Sovereign bond yield spreads: A time-varying coefficient approach,☆☆

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jimonfin.2011.10.006Get rights and content

Abstract

We study the determinants of sovereign bond yield spreads across 10 EMU countries between Q1/1999 and Q1/2010. We apply a semiparametric time-varying coefficient model to identify, to what extent an observed change in the yield spread is due to a shift in macroeconomic fundamentals or due to altering risk pricing. We find that at the beginning of EMU, the government debt level and the general investors’ risk aversion had a significant impact on interest differentials. In the subsequent years, however, financial markets paid less attention to the fiscal position of a country and the safe haven status of Germany diminished in importance. By the end of 2006, two years before the fall of Lehman Brothers, financial markets began to grant Germany safe haven status again. One year later, when financial turmoil began, the market reaction to fiscal loosening increased considerably. The altering in risk pricing over time period confirms the need of time-varying coefficient models in this context.

Introduction

After the start of the European Monetary Union (EMU), financial markets barely differentiated between sovereign borrowers. Sovereign bond yield spreads across EMU member states relative to Germany converged and were generally smaller than fifty basis points. However, with the 2007/2008 global financial crisis, government bond yield spreads began to increase considerably, reaching values around 250 basis points for Greece and Ireland in Q4/2008. Understanding the driving forces of EMU sovereign yield differentials is an important issue for policymakers and economists.

The general consensus in the existing literature is that bond yield differentials are significantly affected by both international and country-specific risk factors such as liquidity or default risk premia.1 Recent evidence shows that the sharp increase of government bond yield spreads during the financial crisis can not purely be attributed to changes in macroeconomic fundamentals, but also to the fact that the general pricing of risk has increased over time, in the sense that financial markets reacted more strongly to different risk variables than they did before. Thus, the relationship between the variables proxying default and liquidity risk and government bond yield spreads may be time-varying. Most studies analyzing the determinants of bond yield spreads rely on simple linear regression models, which assume a constant relationship between the explanatory variables and bond yield spreads. These linear models, however, are not an appropriate approach to accurately model these non-linear dynamics.

We contribute to the literature by estimating time-varying coefficients in an additive non-parametric fixed-effects panel model framework. Estimating time-varying coefficients allows us to identify to what extent an observed change in the yield spread is due to a shift in macroeconomic fundamentals such as a country’s fiscal position and to what extent it reflects a change in markets’ pricing of these fundamentals expressed by a shift in the model coefficients. Further, we are able to endogenously identify the timing and patterns of any changes in the model coefficients. In this form of semiparametric models, a separate non-parametric regression function is fitted to each explanatory variable. An appealing feature of this approach is that additivity of the individual predicting variables is the only assumption on the functional form of the model and hence no further assumptions about the specific functional form for the path of coefficients are imposed on the data. This is a major advantage compared to parametric approaches and is especially relevant for our data set, where the bond yield spreads show no clear convergence or divergence path over the entire time span of the data sample.

Our model is based on Sun et al. (2009), who develop a semiparametric fixed effects panel data model with varying coefficients using a local linear regression approach. Their methodology has the nice feature that the fixed effects are removed by applying a one-step estimation approach based on kernel weights without the need of back-fitting techniques. We adapt their model into a smooth time-varying coefficient model.

We find that the impact of fiscal policy variables and general investors’ risk aversion on sovereign yield spreads is not constant over time, which confirms the need of time-varying coefficient models in this context. At the beginning of EMU in 1999, the debt level of a country and the general investors’ risk aversion significantly explained interest differentials. In the subsequent years, however, the safe haven status of Germany diminished, while sovereign debt differentials continued to play an important role in explaining yield differentials. By the end of 2006, two years before the fall of Lehman Brothers, financial markets began to grant Germany a safe haven status again, which signals that financial markets started worrying about risk long before the start of the financial crisis. With the financial crisis, also the market reaction to fiscal loosening increased considerably. This indicates that financial markets have, at present, an important role in imposing fiscal discipline on governments and constitute an effective supplement to the Stability and Growth Pact (SGP).

The rest of the paper is organized as follows. Section 2 gives an overview about the related literature. Section 3 discusses the methodology that we apply for our estimations. Section 4 details the data and presents some descriptive analysis. Section 5 reports the main results and Section 6 concludes.

