The influence of environmental, organizational, and HRM factors on employee behaviors in subsidiaries: a Mexican case study of organizational learning

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2003.08.006Get rights and content

Abstract

This article presents a case study of a Mexican subsidiary of a U.S. multinational corporation (MNC) that has successfully adopted characteristics of a learning organization. The case is of particular interest because much of the cross-cultural evidence would indicate that employee involvement, work teams, and other management practices associated with a learning strategy, might be incompatible with the Mexican culture. Therefore, the case is used to unravel diverse factors—within the environment and organization—that affect the implementation of different management strategies in foreign subsidiaries. In addition, the case points to the importance of the human resource management practices as a mechanism that facilitates the implementation of management strategies in subsidiaries. Interestingly, while some of the HR practices adopted were standard practices that would be implemented regardless of the country, others were culture-specific and yet other practices were translations of U.S. HR practices to be sensitive to the values of the country. A model is presented and the role of HR within a global context is discussed.

Section snippets

The MNC, organizational learning and appropriate management practices

MNCs have traditionally focused on achieving economies of scale through location economies and cost reduction in multiple countries (Bartlett & Ghoshal, 1989). Such goals when investing in countries such as Mexico with low labor costs were typically achieved by pursuing a cost-leadership strategy (Hout, Porter, & Rudden, 1982). In today’s environment of complexity, change, and uncertainty, learning often needs to occur in subsidiaries that may have been previously only considered as low cost

Learning and national cultural values

Traditionally, practices such as employee involvement has been thought of as congruent with participative cultures such as the United States, and are believed to be less congruent with more authoritarian cultures such as the Mexican culture. For example, Hofstede’s (1980) rankings of power distance show that Mexico is a culture that accepts large power differences. Qualitative accounts also provide evidence of a control or authoritarian culture at work (Kras, 1995). In addition, empirical

A learning organization in Mexico

Equipos1 is a plant in an industrial city of 600,000 on the Gulf of Mexico. The plant is a technology-driven manufacturing plant that produces plastics. There are approximately 170 employees working at the plant. The plant was opened in 1991 as a joint venture between a Mexican and an American partner. Subsequently, the plant was fully bought out by the American partner in 1995, thus becoming a wholly-owned

Environmental factors

Several environmental factors surfaced during interviews with Equipos’ members. For example, managers/facilitators noted that one factor in their favor when implementing management practices was the stability of the workforce in the region were they operated. They contrasted this to subsidiaries in the northern part of Mexico that have to deal with constant mobility of the workforce resulting in a high turnover rate. Others have noted differences between the north and south of Mexico. For

Organizational factors

In the interviews, one of the most important organizational factors that was believed to have facilitated the implementation of management practices associated with a learning strategy is the method in which Equipos was founded, as a joint venture between a Mexican and U.S. partner. The international strategy literature indicates that one of the benefits of entering a joint venture with a local partner is the knowledge that such partner provides on how to conduct business within a foreign

Human resource practices

The managers/facilitators of Equipos were specifically asked what a company could do to facilitate organizational learning as well as what their organization had done and was doing. The most cited answers regarding what a company can do to facilitate learning were HR practices such as: ongoing training, constant communication, employee involvement, clear and consistent goals, rewards and recognition for desired behaviors, a team structure and flat organization, as well as a culture or mindset

An integrating model

A model has been constructed based on the interviews and observations. The model, shown in Fig. 1, shows the environmental and organizational factors that influence the choice of HR practices. These two sets of variables are similar to those delineated by Schuler, Budwar, and Florkowski (2002): exogenous and endogenous variables. Although this model is based on the case described in this article, it incorporates the past models (Negandhi & Prasad, 1971, Schuler et al., 2002) and the relevant

Acknowledgements

I would like to thank the CATO Center for Applied Business Research at the University of North Carolina for their financial support with this study.

References (35)

  • J. Roney

    Cultural implications of implementing TQM in Poland

    Journal of World Business

    (1997)
  • M.B. Teagarden et al.

    Mexico’s maquiladora industry: Where strategic human resource management makes a difference

    Organizational Dynamics

    (1992, Winter)
  • Adler, N. J. (1997). International dimensions of organizational behavior (3rd ed.). Cincinnati, OH: South-Western...
  • Bartlett, C. A., & Ghoshal, S. (1989). Managing across borders: The transnational solution. Boston, MA: Harvard...
  • M.C. Butler et al.

    Strategic management of worker health, safety, and environmental issues in Mexico’s maquiladora industry

    Human Resource Management

    (1993)
  • E.A. Drost et al.

    Leadership behavior in Mexico: Etic philosophies-Emic Practices

    Research in International Business and International Relations

    (1998)
  • Erez, M., & Earley, C. (1994). Culture, self-identity, and work. New York: Oxford University...
  • Farmer, R. N., & Richman, B. M. (1965). Comparative management and economic progress. Homewood, IL: Richard D. Irwin,...
  • Garvin, D. A. (1993). Building a learning organization. Harvard Business Review:...
  • M. Gowan et al.

