Note
Contractive inequalities for mixed norm spaces and the Beta function

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmaa.2021.125938Get rights and content

Abstract

For a wide range of pairs of mixed norm spaces such that one space is contained in another, we characterize all cases when contractive norm inequalities hold. In particular, this yields such results for many pairs of weighted Bergman spaces. Some inequalities of this type are motivated by their applications in Number Theory and in Mathematical Physics.

Introduction

Let 0<p, q, 0<a<. The mixed norm space H(p,q,a) is defined as the set of all functions f that are analytic in the unit disk D and satisfy the conditionfp,q,a=(aq012ρ(1ρ2)aq1Mpq(ρ;f)dρ)1/q<,0<q<,fp,,a=sup0ρ<1(1ρ2)aMp(ρ;f)<, whereMp(ρ;f)=(02π|f(ρeiθ)|pdθ2π)1/p denotes the usual integral means of f of order p on the circle {z:|z|=ρ}. An important special case is the standard weighted Bergman space Aαp=H(p,p,α+1p), 1<α<, withfAαp=(D(α+1)(1|z|2)α|f(z)|pdA(z))1/p<, where dA(z)=1πdxdy is the normalized Lebesgue area measure on D. The classical Hardy space Hp consisting of all functions analytic in D for which the finite limitfHp=limr1Mp(r;f)=sup0<r<1Mp(r;f) exists can be understood as the limit case H(p,,0).

Integrals as in (1) had been considered already by Hardy and Littlewood but the space H(p,q,a) was only formally defined and systematically studied later, first by Hardy's student Thomas Flett [14], [15] and later in [1], [6], among many other papers. Inclusions between different mixed normed spaces in many cases have been known, the information being scattered in the literature. The classification below was completed to include the missing cases in [2], [3]. In both theorems below, we assume that 0<a, b< and 0<p, q, u, v.

Theorem A

If pu, then H(p,q,a)H(u,v,b) if and only if either a<b or a=b and qv.

Theorem B

If p<u, then H(p,q,a)H(u,v,b) if and only if either a+1p<b+1u or a+1p=b+1u and qv.

As a corollary for the weighted Bergman spaces, we have the well-known results (see, for example, [9, Theorem 1.3]): when pq, the inclusion AαpAβq holds only in the trivial case p=q and α=β or when α+1p<β+1q. When p<q, we have the inclusion AαpAβq if and only if α+2p<β+2q.

An important and natural question is: when does the contractive inequality:fu,v,bfp,q,a hold for all fH(p,q,a)? Note that if it holds, it must be sharp since the constant function one has unit norm in all mixed norm spaces. A more specific question is when is the inclusion between two weighted Bergman spaces contractive.

As the main result of this note, we prove that, if pu, the inclusion H(p,q,a)H(u,v,b) is contractive if and only if either (1) qv and ab, or (2) q>v and aqbv.

As a corollary, whenever pq, we obtain that the contractive inequality for weighted Bergman spaces: fAβqfAαp holds if and only if αβ.

Some motivation for this study is in order. Several papers in the literature have been devoted to the study of contractive inequalities under the conditions of Theorem B. For example, a very natural question is whether the following special class of inequalities as above for weighted Bergman normsfAcp2pfAcq2q,1c<q<p<, holds for every fixed f analytic in D. This problem turns out to be extremely difficult but its solution would be of interest for several applications. For example, a conjecture of Lieb and Solovej [16] related to certain inequalities for entropies can be reformulated for the disk as the particular case c=α+12 and q=2 of (4), that is:fA2α+12p2pfA2α12,2p<,0<α<. This conjecture has so far been proved only in certain special cases, for example, p=n/2, where n is a positive integer. Different statements and proofs can be found in the papers [10], [4] and in the most recent works [16] and [5]. In the classical Fock (or Bargmann-Segal) spaces Fαp of entire functions which are p-integrable with respect to a Gaussian measure in the plane with parameter α, there is also a contractive inequality for the spaces Fαp and Fα (cf. [20, p. 40]). Contractive inequalities for generalized Fock spaces in Cn were studied in [11], again in relation to the Wehrl entropy conjecture.

Recently, in [4] a conjecture was formulated that (4) should hold for c=1/2; this was already implicitly suggested in [8]. This would have some important consequences. It is well known that, for 0<c<, the spaces Acp2p become larger as p increases. Also, the Hardy space H1/c can be viewed as the limit case of these spaces as p1c+, in the sense thatfH1/c=limp1/c+fp,cp2. Thus, if true, inequality (4) would also readily imply the following contractive inequality mentioned in [17, Problem 2.1, p. 53]:fAcp2pfH1/c,1c<p< by taking the limit as q1/c+. In [8], a conjecture was posed thatfAp22pfH2,2<p<, which is a special case of (6) with c=1/2. Important related inequalities have been proved in [4]. Proving such inequality would have immediate applications to the theory of Hardy spaces of Dirichlet series and, hence, further direct consequences in Number Theory; cf. [7].

In summary, the case p<u (scenario of Theorem B) seems to be very difficult even in special cases. While some partial results on these cases will be treated elsewhere, in Section 2 this note we devote our effort to characterizing completely the cases when norm inclusions are contractive under the condition of Theorem A: pu. It is our belief that this case should also be of some interest and that it seems appropriate to carry out a systematic study of when the inclusions can be contractive in all cases.

We also list some direct consequences that might be of independent interest, such as certain inequalities for the Beta function which we have not been able to find elsewhere in the literature. This is done in Section 3.

Section snippets

Contractive norm inequalities in the case pu

In what follows, in simplify the notation, for a fixed function f analytic in the unit disk, we shall write throughoutmp(r)=Mp(r;f),0<r<1. Thus, the simple change of variable ρ2=r in (1) yieldsfp,q,a=(01aq(1r)aq1mpq(r)dr)1/q. This formula will be used frequently in the rest of this note. Hölder's inequality shows that Mp(r;f), and hence also mp(r), is an increasing function of p for each fixed r.

Also, by a well-known theorem of Hardy [12, Chapter 1], Mp(r;f) is an increasing function of r

Some inequalities for the Beta function

In this section we formulate some consequences of the results of Subsection 2.1 separately, in view of their possible independent interest. Namely, the contractive inequalities proved there yield certain (seemingly new) inequalities for the Beta function. First, as a consequence of Proposition 1, we obtain the following property.

Corollary 6

Let a>0 and let a positive integer n be fixed. Then F(q)=(aqB(aq,nq+1))1q is a decreasing function of q.

Proof

Apply Proposition 1 to the function f(z)=z2n, observing thatz2

Acknowledgements

The authors are partially supported by the grant PID2019-106870GB-I00 from MICINN, Spain. The first author is supported by the MU Predoctoral Fellowship FPU17/00040.

References (20)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.
View full text