Pentamethylcyclopentadienyl rhodium(III) trifluorovinyl phosphine complexes and attempted intramolecular dehydrofluorinative coupling of pentamethylcyclopentadienyl and trifluorovinyl phosphine ligands
Graphical abstract
Treatment of cationic rhodium piano stool complexes with trifluorovinylphosphines with proton sponge yields complexes of tethered ligands.
Introduction
In contrast to fluorinated aryl and alkyl phosphines [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9], [10], fluoroalkenylphosphines have received relatively little attention [11], [12], [13]. Following the development of a convenient synthetic route to [CF2CF]−Li+ from the readily available HFC-134a (CF3CH2F), and subsequent syntheses of trifluorovinylphosphines R3−xP(CFCF2)x [14], [15], [16], a number of complexes of trifluorovinylphosphines with molybdenum [15], platinum [15], [17] and gold [15] have been reported over the past decade.
The trifluorovinyl substituent is known to be susceptible to nucleophilic attack [16], [18], with substitution of the fluorine atom trans to the phosphorus atom, which allows the opportunity for functionalizing the phosphine. One attractive possibility is the intramolecular coupling of metal-bound cyclopentadienyl and trifluorovinylphosphine ligands. Rhodium complexes of chelating bi- and tri-functional cyclopentadienyl–phosphine ligands have been synthesized by intramolecular dehydrofluorinative carbon–carbon coupling [19], [20], [21], [22], [23], [24]. These ligands contain a three-carbon atom linkage between the cyclopentadienyl ring and the phosphorus atom. To date the complexes synthesized by this method have been restricted to those in which two of the carbon atoms in the linkage are part of a fluoroaromatic group: tetrafluorophenyl [19], [20], [21], [24], fluorophenyl [22] or trifluoropyridyl [23]. The coupling occurs on addition of proton sponge to the salts [Cp*RhCl(PL)]+ (PL = chelating fluoroarylphosphine) or [Cp*RhClL(P)]+, or by heating a benzene solution of [Cp*RhCl(μ-Cl)]2 and PL. The reaction is postulated to proceed by generation of a nucleophilic exo methylene carbon atom by loss of a proton from the pentamethylcyclopentadienyl ring of the cation and subsequent attack at the ortho position of a fluoroarene [19], [25]. If this mechanism is correct then the trifluorovinyl group would be suitable as a substituent leading to a three-carbon atom linkage in which two of the carbon atoms are part of an alkene.
Here we report rhodium piano stool complexes comprising trifluorovinylphosphines and an investigation into the intramolecular coupling of η5-pentamethylcyclopentadienyl to phosphine and phosphine–thioether ligands bearing trifluorovinyl substituents.
Section snippets
Synthesis and characterization
Cleavage of the chloride bridges of the rhodium(III) dimer [Cp*RhCl(μ-Cl)]2 with two equivalents of the trifluorovinyl phosphines PR2(CFCF2) (R = Ph [15], Pri [16], Et [16]), afforded deep orange to red complexes of formula [Cp*RhCl2{PR2(CFCF2)}] (R = Ph 1a, Pri 1b, Et 1c) in ca. 50% yield (Scheme 1). Complexation of the phosphines is confirmed by the 31P{1H} NMR spectra (Table 1), which exhibit doublet resonances with coupling constants of ca. 150 Hz, which are typical for rhodium complexes of
Conclusion
Intramolecular dehydrofluorinative coupling has been achieved between the pentamethylcyclopentadienyl ligand and trifluorovinyl substituents of phosphines in cationic rhodium complexes. However, a mixture of products containing alkene and alkane linkages resulted due to addition of hydrogen fluoride across the vinyl double bond.
Instrumentation
The 1H, 13C, 19F and 31P NMR spectra were recorded using Bruker DPX300 or DPX200 spectrometers. 1H (300.01 or 200.20 MHz) were referenced internally using the residual protio solvent resonance relative to SiMe4 (δ 0), 13C (50.29 MHz) externally to SiMe4 (δ 0), 19F (282.26 or 188.31 MHz) externally to CFCl3 (δ 0) and 31P (121.45 or 81.03 MHz) externally to 85% H3PO4 (δ 0). All chemical shifts are quoted in δ (ppm), using the high frequency positive convention, and coupling constants in hertz. IR
Acknowledgements
We thank ICI Klea for supplying CF3CH2F and I.R. Crossley for helpful discussion.
References (32)
- et al.
Inorg. Chim. Acta
(2005) - et al.
J. Organomet. Chem.
(2000) - et al.
Inorg. Chem. Commun.
(2006) - et al.
J. Chem. Soc. A
(1968) - et al.
J. Chem. Soc., Dalton Trans.
(1995) - et al.
Organometallics
(1998) - et al.
J. Chem. Soc., Dalton Trans.
(2000) - et al.
Can. J. Chem.
(2001) - et al.
Eur. J. Inorg. Chem.
(2001) - et al.
Chem. Commun.
(2004)
Dalton Trans.
Organometallics
Chem. Commun.
Khim. Nauk. Prom.
J. Am. Chem. Soc.
Chemiker-Zeitung
Cited by (13)
Oxidative additions on indenyl rhodium complexes bearing the hemilabile homoallyldiphenylphosphane (HADPP) ligand
2014, Journal of Organometallic ChemistryIntramolecular dehydrofluorinative coupling of η<sup>6</sup>-arene and fluoroarylphosphine ligands in ruthenium complexes
2011, Journal of Fluorine ChemistryCitation Excerpt :The coupling reaction was assessed by in situ NMR experiments on a range of cationic complexes containing different arene and phosphine ligands and on a neutral complex. This strategy has proved useful for assessing the analogous reaction with η5-cyclopentadienide rhodium complexes of polyfluoroaryl- [2] and trifluorovinyl-phopshines [25]. The salts [(η6-toluene)RuCl(dfppe)]BF4, 4, and [(η6-p-cymene)RuCl(dfppe)]BF4, 5, were prepared by treatment of the appropriate [ArRuCl2]2 complex with dfppe in the presence of an excess of tetrafluoroborate, and obtained in moderate to high yields as orange microcrystalline solids.
Synthesis and characterization of half-sandwich Rh, Ir complexes containing mono-thiolate-ortho-carborane ligand
2010, Journal of Organometallic ChemistryCitation Excerpt :The Ir (III) center is also a three-legged piano-stool with Ir atom coordinated by the η5-Cp∗, one CarbS ligand, one phosphorus atom and one chloride atom. The distances Rh(1)–S(1) 2.3848(9) Å, Rh(1)–P(1) 2.3157(10) Å are a litter shorter than that of Rh(1)–Cl(1) 2.4122(9) Å, which are all within the range of known values for them in analogous complexes [10,31,49]. And the lengths Ir(1)–P(1) 2.2998(13) Å, Ir(1)–S(1) 2.3821(12) Å and Ir(1)–Cl(1) 2.4088(12) Å, are all comparable to those reported for the Ir(III) complexes with P,S-ligands [48].
Fluoroalkenyl, fluoroalkynyl and fluoroalkyl phosphines
2009, Journal of Fluorine ChemistryFilling a Niche in “Ligand Space” with Bulky, Electron-Poor Phosphorus(III) Alkoxides
2019, Chemistry - A European Journal