Stochastic semi-Lagrangian micro–macro calculations of liquid crystalline solutions in complex flows
Introduction
Liquid crystals (LCs) are anisotropic fluids in which the orientation of the rigid molecules they comprise are affected by the history of the flow; all the more so since most of the properties of the LC will greatly depend on the fluctuations of the unit vector field (the so-called directors ) which represents the different average orientation of the particles. Furthermore, the actual coupling between flow and particle orientation plays in both directions, according to rules not yet ascertained. Typically, LC molecules (like the extensively studied pentyl-cyano-biphenyl, or 5CB molecule) possess moderately high aspect ratios, and liquid crystalline polymers (LCPs) have rigid units that can behave as rodlike particles, with extremely high aspect ratios.
Along with the Leslie–Ericksen theory [1], [2], [3] and the Landau-de Gennes model (see, e.g. [4]), the Hess–Doi model ([5], [6]) has been widely employed to simulate complex flows of LCPs. In the Hess–Doi model, the LCP is envisioned as an ensemble of particles with infinite aspect ratio (rigid rods) that undergo Brownian motion and interact via a self-consistent mean-field potential. However, the complexity of the problem demands further simplifications, like reducing the dimensions of the configuration space or employing simplified expressions for the rotary diffusivity and the mean-field potential.
Using the Hess–Doi model, remarkable insight has been gained on the behavior of LCPs in pure shear homogeneous flows [7], [8], [9], [10], [11], [12], [13], [14], [15], [16], [17], [18], Poiseuille flow (see, e.g. [19], [20]) and pressure-driven flows [21]; however, complex flows have received comparatively little attention, possibly due to the computational cost of accurately reflecting the historical effects and the flow modification induced by the so-altered particle orientations. An exception is the work by Feng and Leal [22], who investigated the start-up of LCPs according to the Hess–Doi model in an eccentric cylinder geometry.
In order to avoid a direct simulation of the distribution function appearing in the Hess–Doi kinetic model, it is a common approach to combine the macroscopic and the statistical models in some form of closure approximation [9], [10], [11], [16], [18]. Since closure approximations can severely alter the time evolution of the alignment tensor, a wrong choice could lead to inconsistencies with the kinematic model they were based on [23], or produce macroscopic results qualitatively different from those predicted by the distribution function. In this respect, the recent effort by Kröger and co-workers [24] should definitely help in the election of a statistically consistent closure approximation. An investigation of appropriate closure approximations and their possible qualitative impact on the results in the eccentric cylinder geometry can be found in [25], [26]. As an alternative, hybrid methods propose a simultaneous resolution of both the macroscopic equations (Navier–Stokes equations with a source term due to the polymer) and the diffusion equations for the particle orientations.
Thus, the two main families of methods used nowadays attempt either to solve the diffusion equation in configuration space (Fokker–Planck), or to couple discretization techniques with a direct solution of the associated stochastic differential equation for a large ensemble of trajectories. The direct solution of the Fokker–Planck equation is arguably superior in terms of convergence for small numbers of degrees of freedom in homogeneous fields, if the proper trial functions are chosen; spherical harmonics have been traditionally employed [7], but recently, Suen et al. [27] presented the wavelet expansion as a sound alternative. As to the second class of methods, explored in [28], [29], [30], they are still rather competitive when complex flows and precise, rheological information come into scene (see, e.g. the review by Keunings on micro–macro methods for viscoelastic fluids for a more detailed exposition [31]).
Following this latter approach, we intend to devise an efficient and accurate micro–macro method to simulate complex flows of LCPs, with a focus on the solution of the fully coupled problem, and not so much about how the LCP reacts to given velocity fields. The purpose is threefold: (1) to introduce a general method for the simulation of LCPs, assessing its capabilities and drawbacks in the context of complex LCPs flows; (2) to address the discrepancies or concordances between the values predicted by this method and other solution methods such as closure approximations or the spherical harmonics technique for the rheological variables of interest, namely, the scalar order parameter S or the director vector ; and (3) to study the effect of the LCP over a macroscopic, quasi-Newtonian Stokes flow.
The present paper is organized as follows. Section 1 serves as an introduction to the topic of LCPs and their simulation. The mathematical description of the problem is exposed in Section 2. Section 3 provides numerical details on the algorithm, including a succinct description of the micro–macro method used. In Section 4 we show results for the eccentric cylinder geometry, comparing them with those of previous works and discussing the discrepancies that might arise. Finally, Section 5 summarizes the main objectives and conclusions of this work.
Section snippets
Mathematical formulation
The description of the LCP solution will follow the Hess–Doi model [5], [6], where the LCP solution is thought of as an ensemble of neutrally buoyant rodlike particles with infinite aspect ratio. The LCP solution is subject to a macroscopic hydrodynamic flow which depends on the problem geometry. Conversely, the particle orientations, measured by the director vectors, exert a certain stress back on the flow which translates into a flow modification, should the concentration of the polymer in
Numerical formulation
To integrate Eqs. (4), (5), (6) we employ the semi-Lagrangian finite element method introduced in [41]. The main features of this method are the following. (1) The time discretization is performed by a second order in time Backward–Difference–Formula (BDF2) along the characteristics curves of the material derivative operator . (2) The use of Taylor–Hood element for space discretization of velocity and pressure (Fig. 1).
