Research Article
Structural Perspective on Ancient Neuropeptide Y-like System reveals Hallmark Features for Peptide Recognition and Receptor Activation

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmb.2021.166992Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Many peptide–GPCR signaling systems are evolutionary conserved down to basic animals.

  • We illuminate binding of three distinct neuropeptide Y-like ligands in the FLP/NPR system of C. elegans.

  • We identify E5.23(ECL2) and Q3.32 of the receptors are family-conserved residues critical for affinity and efficacy.

  • NanoBRET based ligand binding assays demonstrate flexibility of peptide ligands in the binding pocket.

  • Comparing binding modes in evolutionary ancient homologs can identify key binding and activation mechanisms.

Abstract

The neuropeptide Y (NPY) family is a peptide-activated G protein-coupled receptor system conserved across all bilaterians, and is involved in food intake, learning, and behavior. We hypothesized that comparing the NPY system in evolutionarily ancient organisms can reveal structural determinants of peptide recognition and receptor activation conserved in evolution. To test this hypothesis, we investigated the homologous FLP/NPR system of the protostome C. elegans. For three prototypic peptide–receptor complexes representing different ligand types, we integrate extensive functional data into structural models of the receptors. Common features include acidic patches in the extracellular loops (ECLs) of the receptors that cooperatively ‘draw’ the peptide into the binding pocket, which was functionally validated in vivo. A structurally conserved glutamate in the ECL2 anchors the peptides by a conserved salt bridge to the arginine of the RFamide motif. Beyond this conserved interaction, peptide binding show variability enabled by receptor-specific interactions. The family-conserved residue Q3.32 is a key player for peptide binding and receptor activation. Altered interaction patterns at Q3.32 may drastically increase the efficacy to activate the receptor.

Introduction

A substantial portion of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) is activated by endogenous peptide or protein ligands. These peptide and protein GPCRs are involved in many physiological processes and are important pharmacological targets. Understanding how peptides interact with their receptors is an essential step towards the development of more potent and selective probe molecules that can validate these receptors as targets and ultimately spur therapeutic development. Specifically, the recognition of the large and flexible peptides by the receptor and the mechanisms for receptor-subtype selectivity are intensively studied.

Reflecting their essential physiological functions, many peptide GPCR systems are conserved down to basic animals, which opens up avenues to study conserved aspects of peptide–receptor interactions, and a potential co-evolution of the binding pockets. Among several other systems, the neuropeptide Y (NPY) system has been present already in the common ancestor of protostomes and deuterostomes, the ‘ur-bilaterian’,1, 2 and is thus expected to have homologs in all bilaterians. In humans, the NPY family has an essential role in regulating food intake and is intensively studied as a potential target for modulating food consumption in the context of obesity.3, 4, 5 Additional functions of the NPY system include the regulation of memory retention, mood and anxiety.[6], 7, 8, 9 NPY and the related peptides PYY and PP activate four cognate GPCRs (Y1, Y2, Y4 and Y5) in humans. The peptides feature a C-terminal arginine-phenylalanine/tyrosine sequence with an amidated carboxyl-terminus (–RxRF/Yamide), which is essential for their activity. High-resolution structural insights of NPY binding to its cognate receptors are currently lacking, but structural models suggest that the arginine residues of this sequence contact a conserved D6.59 on the top of transmembrane helix 6 (TM6) of the receptors, and that the C terminus of the peptide accommodates a binding pocket in the TM bundle.10, 11, 12

