Repertoire of antibodies against type 1 poliovirus in human sera

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jviromet.2010.07.037Get rights and content

Abstract

A blocking-ELISA procedure was used to quantify antibodies in sera of humans immunized with poliovirus vaccines. Titers determined by this method demonstrated an excellent correlation with the results of neutralization test. Testing of serum potency with a panel of type 1 poliovirus strains altered antigenically was used to evaluate the composition of polyclonal sera with respect to the epitope specificity of constituent antibodies. Paratope profiles of various polyclonal sera determined by this new method differed, depending on the type of vaccine used for immunization. Antibodies induced in response to inactivated poliovirus vaccine (IPV) contained antibodies directed primarily against antigenic site 1, while sera from recipients of the oral poliovirus vaccine (OPV) contained antibodies to site 3. Antibodies to antigenic sites 2 and 4 were minor constituents in both types of sera. Pre-immunization sera had paratope profiles similar to OPV-induced antisera, allowing the discrimination between antibodies induced by IPV and maternal antibodies. The new method may be useful for analyzing results of clinical trials and to compare immunity induced by different poliovirus vaccines.

Introduction

Poliomyelitis is caused by polioviruses belonging to one of three serotypes, each defined by failure of neutralization by antisera to either of the other two types. Both live attenuated poliovirus and inactivated trivalent poliovirus vaccines induce strong antibody responses to all three serotypes and are highly effective in protecting vaccines against poliomyelitis. Determination of the three-dimensional structure of poliovirus virions (Hogle et al., 1985) and the introduction of monoclonal antibody (mAb) technology (Brioen et al., 1982, Emini et al., 1982, Emini et al., 1983, Evans et al., 1983, Ferguson et al., 1984) were major advances in the understanding of poliovirus structure and antigenicity. Growth of poliovirus in the presence of a mAb induced one or more mutations that rendered the virus resistant to neutralization by the same antibody. Sequencing of antibody-resistant (escape) mutants revealed location of sites within the poliovirus capsid (epitopes) that are critical for binding neutralizing antibodies. Such epitopes are clustered in several areas on the virion surface called antigenic sites. Most neutralizing epitopes of poliovirus are conformational, meaning that disruption of the conformation of native virion destroys both their binding to antibodies that react with native virus and their ability to induce a neutralizing immune response (Blondel et al., 1986, Diamond et al., 1985, Minor, 1990, Minor et al., 1983, Minor et al., 1986a, Minor et al., 1986b). These findings are consistent with the fact that many epitopes are located at the interfaces between different polypeptide chains on the virion surface. For instance, a single mAb can induce specific mutations in different polypeptide chains, because in most cases the affected amino acids are located close to each other in the native 3d-structure (Page et al., 1988).

The role of individual epitopes and antigenic sites in antigenicity and protective properties of poliovirus vaccines in humans remains unknown. The ease with which antibody escape mutants can be generated in vitro suggests that to offer reliable protection, polyclonal sera should contain a spectrum of antibodies of different specificities, both to maximize their ability to neutralize the virus and to prevent antigenic drift. Therefore, vaccines should contain multiple poliovirus epitopes that induce different protective antibodies. Traditionally, the potency of an inactivated poliovirus vaccine (IPV) is determined by ELISA with a well-characterized polyclonal antiserum (Moynihan et al., 1980, Souvras et al., 1980, Wood et al., 1995). This procedure ignores possible variations in epitope composition of the product and depends on the quality of polyclonal antisera used in the potency assays. Some ELISA protocols for potency testing use mAbs (Sawyer et al., 1993, Singer et al., 1989), but these do not allow direct evaluation of the relative contributions of each antigenic site. Recently a method based on a blocking-ELISA protocol using mAbs was developed in this laboratory. That method allowed quantitation of the contribution of individual epitopes into the overall antigenicity of both IPV and strains of live poliovirus (Rezapkin et al., 2005b). It showed that different virus strains have different profiles of reactivity with mAbs and that the process of virus inactivation with formalin destroys selectively some epitopes. As a result, conventional IPV produced from wild strains of poliovirus and Sabin IPV made from attenuated strains had different epitope profiles. The practical significance of these epitope differences remains unclear, but epitope analysis might prove useful for monitoring the consistency of vaccine manufacture and to guide development of effective alternative vaccines.

One approach to revealing potential roles of individual epitopes in protective properties of polio vaccines would be to analyze the antibody composition of polyclonal antisera with respect to their epitope specificities. If the spectra of antibodies, or “paratope profiles” of polyclonal antisera are characterized quantitatively, then their role in protection might be clarified. This information could also be used to compare different vaccines. All existing information on poliovirus epitopes has been generated using mouse mAbs. Some circumstantial evidence derived from analysis of antigenically modified vaccine-derived polioviruses (VDPV) suggests that some antigenic sites identified using a mouse system may not be active in humans (Yakovenko et al., 2006). Therefore, it is also important to determine whether the human immune system recognizes the same sites in poliovirus capsid as in the case in mice, and whether live and inactivated polio vaccines induce the same spectrum of antibodies.