We must note that this element satisfies the so-called inf-sup
Results and discussion
The method is tested in the same eccentric cylinder geometry as studied in [22], [26] (see Fig. 3): the outer cylinder remains at rest while the inner cylinder is started impulsively at time , rotating with angular frequency . Following [22], we select two dimensionless parameters to characterize the geometry shown in Fig. 3: and . We also choose and to avoid fractional results; this is equivalent to using as the characteristic length. Notice also
Conclusions
A comparative study on complex flows of liquid-crystalline solutions using a semi-Lagrangian micro–macro method has been presented. The method has been tested with a reference problem, namely, the eccentric rotating cylinder, the analysis being carried out in two parts.
Firstly, the stochastic part of the model is highlighted by assessing the situation from a decoupled point of view, as suggested by [26]. Investigations of the Peclet number from and up to values are reported, showing
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank the reviewers for their suggestions and comments which have helped to improve the original manuscript.
Financial support by the EC through contracts G5RD-CT-2002-00720 and NMP3-CT-2005-016375, partial support by CICYT grant MAT2006-04029, and support from the Barcelona Supercomputing Center and the high performance computational cluster Magerit at CesViMa UPM is acknowledged.
References (43)
Theory of flow phenomena in liquid crystals
Adv. Liq. Cryst.
(1979)- et al.
Generalized constitutive equation for polymeric liquid crystals. 1. Model formulation using the Hamiltonian (Poisson bracket) formulation
J. Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech.
(1990) - et al.
The dynamics of two dimensional polymer nematics
J. Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech.
(1998) - et al.
The shear flow behavior of LCPs based on a generalized Doi model with distortional elasticity
J. Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech.
(2002) - et al.
Two-alignment tensor theory for the dynamics of side chain liquid-crystalline polymers in planar shear flow
J. Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech.
(2006) - et al.
Simulations of liquid crystals in Poiseuille flow
Comput. Theor. Polymer Sci.
(2001) - et al.
Consistent closure schemes for statistical models of anisotropic fluids
J. Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech.
(2008) - et al.
Flow of nematic polymers in eccentric cylinder geometry: influence of closure approximations
J. Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech.
(2000) - et al.
A wavelet-Galerkin method for simulating the Doi model with orientation-dependent rotational diffusivity
J. Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech.
(2003) - et al.
Calculation of viscoelastic flow using molecular models: the CONNFFESSIT approach
J. Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech.
(1993)
The backward-tracking Lagrangian particle method for trasient viscoelastic flows
J. Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech.
Application of kinetic theory models in spatiotemporal flows for polymer solutions, liquid crystals and polymer melts using the CONNFFESSIT approach
Chem. Eng. Sci.
Rheological phase diagrams for nonhomogeneous flows of rodlike liquid crystalline polymers
J. Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech.
A kineticáhydrodynamic simulation of microstructure of liquid crystal polymers in plane shear flow
J. Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech.
Roll-cell instabilities in shearing flows of nematic polymers
J. Rheol.
Mesoscopic domain theory for textured liquid crystalline polymers
J. Rheol.
Fokker–Planck equation approach to flow-alignment in liquid crystals
Z. Naturforsch
The Theory of Polymer Dynamics
Effect of molecular elasticity on out-of-plane orientations in shearing flows of liquid crystalline polymers
Macromolecules
Exact banded patterns from a Doi–Marrucci–Greco model of nematic liquid crystal polymers
Phys. Rev. E
Full-tensor alignment criteria for sheared nematic polymers
J. Rheol.
Cited by (4)
SLEIPNNIR: A multiscale, particle level set method for Newtonian and non-Newtonian interface flows
2016, Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and EngineeringCitation Excerpt :In this section, we describe the time and space finite element discretization of the macroscopic and microscopic equations ruling the multiphase, laminar flow of incompressible Newtonian and non-Newtonian fluids, using a semi-Lagrangian approach. The semi-Lagrangian approach used to tackle system (1) is similar to those developed in [52,53] for viscoelastic flows, used in the Quasi Monotone Semi-Lagrangian Particle Level Set (QMSL-PLS) method of [19] for interface problems, and more recently in [54] for anisotropic adaptation of convection-dominated problems, and in [45] for droplet dynamics in viscoelastic liquids. Next, we summarize the steps common to the previous works, exploring the specifics of the current method.
An RBF-reconstructed, polymer stress tensor for stochastic, particle-based simulations of non-Newtonian, multiphase flows
2016, Journal of Non-Newtonian Fluid MechanicsCitation Excerpt :However, to our knowledge, multiphase flows using either these approached have yet to appear. Recently, buoyancy-driven droplets in non-Newtonian media were investigated [35] using a semi-Lagrangian, particle-based method [36] along with the micro-macro approach of [37,38]. With stochastic, micro-macro methods and multiphase flows in mind, we propose in this paper the use of Compactly-Supported Radial Basis Functions (CSRBFs) to devise a versatile algorithm which can provide the extra-stress tensor at the mesh points even at the hardest numerical situations with a large degree of mesh independence, thus alleviating one of the major drawbacks of particle-based, micro-macro implementations of non-Newtonian flows.
Stochastic particle level set simulations of buoyancy-driven droplets in non-Newtonian fluids
2015, Journal of Non-Newtonian Fluid MechanicsCitation Excerpt :This approach circumvents the need for any constitutive equation for the polymer contribution to the stress tensor, since the latter can be obtained from the internal configurations of the dumbbells, and offers the full advantages of the mesoscopic, kinetic modeling in terms of more realistic results when compared with other closed-form approximations. In this section, we mainly follow our previous work in [55] and [56] to discretize the micro scale using finite elements and semi-Lagrangian schemes. In this work, we have restricted ourselves to bead-spring dumbbell models.
Multi-scale simulation of Newtonian and non-Newtonian multi-phase flows
2016, Computational Methods in Applied Sciences