Elsevier

Journal of Proteomics

Volume 145, 11 August 2016, Pages 226-236
Journal of Proteomics

A proteomic signature of ovarian cancer tumor fluid identified by highthroughput and verified by targeted proteomics

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jprot.2016.05.005Get rights and content

Abstract

Tumor fluid samples have emerged as a rich source for the identification of ovarian cancer in the context of proteomics studies. To uncover differences among benign and malignant ovarian samples, we performed a quantitative proteomic study consisting of albumin immunodepletion, isotope labeling with acrylamide and in-depth proteomic profiling by LC-MS/MS in a pool of 10 samples of each histological type. 1135 proteins were identified, corresponding to 505 gene products. 223 proteins presented associated quantification and the comparative analysis of histological types revealed 75 differentially abundant proteins. Based on this, we developed a panel for targeted proteomic analysis using the multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) method for validation of 51 proteins in individual samples of high-grade serous ovarian tumor fluids (malignant) and benign serous cystadenoma tumor fluids. This analysis showed concordant results in terms of average amounts of proteins, and APOE, SERPINF2, SERPING1, ADAM17, CD44 and OVGP1 were statistically significant between benign and malignant group. The results observed in the MRM for APOE were confirmed by western blotting, where APOE was more abundant in malignant samples. This molecular signature can contribute to improve tumor stratification and shall be investigated in combination with current biomarkers in larger cohorts to improve ovarian cancer diagnosis.

Biological significance

Despite advances in cancer research, ovarian cancer has a high mortality and remains a major challenge due to a number of particularities of the disease, especially late diagnosis caused by vague clinical symptoms, the cellular and molecular heterogeneity of tumors, and the lack of effective treatment. Thus, efforts are directed to better understand this neoplasia, its origin, development and, particularly the identification and validation of biomarkers for early detection of the disease in asymptomatic stage. In the present work, we confirmed by MRM method in individual ovarian tumor fluid samples the regulation of 27 proteins out of 33 identified in a highthroughput study. We speculate that the presence and/or differential abundance observed in tumor fluid is a cooperation primarily of high rates of secretion of such tumor proteins to extra tumor environment that will at the end accumulate in plasma, and also the accumulation of acute-phase proteins throughout the entire body. On top of that, consideration of physiological influences in the interpretation of expression observed, including age, menopause status, route-of-elimination kinetics and metabolism of the tumor marker, coexisting disease, hormonal imbalances, life-style influences (smoking, alcoholism, obesity), among others, are mandatory to enable the selection of good protein tumor marker candidates for extensive validation.

Introduction

Ovarian cancer (OC) is the most fatal gynecologic malignancy with 140,000 deaths per year, the sixth most common cancer worldwide among women, and is the leading cause of mortality among gynecological malignancies in developed countries [1], [2]. Due to vague clinical symptoms, it is difficult to detect ovarian cancer at an early stage, in which the 5-year survival rate is approximately 92%. Therefore, most patients will be diagnosed with advanced stage disease with wide peritoneal metastasis (approximately 75% stages III or IV), in which the 5-year survival rate is only 30% [3], [4], [5], [6].

Moreover, OC is a heterogeneous disease at the cellular and molecular levels, and comprises a variety of tumors with diverse histopathological features and biological behavior [7], [8]. Since ovarian cancer cells with various histological types may express tumor markers differently, it is important to use multiple tumor markers to detect all ovarian cancers [9]. On the other hand, and because of such heterogeneity, the study of each histologic type separately, may present the most significant advance in understanding the disease [10]. Tumor markers, including a diversity of substances like cell surface antigens, cytoplasmic proteins, enzymes, hormones, oncofetal antigens, receptors, oncogenes and their products, are assuming a growing role in different aspects of cancer care, whether for diagnosis, screening, prediction or treatment monitoring [11], [12].

The discovery of such tumor markers depends on suitable biological samples and an appropriate methodology. Different types of biological samples can be used in cancer research, each one having advantages and disadvantages. Alternatively, our group and others have also explored the use of intra-tumor fluids, which provides information about the protein expressed by the tissue, enabling the detection of low abundance secreted proteins (compared with human plasma) [10], [13], [14], [15]. Therefore, the use of OC intra-tumor fluids as a sample for tumor marker studies allows the detection of panels of potential targets that will fall into the circulation and could truly represent candidate biomarkers that can be validated in other types of samples, such human plasma.

