Elsevier

Journal of Infection

Volume 61, Issue 5, November 2010, Pages 419-426
Journal of Infection

Outcomes of central nervous system cryptococcosis vary with host immune function: Results from a multi-center, prospective study

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinf.2010.08.004Get rights and content

Summary

Background

Central nervous system (CNS) cryptococcosis is most commonly encountered among HIV-infected and other immunosuppressed hosts but is less well-characterized among non-immunosuppressed patients.

Methods

We conducted a three year, prospective, observational study to compare the clinical manifestations and outcome of CNS cryptococcosis in three patient populations: HIV-infected patients (n = 54), HIV-negative immunosuppressed patients (n = 21), and non-immunosuppressed patients (n = 11).

Results

Time from initial symptoms to presentation did not differ between the groups. HIV-infected patients were significantly more likely to present with fevers (p < 0.0001), but were less likely to have abnormal mental status, CNS mass lesions and pulmonary involvement (p = 0.001, 0.01 and 0.03, respectively). The clinical manifestations among HIV-negative immunosuppressed patients were generally intermediate to the other groups. Overall, acuity of illness was worse among non-immunosuppressed patients, as measured by APACHE II scores (p = 0.02). Intracranial pressure was higher in HIV-infected and non-immunosuppressed patients than immunosuppressed patients (p = 0.008 and 0.01, respectively). Repeated lumbar punctures were more common among HIV-infected patients (p = 0.01). There was a trend toward more frequent placement of permanent CNS shunts among non-HIV patients (p = 0.05). The mortality rate was greatest for non-immunosuppressed patients (p = 0.04).

Conclusion

CNS cryptococcosis in non-immunosuppressed patients was associated with poorer prognosis. Our findings suggest that host immune responses may contribute to pathogenesis of CNS cryptococcosis, with more intact immune function associated with increased CNS-related morbidity and overall mortality.

Introduction

Cryptococcus spp. are encapsulated yeasts that are major causes of invasive fungal diseases. Initial cryptococcal infection is by inhalation into the lungs, but clinically apparent pulmonary disease is less common than central nervous system (CNS) cryptococcosis, in particular meningo-encephalitis. Before the HIV epidemic, cryptococcosis was an uncommon disease predominantly seen among immunosuppressed individuals, including those with hematologic malignancies, solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients, and individuals receiving corticosteroids or other immunosuppressive drugs.1, 2 Cryptococcosis emerged as an important opportunistic infection (OI) in the early years of the HIV epidemic, affecting approximately 12% of patients with AIDS. After the introduction of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART), the incidence of cryptococcosis, as with other OIs, dropped significantly among AIDS patients in the developed world. The disease remains prevalent, however, in the developing world and among persons with limited access to HAART. Outside of the HIV-infected population, the incidence of cryptococcosis has likely not changed,3 but there is an increasing recognition of the importance of the disease.4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 In part, this reflects the lengthened survival of at-risk persons, such as SOT recipients and other profoundly immunosuppressed hosts, and the introduction of potent new immunosuppressive agents like anti-TNFα monoclonal antibodies.14 Appreciation of the impact of cryptococcosis among immunocompetent hosts has also increased due to the Vancouver Cryptococcus gattii outbreak,15, 16, 17 in which persons with no apparent defects in immune function were disproportionately involved, and as a consequence of a recent series of Cryptococcus neoformans var. grubii infections that highlighted adverse outcomes.12

To date, relatively few studies have compared cryptococcosis in HIV-infected and HIV-uninfected patients.11 The objectives of the present study were to describe the clinical manifestations and outcome of CNS cryptococcosis among HIV-infected, HIV-negative immunosuppressed, and non-immunosuppressed patients.

