Clinical Study
A multivariate analysis of prognostic factors for health-related quality of life in patients with surgically managed meningioma

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocn.2009.07.111Get rights and content

Abstract

The objective of this study was to examine the prognostic significance of health-related quality of life (HQOL) parameters combined with baseline clinical factors in patients undergoing neurosurgery for treatment of meningioma. A total of 147 patients (61 male, 86 female; mean age 43 years, range 5–77 years) who underwent resection of a meningioma between January 2002 and December 2004 were studied. HQOL was evaluated using a modified questionnaire based on the World Health Organization Quality of Life-100 Scale and the Karnofsky Performance Scale. The relationships between HQOL and clinical history, radiological findings, extent of resection, histological grade and recurrence were investigated using multivariate analysis. The mean HQOL score was 73.94 ± 1.79 for preoperative patients with meningioma, 84.88 ± 2.14 for postoperative patients, and 91.13 ± 1.61 for healthy controls. HQOL for patients with meningioma was significantly lower than that for normal controls (P < 0.001), and postoperative patients had a more satisfactory HQOL than preoperative (P < 0.05). Cox proportional hazards analysis showed that significant predictors of health-related quality of life were tumor size, extent of surgical excision, and histologic grade. Multivariate backward logistic regression yielded the regression equation HQOL = 119.1097 – 1.5002X3 – 8.6650X6 – 10.4210X7 (R = 0.7466; where X3 is tumor size, X6 is extent of surgical excision, and X7 is the histologic grade of the tumor). This equation can be used preoperatively to predict the HQOL of meningioma patients after neurosurgery. A specialized HQOL questionnaire for patients with meningioma provides useful information when planning the operative procedure, and may make it more likely that patients have a satisfactory HQOL after surgery.

Introduction

Meningioma is a common brain tumor for which surgical excision is the often the treatment of choice. Survival rates for patients with meningioma have increased substantially in the past 30 years to the point where attention is now focused on the burdens of morbidity associated with the short- and long-term effects of treatment.1 Measurements of health status and health-related quality of life (HQOL) can make useful contributions in this regard.2 HQOL is a multidimensional construct covering the patient’s perception of the impact of disease and treatment on his or her function in various aspects of life, including the physical, psychological and social domains.[3], [4]

Baseline patient and disease characteristics are well-established predictors of outcome in tumor patients. In particular, baseline HQOL correlates with clinical outcome of tumor treatment, and parameters such as good global HQOL, good physical functioning, minimal pain, and minimal fatigue are predictors of better clinical outcome.[5], [6] Several groups have investigated the prognostic significance of baseline HQOL parameters and baseline clinical characteristics for clinical outcome.[7], [8], [9], [10] In these studies, a variety of unspecialized HQOL instruments were used to evaluate global HQOL after meningioma resection. However, it is not sufficient to describe the relationship between meningioma and HQOL in global terms. Rather, identification of preoperative factors influencing the HQOL of meningioma patients and development of a predictive equation for postoperative QOL would be more valuable.

Due to the many factors involved, and the complex interactions between them, postoperative HQOL in patients undergoing brain surgery is difficult to predict. Hence, using HQOL to assess the success of an operation and other relevant factors synthetically may be very useful. In a previous study, we assessed HQOL in patients with meningioma using the modified Quality of Life Questionnaire,11 a validated, comprehensive, multidimensional self-report instrument. We also determined the prognostic significance of HQOL parameters in the presence of predefined clinical prognostic factors for time-to-event endpoints (overall survival, time to progressive disease, and time to treatment failure). In the present study, we aimed to investigate the prognostic significance of HQOL for predicting postoperative outcome.

Unlike an epidemiologic study, we focused primarily on the clinical features of most concern to neurosurgeons, including inherent tumor characteristics and surgical factors. We wished to investigate the relationships among inherent, intervening (surgical) factors and the HQOL of patients, how they impact on HQOL, and how the HQOL of patients with meningioma can be evaluated and improved.

Section snippets

Subjects

This research project was approved by the institutional review boards of Nanjing Medical University and Shanghai Jiao Tong University. Consecutive patients treated over a period of 36 months at two hospitals in southeast China were assessed for suitability. A total of 165 patients who underwent meningioma surgery in the neurosurgery departments of Wuxi No. 2 Hospital (affiliated with Nanjing Medical University) and Renji Hospital (affiliated with the School of Medicine of Shanghai Jiao Tong

Results

The details of the HQOL questionnaire we developed for Chinese patients with brain tumors have been published elsewhere.11 The questionnaire contains four dimensions, namely physiological, psychological, satisfaction with medical care, and self-care items. Through trial and error, we have demonstrated the reliability and validity of this questionnaire, as well as its potential for clinical use.

