Laboratory Study
Slope analysis of somatosensory evoked potentials in spinal cord injury for detecting contusion injury and focal demyelination

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocn.2010.02.005Get rights and content

Abstract

In spinal cord injury (SCI) research there is a need for reliable measures to determine the extent of injury and assess progress due to natural recovery, drug therapy, surgical intervention or rehabilitation. Somatosensory evoked potentials (SEP) can be used to quantitatively examine the functionality of the ascending sensory pathways in the spinal cord. A reduction of more than 50% in peak amplitude or an increase of more than 10% in latency are threshold indicators of injury. However, in the context of injury, SEP peaks are often obscured by noise. We have developed a new technique to investigate the morphology of the SEP waveform, rather than focusing on a small number of peaks. In this study, we compare SEP signals before and after SCI using two rat models: a contusion injury model and a focal experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis model. Based on mean slope changes over the signal, we were able to effectively differentiate pre-injury and post-injury SEP values with high levels of sensitivity (83.3%) and specificity (79.2%).

Introduction

Based on an average annual incidence of approximately 40 cases per million people in the United States, it is estimated that more than 12 000 people survive a spinal cord injury (SCI) each year.1 Around 258 000 people in the United States are reportedly living with the devastating effects of an SCI.1 On the basis of etiology, there are two general types of SCI: traumatic (due to blunt mechanical impact) and non-traumatic (due to vascular, ischemic or neoplastic causes, or immunological disorders). Traumatic SCI accounts for nearly 60% of all injuries to the spinal cord.2

The number of spared axonal fibers and the degree to which they are demyelinated play important roles in determining the residual functionality present after SCI. “Anatomically incomplete” injuries are those in which a number of spared but demyelinated axons remain intact across the lesion, without electrophysiological responses.[3], [4], [5], [6] Even a small number of spared fibers remaining after SCI can greatly improve the quality of life of SCI patients. Development of therapeutic strategies to reduce secondary injury, and to remyelinate spared, demyelinated axons has generated considerable interest in the past.[7], [8], [9] When evaluating any therapeutic approach for SCI, a suitable SCI animal model and reliable monitoring measures are essential, to allow calibration of the severity of the SCI and monitoring of the progress of injury and extent of recovery.[10], [11]

A popular animal model of SCI for blunt contusion injuries is a rat model with injury induced using the New York University (NYU) impactor,12 which is known to reliably emulate the pathophysiology seen in humans after SCI.13 In this model, some neuronal tissue remains intact along the periphery of the primary site of injury,13 similar to the situation in humans after blunt injury.3

A chemically mediated SCI model is a targeted approach to simulate specific aspects of SCI-like demyelination, inflammation, ischemia or immunological disorders.14 A focal demyelinating lesion can be induced in the spinal cord of the rat experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE) model by administering inflammatory factors directly into the spinal cord of the immunized rat.15 This model is analogous to the human paralyzing disorder transverse myelitis, which often arises idiopathically or in association with multiple sclerosis.

Various outcome measures for animal models can be used to assess changes due to endogenous recovery, drug therapy, surgical intervention or rehabilitation. Behavioral tests can be used to examine functional recovery in laboratory animals after SCI; however, such tests are often subjective. In contrast, electrophysiological techniques present an objective means for quantitative, non-invasive, accurate assessment of the integrity of neural pathways. Somatosensory evoked potential (SEP) is the electrophysiological response of the nervous system to electrical stimulation of a peripheral nerve. SEPs can be used to examine the functionality of the ascending sensory pathways, and allow longitudinal measurements. In a number of SCI studies, SEP values have been correlated with neurological deficit scores.[16], [17], [18], [19], [20], [21] Unfortunately, no detection standards exist for SEPs; however, a general rule for indicating possible tissue damage has been widely adopted: a reduction of more than 50% in peak and inter-peak amplitudes or an increase of more than 10% in latency with respect to baseline are considered indicative of significant likelihood of injury.[22], [23] However, peaks in the SEP waveform are often obscured by noise and may even be indistinguishable in some injuries. This necessitates human intervention for the detection of peaks, rendering the process subject to error and inter-observer variability. This problem prompted us to develop a new technique for quantifying the morphology of the SEP waveform as a whole, rather than just focusing on a few salient peaks.24 The technique is largely borrowed from shape analysis tools in the field of image processing.25

In this paper, we introduce the slope analysis technique for SEPs and present the results of our studies in two rodent SCI models (a contusion model and a focal EAE model).

Section snippets

Materials and methods

All experimental procedures were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Johns Hopkins University. Principles of laboratory animal care as outlined in the National Institutes of Health publication no. 85–23 (revised 1985) were followed.

Results

The averaged SEP signals for both pre-injury and post-injury stages in a single rat are shown in Fig. 1. The spinal cord was injured at T8, so only the hindlimb SEP signals are severely affected. There is a reduction in amplitude for both the right and left hindlimbs, accompanied by major broadening of peaks. However, no prominent effect of injury can be seen in the forelimb SEP signals.

