Elsevier

Journal of Chromatography B

Volume 944, 1 January 2014, Pages 63-68
Journal of Chromatography B

Short Communication
Determination of warfarin alcohols by ultra-high performance liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry: Application to in vitro enzyme kinetic studies

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jchromb.2013.11.014Get rights and content

Highlights

  • A sensitive UHPLC–MS/MS method for the determination of warfarin alcohol metabolites.

  • The method is validated in Tris–HCl incubation buffer with high accuracy and precision.

  • The method is simple with excellent extraction recovery and short run-time of 5 min.

  • The method is successfully applied to in vitro enzyme kinetic studies of warfarin.

Abstract

A sensitive, accurate, and reproducible ultra-high performance liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry method was developed and validated for determination of warfarin and its alcohol metabolites (RS/SR- and RR/SS-warfarin alcohol) in 10 mM Tris–HCl incubation buffer (pH 7.4). Sample preparation involved acidification with 4% formic acid, followed by liquid–liquid extraction using methyl tert-butyl ether. Chromatographic separation was achieved using a Hypersil Gold C18 (2.1 mm × 100 mm, 1.9 μm) analytical column with gradient elution of solvent A (water containing 0.01% formic acid) and solvent B (acetonitrile containing 0.1% formic acid). The flow rate was 0.4 mL/min and the total run time was 5 min. Detection of analytes was performed using heated electrospray ionization (negative mode) and selected reaction monitoring. Excellent linearity was observed for all analytes over the standard curve concentration ranges of 100–10,000 ng/mL for warfarin, and 0.5–250 ng/mL for warfarin alcohols. The intra- and inter-day accuracy and precision for analytes were within ±10.0%. Excellent recovery and negligible matrix effects were observed. The method is robust, sensitive, accurate and reproducible, and was successfully applied to in vitro enzyme kinetic studies of warfarin.

Introduction

Warfarin is the most commonly used oral anticoagulant for the treatment and prevention of thromboembolic disorders [1]. It is a technically difficult medication to use in clinical practice, due to its notoriously narrow therapeutic window, large inter-individual variability, potential for food and drug interactions, and significant risk if suboptimally dosed [2]. Warfarin is administered clinically as a racemic mixture of both R- and S-enantiomers, and is highly metabolized, exhibiting regioselective and stereoselective metabolism [3], [4]. It undergoes Phase I oxidation mediated mainly by cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzymes, CYP2C9 in particular, producing hydroxy metabolites that can be further metabolized by Phase II conjugation [3], [4]. The effect of various factors (e.g., disease, inflammation, genetic polymorphisms) on CYP2C9 function [5] and their subsequent impact on warfarin dose requirements has been extensively studied [6], [7], and this information is now used to optimize warfarin therapy [8], [9].

Another important metabolic pathway for warfarin elimination is reduction. Warfarin undergoes reduction by hepatic reductases, which generate warfarin alcohols of two diastereoisomers, namely RS/SR-warfarin alcohol (alcohol 1), and RR/SS-warfarin alcohol (alcohol 2) [10], [11]. Warfarin reduction is catalyzed predominantly in the cytosol, producing warfarin alcohol 1 as the major metabolite [12], [13]. Although reduction accounts for up to 20% of warfarin metabolism [11] and produces pharmacologically active alcohol metabolites [14], the effect of altered reductase function on the disposition of warfarin and its alcohol metabolites has not been studied to date. In order to do so, a robust and validated analytical method for the quantitative determination of each analyte is required.

Several assays have been developed for measuring the enantiomers of hydroxywarfarin metabolites in biological samples including HPLC with UV [15], combination of UV/fluorescence and circular dichroism [16] or MS detection [17], [18], [19], capillary zone electrophoresis with UV detection [20], and micellar electrokinetic chromatography with MS detection [21]. However, few analytical methods have been reported for the determination of warfarin alcohol metabolites. These include conventional HPLC methods with UV or fluorescence detection [22], [23], [24], [25], and gas chromatography with mass spectrometric (GC–MS) detection [26]. In general, HPLC with UV or fluorescence detection methods are not as sensitive and selective as MS techniques and require larger sample volume to achieve high sensitivity. The GC–MS method is complex, and requires extensive sample preparation including a derivatization step [26]. In addition, each of the reported methods include minimal or no validation parameters for warfarin alcohols. To date, use of contemporary LC–MS techniques for the measurement of warfarin alcohols has not been reported. Thus, the goal of this work was to develop and validate a simple, rapid and robust ultra-high performance liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry (UHPLC–MS/MS) assay for determination of warfarin and its alcohol metabolites. The method was used to examine the enzyme kinetics of warfarin in cytosolic fractions of rat liver tissue.

Section snippets

Chemicals and reagents

Warfarin (C19H16O4), d5-7-hydroxywarfarin (C19H11D5O5, used as internal standard for warfarin alcohols), formic acid, NADPH, magnesium chloride, and tris(hydroxymethyl)aminomethane (Trizma base) were purchased from Sigma (St. Louis, MO, USA). Warfarin alcohols (C19H18O4) were synthesized as previously described [10], [27]. Racemic d5-warfarin (C19H11D5O4, used as internal standard for warfarin) was purchased from Toronto Research Chemical (North York, Ontario, Canada). Hydrochloric acid, methyl

Results and discussion

In order to support in vitro studies exploring warfarin reduction, we aimed to develop and validate a simple and robust UHPLC–MS/MS method for determination of warfarin and warfarin alcohol metabolites. To our knowledge, this is the first LC–MS/MS method developed for this purpose. The method was validated according to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) guidelines for bioanalytical method validation [29]. The method is simple, accurate and precise, and is currently being used to

Conclusions

A simple, robust, rapid, accurate, and precise UHPLC–MS/MS method for the determination of warfarin and warfarin alcohols has been developed and validated. The short run-time and high sensitivity and specificity associated with LC–MS/MS renders this method valuable for studies relating to warfarin alcohols.

