
Cities
Comparison of the spatiotemporal mobility patterns among typical subgroups of the actual population with mobile phone data: A case study of Beijing
Cities
Spatially explicit assessment on urban vitality: Case studies in Chicago and Wuhan
Sustain. Cities Soc.
Management of urban land expansion in China through intensity assessment: A big data perspective
J. Clean. Prod.
Spatial Econometrics: Methods and Models
Local Indicators of Spatial Association—LISA
Geogr. Anal.
Spatial externalities, spatial multipliers, and spatial econometrics
Int. Reg. Sci. Rev.
Observing the rhythms of daily life: A six-week travel diary
Transportation
Empty buildings, shrinking cities and ghost towns
Environ. Plan. B-Plan. Des.
Applied Spatial Data Analysis with R
Geo-located tweets. enhancing mobility maps and capturing cross-border movement
Plos One
Identifying urban spatial structure and urban vibrancy in highly dense cities using georeferenced social media data
Habitat Int.
Socio-economic, built environment, and mobility conditions associated with crime: a study of multiple cities
Sci. Rep.
Urban vibrancy and corporate growth
J. Financ.
Neighbourhood land use and performance: the evolution of neighbourhood morphology over the 20th century
Environ. Plan. B-Plan. Des.
Geographically weighted regression: the analysis of spatially varying relationship
West Essex, England
Multiscale Geographically Weighted Regression (MGWR)
Ann. Am. Assoc. Geogr.
Life Between Buildings: Using Public Space
Defining and measuring employability
Qual. High. Educ.
Evaluating and characterizing urban vibrancy using spatial big data: Shanghai as a case study. Environment and Planning B
Urban Anal. City Sci.
The Death and Life of Great American Cities
Effects of the Human and Built Environment on Neighborhood Vitality: Evidence from Seoul, Korea, Using Mobile Phone Data
J. Urban Plan. Dev.
Data-driven approach to characterize urban vitality: how spatiotemporal context dynamically defines Seoul’s nighttime
Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci.
Cited by (30)
Disentangling relations between dynamic urban structure and its efficiency in 287 cities across China
2023, Sustainable Cities and SocietyPortraying business district vibrancy with mobile phone data and optimal parameters-based geographical detector model
2023, Sustainable Cities and SocietyA multicomponent index method to evaluate the relationship between urban environment and CHD prevalence
2023, Spatial and Spatio-temporal Epidemiology
- 1
Fax: 1 973–655-4072