Regular Article
Understanding the exfoliation and dispersion of MoS2 nanosheets in pure water

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2017.11.013Get rights and content

Abstract

Exfoliation and dispersion of two dimensional (2D) transition metal dichacogenides (TMDCs) such as MoS2 in water are highly demanded. In this paper, we exfoliate MoS2 nanosheets in pure water via ultrasonication and attempt to understand the exfoliation process and the dispersion behavior of hydrophobic MoS2. Cavitation-induced exfoliation leads to thinning and fragmentation of MoS2 flakes. Formation of mesoporous MoS2 sheets suggests that the exfoliation initiates from the basal planes. As for the dispersion of MoS2 nanosheets in water, we find that higher centrifugation rate and thus smaller lateral size, results in improved stability. This can be attributed to the enhanced edge effects. Fragmentation of MoS2 flakes generates many edges, to which hydrophilic and ionizable groups are attached. Herein, the edge effects include two aspects. On the one hand, edge-attached polar and hydrophilic groups promote interactions of MoS2 nanosheets with water molecules and result in better wettability, which can be explained by the hemi-wicking model. On the other hand, dissociation of these groups makes MoS2 sheets negatively charged. It is found that edge charge dominates. As the flake size reduces, attractive van der Waals force and hydrophobic force can be overcome by electrostatic repulsions, which prevent MoS2 nanosheets from aggregation. This study opens a new vista on exfoliating and dispersing hydrophobic 2D nanomaterials in water.

Introduction

Owing to their intrinsic semiconducting characteristics [1], [2], two dimensional (2D) transition metal dichacogenides (TMDCs) can overcome the drawbacks of zero-gap graphene [3], and therefore receive much attention from both scientific and industrial fields. TMDCs are composed of numerous sandwich-like structures, in which one hexagonal layer of transition metal atoms is inserted into two hexagonal layers of sulfur atoms [4]. While the in-plane atoms are held together through covalent interactions, the sandwich-like structures are kept together via weak van der Waals force [4]. As a typical TMDC, monolayer MoS2 is of great interest due to its direct bandgap (1.8 eV) [1], large in-plane carrier mobility (200–500 cm2 V−1 s−1) [5], high current on/off ratio [6], unique electronic [1], optical and catalytic properties [7], [8], [9]. Possessing diverse and exceptional properties, MoS2 holds great promise in a variety of applications, including field-effect transistors (FETs) [5], [6], biosensors [10], photodetectors [11] and photocatalysis [9]. Despite these advantages, finding a cost-effective, facile and scalable method for producing high quality MoS2 sheets still remains a challenge.

Ultrathin MoS2 nanosheets can be prepared via a number of techniques, such as mechanical exfoliation [12], chemical vapor deposition (CVD) [13] and liquid exfoliation [14]. Compared with other methods, liquid exfoliation offers a promising route for scalable production of MoS2 nanosheets, due to its low cost, simplicity and relatively high output. As a classical liquid-based approach, chemical exfoliation has been widely used to prepare ultrathin MoS2 nanosheets [15]. Despite high yield of monolayer nanosheets, chemical exfoliation (i.e. ion intercalation and sonication) suffers from highly flammable and explosive chemicals. Furthermore, the shift from semiconducting state (2H) to metallic state (1T) renders products unsuitable for semiconductor applications [16]. Furthermore, it can also make MoS2 unstable in aqueous solutions, and even leads to degradation of MoS2 nanosheets due to their high chemical activity [17].

Direct exfoliation of MoS2 sheets from bulk materials via ultrasonication in solvents provides another option for liquid exfoliation [14]. During this process, sonication-induced hydrodynamic forces act as the driving force to overcome interlayer van der Waals interactions of 2D materials and eventually peel off atomic-thin layers. Apart from parameters like sonication power and time, solvents also play a vital role in exfoliation yield and efficiency. Properties of different solvents make them behave very differently in terms of exfoliating and stabilizing nanosheets. Coleman et al. use mixing enthalpy theory to predict the energy balance between graphene and solvents [18]. Energetic consumption for exfoliating nanosheets can be expressed by the following equation:ΔHmixVmix2Tflake(δG-δsol)2where Tflake is the thickness of flakes, is the volume fraction of graphene, while δG and δsol denote the square root of surface energy of graphene and solvents, respectively [19]. This prediction can be also employed for other 2D materials. From the expression, one can conclude that if the surface energy of a certain solvent matches that of 2D materials, energy consumption for exfoliation can be minimized. Therefore, exfoliation will occur more easily. Due to their suitable surface energy, some organic solvents (e.g. NMP), are considered to be good solvents for exfoliation [14], [18]. However, since these solvents have toxicity and high boiling point, their usage will bring environmental problems and make flakes easily stacked because of slow solvent evaporation. On the other hand, surfactants can be used for exfoliation in aqueous solutions because their addition can significantly reduce the surface energy of the solvent system and stabilize nanosheets via steric or electrostatic forces [19], [20]. With respect to surfactants, their main drawback is that they are difficult to eliminate completely, resident molecules absorbed on the sheet surface therefore render sheet properties inferior. Hence, finding a green, inexpensive and low-boiling solvent, preferably water, for efficient exfoliation is of great importance. To solve this problem, a mixed-solvent strategy, which adopts mixtures of water and alcohols, has been developed [21]. Recently, Zhao et al. exfoliated MoS2 nanosheets in the mixtures of water and isopropyl alcohol (IPA) and manifested that MoS2-based films hold promise in optoelectronic applications [22].