References (29)

  • J. Hirsh et al.

    Chest

    (2001)
  • L.S. Kaminsky et al.

    Pharmacol. Ther.

    (1997)
  • U.M. Zanger et al.

    Pharmacol. Ther.

    (2013)
  • T.A. Moreland et al.

    Biochem. Pharmacol.

    (1975)
  • J.J. Hermans et al.

    Biochem. Pharmacol.

    (1989)
  • H. Takahashi et al.

    J. Chromatogr. B: Biomed. Sci. Appl.

    (1997)
  • D.R. Jones et al.

    J. Chromatogr. B: Anal. Technol. Biomed. Life Sci.

    (2011)
  • Z. Zuo et al.

    J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal.

    (2010)
  • X. Wang et al.

    J. Chromatogr. A

    (2013)
  • M.J. Fasco et al.

    J. Chromatogr.

    (1977)
  • C. Banfield et al.

    J. Pharm. Sci.

    (1984)
  • Y.W. Wong et al.

    J. Chromatogr.

    (1989)
  • T.A. van der Hoeven et al.

    J. Biol. Chem.

    (1974)
  • M.J. Kim et al.

    J. Clin. Pharmacol.

    (2009)
  • Cited by (14)

    • Synthesis of nickel-doped ceria nanospheres for in situ profiling of Warfarin sodium in biological media

      2022, Bioelectrochemistry
      Citation Excerpt :

      Thus, it is highly needed to develop a cost-effective and high sensitive method for the detection of WFS in biological samples. As yet, there are various methods for detecting WFS such as liquid–liquid micro extraction [31,32], phosphorescence [33], supercritical fluid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry [34], capillary zone electrophoresis [35–37], high-performance liquid chromatography [38,39], and micellar electro kinetic chromatography-electrospray ionization mass spectrometry [40]. However, the electrochemical sensor has become an effective technique for the rapid detection of WFS owing to its low-cost, simple and fast analysis, excellent sensitivity and selectivity.

    • Sensitive warfarin sensor based on cobalt oxide nanoparticles electrodeposited at multi-walled carbon nanotubes modified glassy carbon electrode (Co<inf>x</inf>O<inf>y</inf>NPs/MWCNTs/GCE)

      2017, Electrochimica Acta
      Citation Excerpt :

      Because of very narrow therapeutic window of warfarin, precise control of its amount in the blood is needed [6]. Several analytical methods such as high performance liquid chromatography [7,8], micellar electrokinetic chromatography-mass spectrometry (MEKC-MS) [9], capillary zone electrophoresis [10], supercritical fluid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry (SCF-MS-MS) [11], liquid chromatography (LC) [12,13], multi-mode UPLC (ultra performance liquid chromatography)-MS-MS [14,15], spectrofluorimetry [16,17], sensitized fluorescence [18], solid-phase room-temperature transmitted phosphorescence [19] and electrochemical methods [20–23] have been suggested for the determination and monitoring of warfarin. However, some of them are highly costly and time-consuming, while others suffer from low selectivity and sensitivity.

    • Synthesis of conductive polymeric ionic liquid/Ni nanocomposite and its application to construct a nanostructure based electrochemical sensor for determination of warfarin in the presence of tramadol

      2017, Talanta
      Citation Excerpt :

      Recent data recommend that warfarin drug interactions might be the main cause of the bleeding effects in patients receiving anticoagulant therapy. Numerous methods such as high-performance liquid chromatography [15,16], capillary electrophoresis [17], liquid-liquid micro-extraction [18,19] and electrochemistry methods [20–24] have been described for the measurement of warfarin. Tramadol ((±)-trans-2-[(dimethyl-amino) methyl]-1-(3-methoxyphenyl) cyclohexanol) which is a synthetic 4-phenyl-piperidine analog of codeine is a centrally acting analgesic with potency and efficiency ranging between weak opioids and morphine [25].

    • Mn-doped ZnS phosphorescent quantum dots: Coumarins optical sensors

      2017, Sensors and Actuators, B: Chemical
      Citation Excerpt :

      Molecular structures of these coumarins are shown in Fig. 1. Several analytical methods for coumarins determination were reported in the literature, mostly chromatographic methods [1–34], whereas little work has been done in relation to electrochemical [35–39], capillary electrophoresis [40–42], spectrophotometric [43] and luminescence [11,30,44–55] determination methods. Generally, these analytical techniques are time-consuming, require sophisticated equipment and, consequently, not routinely applicable in quality control laboratories.

    • An electrochemical sensor for warfarin determination based on covalent immobilization of quantum dots onto carboxylated multiwalled carbon nanotubes and chitosan composite film modified electrode

      2015, Materials Science and Engineering C
      Citation Excerpt :

      Therapeutic concentration of WAR is about 2.0–5.0 μg ml− 1 and has a long half-life (20–60 h) [7]. A number of methods have been used for the determination of WAR including high performance liquid chromatography [8–15], liquid chromatography [16,17], capillary electrophoresis [18], phosphorescence [19], fluorescence [20], cloud point extraction [21], and spectrofluorimetric [22]. Electrochemical techniques are alternative methods for the WAR determination because they are simple, fast, sensitive and low cost.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text