Elsevier

Journal of Power Sources

Volume 171, Issue 1, 19 September 2007, Pages 72-78
Journal of Power Sources

Unravelling the complexities of CO2 tolerance at PtRu/C and PtMo/C

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2007.02.050Get rights and content

Abstract

The CO2 tolerance exhibited by PtRu/C is known to be greater than that of PtMo/C catalysts in contrast to the trend in CO tolerance. In this manuscript the origins of these differences are investigated in a cyclic voltammetric investigation of the potential dependence of the poisoning of Pt/C, PtRu/C and PtMo/C anode catalyst electrodes in a miniature PEM fuel cell when exposed to pure CO, pure CO2, or 25% CO2 in H2. The results show that the difference in the mechanisms of improved CO tolerance, compared to a Pt/C reference catalyst, of PtRu and PtMo explain the decreased CO2 tolerance of PtMo compared to PtRu; at PtRu the mechanism is intrinsic (water activation at Ru sites), whilst at PtMo the mechanism relies on the turn-over the Mo(IV/VI) redox couple.

Introduction

It has long been recognised that the anode catalysts used in proton exchange membrane fuel cells (PEMFCs) must have a high tolerance to CO when operating with reformate (impure hydrogen derived from the reformation of hydrocarbons), as even low levels of CO severely poison Pt [1]. Reformate typically contains 20–25% CO2 and 1% CO, and although the latter can be reduced to 10 ppm to 100 ppm by subsequent clean-up steps, it cannot be eliminated.

Considerable effort has been devoted to the development of CO tolerant catalysts, such as PtRu and PtMo bimetallic alloys, with carbon supported PtMo catalysts being identified as particularly promising, with a greater CO tolerance than PtRu [2], [3], [4], [5]. It has been shown that the Pt-containing catalysts developed for their CO tolerance can also be poisoned by CO2 to levels beyond those accounted for by simple dilution [6], [7], [8]. However, the trends in CO2 tolerance of bimetallic alloys do not necessarily follow those for CO tolerance [9], [10], [11]. We have previously reported a difference in the CO2 tolerance exhibited by PtRu/C and PtMo/C catalysts (operating at 80 °C in 40 ppm CO and 25% CO2 in H2) [9]; we found that that the PtRu/C catalyst had better CO2 tolerance than the PtMo/C catalyst.

Voltammetric studies in acidic solution have indicated that deactivation of the Pt electrode surfaces in the presence of CO2 is caused by the build up of a CO-like poison formed by the reduction of CO2 in the presence of adsorbed hydrogen [12]. The reduction of CO2 at Pt under PEMFC anode conditions has been ascribed to a reaction analogous to the reverse water gas shift reaction (RWGS);CO2 + 2M-Hads  M-COads + H2O + Mwhere M is a surface site on the catalyst. The origins of the adsorbed hydrogen, M-Hads, can either be the electrochemical reaction,H+ + e + M  M-Hadsor the non-Faradaic chemical (Tafel) reaction,H2 + 2M  2M-HadsJanssen [11] proposed that the chemical mechanism would probably prevail under PEMFC conditions. However, in a recent investigation of CO2 reduction on carbon supported Pt catalysts in acidic solution Smolinka et al. found a potential dependence of the poisoning of the catalyst surface that indicated that the electrochemical mechanism dominated [13]. They also showed that the result was reproduced in the PEMFC environment.

In the following, we will present and discuss a study of the potential dependence of the poisoning of carbon supported Pt, PtRu, and PtMo catalysts by CO and CO2 in a model PEMFC environment. Results obtained with pure CO2 and 25% CO2 in H2 will be also compared. The results will be interpreted in terms of the role of the electrochemical versus chemical origins of adsorbed hydrogen in the RWGS reaction and the mechanisms of the tolerances of the catalysts to CO and CO2.

Section snippets

Catalysts

Three anode catalysts: 39 wt% Pt, 37 wt%/19 wt% Pt/Ru, and 18 wt%/4 wt% Pt/Mo supported on Cabot XC72R furnace carbons were prepared using proprietary methods. The catalysts were characterised for metal content using inductively coupled plasma-emission spectrometry and Pt crystallite size and degree of intermixing of the binary components by powder X-ray diffraction as summarised in Table 1.

Anode catalyst electrodes were prepared by painting aqueous Nafion containing inks of the anode catalysts onto

Results and discussion

The effect of CO in H2 on the single cell performance is illustrated in Fig. 1, in which the cell voltage as a function of time following switching from H2 to 100 ppm CO in H2 is plotted for the three catalysts at a constant current density of 500 mA cm−2. As previously reported for a similar set of catalysts [9], Pt has the greatest loss in performance, followed by PtRu and PtMo catalysts, both of which suffered much less significant decreases in performance. Similar measurements were conducted

Conclusions

The cyclic voltammetric study presented here has enabled the identification of the origins of the differences in the CO and CO2 tolerances of carbon supported PtRu and PtMo catalysts. The differences in CO tolerance in the PEMFC environment (PtMo more tolerant than PtRu) are attributed to the difference in mechanism by which the CO tolerance is improved compared to Pt; Ru enabling water activation at lower potentials, the intrinsic mechanism, and Mo serving as a promoter via the turn-over of

Acknowledgements

Nigel Jones and Ed Wright (JMTC) are thanked for their assistance in setting up the miniature fuel cell test stand, Brian Theobald (JMTC) for preparing the catalysts, and the Royal Society for the award of an Industry Fellowship to AER.

References (31)

  • F.A. de Bruijn et al.

    J. Power Sources

    (2002)
  • R.C. Urian et al.

    J. Electroanal. Chem.

    (2003)
  • G.J.M. Janssen

    J. Power Sources

    (2004)
  • J. Giner

    Electrochim. Acta

    (1963)
  • T. Smolinka et al.

    Electrochim. Acta

    (2005)
  • R.J.K. Wiltshire et al.

    Electrochim. Acta

    (2005)
  • A. Czerwinski et al.

    Int. J. Appl. Rad. Isot.

    (1974)
  • J. Sobkowski et al.

    J. Electroanal. Chem.

    (1974)
  • J. Sobkowski et al.

    J. Electroanal. Chem.

    (1975)
  • B. Beden et al.

    J. Electroanal. Chem.

    (1982)
  • T. Iwasita et al.

    Electrochim. Acta

    (1992)
  • P. Liu et al.

    Electrochim. Acta

    (2003)
  • M. Watanabe et al.

    J. Electroanal. Chem.

    (1975)
  • T. Ioroi et al.

    Electrochim. Acta

    (2006)
  • T. Ioroi et al.

    Electrochem. Commun.

    (2002)
  • Cited by (29)

    • Continuous flow synthesis of nanostructured bimetallic Pt-Mo/C catalysts in milli-channel reactor for PEM fuel cell application

      2019, Materials Chemistry and Physics
      Citation Excerpt :

      Functionalities arising from two metals and ligand effect improve the fuel cell performance. Alloying Pt with Mo has showed enhanced CO tolerance [10–12]. Mo is a relatively inexpensive and widely available element that also improves the activity of the electrocatalyst.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text