Chemical fixation of toxic metals in stainless steel pickling residue by Na2S∙xH2O, FeSO4∙6H2O and phosphoric acid for beneficial uses

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jes.2019.12.016Get rights and content

Abstract

The leaching concentrations of different metals in stainless steel pickling residue (SSPR) were determined and the toxic metals were treated using Na2S∙xH2O, FeSO4∙6H2O, and phosphoric acid. A modified European Community Bureau of Reference (BCR) sequential extraction was used to identify the speciation of the concerned metals. Results showed that SSPR contains a large amount of Ca (58.41%), Fe (29.44%), Cr (3.83%), Ni (2.94%), Mn (2.82%) and some of Al, Cu, Mg, Zn. Among them, Cr and Ni were the most toxic metals in SSPR, thus the raw SSPR falls into hazardous waste category due to the leaching amount of Cr. In addition, the leached Cr was identified as Cr6+ (MgCrO4) in the waste. BCR test revealed that risk assessment code (RAC) of Cr and Ni were 33.29% and 61.7%, indicating they posed “high” and “very high” risk to the environment, respectively. After fixing by Na2S∙xH2O and FeSO4∙6H2O, the leaching concentrations of Cr and Ni were less than 1.5 and 0.5 mg/L, respectively. After fixing by Na2S∙xH2O and FeSO4∙6H2O the treated SSPR can be safely reused as roadbed materials, concrete and cement aggregates. This study provides a useful implication in treatment and beneficial reuse of heavy metal-containing hazardous wastes.

Introduction

Stainless steel consists of a group of metals with high percentage of iron (Fe), chromium (Cr), nickel (Ni) and manganese (Mn). The stainless steel is famous for its corrosion resistance which mainly depends on the amount of Cr. According to the International Stainless Steel Forum (ISSF), the minimum content of Cr in crude stainless steel should no less than 10% (ISSF, 2012). During stainless steel production, pickling is an important process that usually employed to improve the surface quality of the stainless steel. In pickling process, aggressive mixed acids (i.e., nitric acid and hydrofluoric acid) were used to remove the scale layers from the steel surface and thus, pig iron powder as well as various heavy metals dissolved into pickling liquors (Shi, 2015). The resulted pickling liquors were then precipitated using lime (CaO) or calcium hydroxide (Ca(OH)2) and produced a large amount of sludge. The sludge was then dewatered and finally concerted to residue with a moisture content of 50%–60%. The toxicity characteristic of the residue exceeded the national hazardous waste standards due to the leaching concentrations of Cr and Ni (Zhang et al., 2015, Su et al., 2019a). However, the disposal of stainless steel pickling residue (SSPR) in the hazardous waste landfill is inexecutable due to the high disposal cost and limited landfill space. Therefore, the SSPR had to be temporarily stored on sites in China (NBS, 2013). This provisional solution has the potential of contaminating the sites with heavy metals that could leach out from the SSPR through contacting with rain and surface water. Base on above concerns, there is an acute need to treat and dispose of SSPR.

As have been reported in previous publications, stabilization/solidification (S/S) was commonly used to treat heavy metal-containing solid wastes (Karayannis et al., 2017). Portland cement, fly ash, lime, and thermoplastic materials were widely used as binders (Hu, 2005, Li et al., 2011, Bie et al., 2016). In the S/S process, the mobility of the heavy metals was minimized and the engineering properties of wastes were improved (Wang et al., 2018, Su et al., 2019b). Nevertheless, S/S with above-mentioned binders introduce a large amount of binder that results in a significant increase in the volume and weight of the wastes. This is unacceptable due to the rapid urbanization and increase in the land price. Research indicated that thermal treatment (i.e., incineration, melting and combustion) was an attractive option for waste sludge treatment due to its energy recovery and advantage of reduction of solid waste amount by weight and volume (Zhang et al., 2008, Hu et al., 2013). However, this SSPR was produced from chemical precipitation of industrial pickling liquor that there were almost no organic matters in it. Consequently, SSPR cannot be treated by thermal treatment solely. In this case, Zhang et al. (2017) investigated co-combustion of bituminous coal and pickling sludge in a drop-tube furnace. Their results revealed that heavy metals in flue gas met the national standard, however, the leaching toxicity of the bottom ash exceeded the thresholds for landfill disposal. In addition, harmful off-gases such as SO2, NOx, HF and HCl were detected in the emissions (Zhang et al., 2016).

By comparison, chemical fixation enables to immobilize heavy metals in solid wastes without pre-treatment which makes it cost-efficient, land-saving and thus a promising technology (Jiang et al., 2004, Quina et al., 2014, Wang et al., 2015). Hu (2005) studied the fixation of Pb in municipal solid waste incineration (MSWI) ash using ferrous/ferric solution and stated that when MSWI ash was treated with 1.6 mol/L ferrous/ferric sulfate solution, the formation of MFe2O4 and Ca3Fe9O17 could reduce the leaching concentration of Pb significantly. Moreover, it has been proved that metals in air pollution control (APC) residue could be effectively fixed by soluble phosphates and sodium carbonate (Quina et al., 2010). If the toxic metals in the SSPR can be fixed by chemical fixation, it will provide a new approach to deal with the final disposal of SSPR. Therefore, the objective of this paper was to study the chemical fixation of toxic metals in SSPR. Three chemicals: sodium sulfide hydrate (Na2S∙xH2O), ferrous sulfate heptahydrate (FeSO4∙6H2O), and phosphoric acid (H3PO4) were employed to disclose whether precipitation or reduction working on the treatment of metals in SSPR. The leaching amount of different metals was determined using different toxicity characteristic leaching procedures. A modified European Community Bureau of Reference (BCR) sequential leaching method was conducted to recognize the environmental risk and existing forms of metals in the samples before and after fixation.

