Elsevier

Journal of Human Evolution

Volume 61, Issue 5, November 2011, Pages 549-563
Journal of Human Evolution

Precision dating of the Palaeolithic: A new radiocarbon chronology for the Abri Pataud (France), a key Aurignacian sequence

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhevol.2011.06.005Get rights and content

Abstract

This paper presents a new series of AMS dates on ultrafiltered bone gelatin extracted from identified cutmarked or humanly-modified bones and teeth from the site of Abri Pataud, in the French Dordogne. The sequence of 32 new determinations provides a coherent and reliable chronology from the site’s early Upper Palaeolithic levels 5–14, excavated by Hallam Movius. The results show that there were some problems with the previous series of dates, with many underestimating the real age. The new results, when calibrated and modelled using a Bayesian statistical method, allow detailed understanding of the pace of cultural changes within the Aurignacian I and II levels of the site, something not achievable before. In the future, the sequence of dates will allow wider comparison to similarly dated contexts elsewhere in Europe. High precision dating is only possible by using large suites of AMS dates from humanly-modified material within well understood archaeological sequences modelled using a Bayesian statistical method.

Introduction

A proper understanding of the cultural and behavioural changes that accompanied the Middle to Upper Palaeolithic transition in Europe is predicated upon a reliable chronological framework. The pattern of dispersal by anatomically modern humans in Western Europe, the spread of the Aurignacian and the subsequent disappearance of Neanderthals, can only be disentangled with a solid and reliable chronology. Radiocarbon dating is the most important chronometric method for the period, but since the inception of the method, dates have been plagued by problems of precision, a lack of calibration and associated difficulties encountered during the measurement of samples with low levels of remaining 14C. A lack of precise dates has made it impossible to compare the appearance of similar items in different regions and track cultural changes (Pettitt, 1999). In addition, it has been extremely difficult to work out the temporal relationship between transitional industries such as the Châtelperronian and the Aurignacian, and to test models of ‘acculturation’ or the independent development of Upper Palaeolithic ‘modern’ behaviour by Neanderthals. As such, debates over these issues have run for decades with little or no resolution (Mellars, 1973, Mellars, 1989, Mellars, 1999, Mellars, 2004, Mellars, 2005, Mellars, 2006, White, 1982, d’Errico et al., 1998, Zilhão and d’Errico, 1999, Zilhão and d’Errico, 2003, d’Errico, 2003, Teyssandier et al., 2006, Zilhão, 2006).

Sadly, the databases of radiocarbon dates that are available for sites from the period are filled with many dates that are now known to be problematic or at least potentially quite problematic. Recent work has shown that there are severe doubts regarding the reliability of the majority of the radiocarbon dates obtained thus far on material dating to the Middle and Upper Palaeolithic of Europe. The problems are mainly related to consistent underestimating of the true age for specific samples, which are almost certainly due to the difficulties in effectively decontaminating samples of bone from the deleterious effects of modern carbon contamination (Higham et al., 2006, Higham et al., 2009, Higham, 2011). Similarly, there have been significant challenges in overcoming the effect of the radiocarbon background limit. It is only comparatively recently that programmes to attempt to quantify the background limits for dating bone beyond 40,000 BP (before present) have been developed (see Hedges and Pettitt, 1998). Given that the transition is thought to lie between about this age and ∼35,000 BP, one can see that the potential for age underestimation is only too real. Chappell et al. (1996) have drawn attention to this problem in dating archaeological contexts approaching the radiocarbon limit. Further problems are inherent in the lack of careful selection of material and the use of bulked samples for dating prior to the accelerator era.

Recent work suggests that the problems specific to pre-treatment chemistry, however, are being overcome. We have worked to develop and apply newer methods, including using an ultrafiltration protocol in our collagen extraction (Brown et al., 1988, Bronk Ramsey et al., 2004, Higham et al., 2006), as well as utilising more rigorous ABOx-SC preparation methods for dating charcoal (Bird et al., 1999, Higham et al., 2006, Higham et al., 2009). We inherit a legacy of problematic data, and so to address this we have been working on redating some of the key western European sequences within the orbit of a larger project (funded by the Natural Environment Research Council of the UK). Perhaps as many as 70% of previous radiocarbon dates may be aberrant at some Middle to Upper Palaeolithic sites (Higham, 2011) and those that are not are saved usually by having very large quoted uncertainties. At some sites, all of the dates are almost certainly erroneous, and at others perhaps 40% are questionable. As we shall see, the Abri Pataud is no exception in all of this. The principal reason is apparent when one compares radiocarbon dates of samples prepared before and after the application of ultrafiltration, in the case of bone, and ABOx, in the case of charcoal. Very often, the newly treated samples are significantly older, which we take to mean that they have more successfully been decontaminated of the modern carbon taken up during the burial history of the sample (Higham, 2011).