Section snippets

Study design

We performed a prospective study of consecutive patients with cryptococcal infections in seven hospitals over a thirty-one month period from 2000 to 2003. Four U.S. hospitals included the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (Pittsburgh, PA), Shands Hospital at the University of Florida (Gainesville, FL), Wake Forest University Health Sciences Center (Winston-Salem, NC), and Vanderbilt University Medical Center, M.D. Anderson Cancer Center (Houston, TX). Three hospitals were from countries

Results

Over the study period, 86 patients with CNS cryptococcosis were enrolled: 54 patients (63%) were HIV-infected, 21 patients (24%) were HIV-negative but otherwise immunosuppressed (immunosuppressed group), and 11 patients (13%) had no identified immunodeficiency (non-immunosuppressed group). The US hospitals enrolled 46 patients (22 HIV-infected, 14 immunosuppressed and 10 non-immunosuppressed), the Chinese hospital 22 patients (all HIV-infected), the New Zealand hospital 12 patients (7

Discussion

The results of the present study highlight important differences in the clinical manifestations and outcomes of CNS cryptococcosis among HIV-infected, HIV-negative immunosuppressed, and non-immunosuppressed patients. Most notably, we found that patients with no identifiable immunodeficiency were more critically-ill and suffered greater mortality than HIV-infected patients. Compared to HIV-infected patients, non-immunosuppressed patients were significantly more likely to manifest mental status

Conflicts of interest

MHN, CCH, DPK, AJM, CHH, MW and VLY have no conflict.

SH has been a consultant for Cylex, Inc. and Schering Plough. He has received research funding from Enzon, Astellas and Pfizer.

CJC has received research funding from Pfizer, Astellas and Merck.

JEP had received past research funding from Pfizer, Bayer, Roche, and Fujisawa and has current research funding from Cubist and Basilea.

Acknowledgements

We thank Dr. Mark Pierce for assistance in patient enrollment.

References (34)

  • F. Dromer et al.

    Comparison of the efficacy of amphotericin B and fluconazole in the treatment of cryptococcosis in human immunodeficiency virus-negative patients: retrospective analysis of 83 cases. French Cryptococcosis Study Group

    Clin Infect Dis

    (1996)
  • P.G. Pappas et al.

    Cryptococcosis in human immunodeficiency virus-negative patients in the era of effective azole therapy

    Clin Infect Dis

    (2001)
  • N. Singh et al.

    Cryptococcosis in solid organ transplant recipients: current state of the science

    Clin Infect Dis

    (2008)
  • R. Vilchez et al.

    Longitudinal study of cryptococcosis in adult solid-organ transplant recipients

    Transpl Int

    (2003)
  • G. Wu et al.

    Cryptococcal meningitis: an analysis among 5521 consecutive organ transplant recipients

    Transpl Infect Dis

    (2002)
  • J. Chen et al.

    Cryptococcus neoformans strains and infection in apparently immunocompetent patients, China

    Emerg Infect Dis

    (2008)
  • I.Z. Ecevit et al.

    The poor prognosis of central nervous system cryptococcosis among nonimmunosuppressed patients: a call for better disease recognition and evaluation of adjuncts to antifungal therapy

    Clin Infect Dis

    (2006)
  • Cited by (44)

    • Recent Trends in the Epidemiology of Fungal Infections

      2021, Infectious Disease Clinics of North America
      Citation Excerpt :

      Furthermore, although immunodeficiencies remain a significant risk factor, approximately 20% of non-HIV patients who develop Cryptococcus disease have no known immune impairments.142 Notably, non-HIV/nontransplant patients experience poorer clinical outcomes compared with both HIV-positive and solid organ transplant patients, with higher rates of morbidity and mortality (46% mortality in nonimmunosuppressed vs 19% among those immunosuppressed and 15% among HIV-positive patients), potentially related to delayed detection and an overly reactive immune response among immunocompetent individuals.129,145 Similar to other fungi, antifungal resistance remains a challenge.

    • Infection in kidney transplant recipients

      2019, Kidney Transplantation - Principles and Practice
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text