Research paperApproaches to urban vegetation management and the impacts on urban bird and bat assemblages
Introduction
Networks of green spaces can occupy substantial areas of land within a city (for example, ranging from 1.2–46% cover in European cities, Fuller & Gaston, 2009). However, green spaces are increasingly being lost to urban in-fill development in response to rising housing demand (Jim, 2004). Urban green spaces include both natural (remnant) or planted vegetation, on public and private land, such as residential gardens, recreation fields, public parks and reserves (Tzoulas et al., 2007). They can provide an array of ecosystem services to urban residents such as recreation, cooling, stormwater runoff reduction, noise reduction and carbon storage (Derkzen, van Teeffelen, & Verburg, 2015; Livesley, Ossola, Threllfall, Hahs, & Williams, 2015; Ossola, Hahs, & Livesley, 2015; Tzoulas et al., 2007), in addition to their enormous potential to support urban biodiversity (Bryant, 2006, Hahs et al., 2009; Sandström, Angelstam, & Mikusiński, 2006; Shwartz, Turbé, Julliard, Simon, & Prévot, 2014). Subsequently, there is global interest from city governments to manage urban green spaces so that they support people and biodiversity (Bryant, 2006, Sandstrom, 2002, Walmsley, 2006). However, despite the spread of urban greening initiatives (Walmsley, 2006), and recent growth of programs such as wildlife gardening (Goddard, Dougill, & Benton, 2010), and biodiversity-friendly park management schemes (Shwartz, Muratet, Simon, & Julliard, 2013), there is little empirical evidence to support the use of specific vegetation management regimes in urban green spaces to provide for an array of biodiversity and subsequent ecosystem services (Lin & Fuller, 2013).
Much of our understanding of the value of urban green spaces for biodiversity has come from studies of urban birds (Magle, Hunt, Vernon, & Crooks, 2012; McDonnell and Hahs, 2008, Shwartz et al., 2014). Birds are the most frequently studied urban taxa, probably because they are prevalent across many habitats, conspicuous, easy to observe and have wide public appeal (Larsen, Bladt, Balmford, & Rahbek, 2012; Shwartz et al., 2013). Birds are a significant component of the urban fauna, and 20% of global bird species can be found in cities (Aronson et al., 2014). Studies of urban birds have increased our understanding of ways to design and manage urban green spaces to conserve bird assemblages, however, it is unclear if this understanding is equally relevant to other taxa. The size of urban green spaces, and the density, size and origin of trees within them, have been consistently shown to positively influence the richness and diversity of urban bird assemblages (Chace & Walsh, 2006; Fontana, Sattler, Bontadina, & Moretti, 2011; Ikin, Knight, Lindenmayer, Fischer, & Manning, 2013; Shanahan, Miller, Possingham, & Fuller, 2011; Shwartz et al., 2013; Stagoll, Lindenmayer, Knight, Fischer, & Manning, 2012; White, Antos, Fitzsimons, & Palmer, 2005). Urban green space with a greater diversity of habitat elements, including understorey and overstorey canopy vegetation, leaf litter, logs and long grass, have also been shown to benefit bird assemblages (Evans, Newson, & Gaston, 2009; Shwartz et al., 2013; Stagoll, Manning, Knight, Fischer, & Lindenmayer, 2010). Scientists recommend that urban landscape managers can improve bird habitat by retaining large trees (Stagoll et al., 2012), increasing the proportion of native vegetation (Chace & Walsh, 2006), and improving habitat complexity or diversity (Shwartz et al., 2013). However, unless other fauna respond to green space attributes in the same way as birds, these vegetation management actions may not lead to improved outcomes for urban biodiversity more broadly.
Insectivorous bats are one such group that are commonly found in urban environments (Russo & Ancillotto, 2015), and are highly mobile. Previous studies examining urban bat assemblages have largely focussed on landscape factors, demonstrating that bat assemblages are more diverse in landscapes with larger patches of green space (Avila-Flores and Fenton, 2005, Gehrt and Chelsvig, 2003), and respond positively to increases in the cover of vegetation and density of trees at the landscape scale (Basham, Law, & Banks, 2011; Hale, Fairbrass, Matthews, & Sadler, 2012; Luck, Smallbone, Threlfall, & Law, 2013; Threlfall, Law, & Banks, 2012). Site level factors suggested to be beneficial to bat assemblages include the presence of large trees (Basham et al., 2011), tree hollows (Basham et al., 2011), and an abundant supply of nocturnal invertebrates (Avila-Flores & Fenton, 2005). However, few studies have investigated ways to design and manage urban green spaces to specifically promote bat assemblages (Smith & Gehrt, 2010). This issue is particularly pressing in Australia, where cities have been found to be disproportionately important for the conservation of threatened species in comparison to non-urban regions (Ives et al., 2016). In Australia, several threatened species of birds, bats and other vertebrate fauna, have been found to rely heavily on resources provided by urban landscapes (Ives et al., 2016, Threlfall et al., 2012).