Recently, we showed that the FMRFamide-like peptide (FLP)/neuropeptide receptor-resemblence (NPR) system of the protostome Caenorhabditis elegans is, beyond sequence similarities, pharmacologically highly similar to the human NPY system.13 Most notably, the peptide ligands feature cross-species activity, and human NPY receptors can functionally replace C. elegans npr-1 null mutants in an in vivo context.13 The FLP/NPR system in C. elegans is expanded and comprises more than 70 FLP ligands (incl. isoforms originating from local genome duplications) and 40 NPR receptors14, 15 with apparently redundant activation profiles.13 Interestingly, many of the short peptides only contain a minimal C-terminally conserved –ϕRFamide (ϕ = hydrophobic) sequence, and lack a second Arg/Lys residue at the -4 position which still suffices for receptor activation. To facilitate comparison to human NPY-like peptides, positions are counted from the C terminus. FLP-21 (GLGPRPLRFamide) activates several NPRs. It features nanomolar potencies for NPR-1 and NPR-11, and also activates the human Y2 and Y4 receptor with sub-micromolar potency.13 This peptide carries a second arginine residue at the -5 position (one position displaced from the ‘classic’ -4 position of NPY). Recently, three FLPs with increased length and a ‘classic’ C-terminal –RxRF/Yamide have been functionally characterized (FLP-27, FLP-33, FLP-34), which act at NPR-11 and human NPY receptors,13 but have limited activity at other NPRs.13 Isoform 1 of FLP-34 (FLP-34-1: ADISTFASAINNAGRLRYamide), activates NPR-11 with nanomolar potency.

Here, we illuminate how FLP-21 and FLP-34-1 bind NPR-1 and NPR-11 to resolve the contribution of the C-terminal –RFamide and –RxRYamide motif, respectively, for receptor selectivity and the activation process. For each of the three peptide–receptor combinations (FLP-21 – NPR-1; FLP-21 – NPR-11; FLP-34-1 – NPR-11), we integrate experimental restraints into a comparative model, and dock the peptides with full flexibility, which converged into well-defined binding poses. We demonstrate that binding of the FLP ligands is heavily dependent on the conserved C-terminal motifs, which involves a salt bridge of the arginine at the -2 position (RFamide) to a conserved acidic receptor residue in the ECL2. Additional acidic clusters aid the guidance of the peptides into the binding pocket. Moreover, the C-terminal Phe/Tyr-amide is required for both, affinity to the receptor and receptor activation. The shape of the binding pocket and the receptor residues involved in peptide binding are conserved to a high degree in the human NPY receptors, suggesting a similar mode of action. Mutation of the family-wide conserved Q3.32 in the transmembrane binding pocket of NPR-11 leads to an altered binding mode of FLP-21 at this receptor, which increases G protein signaling, thus identifying interactions for efficacious receptor activation.

Section snippets

The C-terminal residues of FLP-21 are critical for binding and activation of NPR-1

One aim of this study was to characterize the binding and activation of two NPRs (NPR-1 and NPR-11) with two prototypic FLP ligands (FLP-21 and FLP-34-1 prototypic for C-terminal –RFamide and –RxRYamide motifs, respectively), and compare this with the human NPY receptors.

We first set out to identify the residues in the 9 aa FLP-21 that are important for binding and activation of NPR-1. We performed a structure–activity study with several peptide variants to assess the importance of the

Discussion

In the present study, we identified the binding mode of three distinct peptide–receptor interactions of the C. elegans NPY-like FLP/NPR system. Despite the evolutionary far distance, there are remarkable pharmacological and functional similarities between the NPY family of chordates and the FLP/NPR systems in C. elegans that were demonstrated in in vitro and in vivo.13, 19, 24, 25 For instance, FLP-34-1 is involved in aversive olfactory learning through NPR-11 signaling in vivo.25 Together with

Materials

Standard chemicals were obtained from Sigma Aldrich (St. Louis, USA) unless otherwise stated. Enzymes were purchased from ThermoFischer Scientific (Waltham, USA) and cell culture materials from Lonza (Basel, Switzerland).

Cell culture

All in vitro assays were conducted with the commercially available cell line HEK293 (Homo sapiens, female, embryonic kidney; DSMZ ACC 305). Cell cultivation was performed in humidified atmosphere as a monolayer including 37 °C and 5% CO2 in T75 cell culture flasks using

CRediT authorship contribution statement

Miron Mikhailowitsch Gershkovich: Investigation, Formal analysis, Visualization, Data curation, Writing - original draft. Victoria Elisabeth Groß: Investigation, Formal analysis, Data curation, Writing - review & editing. Oanh Vu: Validation, Supervision. Clara Tabea Schoeder: Validation, Supervision. Jens Meiler: Methodology, Resources, Supervision, Funding acquisition, Writing - review & editing. Simone Prömel: Methodology, Resources, Supervision, Funding acquisition, Writing - review &

