Pre-clinical whole-body fluorescence imaging: Review of instruments, methods and applications

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jphotobiol.2009.11.007Get rights and content

Abstract

Fluorescence sampling of cellular function is widely used in all aspects of biology, allowing the visualization of cellular and sub-cellular biological processes with spatial resolutions in the range from nanometers up to centimeters. Imaging of fluorescence in vivo has become the most commonly used radiological tool in all pre-clinical work. In the last decade, full-body pre-clinical imaging systems have emerged with a wide range of utilities and niche application areas. The range of fluorescent probes that can be excited in the visible to near-infrared part of the electromagnetic spectrum continues to expand, with the most value for in vivo use being beyond the 630 nm wavelength, because the absorption of light sharply decreases. Whole-body in vivo fluorescence imaging has not yet reached a state of maturity that allows its routine use in the scope of large-scale pre-clinical studies. This is in part due to an incomplete understanding of what the actual fundamental capabilities and limitations of this imaging modality are. However, progress is continuously being made in research laboratories pushing the limits of the approach to consistently improve its performance in terms of spatial resolution, sensitivity and quantification. This paper reviews this imaging technology with a particular emphasis on its potential uses and limitations, the required instrumentation, and the possible imaging geometries and applications. A detailed account of the main commercially available systems is provided as well as some perspective relating to the future of the technology development. Although the vast majority of applications of in vivo small animal imaging are based on epi-illumination planar imaging, the future success of the method relies heavily on the design of novel imaging systems based on state-of-the-art optical technology used in conjunction with high spatial resolution structural modalities such as MRI, CT or ultrasound.

Introduction

Many researchers in the biological sciences appreciate the extraordinary contrast and specificity provided by fluorescence microscopy. Extrapolating this imaging paradigm to whole-body animal imaging is enticing. However, the physical realities associated with imaging in live tissue make this a continuously elusive objective, as will be evidenced in this review paper. Nevertheless, the information derived from in vivo fluorescence imaging systems can be regarded as an important complement to microscopy studies performed on cell cultures and tissue slices because it provides information about specific biological processes in fully integrated living systems1. Fig. 1 illustrates the salient differences between in vitro, ex vivo and in vivo fluorescence from biological applications relating to brain imaging. Though in essence the underlying technological and biological principles appear to be the same, imaging in each of these regimes imposes unique challenges requiring significantly different approaches to system design.

In this review paper, the basic principles of imaging fluorescence in living tissue is described, together with the practical challenges in designing, implementing, and assessing these systems. Methods available to overcome some challenges using advanced imaging system designs are discussed and an appreciation of the importance and challenges relating to modeling light propagation in tissue is provided. Perhaps most important is to realize that there is an intrinsic limit on the biological information that can be extracted from even the most carefully designed in vivo imaging instrument. Understanding these limitations is critical for researchers in the biological sciences wanting to use custom or commercial in vivo systems in the scope of their research. If, at the onset of research planning, the intrinsic limitations do not interfere with investigational endpoints, a choice must be made among several technological offerings. This paper will help to guide these choices for systems currently available commercially and in research laboratories.

The paper is divided into several sections covering the fundamentals of fluorescence imaging through advanced technology topics. Section 2 discusses the intrinsic limitations of whole-body imaging. These limitations relate to the interaction of light with microscopic tissue components as well as with the specificity and sensitivity of the contrast that can currently be generated in living animals. A description is also provided for the different types of imaging technologies that can be used for in vivo imaging emphasizing which biochemical fluorophore properties can be extracted from each. This is followed by a more detailed description of the various hardware components required in whole-body fluorescence imaging, including state-of-the-art illumination and light detection technology. This section concludes with a description of the various imaging geometries that can be used to perform in vivo small animal imaging. Section 3, consists of an extensive survey of the main commercial systems available on the market. This is presented in parallel with a discussion of salient features of in vivo fluorescence imaging in terms of resolution, sensitivity and quantification. Section 4 reviews recent publications where in vivo fluorescence imaging has been used to study certain biological phenomena. Finally, the paper concludes with a Section 5 reviewing the research done in laboratories to improve the capabilities of in vivo fluorescence imaging.

