Elsevier

Journal of Insect Physiology

Volume 69, October 2014, Pages 12-18
Journal of Insect Physiology

Towards an integrated understanding of gut microbiota using insects as model systems

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinsphys.2014.05.016Get rights and content

Highlights

  • We give an overview of the characteristics of the gut microbiota in insects.

  • We explore factors that explain variability in gut microbial communities.

  • We emphasize the potential of functional studies to understand gut microbiota.

Abstract

Metazoans form symbioses with microorganisms that synthesize essential nutritional compounds and increase their efficiency to digest and absorb nutrients. Despite the growing awareness that microbes within the gut play key roles in metabolism, health and development of metazoans, symbiotic relationships within the gut are far from fully understood. Insects, which generally harbor a lower microbial diversity than vertebrates, have recently emerged as potential model systems to study these interactions. In this review, we give a brief overview of the characteristics of the gut microbiota in insects in terms of low diversity but high variability at intra- and interspecific levels and we investigate some of the ecological and methodological factors that might explain such variability. We then emphasize how studies integrating an array of techniques and disciplines have the potential to provide new understanding of the biology of this micro eco-system.

Introduction

Extracting essential nutritious components from food can be challenging. Metazoans have partly faced this challenge by forming symbioses with microorganisms that both synthesize essential nutritional compounds and increase the efficiency of nutrient digestion and absorption (Fraune and Bosch, 2010, Moran, 2007). In insects, nutritional symbioses can be split into two main categories: (i) intracellular associations, which are generally found in arthropods with restricted diets such as blood and plant sap and involve only few types of symbionts; and (ii) extracellular associations, that are more common among metazoans and involve a complex community of symbionts that generally live within the gut lumen. Symbionts can serve a range of nutritional functions, from mobilizing stored nitrogen to contributing essential amino acids (Brune and Ohkuma, 2011, Douglas, 2009, Feldhaar, 2011, Kaufman and Klug, 1991), and hosts often rely on symbiotic microorganisms to supply nutrients required for viability and fertility (Dillon and Dillon, 2003, Douglas, 2010, Moran and Baumann, 2000).

In recent decades, numerous investigations have been devoted to understanding the metabolic roles of associated microorganisms (Douglas, 2009, Moran, 2007) with a particular emphasizes on the bacteria that compose the gut microbiota (Dillon and Dillon, 2003, Nicholson et al., 2012, Ryu et al., 2008, Storelli et al., 2011). In this context, it has been shown, for instance, that the gut microbiota can contribute up to 70% of a vertebrate’s energy needs (Flint et al., 2008). However, despite the growing awareness that microbes play key roles in metabolism, health and development of metazoans (Fraune and Bosch, 2010, Lee and Brey, 2013, Maslowski and Mackay, 2011), symbiotic relationships within the gut are far from fully understood (Engel and Moran, 2013).

Perhaps the most important obstacle to understanding these symbiotic relationships resides in the high diversity of bacterial communities living within the gut of most vertebrates. In this regard, insects, which generally harbour a lower microbial diversity within their gut, offer an interesting alternative to vertebrates and have recently emerged as potential model systems to study these interactions. Insects are not only tractable and easy to manipulate, they also offer substantial genetic resources allowing investigations of conversed metabolic and immune pathways. However, capturing the properties of insect gut microbiota has been challenging so far due to a high variability in composition between individuals and closely related species. Here, we give a brief overview of the characteristics of the bacterial communities inhabiting the gut of insects in terms of low diversity but high variability at intra- and interspecific levels and we investigate some of the ecological and methodological factors that might explain such variability. We then emphasize how studies integrating the latest technological advances from molecular biology and stable isotope-based techniques can improve our understanding of host/symbiont interactions.

Section snippets

A low diversity

In contrast to mammals, the bacterial diversity in insect digestive tracts is generally low and rarely exceeds a few tens of species (Colman et al., 2012). In Drosophila, the gut only contains 2–20 bacterial species in natural and/or field conditions (Apidianakis and Rahme, 2011, Bae et al., 2010, Blum et al., 2013, Chandler et al., 2011, Corby-Harris et al., 2007, Cox and Gilmore, 2007, Ren et al., 2007, Ryu et al., 2008, Storelli et al., 2011, Wong et al., 2011), while in humans the gut

Towards an integrated understanding of gut microbiota: from genes to function

Molecular techniques that have been employed to analyse gut microbiota might also be sources of variability, particularly for taxonomic identification. The integration of studies combining different methods might allow a better understanding of individual and communal roles of bacteria in the physiology and ecology of the host.

Conclusion

There is a growing interest in using model systems to provide a comprehensive and integrated understanding of the functioning of the gut microbiota and its interactions with host metabolism and immunity. Insects are relevant systems in many ways (Apidianakis and Rahme, 2011, Charroux and Royet, 2012, Erkosar et al., 2013) and numerous studies already provide an abundance of data on the taxonomic diversity of gut microbiota, but also the ecological factors that might influence this diversity and

References (91)

  • N.A. Moran et al.

    Bacterial endosymbionts in animals

    Curr. Opin. Microbiol.

    (2000)
  • F. Ponton et al.