To improve our understanding of the ways in which urban green spaces can be managed to support an array of taxa, we investigated the relationship between bird and bat assemblages and vegetation attributes throughout a network of large and small urban green spaces in Melbourne, Australia. Taking a multi-taxa approach can reveal important differences in the way biodiversity responds to urban environments (Beninde, Veith, & Hochkirch, 2015; MacGregor-Fors et al., 2015), enabling the development of more sophisticated approaches to green space management in both public and private spaces. We selected bats as a comparative taxa to birds due to their ubiquity in Australian cities (Caryl et al., 2014; Hourigan, Catterall, Jones, & Rhodes, 2010; Luck et al., 2013, Scanlon and Petit, 2008, Threlfall et al., 2012), and because their mobility and their insectivorous diet make them potentially highly responsive to the way vegetation is managed in urban areas, particularly as invertebrates are known to be influenced by various aspects of urban vegetation (Beninde et al., 2015). Additionally, bats have been proposed as potential bio-indicators in urban environments (Russo & Ancillotto, 2015), making it critical to compare their response to other more commonly studied taxa.
The aim of our study was to investigate how local scale vegetation management in urban green spaces influences bird and bat assemblages. To do this we examined the effect of three local scale vegetation management approaches: (1) increasing the proportion of native vegetation; (2) increasing the density of trees, and (3) increasing the volume or complexity of understorey vegetation. The ecological responses we examined were measures of the bird and bat assemblage relevant to biodiversity-friendly management goals, including species richness of bird and bat assemblages, bird breeding activity, and the activity and richness of bat species previously classified as being urban sensitive (Threlfall et al., 2012). We expected that birds would respond strongly to differences in native and exotic vegetation in different green spaces, as found by previous Australian studies (White et al., 2005). In contrast, we expected that bats would respond more strongly to structural aspects of urban vegetation, such as tree density and size, rather than the composition of vegetation per se (Kalcounis, Hobson, Brigham, & Hecker, 1999).
Section snippets
Study area
We sampled birds and bats within three types of urban green spaces in south-east Melbourne, including: (1) golf courses, (2) public parks and (3) residential neighbourhoods (e.g. front gardens and streetscapes). Melbourne is home to four million residents, and this region has been experiencing rapid urban expansion since the late 1800’s (Victorian Department of Sustainability and Environment 2005). Residential neighbourhoods typically comprise low density single story detached houses. Golf
Results
We recorded 71 bird species that were not considered ‘water-dependant’. Rainbow Lorikeet Trichoglossus haematodus, Australian Magpie Cracticus tibicen and Little Raven Corvus mellori, were recorded in every green space surveyed (n = 39). Golf courses supported significantly greater bird species richness, including a greater proportion of insectivorous species, in comparison to public parks and residential neighbourhoods (Table 1). Native bird breeding activity was significantly higher in golf
Discussion
Urban green space networks have huge potential to contribute to urban biodiversity conservation (Shwartz et al., 2014). Altering vegetation management practices in these green spaces could significantly improve outcomes for biodiversity (Shwartz et al., 2013). We examined three local scale vegetation management approaches that are suggested to positively influence both bird and bats: (1) increasing the proportion of native vegetation; (2) increasing the density of large trees, and (3)
Conclusions
We found that three local scale vegetation management approaches commonly suggested to improve outcomes for urban biodiversity have significant, positive impacts to several aspects of urban bird and bat assemblages. However, our results also highlight the importance of considering multiple components of vegetation management in order to support a broader range of biodiversity. Importantly, we found that these benefits extend to activities likely to impact population fitness of birds (e.g.
Acknowledgements
We thank participating residents, municipalities and golf courses for granting access to their properties and our volunteer field assistants. This study was funded by the Australian Research Council (LP110100686), the Australian Research Centre for Urban Ecology of the Royal Botanic Gardens Victoria and the Australian Golf Course Superintendents Association. We particularly acknowledge John Geary and BirdLife Australia for their assistance.
References (77)
- et al.
Reliable automation of bat call identification for eastern new south wales, australia, using classification trees and anascheme software
Acta Chiropterologica
(2010) - et al.
A global analysis of the impacts of urbanization on bird and plant diversity reveals key anthropogenic drivers
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
(2014) - et al.
