Effects of suni-bug (Eurygaster spp.) damage on semolina properties and spaghetti quality characteristics of durum wheats (Triticum durum L.)
Introduction
Durum wheat (Triticum durum L.) is one of the most important cereal crops in the world. It is suitable for manufacturing various food products. Pasta is the most common product made from durum wheat. It is also used for the preparation of bulgur, noodles, couscous and various types of bread in the Middle East and North Africa (Elias, 1995, Troccoli et al., 2000).
Cooking quality of pasta is the characteristic of greatest importance for consumers and, therefore, of greatest importance to durum wheat producers, breeders and processors. During pasta cooking, a weak or discontinuous protein matrix results in a protein network that is too loose and permits a greater amount of exudates to escape during starch granule gelatinization (Resmini and Pagani, 1983). The exudates form a surface of starch and the pasta becomes sticky (Feillet, 1988), giving pasta strands the tendency to clump. The variation in pasta cooking quality is due in part to the amount of protein present in semolina samples and in part to the intrinsic characteristics of these proteins (i.e. quality). There is a general agreement that protein content is the primary factor influencing pasta quality and that gluten strength is an important secondary factor (D'Egidio et al., 1990, Feillet and Dexter, 1996, Malcolmson et al., 1993, Matsuo et al., 1982, Novaro et al., 1993). However, there are some other factors with substantial negative influence on gluten quality of durum wheat such as the damage by Heteropterous insects. Hence, in the present study, it was intended to investigate the effects of suni-bug (Eurygaster spp.) damage on gluten quality characteristics and spaghetti cooking properties of durum wheats.
It is known that the pre-harvest attack of wheat by some Heteropterous insects gives wheat flour with reduced bread-making quality (Harriri et al., 2000, Lorenz and Meredith, 1988, Swallow and Every, 1991). The bug damaged wheat contains salivary secretion of insects, which contains proteolytic enzyme(s) (Paulian and Popov, 1980). The protease enzyme breaks down the gluten structure during mixing and fermentation resulting in poor rheological properties and bread with reduced volume and unacceptable texture (Every et al., 1998, Kretovich, 1944, Lorenz and Meredith, 1988, Sivri et al., 1998, Sivri et al., 1999). Flour milled from bug (Eurygaster spp., Aelia spp. and Nysius huttoni) damaged wheat exhibits weak dough properties and unsatisfactory baking quality due to enzymatic degradation of gluten proteins (Cressey and McStay, 1987, Every, 1992, Köksel et al., 2001, Matsoukas and Morrison, 1990, Sivri et al., 1998, Sivri et al., 1999, Sivri and Köksel, 1996). It has been reported that insect infestation affects the glutenin and gliadin fraction of wheat proteins, with increased specificity towards the high molecular weight glutenin subunits (Cressey and McStay, 1987, Perez et al., 2005, Rosell et al., 2002, Sivri et al., 1999).
Although some research publications are available related to the effects of suni-bug damage on gluten proteins, rheological properties and baking quality of bread wheats, we have not encountered any study on the effects of suni-bug damage on pasta quality characteristics. Hence, the present study was planned to investigate the effects of suni-bug damage on some semolina properties and spaghetti quality characteristics of durum wheats (T. durum L.).
Section snippets
Material
Five suni-bug (Eurygaster spp.) damaged durum wheat samples (cvs. Ege, Diyarbakir, Firat, Svevo and Zenith) were obtained (around 50 kg each) from contracted farmers, Sanliurfa, Turkey. Especially Svevo and Zenith are the predominant durum wheat cultivars grown in that region and their pasta making quality is better than the other cultivars. First the wheat samples were cleaned to separate foreign material and heavily damaged kernels using a grain cleaning equipment (Robber D4950, Minden,
Bug damage levels of the samples
For each cultivar percent damage levels were determined “on a kernel number basis” and also “on a kernel weight basis”. The ranges of damage levels for medium damage samples were 22.6 ± 0.7 (number basis) and 20.7 ± 0.7 (weight basis) and the ranges for high damage samples were 43.5 ± 1.3 (number basis) and 39.0 ± 1.0 (weight basis). These ranges indicated that the damage levels of all cultivars were comparable within the medium damage samples, as well as within the high damage samples. Samples with
Discussion
In the present study, the effects of suni-bug damage on durum wheat gluten properties and spaghetti cooking quality were reported. The Glutograph values of the durum wheat semolina obtained from suni-bug damaged wheat samples decreased significantly as the damage levels increased, indicating alterations in gluten components. Suni-bug damage also caused important changes in the spaghetti cooking properties. TOM and CL values of spaghetti samples for all cultivars increased significantly with
Acknowledgment
The project was supported by Turkish Scientific and Technical Research Council (Project No: TOVAG 104 O 479).