The increasing interest in applying proteomics methods to study OC have been contributing to assist the understanding the pathogenesis of cancer, elucidating the mechanism of drug resistance and in the development of biomarkers for ovarian cancer detection [10], [14], [16], [17], [18], [19], [20]. Analysis of protein sets, also denoted as molecular signatures, is a promising approach to adequately grasp biological complexity and to efficiently contribute for the diagnose complex diseases, monitor physiological changes and successfully develop new drugs [21]. To contribute to the elucidation of new sets of OC tumor markers, we combined highthroughput and targeted proteomic analysis to discover and verify panels of differentially abundant proteins in ovarian tumor fluid samples (Fig. 1).

Section snippets

Patients and tumor fluid samples

Tumor fluid samples were obtained during the surgery and stored at − 80 °C until analysis, from 10 women with high grade serous ovarian tumor (mean age 51.2, range 36–72), not treated previously with antineoplastic drugs or radiotherapy, and 10 women with benign serous cystadenoma (mean age 49.7, range 37–71). Patients' characteristics are described in Table 1. The patients were recruited at the University Hospital (Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo, Brazil) from the Ambulatory of the Gynecology and

Patient groups

In our study, samples used for the highthroughput and targeted proteomics analysis were very carefully selected and characterized. As aforementioned, histopathological and molecular features are extremely important for the rigorous selection of tumor marker candidates. Thus we evaluated some clinical parameters in our sample such as age, menarche age, menopause status, menopause premature, number of children born alive and number of abortions, and found no statistically significant difference

Conclusion

Tumor ovarian fluid proved to be a challenging sample to study by proteomics due to its similarity to the plasma. However, we believe that the fluid can provide novel information regarding tumor biology. We have succeeded in using the isotopic labeling by alkylation with acrylamide, enabling the identification and quantitation of a significant number of proteins. In addition, using a MRM method, most of the results were confirmed, revealing a wide variability in proteins levels between

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interests.

Transparency document

Transparency document.

Acknowledgements

The authors gratefully acknowledge the cooperation of all volunteers who participated in this study. This research was supported by FAPESP (Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de são Paulo) (Young Scientist Grant – Proc. No. 2011-0947-1), CNPq (Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico - grants 479934/2011-8, 454703/2014-7), CAPES (Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior), FAEPA (Fundação de Apoio ao Ensino, Pesquisa e Assistência do Hospital das

References (76)

  • J. Ferlay et al.

    Estimates of worldwide burden of cancer in 2008: GLOBOCAN 2008

    Int. J. Cancer

    (2010)
  • I. Romero et al.

    Minireview: human ovarian cancer: biology, current management, and paths to personalizing therapy

    Endocrinology

    (2012)
  • Z. Yurkovetsky et al.

    Development of a multimarker assay for early detection of ovarian cancer

    J. Clin. Oncol.

    (2010)
  • P. Mhawech-Fauceglia et al.

    MET/HGF signaling pathway in ovarian carcinoma: clinical implications and future direction

    Pathol. Res. Int.

    (2012)
  • F. Modugno et al.

    Hormone response in ovarian cancer: time to reconsider as a clinical target?

    Endocr. Relat. Cancer

    (2012)
  • D. Jelovac et al.

    Role of farletuzumab in epithelial ovarian carcinoma

    Curr. Pharm. Des.

    (2012)
  • E. Smolle et al.

    Targeting signaling pathways in epithelial ovarian cancer

    Int. J. Mol. Sci.

    (2013)
  • A. Poersch et al.

    Proteomic analysis of ovarian cancer tumor fluid is a rich source of potential biomarkers

    J. Proteomics Bioinform.

    (2014)
  • C.M. Sturgeon et al.

    National Academy of Clinical Biochemistry Laboratory Medicine Practice Guidelines for use of tumor markers in clinical practice: quality requirements

    Clin. Chem.

    (2008)
  • E.P. Diamandis

    Tumor markers: Past, present, and future

  • B. Kristjansdottir et al.

