FLARelationship between eyelid margin irregularity and meibomian gland dropout
Introduction
According to The Tear Film Ocular Surface Society Dry Eye Work Shop II (TFOS DEWS II), dry eye disease is defined as “a multifactorial disease of the ocular surface characterized by a loss of homeostasis of the tear film, and accompanied by ocular symptoms, in which tear film instability and hyperosmolarity, ocular surface inflammation and damage, and neuro-sensory abnormalities play etiological roles” [1]. The causes of dry eye disease are a lack of aqueous production or excessive evaporation of tear film, or both [2]. The tear film comprises an aqueous-mucin gel and lipid layer [3]. Of the 2 components, it is the lipid layer of the tear film that prevents evaporation of the aqueous layer [4], being formed by Meibum secreted from the meibomian gland. Meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD) is characterized by terminal duct obstruction and reduced/altered meibum secretions [5]. MGD is a leading cause of evaporative dry eye disease, and new diagnostic devices and treatment options for MGD were recently developed [6].
To diagnose MGD, evaluation of subjective symptoms, morphological changes in the eyelid margin, meibum secretion, infrared meibography, lipid layer thickness measurement, and other factors are required [7]. Although examining meibomian gland secretion and identifying abnormal eyelid margins remains the main method for clinically examining MGD, meibography has been also widely used for assessing MGD after introduction of meiboscopy [8], transillumination meibography [9], or infrared non-contact meibography [10], because it directly shows the morphological changes of the meibomian gland.
Not all clinicians have access to an infrared meibography system, but eyelid margin abnormalities can easily be detected by ophthalmologists using slit-lamp microscopy. Although it is predicted that abnormal eyelid margins indicate more meibomian gland loss (dropout) in meibography, there are no published reports confirming that this is the case.
The purpose of the present study was to examine the relationship between lid margin abnormalities, a factor traditionally used for the diagnosis of MGD, and meibomian gland loss, which can be confirmed by infrared meibography. Our findings revealed a correlation between eyelid margin abnormalities and meiboscores. Furthermore, we directly checked the meibomian glands at focal dimples in the lid margins using an infrared camera system.
Section snippets
Patients and methods
This study was a retrospective chart review of 170 patients (173 eyes) who visited Chuncheon Sacred Heart Hospital of Hallym University and were diagnosed with dry eye disease. This study followed the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Chuncheon Sacred Heart Hospital (CHUNCHEON 2019-11-013).
The inclusion criteria were age of ≥20 years and at least mild dry eye symptoms (an Ocular Surface Disease Index [OSDI] score ≥13) and low tear
Relationship between eyelid margin abnormalities and meibomian gland dropout in infrared meibography
Mean age (standard deviation) of the 141 patients was 54.814.6 (range, 20–86 years). There were 37 males and 104 females. Table 1 shows the distribution of the meiboscores of the meibomian glands in the upper and lower eyelids according to the grades of 6 abnormalities in the upper and lower eyelid margin. In the upper eyelids, the meiboscores of patients with higher grades of irregular lid margins seemed to be higher than the meiboscores of those without irregular lid margins (p = 0.065,
Discussion
In 2008, Arita et al. introduced noncontact infrared meibography and demonstrated a correlation between lid margin abnormalities and meibomian gland dropout (meiboscore) [10]. In their report, 4 lid margin abnormalities (irregular lid margin, vascular engorgement, plugging of meibomian gland orifices, and anterior and posterior placement of the mucocutaneous junction) were scored from 0 through 4 according to the number of these abnormalities present in each eye. As a result, the meiboscore was
Financial disclosure
The authors have no commercial or proprietary interest in any concept or product described in this article.
Acknowledgement
This work was supported by a grant of the Korea Health Technology R&D Project through the Korea Health Industry Development Institute (KHIDI), funded by the Ministry of Health & Welfare, Republic of Korea (grant number: HI17C0659) and the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Korea government (Ministry of Science and ICT) (No. 2017R1A1A2A10000681, 2020R1A2C1005009).
References (23)
- et al.
TFOS DEWS II report executive summary
Ocul Surf
(2017) - et al.
TFOS DEWS II tear film report
Ocul Surf
(2017) - et al.
Meibomian gland dysfunction: a clinical scheme for description, diagnosis, classification, and grading
Ocul Surf
(2003) - et al.
In vivo transillumination biomicroscopy and photography of meibomian gland dysfunction. A clinical study
Ophthalmology
(1985) - et al.
Noncontact infrared meibography to document age-related changes of the meibomian glands in a normal population
Ophthalmology
(2008) - et al.
Development of definitive and reliable grading scales for meibomian gland dysfunction
Am J Ophthalmol
(2016) - et al.
Non-contact meibography: keep it simple but effective
Contact Lens Anterior Eye
(2012) The definition and classification of dry eye disease: report of the definition and classification subcommittee of the international dry eye WorkShop
Ocul Surf
(2007)Structure and function of the tear film
Adv Exp Med Biol
(1994)- et al.
The international workshop on meibomian gland dysfunction: executive summary
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci
(2011)
The contribution of meibomian disease to dry eye
Ocul Surf
Cited by (14)
Automated quantification of meibomian gland dropout in infrared meibography using deep learning
2022, Ocular SurfaceCitation Excerpt :A diagnosis of MGD requires evaluation of subjective symptoms, morphologic changes in the eyelid margin, meibum secretion, infrared meibography, lipid layer thickness measurement, and other factors [2]. Although examining MG secretion and identifying abnormal eyelid margins [3] are the main methods for clinical evaluation of MGD, meibography has become widely used to assess the morphologic changes of the MG [4] since the introduction of transillumination meibography [5] and non-contact infrared meibography [6]. Non-contact infrared meibography uses infrared light and an infrared camera to provide MG images with reduced discomfort for the patient.
Higher incidence of meibomian gland dysfunction in postmenopausal women with primary acquired nasolacrimal duct obstruction
2024, International OphthalmologyMeibomian Gland Probing Stimulates a Proliferative Epithelial Response Resulting in Duct Regeneration
2024, Clinical OphthalmologyUnsupervised Learning Based on Meibography Enables Subtyping of Dry Eye Disease and Reveals Ocular Surface Features
2023, Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual ScienceAssociation of meibomian gland morphology with orifice plugging and lid margin thickening in meibomian gland dysfunction patients
2023, International Ophthalmology