    Integrating nutrition and immunology: a new frontier

    J. Insect Physiol.

    (2013)
  • C. Ren et al.

    Increased internal and external bacterial load during drosophila aging without life-span trade-off

    Cell Metab.

    (2007)
  • J.-H. Ryu et al.

    Innate immunity and gut-microbe mutualism in Drosophila

    Dev. Comp. Immunol.

    (2010)
  • G. Storelli et al.

    Lactobacillus plantarum promotes Drosophila systemic growth by modulating hormonal signals through TOR-dependent nutrient sensing

    Cell Metab.

    (2011)
  • B. Weiss et al.

    Microbiome influences on insect host vector competence

    Trends Parasitol.

    (2011)
  • Y. Apidianakis et al.

    Drosophila melanogaster as a model for human intestinal infection and pathology

    Dis. Model. Mech.

    (2011)
  • S. Behrens et al.

    Linking microbial phylogeny to metabolic activity at the single-cell level by using enhanced element labeling-catalyzed reporter deposition fluorescence in situ hybridization (EL-FISH) and NanoSIMS

    Appl. Environ. Microbiol.

    (2008)
  • D. Berry et al.

    Host-compound foraging by intestinal microbiota revealed by single-cell stable isotope probing

    Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.

    (2013)
  • K.N. Bharucha

    The Epicurean fly: using Drosophila Melanogaster to study metabolism

    Pediatr. Res.

    (2009)
  • J.E. Blum et al.

    Frequent replenishment sustains the beneficial microbiome of Drosophila melanogaster

    mBio

    (2013)
  • N.A. Broderick et al.

    Gut-associated microbes of Drosophila melanogaster

    Gut Microbes

    (2012)
  • N.A. Broderick et al.

    Census of the bacterial community of the gypsy moth larval midgut by using culturing and culture-independent methods

    Appl. Environ. Microbiol.

    (2004)
  • Brune, A., Ohkuma, M., 2011. Role of the Termite Gut Microbiota in Symbiotic Digestion. Biology of Termites: a Modern...
  • N. Buchon et al.

    Drosophila EGFR pathway coordinates stem cell proliferation and gut remodeling following infection

    BMC Biol.

    (2010)
  • S.A. Bustin et al.

    The MIQE guidelines: minimum information for publication of quantitative real-time PCR experiments

    Clin. Chem.

    (2009)
  • K.J. Carpenter et al.

    Correlated SEM, FIB SEM, TEM, and nanoSIMS imaging of microbes from the hindgut of a lower termite: methods for in situ functional and ecological studies of uncultivable microbes

    Microsc. Microanal.

    (2013)
  • J.A. Chandler et al.

    Bacterial communities of diverse drosophila species: ecological context of a host–microbe model system

    PLoS Genet.

    (2011)
  • F.J. Clissold et al.

    The gastrointestinal tract as a nutrient-balancing organ

    Proc. R. Soc. B: Biol. Sci.

    (2010)
  • D.R. Colman et al.

    Do diet and taxonomy influence insect gut bacterial communities?

    Mol. Ecol.

    (2012)
  • V. Corby-Harris et al.

    The geographical distribution and diversity of bacteria associated with natural populations of Drosophila melanogaster

    Appl. Environ. Microbiol.

    (2007)
  • C.R. Cox et al.

    Native microbial colonization of Drosophila melanogaster and its use as a model of Enterococcus faecalis Pathogenesis

    Infect. Immun.

    (2007)
  • C. De Filippo et al.

    Impact of diet in shaping gut microbiota revealed by a comparative study in children from Europe and rural Africa

    Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.

    (2010)
  • R.J. Dillon et al.

    The gut microbiota of insects: Nonpathogenic Interactions

    Annu. Rev. Entomol.

    (2003)
  • E.A. Dinsdale et al.

    Functional metagenomic profiling of nine biomes

    Nature

    (2008)
  • A.E. Douglas

    The microbial dimension in insect nutritional ecology

    Funct. Ecol.

    (2009)
  • A.E. Douglas

    The Symbiotic Habit

    (2010)
  • P.B. Eckburg et al.

    Diversity of the human intestinal microbial flora

    Science

    (2005)
  • P. Engel et al.

    The gut microbiota of insects – diversity in structure and function

    FEMS Microbiol. Rev.

    (2013)
  • H. Feldhaar

    Bacterial symbionts as mediators of ecologically important traits of insect hosts

    Ecol. Entomol.

    (2011)
  • H.J. Flint et al.

    Polysaccharide utilization by gut bacteria: potential for new insights from genomic analysis

    Nat. Rev. Microbiol.

    (2008)
  • S. Fraune et al.

    Why bacteria matter in animal development and evolution

    BioEssays

    (2010)
  • M. Gendrin et al.

    The Anopheles Mosquito Microbiota and Their Impact on Pathogen Transmission

  • D. Gevers et al.

    Re-evaluating prokaryotic species

    Nat. Rev. Microbiol.

    (2005)
  • P. Hoppe et al.

    NanoSIMS: technical aspects and applications in cosmochemistry and biological geochemistry

    Geostand. Geoanal. Res.

    (2013)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text