Efficacy of mechanical procedures for removal of a lichen and a gypsum black crust from granite

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2021.102986Get rights and content
Under a Creative Commons license
open access

Highlights

  • Lichen (Diploschistes scruposus) and a gypsum black crust were removed from a granite.

  • The mechanical procedures used were wet and dry sandblasting and dry ice blasting.

  • Lichen was successfully cleaned by dry ice blasting.

  • Gypsum black crust was successfully cleaned by wet sandblasting.

  • Colour data should be considered carefully for assessing cleaning efficacy.

Abstract

This paper provides preliminary data on the use of three different mechanical procedures to remove the lichen Diploschistes scruposus and a gypsum black crust from an ornamental granite. The methods used were wet sandblasting (Hydrogommage®), dry sandblasting (IBIX®) and dry-ice blasting. In addition, lichens were also removed by scraping with a scalpel. The cleaning efficacy and undesirable effects to granite were evaluated by stereomicroscopy, colour spectrophotometry, Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy and scanning electron microscopy.

The cleaning efficacy of the mechanical methods depended on the deposit being removed: i) for lichen, dry sandblasting and dry ice blasting produced the best results, while for the black gypsum crust, although both dry and wet sandblasting removed the black particulate matter from the crust, gypsum crystals remained on the surface; ii) the dry sandblasting method induced extraction of granite grains with the subsequent appearance of fissures; iii) for the lichen, the wet sandblasting method was totally unsatisfactory and iv) for the gypsum black crust, dry ice blasting failed to remove the black particulate matter from the crust.

Keywords

Cleaning efficacy
Wet sandblasting
Dry sandblasting
Dry ice
Granite

Cited by (0)