    Ovarian cyst fluid is a rich proteome resource for detection of new tumor biomarkers

    Clin. Proteomics

    (2012)
  • B. Kristjansdottir et al.

    Potential tumor biomarkers identified in ovarian cyst fluid by quantitative proteomic analysis, iTRAQ

    Clin. Proteomics

    (2013)
  • B. Kristjansdottir et al.

    Early inflammatory response in epithelial ovarian tumor cyst fluids

    Cancer Med.

    (2014)
  • M.A. Elzek et al.

    Proteomics of ovarian cancer: functional insights and clinical applications

    Cancer Metastasis Rev.

    (2015)
  • R. Longuespee et al.

    Ovarian cancer molecular pathology

    Cancer Metastasis Rev.

    (2012)
  • Y. Zhang et al.

    The ovarian cancer-derived secretory/releasing proteome: a repertoire of tumor markers

    Proteomics

    (2012)
  • Y. Cheng et al.

    Proteomics analysis for finding serum markers of ovarian cancer

    Biomed. Res. Int.

    (2014)
  • J.F. Timms et al.

    Discovery of serum biomarkers of ovarian cancer using complementary proteomic profiling strategies

    Proteomics Clin. Appl.

    (2014)
  • S. Sauer

    Protein set analyses: how could this impact the clinic?

    Expert Rev. Proteomics

    (2013)
  • V. Faca et al.

    Quantitative analysis of acrylamide labeled serum proteins by LC-MS/MS

    J. Proteome Res.

    (2006)
  • A. Rauch et al.

    Computational Proteomics Analysis System (CPAS): an extensible, open-source analytic system for evaluating and publishing proteomic data and high throughput biological experiments

    J. Proteome Res.

    (2006)
  • B. MacLean et al.

    General framework for developing and evaluating database scoring algorithms using the TANDEM search engine

    Bioinformatics

    (2006)
  • A.I. Nesvizhskii et al.

    A statistical model for identifying proteins by tandem mass spectrometry

    Anal. Chem.

    (2003)
  • A. Keller et al.

    Empirical statistical model to estimate the accuracy of peptide identifications made by MS/MS and database search

    Anal. Chem.

    (2002)
  • B. Muthusamy et al.

    Plasma Proteome Database as a resource for proteomics research

    Proteomics

    (2005)
  • D. Szklarczyk et al.

    STRING v10: protein-protein interaction networks, integrated over the tree of life

    Nucleic Acids Res.

    (2015)
  • H. Mi et al.

    PANTHER in 2013: modeling the evolution of gene function, and other gene attributes, in the context of phylogenetic trees

    Nucleic Acids Res.

    (2013)
  • P. Shannon et al.

    Cytoscape: a software environment for integrated models of biomolecular interaction networks

    Genome Res.

    (2003)
  • Cited by (33)

    • Applications of mass spectroscopy in understanding cancer proteomics

      2023, Proteomics: A Promising Approach for Cancer Research
    • Analysis of ovarian cancer cell secretome during epithelial to mesenchymal transition reveals a protein signature associated with advanced stages of ovarian tumors

      2021, Biochimica et Biophysica Acta - Proteins and Proteomics
      Citation Excerpt :

      Technical replicates presented an overall coefficient of variation below 13%. The individual sample variations for each peptide was significant, as expected and demonstrated before [41], supporting the importance of panels of proteins as classificators. Fig. 5d shows the full chromatogram and variation of all the 33 peptide monitoring intensities for the same patient using the defined 30 min MRM method.

    • Univariate and classification analysis reveals potential diagnostic biomarkers for early stage ovarian cancer Type 1 and Type 2

      2019, Journal of Proteomics
      Citation Excerpt :

      Prior proteomic studies have commonly analyzed, pooled or individually, a large cohort of samples with mixed histologies [5–8]. Only a few EOC biomarker discovery studies have actually used samples of serous histology only [9,10] or early stage EOC [11,12] and applied mass spectrometry (MS) analysis. Multiple easily accessible body fluids (serum, plasma, ascites, urine, pleural effusions, cervical smear, and ovarian cyst fluids) and tumor tissues have been used in the search for new biomarkers [5,13,14].

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text