Consumers' purchasing decisions regarding environmentally friendly products: An empirical analysis of German consumers

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2016.05.006Get rights and content

Abstract

Research in the area of environmentally friendly purchasing behavior reports inconsistent findings. It is also unclear which factors determine real buying behavior. Therefore, the present study develops a model which identifies major factors forming self-reported purchasing behavior (SRB). A structural equation approach is used to integrate these measures and to test if they are able to predict actual purchasing behavior. Data was obtained from a nationwide panel (n=1760) and included survey data and retail scanner data for seven different product categories in the sector of goods for daily needs. Results show that consumers care for the environment and mirror environmental attitudes in their purchasing behavior (self-reported). Especially norms and willingness to pay are strong predictors of SRB. However, SRB is not transferred to actual purchasing behavior. Therefore, the findings corroborate the gap between stated and actual behavior. Implications for marketing are derived to encourage consumers to purchase environmentally friendly products. In the end, this not only produces benefits for the environment, but also creates opportunities for businesses.

Introduction

Environmentally friendly or “green” buying behavior is one of the domains in which consumers are able to transfer their environmental concerns into corresponding actions. Green behavior reflects actions that are carried out with the aim of optimizing the environmental consequences to meet the needs of current and future generations. Green consumers and their buying behavior are well examined fields of research (for a discussion see Peattie (2001)). Buying organic products is the most popular action to reduce an individual's environmental impact (Isenhour, 2010).

Markets for green products such as organic produce are steadily growing (Bund ökologischer Landwirtschaft (BÖLW), 2016, U.S. Department of Agriculture Economic Research Service, 2014). This development not only produces benefits for the environment, but also creates opportunities for businesses which engage in this growing niche market. Research found that companies and retailers which implement green strategies achieve higher profitability and market shares (Menguc and Ozanne, 2005), greater levels of employee commitment (Maignan and Ferrell, 2001), increased customer satisfaction (Lombart and Louis, 2014, Luo and Bhattacharya, 2006) and a more positive image (Lavorata, 2014). However, findings about the relationship between consumers’ attitudes and environmentally friendly behavior are still inconsistent. It is also unclear which factors determine real buying behavior. Most studies that analyze green purchasing behavior either focus on behavioral intention as a proxy for behavior (Auger et al., 2008, Lu et al., 2015, Schuitema and Groot, 2015) or rely on self-reported survey data (Follows and Jobber, 2000). Although some studies analyze real purchasing behavior, they only focus on attitude and its predecessors as a predictor of behavior (Hauser et al., 2013, Tarkiainen and Sundqvist, 2009).

The present study focuses on consumers' purchasing decisions with reference to environmentally-friendly products. In contrast to prior research in this field, the study takes into account more predictors than just attitude. The conceptualized model also integrates personal norms and willingness to pay (WTP) as further promising factors which might explain behavior. Hence, the relative importance and the respective structure of each single factor can be revealed. The model also contrasts measures of stated attitudes and behavior with measures of actual behavior. Thus, the model tests if these factors are able to predict actual green purchasing behavior. In sum, the study contributes to the understanding of green purchasing behavior. Main drivers of green purchasing behavior can be identified while simultaneously modeling the potential gaps between (a) attitude and behavior and (b) self-reported and actual behavior. The results of the study provide a better understanding of self-reported and actual purchasing behavior in seven different product categories. Thus, the present study responds to the call for more research at the product category level (Padel and Foster, 2005) and even expands research to further product categories beyond organic food.

Section snippets

Conceptualization and hypotheses development

The theory of planned behavior (TPB) (Ajzen, 1991) is widely applied and acknowledged to explain environmentally friendly behavior (Bamberg and Möser, 2007, Leonidou and Leonidou, 2011, Paul et al., 2016). It has also been supported with regard to organic products (Honkanen et al., 2006, Kim and Chung, 2011, Pino et al., 2012, Zhou et al., 2013). According to the TPB, behavior is guided by three major factors: attitude, subjective norm and perception of behavioral control (PBC). Individuals are

Operationalizing green products

Generally, green products are defined as products that are less or not at all harmful for the environment in comparison to a substitute of the same product category. This is linked to one or several product-inherent attributes whose environmental impact is low or even non-existent (Haws et al., 2014). For consumers, it is challenging to assess the environmental impact of products correctly (Tobler et al., 2011). Therefore, the definition of green attributes for the respective product categories

Descriptives

In general, the respondents showed a strong and positive attitude towards the environment (mean =3.599; standard deviation (SD)=0.957). They also tended to follow norms when buying daily consumer goods (mean =3.214; SD =1.005), while expressing a marginally positive yet almost neutral WTP for products with green attributes (mean =3.093; SD =0.963). The overall self-reported behavior was not very distinctive either, but slightly positive (mean =3.177; SD =0.912).

Means of the dependent variables

Discussion and implications

The factors integrated into the study were able to explain approximately two-thirds of the variance of SRB which reflects consumers' behavioral tendencies regarding environmentally-friendly behavior. However, SRB was not significantly related to actual green purchasing behavior in any product category. Since WTP for products with green attributes was considered as a direct predictor of behavior, the gap can hardly be explained by higher costs of green products. Whereas WTP had a significant

Limitations

The results showed that the integrated factors are able to predict SRB. However, SRB and actual purchasing behavior diverge. Naturally, the measure of SRB was based on self-assessment, which requires a careful interpretation of the results. Individuals tend to overestimate their self-reported behavior (Armitage and Conner, 2001), as well as their WTP (Kovalsky and Lusk, 2013). The gap between SRB and behavior might result from consumers’ motives besides environmental aspects as well as from

Acknowledgments

The author gratefully acknowledges that this project was funded by the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research within the program “FHprofUnt” (Grant number 17026X11). She would also like to thank the project partner GfK for the fruitful cooperation and the provision of data. An earlier version of this paper was presented at the AMA 2015 Winter Educators’ Conference in San Antonio, TX, in February 2015. The extended abstract was published in the proceedings under the title “The

References (101)

  • C. Lombart et al.

