Elsevier

Journal of Chromatography B

Volume 877, Issue 26, 15 September 2009, Pages 2696-2708
Journal of Chromatography B

Review
Sphingolipidomics: Methods for the comprehensive analysis of sphingolipids

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jchromb.2008.12.057Get rights and content

Abstract

Sphingolipids comprise a highly diverse and complex class of molecules that serve as both structural components of cellular membranes and signaling molecules capable of eliciting apoptosis, differentiation, chemotaxis, and other responses in mammalian cells. Comprehensive or “sphingolipidomic” analyses (structure specific, quantitative analyses of all sphingolipids, or at least all members of a critical subset) are required in order to elucidate the role(s) of sphingolipids in a given biological context because so many of the sphingolipids in a biological system are inter-converted structurally and metabolically. Despite the experimental challenges posed by the diversity of sphingolipid-regulated cellular responses, the detection and quantitation of multiple sphingolipids in a single sample has been made possible by combining classical analytical separation techniques such as high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) with state-of-the-art tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS) techniques. As part of the Lipid MAPS consortium an internal standard cocktail was developed that comprises the signaling metabolites (i.e. sphingoid bases, sphingoid base-1-phosphates, ceramides, and ceramide-1-phosphates) as well as more complex species such as mono- and di-hexosylceramides and sphingomyelin. Additionally, the number of species that can be analyzed is growing rapidly with the addition of fatty acyl Co-As, sulfatides, and other complex sphingolipids as more internal standards are becoming available. The resulting LC–MS/MS analyses are one of the most analytically rigorous technologies that can provide the necessary sensitivity, structural specificity, and quantitative precision with high-throughput for “sphingolipidomic” analyses in small sample quantities. This review summarizes historical and state-of-the-art analytical techniques used for the identification, structure determination, and quantitation of sphingolipids from free sphingoid bases through more complex sphingolipids such as sphingomyelins, lactosylceramides, and sulfatides including those intermediates currently considered sphingolipid “second messengers”. Also discussed are some emerging techniques and other issues remaining to be resolved for the analysis of the full sphingolipidome.

Introduction

Sphingolipids (SLs) are 1,3-hydroxy-2-amino alkanes or alkenes with substantial structural diversity apart from this common core moiety. SLs are structural components of cellular membranes in all eukaryotes and some prokaryotes, but their variety of signal transduction roles is also well established [1], [2]. Selected SLs and a portion of their de novo biosynthetic and turnover pathways are shown in Fig. 1, from which it is clear that some molecular species are free sphingoid bases (non-acylated, long-chain bases), other species are N-acylated sphingoid bases, and still other species are more complex N-acylated sphingoid bases with a polar moiety at the 1-position. While this increasing molecular diversity results from a series of biosynthetic enzymatic reactions, it should not be overlooked that reversal of these reactions (catabolism or turnover) is a commonly encountered aspect of SL metabolism. Cells exert fine-tuned control over SL metabolic flux and opposing outcomes in cellular state may hang in the balance. For example, sphingosine and sphingosine-1-phosphate are interconverted by kinases and phosphatases [3]; the non-phosphorylated sphingoid base is pro-apoptotic [4] while the phosphorylated sphingoid base is anti-apoptotic [5]. Studies of SL biology clearly require a high degree of specificity for quantitation of multiple molecular species in a single sample because of the structural similarity and interconversion of SL species. Thus, the ability to analytically distinguish (resolve) these species is critical for the accurate determination of metabolic flux. The focus of this review is the development of state-of-the-art technologies in SL analysis, including a compilation of SL publications based upon classical analytical approaches. Although the topics are mentioned here, more comprehensive reviews of SL metabolism [6], [7], metabolic inhibition, and signaling [8], [9], [10], [11] are available.

Section snippets

Sphingoid bases

Sphingoid bases (also called long-chain bases) include 3-ketosphinganine, sphinganine, phytosphingosine (4-hydroxysphinganine), and sphingosine (also called sphing-4-enine). The first products of de novo SL biosynthesis are 3-ketosphinganine and sphinganine. In many mammalian cell types, phytosphingosine and sphingosine are the products of phytoceramide and ceramide de-N-acylation, respectively, not direct 4-hydroxylation and 4,5-E-desaturation of sphinganine. However, yeast cells and some

Thin-layer chromatography (TLC)

TLC has been used for the qualitative study of sphingoid bases and their phosphates, ceramides [28], sphingomyelins [29] and more complex GSLs. Advances in high-performance TLC (HPTLC) have allowed improved resolution of some molecular species [29], [30]. However, TLC does not offer sufficient structural specificity to guarantee homogeneity within a single spot of lipid using detection by Rhodamine 6G or iodine vapor. This has lead to its use as a step to check fraction collections in

Electron ionization (EI) mass spectrometry

Electron ionization mass spectrometry was initially used to elucidate the structures of ceramides [48], [49] and neutral GSL species [50], [51]. These early experiments permitted the analysis of SLs as intact molecular species, and yielded diagnostic fragmentations that could distinguish isomeric SL structures [52], [53]. Because these molecules were either relatively large or polar they required derivatization of the SL to trimethylsilyl or permethyl ethers to reduce their polarity and

Emerging technologies for sphingolipidomic analyses

The term “sphingolipidomic” analysis refers to the structure specific and quantitative measurement of all the individual molecular species of sphingolipids so that the role of each in a given biological context (i.e. biosynthesis or turnover) may be determined. To this end, LC–MS/MS is currently the analytical tool of choice for “sphingolipidomic” analyses for several important reasons. First, LC–MS/MS provides three orthogonal points of specificity with regard to differentiation of complex

