Shoulder
Reverse shoulder arthroplasty for the treatment of three-part and four-part proximal humeral fractures in the elderly

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2014.05.022Get rights and content

Background

The purpose of this study was to review the survivorship, radiologic and clinical outcomes of reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) used for the treatment of 3-part and 4-part proximal humeral fractures in the elderly.

Methods

Between 2003 and 2009, 29 shoulders in 28 elderly patients (87% female) with a 3-part or 4-part fractures were managed with RSA in Brisbane, Australia. Clinical and radiologic outcomes of this continuous cohort were retrospectively reviewed at an average follow-up of 54.9 months. Average age at surgery was 79 years. Survivorship and radiologic outcome assessment for all patients was undertaken. Seven patients died, and 1 was unavailable for clinical review, leaving 21 shoulders in 20 patients available for clinical review.

Results

There were no revisions of the reverse prosthesis. Mean average pain was 2.19 of 100 (standard deviation [SD], 6.97). Mean American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score was 89.3 (SD, 13.65). Mean normalized Constant score was 88.03 (SD, 11.24). Grade 1 scapular notching was observed radiologically in 4 shoulders. A scapular spur was observed in 7 shoulders. Class 1 heterotopic ossification was seen in 4 shoulders. Nonprogressive lucent lines were seen in 2 shoulders. Nonprogressive radiolucency was observed around the superior screw in 3 shoulders. No loosening of the glenoid baseplate or of the humeral component was observed. There was 1 complication of an axillary nerve palsy, which spontaneously resolved by 12 months after surgery.

Conclusion

RSA using the shoulder technique described in this series provides good clinical and radiologic outcomes in elderly patients with 3-part and 4-part fractures.

Section snippets

Materials and methods

In this retrospective study, we performed survivorship, clinical, and radiologic review of all consecutive patients who had RSA for treatment of an acute 3-part or 4-part fracture of the proximal humerus between April 2003 and December 2009.

Patients were included in the study if they were at least 24 months since the date of surgery and the operation was performed by one of the senior authors (M.R. or P.F.R.D.) within 6 weeks of the fracture. For the patients who died, their most recent x-ray

Results

The study comprised 29 RSAs for traumatic humeral fractures in 28 patients.

Discussion

We used the deltopectoral approach because it did not require detachment of the deltoid from the acromion. The deltoid is the primary motor in RSA. This approach also assisted in inferior placement of the glenosphere. Furthermore modified tuberosity fixation is easier through a deltopectoral approach. A further potential benefit of the deltopectoral approach may be the possibility of a lower infection rate. Some previous studies on reverse prostheses have reported a higher infection rate than

Conclusions

This series demonstrates excellent outcomes in the use of a reverse total shoulder arthroplasty for the treatment of 3-part and 4-part fractures in elderly patients. The clinical outcomes of this group were superior to most of the previously published studies and the complication rate was also extremely low, with no dislocations, infections, or prosthetic revisions. We believe that careful attention to the very specific aspects of the surgical technique and rehabilitation that we have used in

Acknowledgment

We thank Dr Richard Page and the shoulder section of the ANJR for provision of data on survivorship.

Disclaimer

The Brisbane Hand and Upper Limb Research Institute receives institutional support from Lima, DePuy, Integra Life Sciences, and LMT, and has received funding from Integra Life Sciences and Lima Corporate.

Mark Ross receives consultancy fees from Integra, LMT, Lima, DePuy, and Arthrex, and receives Speakers Bureau payments from DePuy, Lima, and Integra. Phillip Duke receives consultancy fees from Integra, LMT, Lima and DePuy, and receives Speakers Bureau payments from DePuy and Integra. The other

References (26)

  • C.M. Court-Brown et al.

    The epidemiology of proximal humeral fractures

    Acta Orthop Scand

    (2001)
  • M. Farshad et al.

    Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty–from the most to the least common complication

    Int Orthop

    (2010)
  • G.E. Garrigues et al.

    Hemiarthroplasty versus reverse total shoulder arthroplasty for acute proximal humerus fractures in elderly patients

    Orthopedics

    (2012)
  • Cited by (78)

    • Risk factors for loss of reduction following locked plate fixation of proximal humerus fractures in older adults

      2023, Injury
      Citation Excerpt :

      This data was preferentially obtained from physical therapy visit documentation, as these provided the most precise and standardized values. Achievement of satisfactory functional outcome at final follow up was determined using a previously reported threshold of greater than 90° of active forward flexion [25]. Statistical analysis was performed using Stata/SE® 17.0 for Mac (StataCorp LP, College Station, TX).

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    The Mater Health Services Human Research Ethics Committee approved this study (Protocol Ref No. 1911E).

    View full text