References (30)
Relationship of bread baking quality to levels of visible wheat bug damage and insect proteinase activity in wheat
Journal of Cereal Science
(1992)- et al.
Wheat cultivar susceptibility to grain damage by the New Zealand wheat bug, Nysius huttoni, and cultivar susceptibility to the effects of bug proteinase on baking quality
Journal of Cereal Science
(1998) - et al.
Mini review: durum wheat quality: a multidisciplinary concept
Journal of Cereal Science
(2000) Approved Methods
(1990)- et al.
Wheat bug damage in New Zealand wheats: development of a simple SDS-sedimentation test for bug damage
Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture
(1987) - et al.
Standardization of cooking quality analysis in macaroni and pasta products
Cereal Foods World
(1982) - et al.
Viscoelastograph measures and total organic matter test: suitability in evaluating textural characteristics of cooked pasta
Cereal Chemistry
(1993) - et al.
Chemical and technological variables and their relationships: a predictive equation for pasta cooking quality
Cereal Chemistry
(1990) Durum wheat products
Protein and enzyme composition of durum wheat
Quality requirements of durum wheat for semolina milling and pasta production
Influence of pentatomid insects on the physical dough properties and two-layered flat bread baking quality of Syrian wheat
Journal of Cereal Science
Principles of Cereal Science and Technology
Effect of wheat bug (Eurygaster integriceps) damage on quality of a wheat variety grown in Turkey
Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture
Cited by (19)
Rheology as a tool to predict the effect of different biotic and abiotic factors on the quality of cereals and pseudocereals
2023, Developing Sustainable and Health-Promoting Cereals and Pseudocereals: Conventional and Molecular BreedingIn vitro glycemic index, bile acid binding capacity and mineral bioavailability of spaghetti supplemented with resistant starch type 4 and wheat bran
2020, Journal of Functional FoodsCitation Excerpt :The cooked spaghetti sample was weighed five minutes after draining. Water absorption was expressed as grams of water absorbed (during cooking) per gram of dry pasta (Ozderen, Olanca, Sanal, Ozay, & Koksel, 2008). The sensory characteristics of the cooked spaghetti samples were evaluated by a panel of experts.
Determination of wheat bug (Eurygaster spp.) damage in durum wheat (Triticum durum L.) by electrophoresis and rapid visco analyser
2016, Journal of Cereal ScienceCitation Excerpt :Flour milled from these grains exhibits weak dough properties and unsatisfactory baking quality due to its high content of protease(s) injected into grains by the insects during feeding (Matsoukas and Morrison, 1990; Sivri and Koksel, 2002). Spaghetti made from the bug damaged durum wheat was susceptible to breakage; and cooking (total organic matter and cooking loss values) and sensory properties (stickness, firmness and bulkiness) of pasta decreased due to deteriorative effects of bug damage on gluten quality of durum wheat (Ozderen et al., 2008). The deterioration of the spaghetti quality was attributed to decrease in unextractable polymeric protein (UPP) % of bug damaged durum wheat (Olanca et al., 2009).
Evaluation of common and durum wheat rheological quality through Mixolab<sup>®</sup> analysis after field damage by cereal bugs
2015, Field Crops ResearchCitation Excerpt :It can therefore be seen that the SSV analysis has been able to stress a significant difference, compared to the control even at a 1% replacement level with damaged kernels, thus confirming the remarkable ability of this test to detect the bug damage of flour. Ozderen et al. (2008) reported, for durum wheat, that the pasta processing industry could tolerate a relatively higher level of bug damage than the bread processing industry. Furthermore, the authors compared quite high bug damage levels (around 20% and 40%) with a sound control (0%), with reference to spaghetti cooking quality.
Marketing Perspectives in the Durum Wheat Trade
2012, Durum Wheat Chemistry and Technology: Second EditionGrading Factors Impacting Durum Wheat Processing Quality
2012, Durum Wheat Chemistry and Technology: Second Edition