    Doing the right things in Mexico

    Academy of Management Executive

    (1996)
  • J.R. Harrison et al.

    Keeping the faith: A model of cultural transmission in formal organizations

    Administrative Science Quarterly

    (1991)
  • Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture’s consequences. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage...
  • Hout, T., Porter, M. E., & Rudden, E. (1982, September/October). How global companies win out. Harvard Business Review:...
  • G. Huber

    Organizational learning: The contributing processes and the literatures

    Organization Science

    (1991)
  • G.T. Hult

    Managing the international strategic sourcing process as a market-driven organizational learning system

    Decision Sciences

    (1998)
  • M.A. Huselid

    The impact of human resource management practices on turnover, productivity, and corporate financial performance

    Academy of Management Journal

    (1995)
  • A. Jaeger

    The transfer of organizational culture overseas: An approach to control in the multinational corporation

    Journal of International Business Studies

    (1983)
  • Cited by (42)

    • Strategic customer engagement marketing: A decision making framework

      2018, Journal of Business Research
      Citation Excerpt :

      For example, academic research may explore the specific types of market information used to define CE across firms or industries. Second, management styles in Mexico tend to be more authoritarian and top-down than those utilized in other countries (Gómez, 2004). In the methodology section of this paper, we argued that a majority of our informants were recruited from firms with an international or global presence and thus represent perspectives of engagement practices from both advanced and emerging economies.

    • A comparative study of the application of systems thinking in achieving organizational effectiveness in Malaysian and Pakistani banks

      2018, International Business Review
      Citation Excerpt :

      Likewise, Cameron and Freeman (1991) while investigating the relationship between organizational effectiveness and culture indicated strong relationship between culture and effectiveness. In the same vein, Gomez (2004) has also highlighted that cultural values are part of the external environment that affects the overall organizational performance. Pounder (2002) suggests that the productivity is one aspect of effectiveness and factors that affect organizational effectiveness especially related to employees must also be addressed to attain overall effectiveness.

    • Unpacking the ambidexterity implementation process in the internationalization of emerging market multinationals

      2016, Journal of Business Research
      Citation Excerpt :

      These are crucial features for a good quality case study. Single case studies are frequent in management journals: A new view of organizational adaptation in the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey (Dutton & Dukerich, 1991); The wilderness fire-fighting disaster at Mann Gulch (Weick, 1993); The evolution of Intel Corporation's strategic position (Burgelman, 1994); Knowledge sharing processes from Buckman Laboratories (Pan & Scarbrough, 1999); Organizational adaptation in a firm that was the highest performing technology-based corporation in the world for several decades (Galunic & Eisenhardt, 1996, 2001); Managing pacing and matching hierarchies at Asea Brown Boveri-ABB Group (Dahlgren & Söderlund, 2001); Managing organizational politics for radical change: the case of Beiersdorf-Lechia S.A., Poznan (Blazejewski & Dorow, 2003); A Mexican case study of organizational learning (Gómez, 2004); Reform and restructuring in a Chinese state-owned enterprise: Sinotrans in the 1990s (Buckley, Clegg, & Tan, 2005); and Building entrepreneurial tie portfolios through strategic homophily (Phillipsa, Tracey, & Karrac, 2013). From a statistical inference standpoint, single-case studies have both internal and external validity limitations.

    • Headquarters-subsidiary relationships in MNCs: Fifty years of evolving research

      2016, Journal of World Business
      Citation Excerpt :

      Additionally, they were being described as capable of driving proactive, autonomous, and risk-taking initiatives for local and global applications (Schmid, Dzedek, & Lehrer, 2014). Along the same lines, some new research began to emerge on regional HQs as increasingly important strategic power centers (e.g., Asakawa & Lehrer, 2003; Nell, Ambos, & Schlegelmilch, 2011) that disseminate knowledge and impact the performance of other subsidiaries and the organization as a whole (e.g., Cui, Griffith, Cavusgil, & Dabic, 2006; Ferner, Quintanilla, & Varul, 2001; Gómez, 2004; Kaufmann & Roessing, 2005; Saka-Helmhout, 2010; Wang, Tong, & Koh, 2004). Additionally, the network concept became a common tool to describe both the intra-firm and inter-firm space where MNCs operate (e.g., Griffith & Harvey, 2004; Hansen, Pedersen, & Petersen, 2009; Jindra, Giroud, & Scott-Kennel, 2009; Lee & Williams, 2007; Luo, 2005; Williams & Lee, 2009).

    • The overlooked distinction of multinational enterprise subsidiary learning: Its managerial and entrepreneurial learning modes

      2014, International Business Review
      Citation Excerpt :

      Based on a human resources management approach, the evidence from their research suggests that expatriates and Russian employees may account for different learning obstacles as far as subsidiary activities are concerned. In Gómez's (2004) study, the variables that are likely to ease MNE subsidiary learning are subsidiary-specific factors and host environmental factors. In Saka-Helmhout's research (2007), these variables are MNE-specific factors, subsidiary-specific factors and the institutional context of the host market.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text