A robust fuzzy optimization model for carbon-efficient closed-loop supply chain network design problem: a numerical illustration in electronics industry
Introduction
In supply chain management, to meet customers' demands and improve the general performance of a supply chain (SC), effort should be made to integrate its organizational units and coordinate material, information, and financial flows through proper management (Stadtler, 2005). In general, SC network flows are either forward (FSC) or reverse (RSC); the former encompasses all activities due to which raw materials turn into final products and managers try to improve its performance through demand management, procurement, and order fulfillment, but the latter on the other hand, deals with such activities as the collection and recycling of the returned products (Abdallah et al., 2012). The literature devoted to the RSC networks can be divided into problems that completely concentrate on the reverse flow (i.e. recovery logistics) and those in which the reverse flow is integrated with the forward flow (i.e. closed-loop logistics). Economic aspects, governmental laws and legislations such as the waste electrical and electronic equipment (WEEE) and end-of life vehicles (ELV) directives of the EU (European Union, 2008), and consumers' expectances are the three important factors in the recovery and closed-loop logistics (Melo et al., 2009).
Expansion of the frontiers of knowledge from Forward SC Networks to Reverse, Closed-Loop, and Green has caused Companies and Agencies to gain considerable and desirable economical and environmental achievements. Undoubtedly, this trend has had a significant role in the creation and formation of the sustainable SC management paradigm. In addition to economical and environmental issues, social aspects too are subjects of the sustainable SC network studies and studying the related literature can be of great help to the researchers of this domain (Brandenburg, 2015, Brandenburg and Rebs, 2015).
According to a research carried out in this area, the electric and electronic equipment waste is the third biggest source of environmental pollutant (after transportation and food consumption) and closed-loop supply chain network (CLSC) management can minimize, through remanufacturing process, the amount of the waste materials (Quariguasi Frota Neto et al., 2010). On the other hand, globalization of the supply chain has considerably increased the number of network nodes and its inter-nodal transportation which has caused the emission of an increased volume of greenhouse gases especially CO2. Therefore, design of closed-loop and green SC networks can be an effective step in the future improvements of the environment situation. Most traditional closed-loop SCND (supply chain network design) problems' optimization models have a single objective of minimizing costs through meeting the customers' demands; however, in recent decades, researchers have been trying to add other objectives of minimizing the negative environmental and social effects (e.g. Zhu et al., 2007; Hutchins and Sutherland, 2008; Brandenburg et al., 2014, Eskandarpour et al., 2015).
Controlling uncertain parameters is another serious problem in the closed-loop green SCND; uncertainties in supply (delays in sending raw materials or products), in production and distribution processes, in demand estimation and, especially, in quality and quantity of the returned products are only some samples in CLSC network design problems. Hence, the complex and dynamic nature of the supply chain impose high degrees of uncertainty on the supply chain decisions and considerably affect the performance of the entire network (Özkır and Başlıgil, 2013).
SC decisions are strategic, tactical, or operational. Short term decisions are usually operational and their time intervals vary from approximately 1 h to 1 or 2 days (e.g. order fulfillment and truck scheduling). Medium term decisions are often tactical and their time intervals vary from approximately 1 week to a few months. Long term decisions are strategic and require a time interval of 3–5 years (e.g. facility location). Obviously, the effects of uncertainties on long-term decisions are by far more than on the short-term ones (Pishvaee et al., 2010). Hence, not considering uncertainties at operational levels incurs costs, but not much because the system corrects itself in a short period of time (the cost is incurred in a short duration). But, if uncertainties are ignored at strategic (long term) levels, the damage to the system (cost incurred) is irrecoverable; therefore, designing a reliable supply chain network that can properly function, even when some parameters change, seems necessary.
According to the existing literature, such different mathematical programming approaches as the stochastic, fuzzy and robust optimization models have been utilized to tackle the closed-loop green SCND related uncertainties and researchers have been recently attempting to combine them to attain more efficient models. In this paper, we have proposed a robust fuzzy optimization model for carbon-efficient CLSC network under uncertain conditions which can minimize the total cost in the first objective and carbon dioxide emission in the second.
The remainder of this paper has been organized as follows: the literature related to the CLSC under certain/uncertain conditions has been reviewed in Section 2, the proposed problem has been fully explained and modeled in Section 3, the research methodology including model formulation, uncertainty modeling, solution method, and application has been thoroughly presented in Section 4, the model results and computational performance are analyzed in Section 5, and the paper conclusions are provided in Section 6.