Section snippets

Intrinsic limitations

In considering the potential use of in vivo fluorescence imaging in biological studies, there are intrinsic limitations researchers should probably consider. In part, these limitations relate to the interaction of light with microscopic components of tissue. Also, consideration must be given to difficulties insuring that biomarkers of interest are associated with a detectable level of optical contrast and that the origin of the latter is specific enough to deliver useful objective information.

Results: survey of commercially available systems

This section is focused on the general applications and performance issues relevant for researchers desiring to acquire or build a whole-body in vivo imaging system. As described earlier in this review, there is a variety of important factors that should be used to guide choices for in vivo imaging. The main categories for these factors are: (1) the targeted biological information, (2) the basic instrumentation and data types to be obtained, and (3) the imaging geometry. Specifically, this

Applications

Whole-animal fluorescence imaging has found widespread use in pre-clinical studies of disease progression and pathology, response to therapy, receptor-targeted applications and probe development. An organ system overview of recent developments and applications of in vivo whole-body fluorescence imaging is presented below.

Discussion

Whole-body in vivo fluorescence imaging is evolving, and may likely never reach a steady state, as the applications and technological opportunities continue to drive this evolution. There is a dynamic community of scientists involved in development of innovative approaches to improve and characterize these modalities beyond what has been achieved thus far, and as discoveries are made, the equipment and applications will advance. This research is pursued with the goal of understanding and

Disclaimer

Authors F. Leblond and B. W. Pogue have been consultants for ART Inc in the past, one of the suppliers of an imaging system reviewed in this paper.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) through Award Number K25CA138578 and Grant Numbers RO1CA109558 and RO1CA120368 from the National Cancer Institute (NCI). The authors would like to extend their gratitude to the companies (ART Advanced Research Technologies, Berthold Technologies, Caliper Life Sciences, CRi, Carestream Health, LI-COR Biosciences, UVP and VisEn Medical) who provided the images shown in Fig. 5, as well as most of the information compiled in Table 1

References (178)

  • Y. Hama

    Targeted optical imaging of cancer cells using lectin-binding BODIPY conjugated avidin

    Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.

    (2006)
  • D.R. Vera

    Cy5.5-DTPA-galactosyl-dextran: a fluorescent probe for in vivo measurement of receptor biochemistry

    Nucl. Med. Biol.

    (2005)
  • Y. Koyama

    In vivo molecular imaging to diagnose and subtype tumors through receptor-targeted optically labeled monoclonal antibodies

    Neoplasia

    (2007)
  • E.G. Duysen et al.

    Whole body and tissue imaging of the butyrylcholinesterase knockout mouse injected with near infrared dye labeled butyrylcholinesterase

    Chem. Biol. Interact.

    (2008)
  • S.L. Jacques et al.

    Tuturial on diffuse light transport

    J. Biomed. Opt.

    (2008)
  • J. Swartling

    Fluorescence spectra provide information on the depth of fluorescent lesions in tissue

    Appl. Opt.

    (2005)
  • S.C. Davis

    Contrast-detail analysis characterizes diffuse optical fluorescence tomography image reconstruction

    J. Biomed. Opt.

    (2005)
  • G.A. Wagnieres et al.

    In vivo fluorescence spectroscopy and imaging for oncological applications

    Photochem. Photobiol.

    (1998)
  • J.R. Mansfield

    Autofluorescence removal, multiplexing, and automated analysis methods for in-vivo fluorescence imaging

    J. Biomed. Opt.

    (2005)
  • S.C. Davis

    Image guided diffuse optical fluorescence tomography implemented with Laplacian-type regularization

    Opt. Express

    (2007)
  • E.M.C. Hillman et al.

    All-optical anatomical co-registration for molecular imaging of small animals using dynamic contrast

    Nat. Photon.

    (2007)
  • R. Richards-Kortum et al.

    Quantitative optical spectroscopy for tissue diagnosis

    Ann. Rev. Phys. Chem.

    (1996)
  • S.L. Jacques et al.

    Tutorial on diffuse light transport

    J. Biomed. Opt.

    (2008)
  • B.W. Pogue et al.

    Fluorescence imaging in vivo: raster scanned point-source imaging provides more accurate quantification than broad beam geometries

    Tech. Cancer Res. Treat.

    (2004)
  • B.W. Pogue et al.

    Fiber optic bundle design for quantitative fluorescence measurement from tissue

    Appl. Opt.