Supplementary Fig. 2 shows examples of slope histograms and mean slope vectors for both pre-injury and

Discussion

Somatosensory evoked potentials can be used to reliably assess the integrity and functionality of the sensory pathways in the spinal cord. However, the peaks in these signals are not always discernible. For instance, the SEP flattens following severe SCI, resulting in especially indistinct peaks. This problem prompted us to develop a new technique that is not based on peak detection, and can be used to analyze the slope of the evoked potentials more reliably, without human intervention. The

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by the Maryland Stem Cell Research Fund (grants 2007-MSCRFII-0159-00 and 2009-MSCRFII-0091-00) and the Johns Hopkins Project RESTORE fund (Transverse Myelitis Research Project).

References (26)

  • B.A. Kakulas

    A review of the neuropathology of human spinal cord injury with emphasis on special features

    J Spinal Cord Med

    (1999)
  • J. Fawcett

    Repair of spinal cord injuries: where are we, where are we going?

    Spinal Cord

    (2002)
  • B.A. Kakulas

    Neuropathology: the foundation for new treatments in spinal cord injury

    Spinal Cord

    (2004)
  • Cited by (29)

    • Effect of thoracic spinal cord injury on forelimb somatosensory evoked potential

      2021, Brain Research Bulletin
      Citation Excerpt :

      In addition, the forelimb SSEPs could also be used to provide replacement for the baseline traces in longitudinal SCI monitoring, where the baseline recordings are absent, particularly in clinical cases (Al-Nashash et al., 2009, 2020). Novel forms of signal processing techniques such as linear modeling (Mir et al., 2015), shape analysis (Agrawal et al., 2009a, 2009b, 2009c), slope analysis (Agrawal et al., 2010a, 2010b), sparse modeling (Mir et al., 2017), spectral coherence (Al-Nashash et al., 2009), adaptive coherence (Sherman et al., 2010) and chirp modeling (Väyrynen et al., 2016) have empowered both physicians and scientists to use the SSEP signals for detecting even minuscule changes.These SSEP signals for ascending and Motor Evoked Potentials (MEPs) for descending neuropathways monitoring (Agrawal et al., 2009a, 2009b, 2009c; Iyer et al., 2010; Mir et al., 2011) are also employed to detect the onset of trauma, its progression (Agrawal et al., 2010a, 2010b) as well as endogenous and therapeutic recoveries such as stem cell replacement therapy (All et al., 2015, 2012; Kerr et al., 2010; Walczak et al., 2011) and neuroprotective hypothermia (Bazley, Pashai, et al., 2014; Vipin et al., 2015). Although it is known that a cervical SCI would cause changes in SSEP and MEP signals in both upper-limbs and lower-limbs, it is imperative to also investigate possible changes in the upper-limbs signals after thoracic SCI, where the trauma mainly envolves the lower-limbs neuropathways.

    • Characterization of transection spinal cord injuries by monitoring somatosensory evoked potentials and motor behavior

      2020, Brain Research Bulletin
      Citation Excerpt :

      Electroencephalography (EEG) and its many variants such as electrocorticography (ECoG), somatosensory evoked potential (SSEP), and magnetoencephalography (MEG) have been proven valuable for CNS assessment and monitoring. They have shown promise in evaluation and assessments of SCI as well (Rabbani et al., 2019; Al-Nashash et al., 2009; Agrawal et al., 2010a). SSEP is a clinical neuro-electrophysiological tool used to assess the onset and progress of neuronal injuries.

    • Development of a traumatic cervical dislocation spinal cord injury model with residual compression in the rat

      2019, Journal of Neuroscience Methods
      Citation Excerpt :

      The anesthetic typically used at our centre for survival surgeries is inhalational isoflurane, which is well documented to suppress SSEP signals (Kortelainen et al., 2014; Liu et al., 2005). Many of the most recent rat SCI studies have used ketamine (Agrawal et al., 2010, 2009; Cloud et al., 2012; Wang et al., 2008). However, the influence of ketamine on sensory and motor evoked potentials is dependent on the depth of anesthesia.

    • Neuroprotective assessment of prolonged local hypothermia post contusive spinal cord injury in rodent model

      2018, Spine Journal
      Citation Excerpt :

      Transcranial screw electrodes were connected to an amplifier for SSEP recording, and approximately 150 sweeps were recorded per limb. Our neuroelectrophysiology monitoring setup (RZ5 BioAmp Processor, Tucker-Davis Technologies, Alachua, FL) has also previously described in detail [2,18–22]. A baseline SSEP recording was taken for each rat before starting experimental procedures (laminectomy, contusion, or hypothermia induction).

    • Multi-limb acquisition of motor evoked potentials and its application in spinal cord injury

      2010, Journal of Neuroscience Methods
      Citation Excerpt :

      Carboxylate dental cement (Durelon Carboxylate Cement, 3M, ESPE, St. Paul, MN) was then used to hold the screw electrodes and the pedestal in place, securing them for long term stimulation of MEPs. The electrode implantation was done with high level of precision by an expert micro-surgeon with many years of experience of rat surgery with many publications (Dr. All) (Agrawal et al., 2009b, 2010a,b). Although the positional accuracy with respect to anatomy is hard to characterize, the reproducibility of our MEP signals across different animals and across different trials in a single animal, is indicative of this precision.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text