Elsevier

Journal of Plant Physiology

Volume 171, Issue 14, 1 September 2014, Pages 1248-1255
Journal of Plant Physiology

Physiology
Plasticity in stomatal size and density of potato leaves under different irrigation and phosphorus regimes

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jplph.2014.06.002Get rights and content

Abstract

The morphological features of stomata including their size and density could be modulated by environmental cues; however, the underlying mechanisms remain largely elusive. Here, the effect of different irrigation and phosphorus (P) regimes on stomatal size (SS) and stomatal density (SD) of potato leaves was investigated. The plants were grown in split-root pots under two P fertilization rates (viz., 0 and 100 mg kg−1 soil, denoted as P0 and P1, respectively) and subjected to full (FI), deficit (DI), and partial root-zone drying (PRD) irrigation regimes. Results showed that SS and SD were unresponsive to P but significantly affected by the irrigation treatment. FI plants had the largest SS, followed by DI, and PRD the smallest; and the reverse was the case for SD. Compared to FI and DI, PRD plants had significantly lower values of specific leaf area (SLA) and leaf carbon isotope discrimination (Δ13C) under P0. Midday leaf water potential (Ψleaf) and stomatal conductance (gs) was similar for DI and PRD, which was significantly lower than that of FI. Leaf contents of C, N, K, Ca and Mg were higher in PRD than in DI plants, particularly under P0. When analyzed across the three irrigation regimes, it was found that the P1 plants had significantly higher leaf contents of P and Mg, but significantly lower leaf K content compared to the P0 plants. Linear correlation analyses revealed that SS was positively correlated with Ψleaf and Δ13C; whereas SD was negatively correlated with Ψleaf, Δ13C and SLA, and positively correlated with leaf C, N and Ca contents. And gs was positively correlated with SS but negatively correlated with SD. Collectively, under low P level, the smaller and denser stomata in PRD plants may bring about a more efficient stomatal control over gas exchange, hereby potentially enhance water-use efficiency as exemplified by the lowered leaf Δ13C under fluctuating soil moisture conditions.

Introduction

Stomata play a pivotal role in the regulation of leaf gas exchange. Stomatal conductance (gs) for water vapour and CO2 is determined primarily by the size (SS) and density (SD) of stomata for a given species under a certain environment (Parlange and Waggoner, 1970). It is believed that SS and SD are controlled by both genetic and environmental factors (Lake et al., 2002, Hetherington and Woodward, 2003, Casson and Gray, 2008, Yan et al., 2012, Zhang et al., 2012). They may vary considerably across plant species and can be modulated by abiotic environmental perturbations such as changes of atmospheric CO2 concentration, light intensity, temperature, soil water and nutritional status (Woodward, 1987, Woodward and Kelly, 1995, Lake et al., 2001, Lake and Woodward, 2008, Sekiya and Yano, 2008, Xu and Zhou, 2008, Yan et al., 2012). Due to their crucial role in regulating gs, SS and SD are important ecophysiological traits controlling plant water use, especially in water-limited environments (Croxdale, 2000, Sack et al., 2003, Poulos et al., 2007, Xu and Zhou, 2008).

Accumulated evidence indicates that a long-distance signal generated from the mature leaves that senses the environmental cues plays an important role in the regulation of stomatal formation on newly expanding leaves (e.g. Lake et al., 2001, Lake et al., 2002, Sekiya and Yano, 2008, Lake and Woodward, 2008). Experimental studies involving exposure the mature leaves to different atmospheric stimulus, e.g. irradiation intensity, air humidity, and CO2 concentration, have revealed that systemic signalling systems including sugar and phytohormones are implicated in the long-distance signalling pathways regulating the stomatal development in new leaves (Lake et al., 2002, Miyazawa et al., 2006, Lake and Woodward, 2008). In addition to changes of atmospheric conditions, variation of the belowground abiotic environments around the roots such as soil moisture and nutrient status has also been found to modify stomatal morphology (Xu and Zhou, 2008, Sekiya and Yano, 2008), yet the underlying mechanisms for such regulation remain largely elusive. Besides, there is no consensus in the literature about how changes of soil environments affect SD and SS. For instance, earlier findings on modifications of SD responding to soil water deficits have been contradictory. Some studies reported that SD increases in response to soil water deficit (e.g. Elias, 1995, Franks et al., 2009, Fraser et al., 2009), while others observed an opposite effect (e.g. Quarrie and Jones, 1979, Silva et al., 2009). It seems that the response of SS and SD to soil water deficits depending on the degree of severity of the stress, and SD increases when the stress is moderate, and after reaching a threshold level of soil water deficit, SD decreases as the stress becomes severer (Xu and Zhou, 2008). Moreover, studies have documented that the effects of soil water status on SS and SD are interactively influenced by soil nitrogen (N) (Yan et al., 2012) or phosphorus (P) (Sekiya and Yano, 2008), underpinning the complexity in the regulation of stomatal morphology by soil water and nutrient status. Nonetheless, both studies have shown that SD is negatively correlated with Δ13C of the leaves (Sekiya and Yano, 2008, Yan et al., 2012), indicating that SD is closely associated with the optimization of leaf gas exchange, such that a maximal water use efficiency (WUE) is obtained according to the availability of water and nutrient in the soil. Collectively, it is clear that both water and nutrient status in the soil may influence the stomatal morphology thereby affecting WUE.