This paper describes attempts to develop a method for characterizing the antibody repertoire of human polyclonal sera. Methods based on competition between mAbs and polyclonal sera have failed to discriminate the contribution of individual paratopes. Therefore, a method using a panel of mutant poliovirus strains with epitopes altered selectively was created to characterize the contributions of respective antibodies to ELISA reactivity and virus neutralization. The results demonstrate that antibody profiles induced in humans by IPV and by live attenuated oral polio vaccine (OPV) are significantly different. Those differences permitted easy discrimination between maternally derived OPV-induced antibodies and antibodies induced in infants by vaccination with IPV.

Section snippets

Viruses and cell cultures

All polioviruses were grown in cultures of Vero cells at passage level 148–158. Cells were grown in DMEM with 5% FBS, however viruses were grown in Vero cells with DMEM without FBS. The following type 1 polioviruses were used in this study: Mahoney wild-type poliovirus (ATCC VR59), attenuated Sabin strain (US neurovirulence reference NA4 stock), vaccine-derived poliovirus (VDPV) isolates 32334 and 29775 (Yakovenko et al., 2006).

Mutant strains were generated by selection of mAb-resistant

Competition ELISA

In a previous study, a modified blocking-ELISA protocol was used to quantify contributions of individual epitopes to the overall immunoreactivity of poliovirus (Rezapkin et al., 2005b). The blocking-ELISA method was based on competition between a panel of mAbs and a polyclonal conjugate used to detect poliovirus antigens. Virions were captured on microtiter plates coated with the polyclonal anti-polio IgG and treated with different mAbs. After washing the wells, polyclonal conjugate was added,

Discussion

Immune responses to most viruses involve production of antibodies to multiple antigenic sites, and each of them may contain multiple epitopes. In other words, immune sera are composed of a mixture of antiviral immunoglobulins with different specificities (paratopes). Antigenic structures of many viruses including poliovirus have been studied extensively using mouse mAbs (Brioen et al., 1982, Minor, 1990). In contrast, little is known on the specificity of human immune responses, and the role

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Branda Hu, Tim Voloshen and Steve Hildreth from Sanofi Pasteur Global Clinical Immunology Platform for preparing serum panels, Martin Dupuy of the Sanofi Pasteur Clinical Development Biometry Platform for extraction of historical datasets, and Drs. David Asher, Ronald Lundquist, and Ira Berkower for their critical reading of the manuscript and helpful suggestions.

References (36)

  • R. Crainic et al.

    Natural variation of poliovirus neutralization epitopes

    Infect. Immun.

    (1983)
  • D.C. Diamond et al.

    Antigenic variation and resistance to neutralization in poliovirus type 1

    Science

    (1985)
  • E.M. Dragunsky et al.

    Evaluation of immunogenicity and protective properties of inactivated poliovirus vaccines: a new surrogate method for predicting vaccine efficacy

    J. Infect. Dis.

    (2004)
  • E.A. Emini et al.

    Poliovirus neutralization epitopes: analysis and localization with neutralizing monoclonal antibodies

    J. Virol.

    (1982)
  • E.A. Emini et al.

    Functional basis of poliovirus neutralization determined with monospecific neutralizing antibodies

    J. Virol.

    (1983)
  • D.M. Evans et al.

    Critical role of an eight-amino acid sequence of VP1 in neutralization of poliovirus type 3

    Nature

    (1983)
  • M. Ferguson et al.

    Antigenic characterization of poliovirus type 3 using monoclonal antibodies

    Rev. Infect. Dis.

    (1984)
  • J. Herold et al.

    Poliovirus requires a precise 5’ end for efficient positive-strand RNA synthesis

    J. Virol.

    (2000)
  • Cited by (13)

    • Universal ELISA for quantification of D-antigen in inactivated poliovirus vaccines

      2020, Journal of Virological Methods
      Citation Excerpt :

      Two manufacturers in Japan and China have already licensed their sIPV products and several others are in different phases of clinical and pre-clinical development (Shimizu, 2016). Wild strains used for manufacture of cIPV slightly differ immunologically from Sabin strains (Rezapkin et al., 2010; Minor et al., 1986; Crawt et al., 2019). Therefore, the switch from cIPV to sIPV creates several challenges for evaluation of an IPV vaccine potency and efficacy.

    • Poliovirus Vaccine–Inactivated

      2017, Plotkin's Vaccines
    • Poliovirus vaccine-inactivated

      2012, Vaccines: Sixth Edition
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    1

    Current address: National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20895, USA.

    View full text