“Shotgun” lipidomics

Other mass spectrometric techniques have been introduced for the identification, structure determination, and quantitation of sphingolipids. For example, two-dimensional (2D) ESI MS, using a triple quadrupole instrument has been described by Han and Gross [77], [78]. This technique utilizes MS and MS/MS analyses of an infused sample in both positive and negative ESI conditions. The formation of charged molecular adducts in the positive mode and anionic species in the negative mode is promoted

Summary and perspective

Initially described and named in 1884 by Jo-han Ludwig Wilhelm Thudichum [98], sphingolipids are now known to mediate many important cellular processes, such as apoptosis, differentiation, and chemotaxis. The structural diversity of SLs has been established by numerous chromatographic separation techniques, including TLC and HPLC. Mass spectrometry provides many advantages in the detection of SLs, especially sensitivity, and both specificity and structural information may be provided by MS/MS

Acknowledgement

The authors thank Prof. Alfred H. Merrill, Jr. for critical reading of this manuscript and Lipid MAPS (U54 GM069338) for continued support

References (280)

  • R. Buccoliero et al.

    Pharmacol. Res.

    (2003)
  • D.S. Menaldino et al.

    Pharmacol. Res.

    (2003)
  • H. Fyrst et al.

    J. Lipid Res.

    (2004)
  • M. Maceyka et al.

    J. Biol. Chem.

    (2005)
  • P. Ternes et al.

    J. Biol. Chem.

    (2002)
  • M. Tani et al.

    J. Lipid Res.

    (2005)
  • U. Reiss et al.

    J. Biol. Chem.

    (2004)
  • C. Riebeling et al.

    J. Biol. Chem.

    (2003)
  • S. Lahiri et al.

    J. Biol. Chem.

    (2005)
  • C. Michel et al.

    J. Biol. Chem.

    (1997)
  • B.J. Pettus et al.

    J. Biol. Chem.

    (2004)
  • A. Abe et al.

    J. Biol. Chem.

    (1998)
  • L. Svennerholm

    J. Lipid Res.

    (1964)
  • J.D. Pollack et al.

    J. Lipid Res.

    (1971)
  • S. Pollet et al.

    J. Lipid Res.

    (1978)
  • R. Ledeen et al.

    J. Lipid Res.

    (1968)
  • F.B. Jungalwala et al.

    J. Lipid Res.

    (1983)
  • G.S. Shephard et al.

    J. Chromatogr. B Biomed. Sci. Appl.

    (1998)
  • R.L. Lester et al.

    Anal. Biochem.

    (2001)
  • M. Smith et al.

    J. Lipid Res.

    (1981)
  • T.B. Caligan et al.

    Anal. Biochem.

    (2000)
  • T.J. McNabb et al.

    Anal. Biochem.

    (1999)
  • E.H. McCluer et al.

    J. Lipid Res.

    (1976)
  • R.H. McCluer et al.

    J. Lipid Res.

    (1973)
  • O.C. Martin et al.

    Anal. Biochem.

    (1986)
  • L.A. Cowart et al.

    J. Lipid Res.

    (2002)
  • B. Samuelsson et al.

    J. Lipid Res.

    (1969)
  • B. Samuelsson et al.

    Biochim. Biophys. Acta

    (1968)
  • K. Samuelsson et al.

    Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.

    (1969)
  • C.C. Sweeley et al.

    Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.

    (1969)
  • S. Hammarstrom et al.

    Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.

    (1970)
  • K. Samuelsson et al.

    Chem. Phys. Lipids

    (1970)
  • Y. Kushi et al.

    Anal. Biochem.

    (1989)
  • A.H. Merrill et al.

    Methods

    (2005)
  • N. Kaga et al.

    Anal. Biochem.

    (2005)
  • D. Pacetti et al.

    J. Chromatogr. A

    (2005)
  • T. Fujiwaki et al.

    J. Chromatogr. B Biomed. Sci. Appl.

    (1999)
  • K. Venkataraman et al.

    J. Biol. Chem.

    (2002)
  • E. Wang et al.

    J. Biol. Chem.

    (1991)
  • X. Han et al.

    J. Lipid Res.

    (2003)
  • X. Han et al.

    Anal. Biochem.

    (2004)
  • C.A. Haynes et al.

    J. Lipid Res.

    (2008)
  • M.A. McFarland et al.

    J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom.

    (2005)
  • Z. Vukelic et al.

    J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom.

    (2005)
  • J.J. Jones et al.

    J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom.

    (2004)
  • J.J. Jones et al.

    Comput. Biol. Chem.

    (2005)
  • S.N. Jackson et al.

    J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom.

    (2005)
  • B.H. Clowers et al.

    J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom.

    (2005)
  • K. Borner et al.

    Biochim. Biophys. Acta

    (2006)
  • S. Spiegel et al.

    Faseb J.

    (1996)
  • Cited by (111)

    • Glycolipids

      2022, Encyclopedia of Cell Biology: Volume 1-6, Second Edition
    • Qualitative distribution of endogenous sphingolipids in plasma of human and rodent species by UPLC-Q-Exactive-MS

      2021, Journal of Chromatography B: Analytical Technologies in the Biomedical and Life Sciences
    View all citing articles on Scopus

    This paper is part of the special issue “Lipidomics: Developments and Applications”, X. Han (Guest Editor)”.

    View full text