Fractography of biaxial tested Si3N4-specimens
Introduction
At low temperatures brittle fracture is the most significant damage mechanism in ceramics. Fractographic analyses are used to investigate failure in service or to find fracture initiating flaws in test specimens in order to provide a guide to material, process or design improvement. In general, the strength of ceramics is measured with uniaxial bending tests. In the past many authors have described the performing of a fractographic analyses including practical examples (e.g. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7).
However, in most cases these examples were given for specimens, which were tested in uniaxial bending experiments on bars and rods. The Ball-on-Three Balls Test is a new possibility for biaxial testing and can be applied on specimens, which have different shapes (like discs or plates) and sizes ranging from approximately 1 mm up to some 10 mm in diameter (details concerning the B3B-test can be found in 8, 9, 10, 11, 12). Since this test is relatively new, only little fractographic work on B3B-specimens has been published yet (e.g. [13]). In this paper we present the results of an extensive investigation of silicon nitride specimens fractured using the B3B-test.
Section snippets
Identification of fracture origins
The failure of polycrystalline ceramics with no or low porosity is caused by the extension of a single crack. Failure starts from a defect which acts as (or develops into) a sharp crack, is called the fracture origin. One definition for the fracture origin, given in,5 states that the “fracture origin is both a location and a flaw”, and defines the fracture origin as “the source from which brittle fracture begins”. With increasing crack propagation the speed of the crack accelerates and can
Investigated material
The investigated Si3N4-specimens were disc shaped (diameter 20 mm, thickness approximately 2 mm) and manufactured by FCT Ingenieurkeramik, Germany. The surfaces of batches of the 260 specimens were machined in eight different ways; afterwards approximately half of each batch was annealed (temperature 1000 °C, exposure time 10 h13). Fig. 2 summarizes the surface conditions and the results of the strength tests of the different batches.
The size of the fracture origins (calculated with Eq. (3) for the
Fractographic investigation and discussion
During the strength experiments, particularly the annealed specimens (which have a higher strength) broke in many fragments and splints. Commonly the number of fragments increases with the stored elastic energy, see Fig. 3. Due to the high fracture forces and the contact of the fragments with balls and jig secondary damage occurred. Because sometimes small fragments or shards get lost during the experiment, it was not possible to identify typical fracture origins in many cases. On the tensile
Conclusions
The B3B-test applies a biaxial stress field to the specimen; the highest tensile stress appears in a small area on the surface of the specimens and decreases very rapidly towards the periphery and into the volume of the disc. Therefore the result of the test is very sensitive to surface defects which appear in the centre of the disc.
The fracture origins which were identified in this investigation were therefore in most cases surface defects (type 1 and type 2) or near surface located flaws
References (25)
- et al.
The ball on three balls test for strength testing of brittle discs: stress distribution in the disc
J Eur Ceram Soc
(2002) - et al.
The ball on three balls test for strength testing of brittle discs: Part II: analysis of possible errors in the strength distribution
J Eur Ceram Soc
(2004) - et al.
The ball on three balls test – strength and failure analysis of different materials
J Eur Ceram Soc
(2007) - et al.
Influence of surface defects on the biaxial strength of a silicon nitride ceramic-Increase of strength by crack healing
J Eur Ceram Soc
(2012) - et al.
“Snow flake” structures in silicon nitride ceramics—reasons for large scale inhomogeneities
J Eur Ceram Soc
(2008) Some notes on the correlation between fracture and defect statistics
J Eur Ceram Soc
(2006)- et al.
Residual stress field of HIPed silicon nitride rolling elements
Cer Int
(2002) - et al.
Examination of the material removal mechanisms during the lapping process of advanced ceramic rolling elements
Wear
(2005) Ceramic Fracture Features, Observations, Mechanisms, and Uses
ASTM STP 827
(1984)Quantitative fractography: an assessment
Ceram Trans
(1991)
Fractography and fracture mechanics property assessment of advanced structural ceramics
Int Mater Rev
Fractography of brittle materials (Measurement Good Practice Guide No. 14, HMSO)
Cited by (10)
Stereolithography-based additive manufacturing of polymer-derived SiOC/SiC ceramic composites
2022, Journal of the European Ceramic SocietyCitation Excerpt :In case of the specimen shown, the fracture origin can be seen as an indentation on the tensile surface at higher magnification (Fig. 11b). These indentions at the surface originate from machining flaws during the polishing process, as seen in Fig. 6 [26]. It appears that the crack originates from the center of the specimen, which is plausible since the highest tensile stress is applied to the specimen at this point, as can be seen in Fig. 8b.
Influence of laser surface texturing on the flexural strength of Al<inf>2</inf>O<inf>3</inf> and Si<inf>3</inf>N<inf>4</inf>
2022, Journal of the European Ceramic SocietyCitation Excerpt :The hackle lines which are usually identified from large radial shaped ridges indicate that the fracture starts near or at the surface of the tensile side [30]. Harrer et al. [30,31] categorized the defect types of Si3N4 specimens in B3B test. Since the specimens in our study are polished with very good surface quality, it is believed that surface-connected defects or near surface located defects are responsible for the fracture.
Survival probability of zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate ceramic: Effect of surface condition and fatigue test load profile
2020, Dental MaterialsCitation Excerpt :All discs from roughened condition failed into 3 pieces, while polished discs showed higher number of pieces than the discs tested under aggressive profile (Fig. 3). Several investigations had already correlated the higher number of broken pieces with higher values of strength [35–38]. However, information on the influence of the load profile on the fracture mode of the specimens is still scarce.
Uniaxial/biaxial flexure strengths and elastic properties of resin-composite block materials for CAD/CAM
2019, Dental MaterialsCitation Excerpt :This trend (for VE and UL) appeared more clearly in the BOR testing than that observed in the 3PBS testing of a previous study [55]. The multiple fragmentations in the biaxial disks result from the high-strain energy stored during loading [10,56]. Biaxial flexure tests were originally developed for brittle ceramic or glassy materials, and solutions for the BFS were based on a linear elastic equation by Kirstein and Woolley [48].
Strength of pure alumina ceramics above 1 GPa
2018, Ceramics International