    (1998)
  • A. Soubret et al.

    Accuracy of fluorescent tomography in the presence of heterogeneities: study of the normalized born ratio

    IEEE Trans. Med. Imag.

    (2005)
  • M. Sinaasappel et al.

    Quantification of the hematoporphyrin derivative by fluorescence measurement using dual-wavelength excitation and dual-wavelength detection

    Appl. Opt.

    (1993)
  • E.M. Hillman et al.

    All-optical anatomical co-registration for molecular imaging of small animals using dynamic contrast

    Nat. Photon.

    (2007)
  • M. Takeda et al.

    Fourier transform profilometry for the automatic measurement of 3-D object shapes

    Appl. Opt.

    (1983)
  • V. Ntziachristos

    Fluorescence molecular tomography resolves protease activity in vivo

    Nat. Med.

    (2002)
  • S.L. Gibbs-Strauss

    Noninvasive measurement of aminolevulinic acid-induced protoporphyrin IX fluorescence allowing detection of murine glioma in vivo

    J. Biomed. Opt.

    (2009)
  • M. Veiseh

    Tumor paint: a chlorotoxin:Cy5.5 bioconjugate for intraoperative visualization of cancer foci

    Cancer Res.

    (2007)
  • M. Hintersteiner

    In vivo detection of amyloid-beta deposits by near-infrared imaging using an oxazine-derivative probe

    Nat. Biotechnol.

    (2005)
  • Q. Wang

    Visualizing localized dynamic changes during epileptic seizure onset in vivo with diffuse optical tomography

    Med. Phys.

    (2008)
  • J. Klohs

    In vivo imaging of the inflammatory receptor CD40 after cerebral ischemia using a fluorescent antibody

    Stroke

    (2008)
  • J. Klohs

    In vivo near-infrared fluorescence imaging of matrix metalloproteinase activity after cerebral ischemia

    J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab.

    (2009)
  • J.O. Deguchi

    Inflammation in atherosclerosis: visualizing matrix metalloproteinase action in macrophages in vivo

    Circulation

    (2006)
  • J. Chen

    In vivo imaging of proteolytic activity in atherosclerosis

    Circulation

    (2002)
  • M. Nahrendorf

    Nanoparticle PET–CT imaging of macrophages in inflammatory atherosclerosis

    Circulation

    (2008)
  • D.E. Sosnovik

    Fluorescence tomography and magnetic resonance imaging of myocardial macrophage infiltration in infarcted myocardium in vivo

    Circulation

    (2007)
  • D.E. Sosnovik

    Fluorescence tomography and magnetic resonance imaging of myocardial macrophage infiltration in infarcted myocardium in vivo

    Circulation

    (2007)
  • M. Nahrendorf

    Dual channel optical tomographic imaging of leukocyte recruitment and protease activity in the healing myocardial infarct

    Circ. Res.

    (2007)
  • Y. Urano

    Selective molecular imaging of viable cancer cells with pH-activatable fluorescence probes

    Nat. Med.

    (2009)
  • J. Haller

    Visualization of pulmonary inflammation using noninvasive fluorescence molecular imaging

    J. Appl. Physiol.

    (2008)
  • J. Grimm

    Use of gene expression profiling to direct in vivo molecular imaging of lung cancer

    Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA

    (2005)
  • A. Koenig

    In vivo mice lung tumor follow-up with fluorescence diffuse optical tomography

    J. Biomed. Opt.

    (2008)
  • J. Grimm

    Use of gene expression profiling to direct in vivo molecular imaging of lung cancer

    PNAS

    (2005)
  • V. Cortez-Retamozo

    Real-time assessment of inflammation and treatment response in a mouse model of allergic airway inflammation

    J. Clin. Invest.

    (2008)
  • X. Montet

    Tomographic fluorescence imaging of tumor vascular volume in mice

    Radiology

    (2007)
  • J. von Burstin

    Highly sensitive detection of early-stage pancreatic cancer by multimodal near-infrared molecular imaging in living mice

    Int. J. Cancer.

    (2008)
  • Cited by (514)

    • Nanomaterials in theranostics

      2024, Handbook of Nanomaterials, Volume 2: Biomedicine, Environment, Food, and Agriculture
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text