A geographically and socio-economically disaggregated local household consumption model for the UK

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2007.05.004Get rights and content

Abstract

A key challenge for local environmental and economic planning is to predict resource flows and material waste arisings at a high level of geographical localisation. This paper presents an approach to household consumption modelling in which the material demands of small socio-economically homogeneous neighbourhoods are estimated on the basis of consumer expenditure data in conjunction with Census data. Household waste arisings are estimated through incorporation of a household metabolism model. Selected material flows of consumer commodities, such as household appliances, carpets and clothing, are examined in case study areas representing extremes of relative deprivation, and neighbourhoods representing typical examples of the UK National Output Area Classification (OAC). The model will be of use in sustainable consumption policy-making and local waste strategy planning.

Introduction

Materially intensive consumption patterns and lifestyles present a major challenge to sustainability: resources are finite; there is limited capacity provided by the environment for disposal of wastes; and the use of materials is contributing to global environmental problems such as climate change [1], [2], [3], [4]. In particular, the increasing quantity of waste produced by households has significant environmental impacts. For example, landfill sites produce toxic leachate and greenhouse gases, and there is a scarcity of sites available for landfill. Traditionally, waste has been treated as an ‘end of pipe’ problem, but there is now a move amongst policy-makers to address the problem of waste by taking a whole life cycle approach to resource and waste management. Accordingly, the emphasis is now focused more towards reducing the demand for new resources, involving, for example, eco-design of goods, with increasing rates of repair, re-use, re-manufacture and recycling, thus aiming to achieve waste reduction. The starting point for such an approach must be an understanding of the upstream flow of resources through the economy and through households [5], [6].

The Local Area Resource Analysis (LARA) model described in this paper presents a framework that maps resource use, from a consumption perspective, through UK households grouped by highly socio-economically and geographically disaggregated areas, and relates resource use to waste arisings. Results generated by LARA add to the evidence base in several ways. First, they can be used to identify the demand for specific commodity types (and waste arisings) in a given geographical area. Next, they can be used to identify when and where opportunities for repair, re-use, re-manufacture and recycling arise and match these opportunities to available re-use or recycling facilities. Furthermore, LARA can start to answer questions about the resource consumption of specific socio-economic and lifestyle groups. Finally, LARA can, in principal, relate household resource use to local institutional infrastructure, and this will give us an insight into the extent to which households are “locked” into unsustainable consumption patterns through the infrastructure in which they operate [7], [8], [9].

LARA originated from an objective to estimate the waste arisings from households. The environmental impacts of those arisings depend on a number of factors, including the toxicity and fate of the wastes. A full life cycle assessment (LCA) of waste arising (or indeed of resource use) is beyond the scope of this paper [10], [11], [12]. Rather, LARA is a pragmatic framework that adopts a streamlined approach to environmental assessment based on principles of materials flow analysis [4], [13], [14]. Its strength lies in its ability to estimate very specific material demand and waste arisings in highly geographically and socio-demographically disaggregated areas.

In pursuit of these aims, this paper is organised as follows. The methodological approach adopted is described in Section 2, and the assumptions and limitations are outlined in Section 2.4. In Sections 3.1 Commodity demand in typical OAC areas, 3.2 Commodity demand in areas of contrasting relative deprivation, material demands for selected consumer commodities (household appliances, carpets, and women's and girls' outer garments) for selected case study areas are presented, and estimation of waste arisings is contained in Section 3.3. A discussion concerning validation of the model is provided in Section 3.4. This paper concludes by describing the contribution of the model to the evidence base for policy-making, and includes recommendations concerning data provision. A glossary of terms is placed after the conclusion.

Section snippets

Methodological approach

This paper describes a Local Area Resource Analysis (LARA) model, and presents an example of one of its uses. LARA quantifies average household expenditure of small socio-economically homogeneous local areas in England and Wales, and by applying the mass balance principle, which states that resource flows into a system must equal the resource flows that come out of the system plus stock accumulated [15], material demand is calculated. As an example, this paper shows how the material demand

Commodity demand in typical OAC areas

In this section results obtained from LARA for average household material demand of selected consumer commodities (Clothes Washer/Driers, Carpets, and Women's and Girls' Outer Garments) in the set of case study areas representing OAC super-groups are presented and discussed. These results illustrate the relative mass throughput of materials in the different types of areas, and provide the basis for estimating local household waste arisings in specific waste categories, as described in Sections

Conclusion

Policies aimed at moving towards a more resource-lean society are currently being developed and implemented in the UK at both national and local levels, and the Local Area Resource Analysis (LARA) model, described in this paper, has the ability to contribute to future policy-making at both these levels. At a national level, LARA enhances our understanding of what type of households is responsible for how much resource use, by relating resource use to socio-economic characteristics. This ability

Acknowledgements

This research was made possible through funding from the EPSRC Sustainable Urban Environment Waste Consortium programme (Grant Number GR/S79626/01), and ESRC Research Group on Lifestyles Values and Environment (RESOLVE) (Grant Number RES-152-25-1004). Data from the 2001 Census are provided by the Commissioned Output Census Service of the Office for National Statistics (Crown Copyright 2005).

Glossary of abbreviations

COICOP
Classification of Individual Consumption by Purpose
CPI
Consumer Price Index
HoC
Household Characteristics Classification
HRP
Household Representative Person (head of household)
LARA
Local Area Resource Analysis model
OA
Census 2001Output Area
OAC
UK National Output Area Classification

Angela Druckman is research fellow at the Centre for Environmental Strategy, University of Surrey. Angela is also a member of the ESRC Research Group on Lifestyles, Values and Environment (RESOLVE).