2D materials, e.g. graphene and MoS2, are conventionally considered to be insoluble in water. However, recent reports demonstrate that the hydrophobicity of graphene and MoS2 stems from airborne hydrocarbon contamination, whereas clean surfaces of these materials are mildly hydrophilic [23], [24]. This discovery raises the question as to whether the exfoliation and dispersion of nanosheets can be achieved in aqueous solutions in absence of organic solvents and surfactants. Recent studies confirm that MoS2 nanosheets can be exfoliated in pure water by ultrasonication [9], [25], shear mixing [26], high-pressure homogenizer [27] and freezing expansion [28]. However, few studies pay sufficient attention to interactions of water with MoS2 flakes and their effects on exfoliation as well as dispersion. Though many efforts have been made, there is still a lack of understanding in terms of exfoliation and dispersion mechanism.

In this paper, we directly exfoliate MoS2 nanosheets from bulk material in pure water via ultrasonication, and discuss effects and possible mechanism of exfoliation based on characterization results. Furthermore, we find that higher centrifugation rate results in improved colloidal stability in water. This phenomenon can be ascribed to the enhanced edge effects. We believe that our findings give new insights in producing and dispersing hydrophobic 2D nanomaterials in aqueous solutions.

Section snippets

Experimental section

Bulk MoS2 powder (Alfar Aesar, 325 mesh) was mixed with deionized (DI) water (4000 mg/200 mL). The resultant dispersion was sonicated using an ultrasonic processor (1730 T, 130 W, 40 kHz) for 8 h. After that, the dispersion was kept static for sedimentation for 2 h. Subsequently, the upper solution was centrifuged (30 min, 1500–3000 rpm) using a high-speed centrifuge (Jintan Zhongda Apparatus) to remove the largish and thick flakes. Finally, the supernatant was carefully extracted to obtain MoS2

Characterization of MoS2 nanosheets

SEM images of bulk MoS2 and exfoliated MoS2 nanosheets are shown in Fig. 1. Bulk MoS2 particles have flake size of 20–40 μm and thickness of 2–7 μm. In contrast, as-prepared MoS2 nanosheets are very thin and have lateral size of 100–400 nm. This suggests that bulk MoS2 particles are successfully exfoliated and substantially fragmented. The morphology of individual MoS2 nanosheets can be observed by TEM and HRTEM. Relatively thin and thick sheets can be readily distinguished by their different

Conclusions

In sum, MoS2 nanosheets are exfoliated and dispersed in pure water. Mesoporous nanosheets can be observed by TEM and may reveal the exfoliation mechanism. Exfoliation leads to thinning and fragmentation of MoS2 flakes. The latter results in breaking of Mo-S bonds and generates a great many edges. Edge-attached reactive and unsaturated species can react with water or water and oxygen to form hydrophilic and ionizable groups. These groups not only enhance interactions of nanosheets with water

Acknowledgements

This work is supported by the Special Funds for Co-construction Project of Beijing Municipal Commission of Education and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities.

References (58)

  • Y.H. Lu et al.

    Band-gap engineering with hybrid graphene-graphene nanoribbons

    J. Phys. Chem. C

    (2009)
  • H. Zhu et al.

    Observation of piezoelectricity in free-standing monolayer MoS2

    Nat. Nanotechnol.

    (2015)
  • Y. Huang et al.

    Two-dimensional atomically thin MoS2 nanosheets and their sensing applications

    Nanoscale

    (2015)
  • B. Radisavljevic et al.

    Single-layer MoS2 transistors

    Nat. Nanotechnol.

    (2011)
  • S. Wu et al.

    Vapor-solid growth of high optical quality MoS2 monolayers with near-unity valley polarization

    ACS Nano

    (2013)
  • W. Zhao et al.

    Origin of indirect optical transitions in few-layer MoS2, WS2 and WSe2

    Nano Lett.

    (2013)
  • X. Hai et al.

    Engineering the edges of MoS2 (WS2) crystals for direct exfoliation into monolayers in polar micromolecular solvents

    J. Am. Chem. Soc.

    (2016)
  • D. Sarkar et al.

    MoS2 field-effect transistor for next-generation label-free biosensors

    ACS Nano

    (2014)
  • D. Kufer et al.

    Highly sensitive, encapsulated MoS2 photodetector with gate controllable gain and speed

    Nano Lett.

    (2015)
  • X. Huang et al.

    Metal dichalcogenide nanosheets: preparation, properties and applications

    Chem. Soc. Rev.

    (2013)
  • Y.H. Lee et al.

    Synthesis of large-area MoS2 atomic layers with chemical vapor deposition

    Adv. Mater.

    (2012)
  • J.N. Coleman et al.

    Two-dimensional nanosheets produced by liquid exfoliation of layered materials

    Science

    (2011)
  • D. Voriy et al.

    Conducting MoS2 nanosheets as catalysts for hydrogen evolution reaction

    Nano Lett.

    (2013)
  • S. Bai et al.

    Chemically exfoliated metallic MoS2 nanosheets: a promising supporting co-catalyst for enhancing the photocatalytic performance of TiO2 nanocrystals

    Nano Res.

    (2015)
  • Z. Wang et al.

    Chemical dissolution pathways of MoS2 nanosheets in biological and environmental media

    Environ. Sci. Techno.

    (2016)
  • Y. Hernandez et al.

    High-yield production of graphene by liquid-phase exfoliation of graphite

    Nat. Nanotechnol.

    (2008)
  • M. Lotya et al.

    Liquid phase production of graphene by exfoliation of graphite in surfactant/water solutions

    J. Am. Chem. Soc.

    (2009)
  • M. Lotya et al.

    High-concentration, surfactant-stabilized graphene dispersions

    ACS Nano

    (2010)
  • K.G. Zhou et al.

    A mixed-solvent strategy for efficient exfoliation of inorganic graphene analogues

    Angew. Chem. Int. Edi.

    (2011)
  • Cited by (110)

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text