Section snippets

Literature review

Analyzing the determinants of sovereign yield spreads in the euro area is attracting a lot of interest in the literature. A number of studies find that part of the interest differentials across EMU countries are significantly affected by fiscal imbalances, which indicates that interest rates are subject to a default risk premium. Codogno et al. (2003) find in a sample of nine EMU countries that for Italy and Spain the fluctuations in yield differentials can be attributed to domestic fiscal

Methodology

We estimate the time-varying determinants of EMU yield spreads by applying a semiparametric model in form of an additive non-parametric regression approach. In such semiparametric models, a separate non-parametric regression function is fitted to each explanatory variable. An appealing feature of this approach is that additivity of the individual predicting variables is the only assumption on the functional form of the model and hence no further assumptions about the specific functional form

Data and descriptive analysis

We analyze the sovereign bond yields of ten euro area countries: Belgium, Finland, France, Greece, Ireland, Italy, the Netherlands, Austria, Portugal and Spain. The time covered runs from Q1/1999, the beginning of EMU, until Q1/2010, such that our data sample consists of in total 440 observations. The yield spreads of the individual countries are calculated as the end-quarter yield differential of their 10-year benchmark bonds relative to the 10-year German Bund. Since Greece joined EMU only in

The static linear panel model

As a starting point, we ignore the fact that the determinants of euro area sovereign bond yield spreads may be time-varying by estimating a standard OLS fixed effects panel data model.16 We use the corporate bond yield spread, the bid-ask spread and the linear and squared debt and projected deficit ratio as explanatory variables. Table 1 shows the results.

In line with previous

Conclusions

This paper contributes to the literature on sovereign risk in the euro area by applying a time-varying coefficient fixed-effects panel model. We analyze the government bond yield spreads of 10 euro area countries between Q1/1999 and Q1/2010. By estimating time-varying coefficients we take into account that government bond yields may not only be affected by changes in macroeconomic fundamentals but also by shifts in the pricing of sovereign risks as reflected by a shift in the model coefficients.

References (47)

  • Barrios, S., Iversen, P., Lewandowska, M., Setzer, R., 2009. Determinants of intra-euro area government bond spreads...
  • T. Bayoumi et al.

    Do credit markets discipline sovereign borrowers? Evidence from the U.S. states

    Journal of Money, Credit and Banking

    (1995)
  • A. Beber et al.

    Flight-to-quality or ight-to-liquidity? Evidence from the Euro-Area bond market

    The Review of Financial Studies

    (2009)
  • Bernoth, K., von Hagen, J., Schuknecht, L., 2006. Sovereign risk premiums in the European government bond market....
  • K. Bernoth et al.

    Sovereign risk premiums in the European government bond market

    (2010)
  • K. Bernoth et al.

    Fool the markets? Creative accounting, fiscal transparency and sovereign risk premia

    Scottish Journal of Political Economy

    (2008)
  • L. Codogno et al.

    Yield spreads on EMU government bonds

    Economic Policy

    (2003)
  • Ejsing, J. W., Sihvonen, J., 2009. Liquidity premia in German government bonds. Working Paper 1081, European Central...
  • C. Favero et al.

    How does liquidity affect government bond yields?

    Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis

    (2010)
  • M.J. Fleming

    Measuring treasury market liquidity

    Economic Policy Review

    (2003)
  • T. Gasser et al.

    Kernel estimation of regression functions. Smoothing Techniques for Curve Estimation

    (1979)
  • T. Gasser et al.

    Kernels for nonparametric curve estimation. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society

    Series B (Methodological)

    (1985)
  • Gerlach, S., Schulz, A., Wolff, G. B., 2010. Banking and sovereign risk in the euro area. Discussion paper series 1:...
  • Cited by (161)

    • Risk, financial stability and FDI

      2022, Journal of International Money and Finance
    View all citing articles on Scopus

    The authors thank the referees, Konstantin Kholodilin, Vladimir Kuzin, John Lewis, Dominik Maltritz, Andreas Pick, Georg Stadtmann, the seminar participants at the DIW Berlin and the University of Trier, and the participants of the 15th Annual International Conference on “ ‘Macroeconomic Analysis and International Finance”’ organized by the University of Crete for helpful comments and suggestions.

    ☆☆

    This paper is an extended version of an analysis that is part of the Ph.D. thesis by Burcu Erdogan.

    View full text