Discussion

Since the 1990s, the HQOL of patients undergoing surgery has become a subject of great interest. HQOL is a multidimensional construct that is best measured using several different instruments. Internationally, factors that can seriously impair the HQOL of patients with brain tumors, such as fatigue, depression, cognitive impairment, and excessive daytime somnolence, are normally assessed using the KPS.[12], [13], [14] Although a small proportion of patients show significant improvement over the

Acknowledgments

The study was funded by grants from the Scientific Research Foundation of Nanjing Medical University (no. 2002-19) and Shanghai Science and Technology Committee (no. 074107019).

References (22)

  • W. Tirakotai et al.

    Peri-operative quality of life assessment in endoscopically treated patients with pineal region tumours

    Childs Nerv Syst

    (2007)
  • E. Wu et al.

    Assessment of health-related quality of life of adolescent cancer patients using the Minneapolis-Manchester quality of life adolescent questionnaire

    Pediatr Blood Cancer

    (2007)
  • M. Fluchel et al.

    Self and proxy-reported health status and health-related quality of life in survivors of childhood cancer in Uruguay

    Pediatr Blood Cancer

    (2007)
  • M.A. Landolt et al.

    Health-related quality of life in children with newly diagnosed cancer: a one year follow-up study

    Health Qual Life Outcomes

    (2006)
  • P.D. Brown et al.

    Prospective study of quality of life in adults with newly diagnosed high-grade gliomas

    J Neurooncol

    (2006)
  • D.F. Roychowdhury et al.

    Health-related quality-of-life parameters as independent prognostic factors in advanced or metastatic bladder cancer

    J Clin Oncol

    (2003)
  • D.V. Nieuwenhuizen et al.

    Differential effect of surgery and radiotherapy on neurocognitive functioning and health-related quality of life in WHO grade I meningioma patients

    J Neurooncol

    (2007)
  • S.N. Kalkanis et al.

    Quality of life following surgery for intracranial meningiomas at Brigham and Women’s Hospital: a study of 164 patients using a modification of the functional assessment of cancer therapy – brain questionnaire

    J Neurooncol

    (2000)
  • I. Mohsenipour et al.

    Quality of life in patients after meningioma resection

    Acta Neurochir (Wien)

    (2001)
  • F. Ildan et al.

    Predicting the probability of meningioma recurrence in the preoperative and early postoperative period: a multivariate analysis in the midterm follow-up

    Skull Base

    (2007)
  • Y. Miao et al.

    Assessment of self-reported and health-related quality of life in patients with brain tumours using a modified questionnaire

    J Int Med Res

    (2008)
  • Cited by (47)

    • Life after surgical resection of a low-grade glioma: A prospective cross-sectional study evaluating health-related quality of life

      2021, Journal of Clinical Neuroscience
      Citation Excerpt :

      In particular, longitudinal change in HRQoL after time from diagnosis is understudied with many studies only comparing two arbitrary timepoints in different patient groups. These studies, for several brain tumour types, including LGG, may report improved HRQoL over time.19,26–29 However, the study design may have significant selection bias, as patient dropout due to clinical deterioration may lead to over-estimation of long-term HRQoL.

    • Long-Term Outcome and Health-Related Quality of Life of Elderly Patients After Meningioma Surgery

      2019, World Neurosurgery
      Citation Excerpt :

      Unlike our study, they did not analyze the data from elderly patients of different age groups. Instead, they had compared a fewer number of young patients aged <14 years and elderly patients aged >60 years with patients aged 14–60 years.25 In addition, Schul et al.27 investigated 164 patients aged >65 years who had undergone meningioma surgery.

    • Intracranial Meningiomas: A Systematic Analysis of Prognostic Factors for Recurrence in a Large Single Institution Surgical Series

      2019, World Neurosurgery
      Citation Excerpt :

      The 2016 WHO classification of central nervous system tumors defined 3 histologic subtypes for meningioma in relation to brain invasion, a mitotic count, spontaneous necrosis, sheeting, prominent nucleoli, high cellularity and small cells, as follows: “meningioma grade I” characterized by a low mitotic rate, <4/10 high-power fields (HPFs), and absence of brain invasion; “ meningioma grade II or atypical meningioma” defined by a mitotic rate 4/19 per HPF, or brain invasion, or 3 of 5 specific histologies: spontaneous necrosis, sheeting, prominent nucleoli, high cellularity, and small cells; “meningioma grade III or anaplastic meningioma” featured by mitotic rate >20 per HPF, or specific histologies (papillary or rhabdoid).31 With advances in treatment during the past 30 years, meningiomas have become a chronic disease, and it is crucial to consider the risk of meningioma recurrence and symptomatic progression when deciding on treatment.32-34 Probably, to carry out a fair therapeutic strategy, several factors have to be considered.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text