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Torsten Schöneberg and Annette G. Beck-Sickinger for helpful discussions, and Tobias Fischer for sharing a script for automatic analysis of the docked models (heatmap). The excellent technical assistance of Christina Dammann, Kristin Löbner, Ronny Müller, Regina Reppich-Sacher, and Janet Schwesinger is gratefully acknowledged. Further, the authors thank E. Jørgenson and L. Ma for kindly sharing reagents.

This work was supported by the Free State of Saxony, Ministry for Higher

Author contributions

M.M.G. and A.K. synthesized peptides, generated receptor mutants and performed signaling and binding assays in HEK293 cells. V.E.G. and S.P. generated receptor constructs for transgenesis and performed in vivo assays. M.M.G. generated receptor homology models and performed molecular docking with the help of O.V. and C.T.S. J.M. oversaw the molecular docking. M.M.G., O.V., V.E.G. C.T.S., J.M., S.P. and A.K. analyzed and discussed data. A.K. designed the study and supervised the research. M.M.G.

Declaration of Competing Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

References (55)

  • S. Hoffmann et al.

    Structure-affinity studies of C-terminally modified analogs of neuropeptide Y led to a novel class of peptidic Y1 receptor antagonist

    Regul. Pept.

    (1996)
  • C. Mello et al.

    DNA transformation

    Methods Cell Biol.

    (1995)
  • B.J. Bender et al.

    Structural model of ghrelin bound to its G protein-coupled receptor

    Structure

    (2019)
  • D.T. Jones

    Protein secondary structure prediction based on position-specific scoring matrices

    J. Mol. Biol.

    (1999)
  • J.A. Ballesteros et al.

    Integrated methods for the construction of three-dimensional models and computational probing of structure-function relations in G protein-coupled receptors

  • G. Jékely

    Global view of the evolution and diversity of metazoan neuropeptide signaling

    Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.

    (2013)
  • O. Mirabeau et al.

    Molecular evolution of peptidergic signaling systems in bilaterians

    Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.

    (2013)
  • N. Sato et al.

    Modulation of neuropeptide Y receptors for the treatment of obesity

    Expert Opin. Ther. Pat.

    (2009)
  • E. Yulyaningsih et al.

    NPY receptors as potential targets for anti-obesity drug development

    Br. J. Pharmacol.

    (2011)
  • C. Carvajal et al.

    Neuropeptide Y: Role in emotion and alcohol dependence

    CNS Neurol Disord Drug Targets.

    (2006)
  • A. Thorsell et al.

    Neuropeptide Y in alcohol addiction and affective disorders

    Front. Endocrinol.

    (2017)
  • X. Pedragosa-Badia et al.

    Neuropeptide Y receptors: how to get subtype selectivity

    Front. Endocrinol.

    (2013)
  • A. Kaiser et al.

    Unwinding of the C-Terminal Residues of Neuropeptide Y is critical for Y 2 Receptor Binding and Activation

    Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl.

    (2015)
  • Z. Yang et al.

    Structural basis of ligand binding modes at the neuropeptide Y Y1 receptor

    Nature

    (2018)
  • M.M. Gershkovich et al.

    Pharmacological and functional similarities of the human neuropeptide Y system in C. elegans challenges phylogenetic views on the FLP/NPR system

    Cell Commun. Signal.

    (2019)
  • K. Peymen et al.

    The FMRFamide-like peptide family in nematodes

    Front. Endocrinol.

    (2014)
  • L. Frooninckx et al.

    Neuropeptide GPCRs in C. elegans

    Front. Endocrinol.

    (2012)
  • Cited by (6)

    Present address: Institute of Medical Physics and Biophysics, Medical Faculty, Leipzig University, Härtelstr. 16-18, 04107 Leipzig, Germany.

    Present address: Institute of Cell Biology, Department of Biology, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Universitätsstr. 1, 40225 Düsseldorf, Germany.

    View full text