Section snippets

The Abri Pataud

The Abri Pataud is a key archaeological sequence in Les Eyzies-de-Tayac, in the French Dordogne. The site itself sits at the base of imposing limestone cliffs flanking the Vézère River (Fig. 1). Pataud was discovered at the end of the 19th century but it was not until the 1950s that extensive and deep excavations took place under the direction of Hallam L. Movius (Movius, 1977). These excavations were rigorous and innovative, and the recording techniques used at the time have allowed subsequent

Radiocarbon dating

This paper focuses on the chronology of the key Aurignacian and Early Gravettian layers of the site. Producing a reliable radiocarbon chronology is crucial because lithic sequences from many other sites dating to the period are compared against the Pataud sequence, since it is so extensive and deep, and it is one of the key Périgord sites. A large group of previous dates have been obtained (Table 1 and Fig. 3). Movius applied the radiocarbon method widely at the site. The dates initially

Methods

Initially, we planned to date directly samples of osseous bone implements, such as points, from the Abri Pataud sequence, but these were smaller than expected and had evidence for extensive glues and preservatives on the surfaces from conservation work. This could influence the accuracy of radiocarbon measurements. We decided instead to focus on humanly-modified and cut bone. Our first selection of samples in 2007 covered levels 6–14. Later, material from these levels and level 5 was resampled

Results

We have obtained 31 new AMS determinations. These are shown in Table 3. All analytical data associated with each of the dated bones is also provided. Three bones yielded collagen below our minimum required threshold of 1.0% weight. These were given OxA-X, rather than OxA- numbers, but overall the collagen yields were acceptable. Ultrafiltration reduces collagen yields compared with other techniques, but we think that this allows us to exclude potentially problematic, poorly preserved samples.

Calibration

Calibration of radiocarbon has proven particularly problematic within Marine Oxygen Isotope Stage 3 (MIOS3). In 2004, INTCAL04 was published, with a curve allowing calibration back to 26,000 cal BP, based on preliminary data mainly from coral and foraminifera (Reimer et al., 2004). In this paper, we use the INTCAL09 dataset, which spans back to 50 ka cal BP (Reimer et al., 2009). A note of caution is warranted regarding the use of calibration in this period. Calibration is an ongoing process

Bayesian modelling

A Bayesian modelling framework and OxCal 4.1 (Ramsey, 2001, Bronk Ramsey, 2009a) were used to analyse the radiocarbon data. This approach enables the incorporation of archaeological stratigraphic information along with the radiocarbon likelihoods obtained, within a statistical model. This method has been outlined in previous publications (e.g., Buck et al., 1996, Bronk Ramsey, 2009a). The model we developed is shown in Fig. 4. It consists of a series of phases, represented by the successive

Discussion

As mentioned above, boundaries mark the start and end dates of Eboulis through the sequence as well as archaeological levels (Fig. 5). These boundaries are not dated themselves, but are produced as part of the modelling as probability distribution functions (PDFs). They allow us to provide temporal constraints for when events occurred, began or ended, through the archaeological sequence.

We have tentatively compared the new chronological sequence with the NGRIP δ18O palaeotemperature profiles

Conclusions

New radiocarbon dating, involving the pre-treatment of bone using an ultrafiltration protocol, as well as the application of Bayesian modelling to the results, has provided for the first time a precise chronological sequence for Aurignacian levels 6–14, and Gravettian level 5, at the site of Abri Pataud. Previous dates are shown to be almost completely unreliable. The principal reason is that the type of material that was dated was not reliable. In some contexts (e.g. Level 6) the previous

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge the entire team at the Oxford Radiocarbon Accelerator Unit, University of Oxford, particularly F. Brock, M. Humm, D. Baker, A. Bowles, B. Emery, P. Leach and J. Davies. The Natural Environment Research Council (NERC) (grant NE/D014077/1) funded this work. We acknowledge, with gratitude, the help of Dr. C. Vercoutère (Paris), Dr. R. Dinnis (Sheffield) and Mrs. Margaret Chapman (Cheddar) for discussions and in helping us sort and select good material for dating at the Musée de

References (85)

  • T.F.G. Higham et al.

    Problems with radiocarbon dating the Middle to Upper Palaeolithic transition in Italy

    Quatern. Sci. Rev.

    (2009)
  • K. Hughen et al.

    Marine-derived 14C calibration and activity record for the past 50,000 years updated from the Cariaco Basin

    Quatern. Sci. Rev.

    (2006)
  • R. Nespoulet

    Le Gravettien final de l’abri Pataud, Les Eyzies-de-Tayac, Dordogne. Nouvelles données technologiques et typologiques sur l’industrie lithique provenant du niveau 3

    L’Anthropologie

    (2000)
  • P. Sepulchre et al.

