Elsevier

Journal of Chromatography B

Volume 1019, 15 April 2016, Pages 45-50
Journal of Chromatography B

Validation of a liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry method to measure oxidized and reduced forms of glutathione in whole blood and verification in a mouse model as an indicator of oxidative stress

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jchromb.2015.10.041Get rights and content

Highlights

  • New method for reduced (GSH) and oxidized glutathione (GSSG) was developed.

  • We validated analytical performance of the method including precision and recovery.

  • Clinical usefulness of the GSH/GSSG ratio was validated using a mouse model.

  • Previously well-established mouse model of chronic oxidative stress was employed.

  • The GSH/GSSG ratios decreased with increased induction of oxidative stress.

Abstract

As a possible marker of oxidative stress, many studies have measured whole blood reduced glutathione (GSH) and oxidized glutathione (GSSG). However, large differences in GSH and GSSG levels reported in different studies, calls for a reliable standardized method. In this study, we validate not only analytical performance of new measurement method for GSH and GSSG, but also the clinical utility of these markers in a mouse model with chronic oxidative stress. Twenty mice were randomized into four treatment groups according to iron burden: 0 mg, 5 mg, 10 mg, or 15 mg of iron were injected into the peritoneum per day over 4 weeks. To prevent artifactual GSH auto-oxidation, we pretreated the sample with N-ethylmaleimide (NEM) immediately after sample collection. After protein precipitation using sulfosalicylic acid, GSSG and GSH-NEM were measured using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC⿿MS/MS). The mean GSH/GSSG ratios of the mouse model were 163.1, 31.0, 27.9, and 12.8 for control, 5 mg, 10 mg, and 15 mg injection groups, respectively, showing a decrease in the GSH/GSSG ratios according to the amount of oxidative stress induced. Inter-assay coefficients of variation were 4.1% for GSH-NEM and 7.3% for GSSG. Recoveries were 98.0⿿105.9% for GSH-NEM and 98.0⿿107.3% for GSSG. No ion suppression was observed at the retention time for GSH-NEM and GSSG. This study suggests an accurate method that can be used for glutathione measurement using LC⿿MS/MS, and showed that GSH/GSSG ratio could provide an assessment of the degree of oxidative stress.

Introduction

Increasing evidence suggests that oxidative stress is linked to various human diseases such as chronic lung diseases, cardiovascular diseases, neurodegenerative disorders, diabetes, rheumatoid arthritis, and malignancy, as well as the general aging process [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6]. However, this association still needs to be confirmed, and has likely been underestimated because of recognized shortcomings of the methods for assessing oxidative stress in vivo in humans [3], [7]. Glutathione (γ-glutamyl-l-cysteinylglycine) is an important antioxidant that plays a key role in the cellular resistance to oxidative damage [8]. It is present mainly in its reduced form (GSH), however, under oxidative conditions two GSH molecules are oxidized to form glutathione disulfide (GSSG). A low GSH level, high GSSG level, and/or a low GSH/GSSG ratio are interpreted as increased oxidative stress [9]. As functional tissue is less accessible, whole blood is a noninvasive alternative to use for GSH and GSSG measurement, which has been confirmed to reflect the status of other tissues [3], [10]. Therefore, the levels of GSH and GSSG in blood have been considered an index of whole body glutathione status and have been used in clinical diagnosis and investigations of many diseases [3].

The authors of many previous studies have measured whole blood GSH and GSSG, comparing concentrations obtained in healthy individuals with those measured in persons affected by various diseases, and reporting a relationship between the disease and low GSH/GSSG ratios [2], [11], [12]. However, various methods have been used for the determination of glutathione, which has induced large differences in the reported values of GSH and GSSG between investigations, even for control values in healthy people [1], [13]. As the main cause of this wide variation is considered to be artifactual GSH oxidation during sample processing and consequently marked overestimation of GSSG level, particular attention should be paid to sample processing [3], [9]. To prevent artifactual GSH oxidation, methods derivatizing GSH with alkylating agents such as N-ethylmaleimide (NEM) [9], iodoacetic acid [14], 5-iodoacetamidfluorescein [15], phthalimide [16], and dithionitrobenzoate [17] have been devised. Among these agents, NEM has been most widely used, and pretreatment of samples with NEM immediately after blood collection has been recommended as the most reliable method [9]. A wide variety of methods including spectrophotometry, fluorometry, high pressure liquid chromatography (HPLC), and HPLC coupled to tandem mass spectrometry (HPLC⿿MS/MS) have been used for GSH and GSSG measurement [18]. Among these methods, HPLC⿿MS/MS offers the most sensitive and selective glutathione measurement [19], [20].