Section snippets
Literature review
Here, to systematically compare the related literature with the present research, we have investigated them in five parts. In Part 1, all SC network echelons are either forward (supply, manufacturing, and distribution centers) or reverse (collection, repair, redistribution, remanufacturing, recycling, and disposal centers). In Part 2, papers are categorized based on their time period and product multiplicity; in the next three Parts, decision variables, objective functions, and the mathematical
Problem definition
Fig. 1 shows the schematic view of the model, the proposed CLSC network, consisting of a set of manufacturing/remanufacturing and collection/inspection centers besides disposal center and markets. The manufacturing/remanufacturing centers can produce new products as well as remanufacture the returned ones, and the products are directly sent to the markets from these centers. The returned products are sent to the collection/inspection centers which have the following duties:
- ▪
Collecting the
Research methodology
This section consists of four main subsections: model formulation, uncertainty modeling, solution method, and application. The detailed information of each is as follows:
Results
For a case where all proposed problem parameters are crisp, the values of the first and second objective functions and manufacturing/remanufacturing and collection/inspection centers selected from the existing candidates in 10 ε-iterations are shown in Table 5. In such a case, the optimum value of the first objective function is 21.88 × 106 rials, and manufacturing/remanufacturing centers 1, 2, and 4 and collection/inspection centers 2 and 4 are selected. Also, the optimum value of the second
Conclusions
In this research, effort has been made to develop a bi-objective mixed integer programming model for the facility location-allocation of a closed-loop green supply chain network that encompasses two echelons in the forward flow (i.e. echelons comprised by the flows among the entities of manufacturing/remanufacturing centers and customers) and three echelons in the reverse flow (i.e. echelons comprised by the flows among the entities of customers, collection/inspection centers,
Acknowledgements
The authors are indebted to the anonymous referees whose detailed reviews and insightful comments led to a significant improvement in the article.
References (39)
- et al.
Green supply chains with carbon trading and environmental sourcing: formulation and life cycle assessment
Appl. Math. Model.
(2012) - et al.
A multi-objective facility location model for closed-loop supply chain network under uncertain demand and return
Appl. Math. Model
(2013) - et al.
Quantitative models for sustainable supply chain management: developments and directions
Eur. J. Oper. Res.
(2014) - et al.
A stochastic model for forward–reverse logistics network design under risk
Comput. Ind. Eng.
(2010) - et al.
Sustainable supply chain network design: an optimization-oriented review
Omega
(2015) - et al.
Manufacturing network configuration in supply chains with product recovery
Omega
(2009) - et al.
An exploration of measures of social sustainability and their application to supply chain decisions
J. Clean. Prod
(2008) - et al.
Possibilistic linear programming: a brief review of fuzzy mathematical programming and a comparison with stochastic programming in portfolio selection problem
Fuzzy Sets Syst.
(2000) - et al.
A genetic algorithm-based heuristic for the dynamic integrated forward/reverse logistics network for 3PLs
Comput. Oper. Res.
(2007) - et al.
A heuristic approach to logistics network design for end-of-lease computer products recovery
Transp. Res. Part E Logist. Transp. Rev.
(2008)
Dynamic network design for reverse logistics operations under uncertainty
Transp. Res. Part E Logist. Transp. Rev.
A facility location model for logistics systems including reverse flows: the case of remanufacturing activities
Comput. Oper. Res.
Facility location and supply chain management–A review
Eur. J. Oper. Res.
The dynamic design of a reverse logistics network from the perspective of third-party logistics service providers
Int. J. Prod. Econ.
Multi-objective optimization of closed-loop supply chains in uncertain environment
J. Clean. Prod.
A possibilistic programming approach for closed-loop supply chain network design under uncertainty
Fuzzy Sets Syst.
A memetic algorithm for bi-objective integrated forward/reverse logistics network design
Comput. Oper. Res.
A stochastic optimization model for integrated forward/reverse logistics network design
J. Manuf. Syst.
A robust optimization approach to closed-loop supply chain network design under uncertainty
Appl. Math. Model.
Cited by (248)
Optimal integration of electricity supply chain and sustainable closed-loop supply chain
2024, Expert Systems with ApplicationsGreen-resilient model for smartphone closed-loop supply chain network design: A novel four-valued refined neutrosophic optimization
2024, Computers and Industrial EngineeringA subsidized reverse supply chain in the Chinese electronics industry
2024, Omega (United Kingdom)A design of a circular closed-loop agri-food supply chain network—A case study of the soybean industry
2023, Journal of Industrial Information IntegrationRevolutionizing sustainable supply chain management: A review of metaheuristics
2023, Engineering Applications of Artificial IntelligenceOptimizing the COVID-19 cold chain vaccine distribution network with medical waste management: A robust optimization approach
2023, Expert Systems with Applications