    A study of the impact of corporate social responsibility and price image on retailer personality and consumers' reactions (satisfaction, trust and loyalty to the retailer)

    J. Retail. Consum. Serv.

    (2014)
  • L. Loussaïef et al.

    Do CSR actions in retailing really matter for young consumers? A study in France and Norway

    J. Retail. Consum. Serv.

    (2014)
  • I. Maignan et al.

    Antecedents and benefits of corporate citizenship: an investigation of French businesses

    J. Bus. Res.

    (2001)
  • J.N. Meise et al.

    Feed them facts: value perceptions and consumer use of sustainability-related product information

    J. Retail. Consum. Serv.

    (2014)
  • B. Menguc et al.

    Challenges of the “green imperative”: a natural resource-based approach to the environmental orientation—business performance relationship

    J. Bus. Res.

    (2005)
  • H.G. Parsa et al.

    Corporate social and environmental responsibility in services: will consumers pay for it?

    J. Retail. Consum. Serv.

    (2015)
  • J. Paul et al.

    Predicting green product consumption using theory of planned behavior and reasoned action

    J. Retail. Consum. Serv.

    (2016)
  • J.R. Rossiter

    The C-OAR-SE procedure for scale development in marketing

    Int. J. Res. Mark.

    (2002)
  • S.H. Schwartz

    Normative influences on altruism

  • Y. Strizhakova et al.

    The “green” side of materialism in emerging BRIC and developed markets: The moderating role of global cultural identity

    Int. J. Res. Mark.

    (2013)
  • B. Sun et al.

    Stated intentions and purchase behavior: a unified model

    Int. J. Res. Mark.

    (2010)
  • J. van Doorn et al.

    Willingness to pay for organic products: differences between virtue and vice foods

    Int. J. Res. Mark.

    (2011)
  • M. Wier et al.

    The character of demand in mature organic food markets: Great Britain and Denmark compared

    Food Policy

    (2008)
  • W. Wood et al.

    The habitual consumer

    J. Consum. Psychol.

    (2009)
  • I. Ajzen

    The theory of planned behavior

    Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process.

    (1991)
  • I. Ajzen

    Perceived behavioral control, self-efficacy, locus of control, and the theory of planned behavior

    J. Appl. Social Psychol.

    (2002)
  • J.C. Anderson et al.

    Structural equation modeling in practice: a review and recommended two-step approach

    Psychol. Bull.

    (1988)
  • Arbuckle, J.L., 2012. Amos (Version 21). SPSS,...
  • C.J. Armitage et al.

    Efficacy of the theory of planned behaviour: a meta-analytic review

    Br. J. Social. Psychol.

    (2001)
  • R.P. Bagozzi et al.

    Representing and testing organizational theories: a holistic construal

    Adm. Sci. Q.

    (1982)
  • R.P. Bagozzi et al.

    Specification, evaluation, and interpretation of structural equation models

    J. Acad. Mark. Sci.

    (2012)
  • S. Baker et al.

    Mapping the values driving organic food choice: Germany vs the UK

    Eur. J. Mark.

    (2004)
  • R. Bezawada et al.

    What Is special about marketing organic products? How organic assortment, price, and promotions drive retailer performance

    J. Mark.

    (2013)
  • J.K. Brewer

    On the power of statistical tests in the American Educational Research Journal

    Am. Educ. Res. J.

    (1972)
  • Bund ökologischer Landwirtschaft (BÖLW), 2016. Die Bio-Branche 2016. Zahlen, Daten, Fakten (The organic sector 2016 –...
  • P.F. Burke et al.

    Segmenting consumers' reasons for and against ethical consumption

    Eur. J. Mark.

    (2014)
  • B.M. Byrne

    Structural Equation Modeling with Amos: Basic Concepts, Applications, and Programming (Multivariate Applications Series)

    (2010)
  • J. Cohen

    Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences

    (1988)
  • J. Davies et al.

    Beyond the intention–behaviour mythology: an integrated model of recycling

    Mark. Theory

    (2002)
  • A. Diekmann et al.

    Green and greenback: the behavioral effects of environmental attitudes in low-cost and high-cost situations

    Ration. Soc.

    (2003)
  • L.R. Fabrigar et al.

    Evaluating the use of exploratory factor analysis in psychological research

    Psychol. Methods

    (1999)
  • S.B. Follows et al.

    Environmentally responsible purchase behaviour: a test of a consumer model

    Eur. J. Mark.

    (2000)
  • C. Fornell et al.

    Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error

    J. Mark. Res.

    (1981)
  • German Federal Statistical Office, 2011. Bevölkerung und Erwerbstätigkeit. Entwicklung der Privathaushalte bis 2030...
  • S. Gupta et al.

    To buy or not to buy? A social dilemma perspective on green buying

    J. Consum. Mark.

    (2009)
  • J. Guthrie et al.

    Nudging consumers toward better food choices: policy approaches to changing food consumption behaviors

    Psychol. Mark.

    (2015)
  • J.F. Hair et al.

    Multivariate Data Analysis

    (2006)
  • L. Hamzaoui Essoussi et al.

    Decision making process of community organic food consumers: an exploratory study

    J. Consum. Mark.

    (2008)
  • D. Hanss et al.

    Sustainability seen from the perspective of consumers

    Int. J. Consum. Stud.

    (2012)
  • T. Harries et al.

    Is social norms marketing effective? A case study in domestic electricity consumption

    Eur. J. Mark.

    (2013)
  • Cited by (165)

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text