References (49)

  • C. Sanne

    Willing consumers – or locked-in? Policies for a sustainable consumption

    Ecological Economics

    (2002)
  • S. Spatari et al.

    Twentieth century copper stocks and flows in North America: a dynamic analysis

    Ecological Economics

    (2005)
  • T. Jackson

    Material concerns. Pollution, profit and quality of life

    (1996)
  • E.G. Hertwich

    Consumption and industrial ecology

    Journal of Industrial Ecology

    (2005)
  • A. Tukker et al.

    Environmental impact of products (EIPRO): analysis of the life cycle environmental impacts related to the total final consumption of the EU25

    (2005)
  • S. Bringezu et al.

    Material flow analysis

  • W. Powrie et al.

    Sustainable waste management – what is it and how do we get there?

    Waste and Resources Management

    (2007)
  • Hampshire County Council. “Commitment to Change”. Project Integra business plan 2005–2010;...
  • T. Jackson

    Challenges for sustainable consumption policy

  • DTI

    Energy white paper: our energy future – creating a low carbon economy

    (2003)
  • UNEP

    Life cycle assessment

  • SETAC-Europe. Second working group on LCIA. Best available practice regarding impact categories and category indicators...
  • US EPA

    Life cycle assessment framework

  • E. Matthews et al.

    The weight of nations: material outflows from industrial economies

    (2000)
  • J. Todd et al.

    Streamlined life-cycle assessment: a final report from SETAC North America streamlined LCA workgroup

    (1999)
  • P. Bartelmus

    Dematerialization and capital maintenance: two sides of the sustainability coin

    (2002)
  • Druckman A, Sinclair P, Jackson T. Household resource usage and its drivers: a highly socio-economically disaggregated...
  • Eurostat

    Economy-wide material flow accounts and derived indicators. A methodological guide

    (2001)
  • J. Rosenblum et al.

    Environmental implications of service industries

    Environmental Science and Technology

    (2000)
  • R.E. Miller et al.

    Input–output analysis: foundations and extensions

    (1985)
  • W. Leontief

    Input–output economics

    (1986)
  • J.L.R. Proops et al.

    Reducing CO2 emissions. A comparative input–output study for Germany and the UK

    (1993)
  • Druckman A, Sinclair P, Jackson T. The local area resource analysis (LARA) model: concepts, methodology and...
  • Office for National Statistics Geography Policy
  • Cited by (28)

    • Environmentally extended input-output analysis on a city scale - Application to Aveiro (Portugal)

      2014, Journal of Cleaner Production
      Citation Excerpt :

      The environmental assessment of a city or other territory is complex and currently there is no consensual and widely adopted method (Loiseau et al., 2012). A number of holistic methods and tools have been used for this purpose, such as the ecological footprint (Collins et al., 2006; Global Footprint Network, 2013), material flow analysis and accounting (Barles, 2009; Browne et al., 2011; Druckman et al., 2008; Niza et al., 2009), substance flow analysis (Timmermans and Van Holderbeke, 2004; Wu et al., 2012), emergy analysis (Campbell et al., 2004; Pulselli et al., 2007; Zhang et al., 2009), exergy analysis (Sciubba et al., 2008), environmentally extended input–output (IO) analysis (Larsen and Hertwich, 2010; Lenzen and Peters, 2009), physical IO tables (Liang and Zhang, 2011), ecological network analysis (Zhang et al., 2010), and hybrid IO Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) (Heinonen et al., 2011; Heinonen and Junnila, 2011). IO analysis is a macroeconomic technique that uses data on inter-industrial monetary transactions to account for the complex interdependencies of industries in modern economies (Lenzen et al., 2004a).

    • Examining the use of a geodemographic classification in an exploratory analysis of variations in fire incidence in South Wales, UK

      2013, Fire Safety Journal
      Citation Excerpt :

      The analysis presented here is largely based on these super-groups although we have also explored the use of the second tier in the clustering process—so called group level classifications (this consists of 21 clusters at the national level). The Output Area Classification has been used in a number of policy application areas such as accessibility to public transport opportunities [50] and household consumption modelling [51]. There have also been attempts to tailor the OAC to particular local circumstances such as the targeting of public health campaigns in London [25] and to build on the OAC methodology to create a bespoke educational geodemographic system [12].

    • Procedures and criteria to develop and evaluate household sustainable consumption indicators

      2012, Journal of Cleaner Production
      Citation Excerpt :

      The projected economic growth of 2.4% per year in the EU-25 between 2000 and 2030 will be accompanied by similar growth in consumption (EEA, 2005). Evolving material intensive consumption patterns and lifestyles present a major challenge to sustainability (Druckman et al., 2008). It has become increasingly clear that sustainable economies must be built upon concepts and approaches of Sustainable Consumption (SC) (Clark, 2007; UNEP, 2011).

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    Angela Druckman is research fellow at the Centre for Environmental Strategy, University of Surrey. Angela is also a member of the ESRC Research Group on Lifestyles, Values and Environment (RESOLVE).

    Philip Sinclair is research fellow at the Centre for Environmental Strategy, University of Surrey.

    Tim Jackson is Professor of Sustainable Development at the Centre for Environmental Strategy, University of Surrey and Director of RESOLVE. He is also the Economics Commissioner on the UK Sustainable Development Commission and sits on the Environment Agency Science Advisory Panel.

    View full text