Use of spatial features by foraging insectivorous bats in a large urban landscape
Journal of Mammalogy
(2005) - et al.
Microbats in a ‘leafy' sydney urban landscape: are they persisting, and what factors influence their presence?
Austral Ecology
(2011) - et al.
Biodiversity in cities needs space: A meta-analysis of factors determining intra-urban biodiversity variation
Ecology Letters
(2015) - et al.
Arthropods on street trees: a food resource for wildlife
Pacific Conservation Biology
(2000) - et al.
Vegetation density of urban parks and perceived appropriateness for recreation
Urban Forestry & Urban Greening
(2006) Urban landscape conservation and the role of ecological greenways at local and metropolitan scales
Landscape and Urban Planning
(2006)- et al.
Impact of native plants on bird and butterfly biodiversity in suburban landscapes
Conservation Biology
(2009) - et al.
Continuous predictors of species distributions support categorically stronger inference than ordinal and nominal classes: an example with urban bats
Landscape Ecology
(2014)
Urban effects on native avifauna: a review
Landscape and Urban Planning
Coverage-based rarefaction and extrapolation: standardizing samples by completeness rather than size
Ecology
Quantifying urban ecosystem services based on high‐resolution data of urban green space: an assessment for rotterdam, The Netherlands
Journal of Applied Ecology
The role of arborists in providing wildlife habitat and landscape linkages throughout the urban forest
Journal of Arboriculture
Habitat influences on urban avian assemblages
Ibis
The disproportionate value of scattered trees
Biological Conservation
When more is less: urban remnants support high bird abundance but diversity varies
Pacific Conservation Biology
How to manage the urban green to improve bird diversity and community structure
Landscape and Urban Planning
The scaling of green space coverage in european cities
Biology Letters
Bat activity in an urban landscape: patterns at the landscape and microhabitat scale
Ecological Applications
Tree hollows and wildlife conservation in Australia
Scaling up from gardens: biodiversity conservation in urban environments
Trends in Ecology & Evolution
A global synthesis of plant extinction rates in urban areas
Ecology Letters
Habitat composition and connectivity predicts bat presence and activity at foraging sites in a large UK Conurbation
PLoS One
Handbook of Australian New Zealand & Antarctic birds
The efficacy of small-scale conservation efforts, as assessed on australian golf courses
Biological Conservation
The conservation value of suburban golf courses in a rapidly urbanising region of australia
Landscape and Urban Planning
The diversity of insectivorous bat assemblages among habitats within a subtropical urban landscape
Austral Ecology
The influence of native versus exotic streetscape vegetation on the spatial distribution of birds in suburbs and reserves
Diversity and Distributions
Cities are hotspots for threatened species
Global Ecology and Biogeography
Green-space preservation and allocation for sustainable greening of compact cities
Cities
Bat activity in the boreal forest: importance of stand type and vertical strata
Journal of Mammalogy
Birds as biodiversity surrogates: will supplementing birds with other taxa improve effectiveness?
Journal of Applied Ecology
Reduced availability of habitat structures in urban landscapes: implications for policy and practice
Landscape and Urban Planning
The future of large old trees in urban landscapes
PLoS One
Natural regeneration of trees in urban woodlands
Journal of Vegetation Science
Sharing or sparing? How should we grow the world's cities?
Journal of Applied Ecology
Cited by (115)
Adaptive green space management strategies for sustainable carbon sink parks
2024, Urban Forestry and Urban GreeningHow does urbanization affect the fauna of the largest urban forest in Mexico?
2024, Urban Forestry and Urban GreeningConstructing urban ecological corridors to reflect local species diversity and conservation objectives
2024, Science of the Total EnvironmentTraits shaping urban tolerance in birds differ around the world
2023, Current BiologyA rapid assessment technique for evaluating biodiversity to support accreditation of residential properties
2023, Landscape and Urban PlanningTropical bird communities benefit from regular-shaped and naturalised urban green spaces with water bodies
2023, Landscape and Urban PlanningCitation Excerpt :Natural or semi-natural vegetation in urban matrices have been observed to have a positive influence on bird diversity (Rico-Silva et al., 2020; Garizábal-Carmona & Mancera-Rodríguez, 2021). This can be attributed to more structural complexity and a higher proportion of native vegetation, which can sustain greater bird diversity (Threlfall et al., 2016). In cities where green spaces often exist as fragmented patches, higher avian diversity is also associated with larger green spaces due to the species-area relationship (MacArthur & Wilson, 1967; Fernández-Juricic and Jokimäki, 2001; Chaiyarat et al., 2019).