    H4 abrupt event and late Neanderthal presence in Iberia

    Earth Planet. Sci. Lett.

    (2007)
  • P. Shipman et al.

    Burnt bones and teeth: an experimental study of color, morphology, crystal structure and shrinkage

    J. Archaeol. Sci.

    (1984)
  • R.A. Staff et al.

    A re-analysis of the Lake Suigetsu terrestrial radiocarbon calibration dataset

    Nucl. Instrum. Methods B

    (2010)
  • A. Svensson et al.

    The Greenland ice core chronology 2005, 15–42 ka. Part 2: comparison to other records

    Quatern. Sci. Rev.

    (2006)
  • B. Weninger et al.

    14C age calibration curve for the last 60 ka: the Greenland-Hulu U/Th timescale and its impact on understanding the Middle to Upper Paleolithic

    J. Hum. Evol.

    (2008)
  • M.I. Bird et al.

    Radiocarbon dating of ’old’ charcoal using a wet oxidation-stepped combustion procedure

    Radiocarbon

    (1999)
  • M. Blaauw et al.

    Were last glacial climate events simultaneous between Greenland and France? A quantitative comparison using non-tuned chronologies

    J. Quatern. Sci.

    (2010)
  • B. Bosselin

    Contribution de l’abri Pataud à la chronologie du Gravettien Français

    Bull. Soc. Préhist. Fr.

    (1996)
  • B. Bosselin et al.

    La chronologie du Gravettien français

    Préhist. Européenne

    (1994)
  • J. Bouchud

    Etude de la faune de l’abri Pataud, les Eyzies, Dordogne

  • Bricker, H.M., 1973. The Perigordian IV and related cultures in France. Ph.D. Dissertation, Harvard...
  • Bricker, H.M., 1995. Le Paléolithique supérieur de l’abri Pataud (Dordogne) : les fouilles de H. L. Movius Jr....
  • H.M. Bricker et al.

    Excavation of the Abri Pataud, Les Eyzies (Dordogne)

    (1984)
  • H.M. Bricker et al.

    Datation 14C de l’abri Pataud (Les Eyzies, Dordogne) par le procédé accélérateur-spetromètre de masse

    L’Anthropologie

    (1987)
  • F. Brock et al.

    Current pretreatment methods for AMS radiocarbon dating at the Oxford Radiocarbon Accelerator Unit (ORAU)

    Radiocarbon

    (2010)
  • C. Bronk Ramsey

    Development of the radiocarbon program OxCal

    Radiocarbon

    (2001)
  • C. Bronk Ramsey

    Bayesian analysis of radiocarbon dates

    Radiocarbon

    (2009)
  • C. Bronk Ramsey

    Dealing with outliers and offsets in radiocarbon dating

    Radiocarbon

    (2009)
  • C. Bronk Ramsey et al.

    Improvements to the pre-treatment of bone at Oxford

    Radiocarbon

    (2004)
  • T.A. Brown et al.

    Improved collagen extraction by modified long in method

    Radiocarbon

    (1988)
  • C.E. Buck et al.

    Bayesian Approach to Interpreting Archaeological Data

    (1996)
  • J. Chappell et al.

    Beyond the radiocarbon limit in Australian archaeology and Quaternary research

    Antiquity

    (1996)
  • Chiotti, L. 2005. Les industries lithiques aurignaciennes de l’abri Pataud, Dordogne, France. Les fouilles de Hallam L....
  • L. Chiotti et al.

    L’apport méthodologique des fouilles de Hallam L. Movius à l’abri Pataud (Les Eyzies-de-Tayac, Dordogne). Un siècle de construction du discours scientifique en Préhistoire, XXVIème Congrès préhistorique de France

    (2007)
  • L. Chiotti et al.

    Comportments techniques et de subsistance à l’Aurignacien ancien: la couche 11 de l’abri Pataud (Dordogne)

    Gallia Préhist

    (2003)
  • N.C. David

    Excavation of the Abri Pataud, Les Eyzies (Dordogne): the Noaillian (Level 4) assemblages and the Noaillian Culture in Western Europe

    (1985)
  • F. Delpech et al.

    Approche stratigraphique des temps Gravettiens: l’éclairage aquitain

    Paléo

    (2007)
  • F. d’Errico

    The invisible frontier. A multiple species model for the origin of behavioral modernity

    Evol. Anthropol.

    (2003)
  • F. d’Errico et al.

    Neanderthal acculturation in Western Europe? A critical review of the evidence and its interpretation

    Curr. Anthropol.

    (1998)
  • Cited by (0)

    1

    Deceased.

    View full text