In-hospital infective endocarditis following transcatheter aortic valve replacement: a cross-sectional study of the National Inpatient Sample database in the USA

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhin.2018.05.014Get rights and content

Summary

Background

While the utilization of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) for patients with severe aortic stenosis has been increasing, in-hospital infective endocarditis (IE) following TAVR has not been well described.

Aim

To identify in-hospital IE following TAVR.

Methods

All patients who underwent TAVR between 2012 and 2014 were identified using the National Inpatient Sample database. Multi-variate logistic regression was performed to identify the predictors of in-hospital IE after TAVR.

Findings

Of the 41,025 patients who received TAVR, 120 patients (0.3%) developed in-hospital IE. Viridans group streptococci (20.8%) was the most frequent causative organism for in-hospital IE, followed by Staphylococcus aureus (16.7%) and enterococci (8.3%). Patients who developed in-hospital IE after TAVR had significantly higher rates of death (20.8% vs 4.1%, P<0.001), septic shock (16.7% vs 0.8%, P<0.001), cardiogenic shock (12.5% vs 3.4%, P=0.02), acute kidney injury requiring haemodialysis (16.7% vs 1.6%, P<0.001), bleeding requiring transfusion (29.2% vs 11.3%, P=0.01), myocardial infarction (12.5% vs 2.1%, P<0.001) and permanent pacemaker removal (4.2% vs 0.05%, P<0.001) compared with patients without IE. Independent predictors of in-hospital IE after TAVR include younger age [odds ratio (OR) 0.92, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.89–0.95], drug abuse (OR 48.9, 95% CI 6.9–347.3) and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection (OR 7.8, 95% CI 1.4–44.4).

Conclusion

IE occurred in 0.3% of patients after TAVR during the same hospitalization, resulting in higher rates of adverse outcomes including mortality. Patients with younger age, a history of drug abuse or HIV infection are at greater risk of in-hospital IE following TAVR, and would benefit from vigilant preventive measures perioperatively.

Section snippets

Background

Aortic stenosis (AS) is the most common type of valvular heart disease, and the prevalence of severe AS is 3.4% in the elderly [1]. The utilization of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has been increasing rapidly for treatment of patients with symptomatic severe AS who are at prohibitive or high surgical risk. Infective endocarditis (IE) is the third or fourth most common life-threatening infection [2]. The long-term incidence of IE following TAVR (TAVR-IE) is 3.1%, with a median

Data source and study population

This study used the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database from 2012 to 2014, developed by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ). The NIS database, the largest publicly available healthcare database in the USA, approximates a 20% stratified sample of discharges from all US community hospitals, and represents more than 97% of the US population [8]. The sampling design of this nationally representative NIS database has been validated previously in numerous publications [9], [10]

Results

Of the 107,441,456 discharge records in the NIS data from 1st January 2012 to 31st December 2014, 41,025 patients (aged ≥18 years) who underwent TAVR were identified. Table I shows the comparison of clinical characteristics between patient groups with and without in-hospital TAVR-IE. One hundred and twenty patients (0.3%) developed in-hospital TAVR-IE. The patients with in-hospital TAVR-IE were younger and had a higher burden of comorbidities, including drug abuse, human immunodeficiency virus

Discussion

In this study of a large nationally representative data set of US hospitals examining in-hospital IE following TAVR between 2012 and 2014, several important findings were identified. First, the incidence of healthcare-associated in-hospital IE following TAVR was 0.3%, with viridans group streptococci being the most common causative organism. Second, patients with TAVR-IE experienced significantly higher incidence rates of in-hospital complications including mortality than those without IE after

Conflict of interest statement

None declared.

Funding sources

This work was supported by grants from the Michael Wolk Heart Foundation and the New York Cardiac Center, Inc., New York, USA.

References (33)

  • C.M. Otto et al.

    2017 ACC expert consensus decision pathway for transcatheter aortic valve replacement in the management of adults with aortic stenosis: a report of the American College of Cardiology Task Force on Clinical Expert Consensus Documents

    J Am Coll Cardiol

    (2017)
  • G. Pons-Llado et al.

    Findings on Doppler echocardiography in asymptomatic intravenous heroin users

    Am J Cardiol

    (1992)
  • L.M. Baddour et al.

    Infective endocarditis in adults: diagnosis, antimicrobial therapy, and management of complications: a scientific statement for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association

    Circulation

    (2015)
  • N.T. Olsen et al.

    Prosthetic valve endocarditis after transcatheter aortic valve implantation

    Circ Cardiovasc Interv

    (2015)
  • I.J. Amat-Santos et al.

    Infective endocarditis after transcatheter aortic valve implantation: results from a large multicenter registry

    Circulation

    (2015)
  • Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality

    Overview of the national (nationwide) inpatient sample (NIS)

    (2018)
  • Cited by (14)

    • Infective Endocarditis—Update for the Perioperative Clinician

      2023, Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia
    • The evolution of polyurethane heart valve replacements: How chemistry translates to the clinic

      2022, Materials Today Communications
      Citation Excerpt :

      Compared with MHVs, bioprosthetic valves obtained from animal tissue are considerably softer and more flexible, offering leaflet movements that resemble native heart valves [33–38]. However, bioprosthetic valves are prone to calcification, tissue failure, adverse inflammatory responses, and variable durability, particularly in younger patients [39–47], while transcatheter BHVs have been known to be susceptible to infection [48–50]. Moreover, BHVs cannot be customized to adopt the specific anatomy of patients as their specifications (e.g., thickness distribution, shape) are set by their biological donors [51,52].

    • Incidence, Predictors, and Outcomes of Endocarditis After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in the United States

      2020, JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions
      Citation Excerpt :

      Follow-up of endocarditis readmissions occurred through December 2017, providing a minimum follow-up period of 60 days for all patients. We identified the microbial organisms of endocarditis using validated ICD-9 and ICD-10 codes that were utilized in prior studies (Supplemental Table 1) (16–18). Based on the time of occurrence of endocarditis after the index TAVR admission, patients were classified into 3 groups—very early (≤30 days), early (31 days to 1 year), and late (>1 year) endocarditis—following definitions previously described (11).

    • Infective endocarditis in patients who have undergone transcatheter aortic valve implantation: a review

      2020, Clinical Microbiology and Infection
      Citation Excerpt :

      The Fig. S1 shows the selection process of the included studies (Fig. S1). TAVI-IE is defined as early IE (IE related to THV within 12 months after TAVI) or late IE (IE > 12 months from TAVI) [19,20]. In-hospital IE subsequent to TAVI was investigated in a US cross-sectional study of the National Inpatient Sample database where 120 of 41 025 patients (0.3%) developed IE during hospitalization for TAVI leading to higher rates of death (20.8% vs. 4.1%, p < 0.001) [19].

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text