Section snippets

Materials

The SSPR was obtained from Dainan town in Jiangsu province, China. There are over 1200 stainless steel factories in Dainan and thus, the environmental problems caused by SSPR are very prominent in this town. The moisture content of the SSPR was determined to be 53.3% and the pH was measured to be 9.01 according to U.S. Environmental protection agency (EPA) Method 9045D - Soil and waste pH (USEPA, 2004). Before use, the SSPR was dried at 105°C and crushed into fine particles.

The sodium sulfide

Total amount of different metals detected in the SSPR

The total amount of different metals in the SSPR was determined and the results indicated that SSPR contains a large amount of Ca and Fe (175,000 and 88,200 mg/kg, respectively). This is reasonable because Ca(OH)2 was used to precipitate the pickling liquors and pig iron existed in the scale layer dissolved in the pickling process (Leonzio, 2016). The total amount of other metals followed the order of Cr (11,500 mg/kg) > Ni (8800 mg/kg) > Mn (8470 mg/kg) > Mg (3590 mg/kg) > Al (3150 mg/kg) > Cu

Conclusions

In this study, the leaching concentration of different metals in SSPR was determined by three different single extraction and BCR sequential extraction. The risk assessment code of the metals was also determined. We also studied the chemical fixation performance of Na2S∙xH2O, FeSO4∙6H2O, and H3PO4 on the toxic metals. The results indicated that SSPR is a hazardous waste with respect to its leaching toxicity. Cr was identified as the most toxic heavy metal due to its total amount was

Declaration of interests

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by Tsinghua University Graduate School in Shen Zhen, China and Jackson State University, USA through a collaborative effort. The authors thank Prof. Fengxiang Han and Dr. Rong Zhang at Jackson State University, Mississippi, USA for their assistance in XRD and SEM analysis of the samples. We also thank Dr. Rui Xu for his work about chemical analysis.

References (31)

Cited by (12)

  • Effective removal of non-radioactive and radioactive cesium from wastewater generated by washing treatment of contaminated steel ash

    2023, Nuclear Engineering and Technology
    Citation Excerpt :

    There have been relatively numerous reports of using iron sulfate to remove the various hazardous chemicals in wastewater. However, there is hardly evidence concerning its use to remove radionuclides in radioactive liquid waste [24,25]. Therefore, the use of iron-potassium ferrocyanide (FeKFC) as a precipitant is an interesting way to support cesium removal in aqueous solutions.

  • Bioremediation of stainless steel pickling sludge through microbially induced carbonate precipitation

    2022, Chemosphere
    Citation Excerpt :

    The SSPS usually contains large amounts of metals like calcium (Ca), iron (Fe), and significant amounts of heavy metals such as chromium (Cr), nickel (Ni), zinc (Zn), etc. (Zhang et al., 2017; Wu et al., 2019; Su et al., 2019). Besides, SSPS has been recognized as hazardous waste due to the high leaching concentration of Cr and Ni, making the disposal of SSPS an intractable issue from the environmental perspective (Su et al., 2020; Liu et al., 2020). Traditional techniques for SSPS treatment include but are not limited to cement stabilization/solidification.

  • Recovery of iron from iron-rich pickling sludge for preparing P-doped polyferric chloride coagulant

    2021, Chemosphere
    Citation Excerpt :

    If these heavy metal-containing wastewaters are not pretreated to reduce the toxicity, they are not allowed to enter the sewage pipeline. Therefore, most steel manufacturing companies will neutralize these wastewaters using lime before discharging (Singhal et al., 2008; Chen et al., 2010b; Su et al., 2020). The metals in the wastewaters will be precipitated through neutralization reaction to produce a large amount of pickling sludge.

  • Acid recovering and iron recycling from pickling waste acid by extraction and spray pyrolysis techniques

    2021, Journal of Cleaner Production
    Citation Excerpt :

    If these impurities were not erased completely, the subsequent processability would be aggravated seriously in the production of hot-dip galvanized steel, galvanized steel, coated steel, or plastic-coated steel (El Kacimi et al., 2020; Shibli et al., 2015). In acid pickling, pig iron powder would dissolve into pickling liquors, generating a great deal of waste acid solution containing high concentration of iron contents (Shi, 2015; Su et al., 2020). Iron ions in the spent pickling solution typically range from 40 to 150 g L−1, while hydrochloric acid concentration lies in the range of 15–30% w/w (Stocks et al., 2005).

View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text