Considering freshwater resources become scarcer in many places in the world, research on water saving irrigation strategies such as alternate partial root-zone drying (PRD) irrigation and deficit irrigation (DI) has received increased attention (Yan et al., 2012). DI is a method that irrigates the entire root zone with an amount of water less than the potential evapotranspiration, and the minor stress that develops has minimal effects on the yield (English and Raja, 1996). PRD is a further refinement of DI; it involves irrigating only part of the root zone, leaving the other part to dry to a predetermined level before the next irrigation (Davies et al., 2002). Both DI and PRD allow the induction of the abscisic acid (ABA)-based root-to-shoot chemical signals to regulate plant growth and water use hereby improving WUE (Sun et al., 2013). Distinct effects on gs and WUE between the two irrigation regimes have frequently been noticed; however, it remains unknown whether different irrigation in combination with P-fertilization regimes affect stomatal morphologic characteristics in plants, and its implications in modulating crop WUE.

In the present study, potato plants were grown in split-root pots and the effects of different irrigation regimes and P-fertilization rates on SS and SD of the fully expanded upper canopy leaves were investigated. The objective was to analyse the associations between leaf physiochemical characteristics and stomatal morphology, which will be helpful in understanding the mechanisms by which changes of soil water and nutrient environments modify SS and SD in potatoes.

Section snippets

Experimental setup

The experiment was conducted from May to July 2012 in a glasshouse located at the experimental farm of the Faculty of Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Taastrup, Denmark. Potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) plants were grown in 4 L pots (15.2 cm in diameter and 25 cm in depth). The pots were filled with 5.6 kg of soil with a bulk density of 1.4 g dry weight cm−3. The soil was classified as sandy loam, having a pH of 6.7, total C 12.0 g kg−1, total N 1.2 g kg−1, available P 22 mg kg−1(water-soluble P), and a

Soil water dynamics

Fig. 1 shows the daily changes of volumetric soil water content (%, vol.) in the pots during the whole period of the irrigation treatments as monitored by the TDR. As there was no significant difference in water use between the P0 and P1 plants, here only the effect of the irrigation treatments on soil water dynamics is presented. It can be seen that, the soil water content was ca. 20% for the FI plants and ca. 14% for the DI plants during most period of the experiment. For the PRD plants, in

Discussion

In the present study, the results showed that both SS and SD of potato leaves were significantly affected by the irrigation regimes but not by the P fertilization treatments. As has been mentioned previously, change of stomatal morphology by varying soil water status has been frequently observed, though the results were controversial among plant species and across different experimental conditions (Franks et al., 2009, Silva et al., 2009, Yan et al., 2012). Here, it was found that soil water

Acknowledgement

Yanqi Sun thanks the financial support by the Chinese Scholar Centre (CSC) during her Ph.D. study at University of Copenhagen. Thanks also go to China Postdoctoral Science Foundation Grant (2014M550812) for financial support during manuscript preparation. Technical assistant by Jens Bertelsen, Lene Korsholm Jørgensen, and Birgitte Boje Rasmussen is gratefully acknowledged.

References (42)

  • P.L. Drake et al.

    Smaller, faster stomata: scaling of stomatal size, rate of response, and stomatal conductance

    J Exp Bot

    (2013)
  • P. Elias

    Stomata density and size of apple-trees growing under irrigated and nonirrigated conditions

    Biologia (Bratisl)

    (1995)
  • G.D. Farquhar et al.

    Carbon isotope discrimination and photosynthesis

    Ann Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol

    (1989)
  • P.J. Franks et al.

    Plasticity in maximum stomatal conductance constrained by negative correlation between stomatal size and density: an analysis using Eucalyptus globulus

    Plant Cell Environ

    (2009)
  • P.J. Franks et al.

    The effect of exogenous abscisic acid on stomatal development, stomatal mechanics, and leaf gas exchange in Tradescantia virginiana

    Plant Physiol

    (2001)
  • L.H. Fraser et al.

    Adaptive phenotypic plasticity of Pseudoroegneria spicata: response of stomatal density, leaf area and biomass to changes in water supply and increased temperature

    Ann Bot

    (2009)
  • J. Galmés et al.

    Water relations and stomatal characteristics of Mediterranean plants with different growth forms and leaf habits: responses to water stress and recovery

    Plant Soil

    (2007)
  • J. Galmés et al.

    Leaf responses to drought stress in Mediterranean accessions of Solanum lycopersicum: anatomical adaptations in relation to gas exchange parameters

    Plant Cell Environ

    (2013)
  • A.M. Hetherington et al.

    The role of stomata in sensing and driving environmental change

    Nature

    (2003)
  • T.H. Kim et al.

    Guard cell signal transduction network: advances in understanding abscisic acid, CO2, and Ca2+signaling

    Ann Rev Plant Biol

    (2010)
  • J.A. Lake et al.

    Signals from mature to new leaves

    Nature

    (2001)
  • Cited by (70)

    • Review on Partial Root-zone Drying irrigation: Impact on crop yield, soil and water pollution

      2022, Agricultural Water Management
      Citation Excerpt :

      In a study done on potato, leaves in the PRD treatment had smaller stomata and lower stomatal density compared to those in the DI treatment, which is due to the modulation of stomatal morphology by the PRD treatment, to effectively reduce transpiration rates and conserve plant water (Yan et al., 2012). Also on potato, Sun et al. (2014) found that PRD plants had smaller and denser stomata compared to FI and DI, which could have allowed the plants to optimize leaf gas exchange and lead to improved WUE. The mechanism responsible for the stomatal opening is based on the accumulation in particular of potassium, anions (chloride, malate) and sucrose at the level of the guard cells (Belin, 2006).

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text