In this study, we developed a new liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry method for determination of whole blood GSH and GSSG, modifying a recently proposed method by Moore et al. [21]. In addition, we validated the relevance of the GSH/GSSG ratio as a marker of oxidative damage in a well-documented animal model of chronic oxidative stress.

Section snippets

Mouse model development

A previously well-established mouse model of chronic iron overload was employed for this experiment [22]. This mouse model consists of 8⿿9 weeks old (25⿿30 g) male inbred BALB/C mice (OrientBio, Seoul, Korea), which have genetic and phenotypic uniformity. Iron loading was achieved by intraperitoneal (IP) injections of iron dextran (CosmoFer for injection, Pharmbio Korea Co., Ltd., Seoul, Korea) over a defined experimental period. The current investigation acquired institutional approval from the

Chromatography

Typical chromatograms of GSH-NEM and GSSG produced by LC⿿MS/MS are shown in Fig. 1. GSH-NEM and GSSG were eluted from the column at 3.1 and 3.8 min, respectively. The type and concentration of electronic modifiers in the mobile phase can have a noticeable effect on the retention, selectivity, and the peak symmetry of solutes separated on Hyercarb columns. As mobile phase additives, either 0.1% formic acid, 0.1% diethylamine, or 0.1% TFA was evaluated. Optimal symmetric peak shape was achieved

Discussion

Despite considerable interest in GSH and GSSG ratio as an index of oxidative stress, there has been no standardized protocol for sample preparation and analysis for the quantification of these molecules in biological samples [3], [8], [9]. Consequently, various research groups have reported rather different levels of GSH and, particularly, GSSG, even in the blood of healthy individuals used as controls [3], [9]. The major artifact that can occur during GSH and GSSG quantification is about 5⿿15%

Conclusions

We have developed and validated an accurate and reliable method for quantification of whole blood GSH and GSSG using LC⿿MS/MS. Artifactual GSH auto-oxidation was prevented through derivatization with NEM immediately after drawing whole blood. The precipitation of proteins using 10% SSA containing isotopically labeled internal standard also minimized the preanalytical and analytical variations between samples. Our data showed sufficiently precise and accurate measurements of both GSH and GSSG.

Conflict of interest

All authors declare no conflict of interest.

Acknowledgment

This research was supported by a faculty research grant of Yonsei University College of Medicine (6-2014-0013).

References (33)

  • M.B. Kadiiska et al.

    Biomarkers of oxidative stress study III. Effects of the nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory agents indomethacin and meclofenamic acid on measurements of oxidative products of lipids in CCl4 poisoning

    Free Radic. Biol. Med.

    (2005)
  • M.B. Kadiiska et al.

    Biomarkers of oxidative stress study II: are oxidation products of lipids, proteins, and DNA markers of CCl4 poisoning?

    Free Radic. Biol. Med.

    (2005)
  • M.B. Kadiiska et al.

    Biomarkers of oxidative stress study: are plasma antioxidants markers of CCl(4) poisoning?

    Free Radic. Biol. Med.

    (2000)
  • D. Giustarini et al.

    Oxidative stress and human diseases: origin, link, measurement, mechanisms, and biomarkers

    Crit. Rev. Clin. Lab. Sci.

    (2009)
  • I. Dalle-Donne et al.

    Molecular mechanisms and potential clinical significance of S-glutathionylation

    Antioxid. Redox Signal.

    (2008)
  • I. Dalle-Donne et al.

    Biomarkers of oxidative damage in human disease

    Clin. Chem.

    (2006)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text