Short communication
Development of a sensitive LC–MS/MS method for quantification of coniferyl ferulate and its metabolite coniferyl alcohol in rat plasma: Application to a pharmacokinetic study

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpba.2017.08.033Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Coniferyl ferulate and its metabolite coniferyl alcohol were simultaneously determined.

  • Method validation procedures were in accordance with EMA regulations.

  • It was successfully applied to the pharmacokinetic study in rats.

Abstract

A rapid and simple LC–MS/MS method was developed and validated for the simultaneous determination of coniferyl ferulate (CF) and its metabolite coniferyl alcohol (CA) using bavachromene as an internal standard (IS). A TSQ Quantum Access mass spectrometer was operated under selected-reaction monitoring mode using negative electrospray ionization. Extraction with ether was used in sample preparation. The plasma samples were prepared and then chromatographed on a Phenomenex Luna C18 column (2.1 mm × 50 mm, 1.7 μm; Torrance, USA) at 35 °C, using acetonitrile: water (65:35, v/v) in an isocratic mode at a flow rate of 0.3 mL/min. Method validation was performed as per the FDA guidelines and calibration curves showed good linearity over the concentration range of 2.5–1000 ng/mL for both CF and CA. The intra- and inter-day precision and accuracy were within the acceptable limits. The developed assay was successfully applied to a pharmacokinetic study of CA in rats.

Introduction

Coniferyl ferulate (CF, see Fig. 1) was isolated from Levisticum officinale, Angelica sinensis, and Ligusticum chuanxiong [1], [2]. These herbal medicines have long been used as traditional Chinese medicines for the treatment of female irregular menstruation, amenorrhea rheumatic arthralgia, menstrual disorders, and swelling pain [3], [4]. The compound CF exhibits multiple pharmacological activities such as antibacterial [5], antioxidant [6], anticancer [7], [8], and vasodilating effects [9]. Moreover, CF could significantly inhibit CCl4-induced hepatic fibrosis in mice, which mediated through inhibiting TGF-β signaling pathway [10]. Clearly, it is of interest to further evaluate the medicinal potential of cf. There are just a few reports that separated and determined CF from Angelica sinensis and Ligusticum chuanxiong by HPLC methods [11], [12], [13], but these methods were not available for the pharmacokinetic application because of low sensitivity and poor selectivity. In this study, we established a rapid and simple LC–MS/MS method for simultaneous determination of CF and its active metabolite coniferyl alcohol (CA) in rat plasma, and it was successfully applied to the pharmacokinetic study of CF.

Section snippets

Chemicals and reagents

Standards of CF and bavachromene used as an internal standard (IS) were purchased from the Chengdu Biopurify Phytochemicals Ltd. (Chengdu, China). Standard of CA was obtained from Baoji Chengguang Biotechnology Co. Ltd. (Baoji, China). LC-grade acetonitrile was obtained from Honeywell Burdick & Jackson (Ulsan, Korea). Ultra-pure water was prepared by a Millipore Milli-Q purification system (Bedford, MA, USA). All other reagents were of analytical grade.

LC–MS/MS conditions

The LC–MS/MS system consisted of the

Optimization of LC–MS/MS conditions

Both negative and positive ESI modes were carried out in this study to obtain stronger intense signal and lower background noise. For analytes and IS, higher response was made in the negative mode than in the positive mode. Thus, the ion source was selected in the negative mode during the analytical procedure. The predominately SRM transitions m/z 355.1  193.0 for CF, m/z 179.2  146.0 for CA, and m/z 323.1  203.0 for the IS were selected for quantitative analysis. The product ion spectra of

Conclusions

A sensitive LC–MS/MS method was developed to simultaneously determine the concentrations of CF and CA after intravenous administration of CF in rats. All of the method validation procedures were in accordance with EMA regulations for the validation of bioanalytical methods. And this method was successfully applied to the pharmacokinetic study in rats after intravenous administration of CF.

References (14)

  • J. Huang et al.

    Anti-inflammatory ligustilides from Ligusticum chuanxiong hort

    Fitoterapia

    (2013)
  • W.L. Wei et al.

    Angelica sinensis in China–a review of botanical profile, ethnopharmacology, phytochemistry and chemical analysis

    J. Ethnopharmacol.

    (2016)
  • J.J. Xie et al.

    Optimization and comparison of five methods for extraction of coniferyl ferulate from Angelica sinensis

    Molecules

    (2009)
  • L.C. Hu et al.

    Optimization of supercritical fluid extraction of bioactive components in Ligusticum chuanxiong by orthogonal array design

    Chin. J. Chin. Mater. Med.

    (2013)
  • S.C. Chou et al.

    Antibacterial activity of components from Lomatium californicum

    Phytother. Res.

    (2006)
  • S.Y. Li et al.

    Identification of antioxidants in essential oil of Radix Angelicae sinensis using HPLC coupled with DAD-MS and ABTS-based assay

    J. Agric. Food. Chem.

    (2007)
  • H.F. Zou, L. Kong, N.H. Sun, L.H. Wu, X.G. Chen, Use of coniferyl ferulate in anticancer medicine China Patent No....
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (3)

  • Plant genetic diversity by DNA barcoding to investigate propolis origin

    2022, Phytochemistry
    Citation Excerpt :

    Both compounds were confirmed by comparison with the exact mass and MS/MS fragmentation pattern from the literature (Xu et al., 2019). The dehydroabietic acid (m/z at 299) was identified and confirmed in all propolis produced in General Carneiro by the specific fragment ions formed at m/z 299 and 300 (Dai et al., 2017; MoNA, 2021). Some compounds were identified in all propolis: pinusenocarp (m/z at 291) and some isomers of the diterpenes dihydroagathic acid (m/z at 335), agathic acid (m/z at 333), dihydroxydehydroabietic acid (m/z at 331), hydroxydehydroabietic acid (m/z at 315), hydroxyisopimaric acid (m/z at 317) and cupressic acid (m/z at 319).

1

These authors contributed equally to this work.

View full text