Basic Research
Accuracy of 3-dimensional–printed Endodontic Surgical Guide: A Human Cadaver Study

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2019.02.005Get rights and content

Highlights

  • The accuracy of cone-beam computed tomographic (CBCT)-designed surgical guides for use during endodontic surgery was evaluated using human cadaver jaws.

  • CBCT-designed surgical guides facilitate access to the apices of the roots for endodontic surgery.

  • Using a CBCT-designed printed surgical guide is a more accurate method for access to the apical portion of the root during surgical endodontics compared with a “freehand” CBCT-approximated method.

Abstract

Introduction

Cone-beam computed tomographic (CBCT)-based 3-dimensional–printed surgical guides, such as those used in implant placement and orofacial surgery, allow for accurate planning and performance of surgical procedures. The objective of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of CBCT-designed surgical guides for use during endodontic surgery.

Methods

A split-mouth design was conducted using 48 roots in a cadaver model. In the experimental group, using information from the preoperative CBCT scans and digital impressions, surgical guides were designed using Blue Sky Bio (Grayslake, IL) planning software and printed using a Form 2 3-dimensional printer (Formlabs, Somerville, MA). The guides were designed to allow for surgical access at 3 mm from the apex of each root with depth control to the lingual or palatal surface of the root. In the control group, surgical access was completed “freehand” by visually approximating measurements from the CBCT scan only. The planned and postoperative CBCT images were superimposed, and the deviation of the surgical access point from the planned target was measured using Invivo software (Anatomage, San Jose, CA). A 2-tailed t test and the Fisher exact test were conducted to compare the deviation in the experimental CBCT-guided group versus the control CBCT-approximated freehand group.

Results

The mean deviation for the guided group (1.743 mm) was significantly less than that of the approximated freehand group (2.638 mm, P < .001). Only in 11 of the 24 samples of the control group was surgical access considered clinically successful (within the apical area of the root), whereas all 24 of the experimental samples were considered clinically successful.

Conclusions

Using a CBCT-designed printed surgical guide is a more accurate method for access to the apical portion of the root during surgical endodontics compared with a “freehand” CBCT-approximated method.

Section snippets

Materials and Methods

Two embalmed cadaver heads were obtained from the Willed Body Program, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX. The use of cadaveric materials follows the regulations of the Anatomical Board of the State of Texas. From these specimens, 48 roots were included in the study (24 roots/group). In a split-mouth design, right or left sides of cadaver maxillae or mandibles were randomly selected as control versus experimental specimens. Palatal roots of the maxillary molars were

Results

The distance (in millimeters) between the root apex and the nearest point of the drill path was collected as the outcome. The mean and standard deviations for the control and treatment groups are presented in Table 1. The following group comparison was performed using a 2-tailed t test with unequal variances. The resulting statistic was t35.407 = −3.6212 and P = .0009. Thus, the mean distances between the planned and the actual paths in the control and treatment groups were statistically

Discussion

Accuracy in endodontic surgery is important, especially when roots approximate vital structures. In a prospective clinical study by Song et al (17), they found that anterior, premolar, and molar teeth had significantly different success rates after microsurgery. They also found a significant difference between the maxillary and mandibular teeth groups. They concluded that the decreased success rates in the mandibular anterior and molar teeth compared with the maxillary anterior teeth may be

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Chris Gonzales, prosthodontic resident from the prosthodontic department at Texas A&M College of Dentistry for his help with photography; Jennifer M. Gonzalez, Vanessa Martinez, and Roxanne R. Edwards from the radiology department at Texas A&M College of Dentistry for their help with the iCAT scans; Bethany S. Wright from the Department of Biomedical Sciences at Texas A&M College of Dentistry for her help in preparing the specimens; and Anatomage (San Jose, CA) for

Cited by (36)

  • A Novel Simplified Workflow for Guided Endodontic Surgery in Mandibular Molars With a Thick Buccal Bone Plate: A Case Report

    2022, Journal of Endodontics
    Citation Excerpt :

    Three-dimensional–printed guides have been widely applied in endodontics, and several studies regarding this issue are currently available20. Many authors18,19,21,22 reported the applications of these prototyped guides in different apical surgery situations. Specifically, regarding mandibular molars, different authors demonstrated the advantages of using a 3D-printed guide in patients with a thick buccal bone plate, allowing both precision and safety for accessing the apex15,23,24.

  • Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma Mimicking Endodontic Lesion: A Case Report with 3-dimensional Analysis, Segmentation, and Printing

    2021, Journal of Endodontics
    Citation Excerpt :

    Over the past few years, CBCT imaging has become an integral part of modern endodontic practice. CBCT imaging is now used as a complementary tool to better diagnose endodontic disease and to plan for nonsurgical root canal treatments16, retreatments17, and endodontic surgeries18. CBCT imaging improves our understanding about the internal and external anatomy of the teeth16,19,20, the location and extension of resorptions and perforations21, and the location and extension of radiolucent lesions22,23.

View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text