Elsevier

The Journal of Pediatrics

Volume 204, January 2019, Pages 59-65.e3
The Journal of Pediatrics

Original Articles
All Aboard Meal Train: Can Child-Friendly Menu Labeling Promote Healthier Choices in Hospitals?

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpeds.2018.08.073Get rights and content

Objective

To evaluate patient meal orders and consumption with a revised menu design that includes child-friendly labeling.

Study design

A randomized controlled trial among hospitalized children was performed over a 1-month period comparing the control menu layout and the intervention menu. The intervention menu contained the same choices but was labeled to encourage healthy eating. Children on a specialized diet, receiving parenteral nutrition, or age <2 years were excluded.

Results

A total of 163 patients (81 males) were included, with a mean age of 9.9 ± 5.1 year, and a mean weight z-score of −0.08 ± 1.3. Children receiving the intervention ordered more “green-light” healthy choices and fewer “red-light” items, with 0.65 lower odds of selecting a red-light item (95% CI, 0.55-0.76) and 1.75 higher odds of selecting a green-light item (95% CI, 1.49-2.04), both at the first meal, but with effects waning over time. There were trends toward increased intake of fruits and vegetables and decreased intake of “foods to limit”, but no impact on the consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages. Both intervention and control group consumed their meals in equal proportions.

Conclusions

The combination of menu labeling techniques targeted to children in the inpatient hospital setting was an effective short-term tool for increasing the intake of healthier foods, although the effect of labeling waned over time.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02692001.

Section snippets

Methods

A review of the literature was undertaken using the PubMed, Google Scholar, MEDLINE, and CINAHL databases to identify menu labeling interventions targeted at children, adolescents, and their parents. Interventions that included a traffic light system, attractive characters, and fun descriptive names are most successful at being noticed, influencing behavior, and promoting perceived healthiness of the selected food items.14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20 They raise awareness of the food and appeal to

Results

The study cohort comprised 163 patients (81 males) with a mean age of 9.9 ± 5.1 years and a mean weight-for-age z-score of −0.08 ± 1.3 (Table I). A CONSORT diagram of the study design is provided (Figure 2; available at www.jpeds.com).

Discussion

Our findings in this study show a significantly higher odds of ordering green-light healthier option foods and lower odds of ordering red-light foods when exposed to child-friendly menu labeling. This effect waned over time, such that after 8 meals, proportions of red-light and green-light choices were similar with both menus. There was also variation in the servings of red and green choices made at different meals, with breakfast showing a higher proportion of both red and green orders

References (33)

  • J.S. Savage et al.

    Parental influence on eating behavior: conception to adolescence

    J Law Med Ethics

    (2007)
  • K. Roberts et al.

    Overweight and obesity in children and adolescents: results from the 2009 to 2011 Canadian health measures survey

  • C.M. McDonald et al.

    Nutrition and exercise environment available to outpatients, visitors, and staff in children's hospitals in Canada and the United States

    Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med

    (2006)
  • P., Cram et al.

    Fast food franchises in hospitals

    JAMA

    (2002)
  • T. Kuo et al.

    Menu labeling as a potential strategy for combating the obesity epidemic: a health impact assessment

    Am J Public Health

    (2009)
  • A.C. Fernandes et al.

    Influence of menu labeling on food choices in real-life settings: a systematic review

    Nutr Rev

    (2016)
  • Supported by the Fraser Mustard Institute/Center for Healthy Active Kids Catalyst Seed Grant. S.B. received support from a Canadian Pediatric Endocrine Group Fellowship Award. J.H. receives unrestricted research funds from the Mead Johnson Chair in Child Nutritional Science. The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

    View full text