Elsevier

Joint Bone Spine

Volume 78, Issue 2, March 2011, Pages 138-143
Joint Bone Spine

Review
Role for imaging studies in ankylosing spondylitis

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbspin.2010.07.008Get rights and content

Abstract

Although the diagnosis and structural monitoring of ankylosing spondylitis relies classically on standard radiography, recent classification criteria and recommendations issued by the ASAS-OMERACT working group give considerable weight to modern imaging methods, most notably magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). MRI and, more recently, ultrasonography, yield three major benefits: they ensure the early diagnosis of ankylosing spondylitis in the absence of radiographic sacroiliitis, they provide therapeutic guidance at any time during the course of the disease, and they supply objective information on the degree of inflammation and response to treatment. Prospective longitudinal studies are under way to determine the respective roles for MRI and ultrasonography in the diagnosis and monitoring of axial and peripheral forms of ankylosing spondylitis. The introduction of whole-body MRI, new MRI sequences and positron emission tomography can be expected to further benefit the diagnosis of ankylosing spondylitis.

Section snippets

Ultrasonography

Ultrasonography is a tool of choice for the evaluation of SpAs, as it can provide information on all the peripheral joints and entheses. Assessment of the superficial entheses requires high-frequency (12–20 MHz) linear probes and high-performance power Doppler machines.

Diagnostic usefulness of ultrasonography

As occurred with MRI, the development of standardized ultrasonography protocols and the conduct of vast prospective studies will probably allow the OMERACT-EULAR Ultrasound Task Force to validate this diagnostic tool in the near future and to define its role for the early diagnosis and monitoring of patients with axial and/or peripheral SpAs. However, in contrast to MRI, ultrasonography cannot visualize foci of bone marrow inflammation, as the cortex blocks the ultrasound beam. The most

Scores

A few ultrasound scores have been developed for evaluating patients with SpAs [11], [31]. The sites examined vary but the criteria used for the evaluation are always the same: enthesis thickness, structure, calcifications, erosions, bursae and power Doppler signal.

Correlations with clinical and laboratory variables and changes during treatment

Disease activity as evaluated by ultrasonography showed weak correlations with clinical and laboratory variables [32], [33]. TNFα antagonist therapy was associated with a decrease or the disappearance of the power Doppler signals.

Discussion and perspectives

MRI and ultrasonography clearly improve the management of patients with SpAs. These two investigations are complementary for visualizing and locating the inflammatory lesions (axial versus peripheral) (Table 2). MRI and ultrasonography not only assist in diagnosing and monitoring SpAs, but also provide information on the pathophysiology of these diseases. MRI has helped to understand the events that occur during the course of SpAs and has allowed detailed descriptions of the elemental lesions,

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References (62)

  • D. Wendling et al.

    Imaging study scores for ankylosing spondylitis

    Joint Bone Spine

    (2006)
  • B. Fournié et al.

    Extrasynovial ultrasound abnormalities in the psoriatic finger. Prospective comparative power-Doppler study versus rheumatoid arthritis

    Joint Bone Spine

    (2006)
  • A.K. Mager et al.

    Role of whole-body magnetic resonance imaging in diagnosing early spondyloarthritis

    Eur J Radiol

    (2009)
  • A. Cotten et al.

    New MRI sequences

    Joint Bone Spine

    (2009)
  • S. Van der Linden et al.

    Evaluation of diagnostic criteria for ankylosing spondylitis. A proposal for modification of the New York criteria

    Arthritis Rheum

    (1984)
  • E. Feldtkeller et al.

    Age at onset and diagnosis delay in HLA-B27 negative vs. positive patients with ankylosing spondylitis

    Rheumatol Int

    (2003)
  • A.J. Wanders et al.

    What is the most appropriate radiologic scoring method for ankylosing spondylitis? A comparison of the available methods based on the Outcome Measures in Rheumatology Clinical Trials filter

    Arthritis Rheum

    (2004)
  • F. Salaffi et al.

    Radiological scoring methods for ankylosing spondylitis: a comparison between the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Radiology Index and the modified Stoke Ankylosing Spondylitis Spine Score

    Clin Exp Rheumatol

    (2007)
  • K.B. Puhakka et al.

    Imaging of sacroiliitis in early seronegative spondyloarthropathy. Assessment of abnormalities by MR in comparison with radiography and CT

    Acta Radiol

    (2003)
  • K.B. Puhakka et al.

    MR imaging of the normal sacroiliac joint with correlation to histology

    Skeletal Radiol

    (2004)
  • I.H. Song et al.

    The diagnostic value of scintigraphy in assessing sacroiliitis in ankylosing spondylitis: a systematic literature research

    Ann Rheum Dis

    (2008)
  • M. Rudwaleit et al.

    The development of Assessment of SpondyloArthritis international Society classification criteria for axial spondyloarthritis (part I): classification of paper patients by expert opinion including uncertainty appraisal

    Ann Rheum Dis

    (2009)
  • M. Rudwaleit et al.

    The development of Assessment of SpondyloArthritis International Society classification criteria for axial spondyloarthritis (part II): validation and final selection

    Ann Rheum Dis

    (2009)
  • M.A. D’Agostino et al.

    Assessment of peripheral enthesitis in the spondylarthropathies by ultrasonography combined with power Doppler: a cross-sectional study

    Arthritis Rheum

    (2003)
  • P. Balint et al.

    Ultrasonography of entheseal insertions in the lower limb in spondyloarthropathy

    Ann Rheum Dis

    (2002)
  • F. Joshua et al.

    Summary findings of a systematic review of the ultrasound assessment of synovitis

    J Rheumatol

    (2007)
  • M. Szkudlarek et al.

    Ultrasonography of the metatarsophalangeal joints in rheumatoid arthritis, compared with magnetic resonance, conventional radiography and clinical examination

    Arthritis Rheum

    (2004)
  • M. Rudwaleit et al.

    Defining active sacroiliitis on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for classification of axial spondyloarthritis: a consensual approach by the ASAS/OMERACT MRI group

    Ann Rheum Dis

    (2009)
  • J. Sieper et al.

    The Assessment of SpondyloArthritis International Society (ASAS) handbook: a guide to assess spondyloarthritis

    Ann Rheum Dis

    (2009)
  • V. Hoenen-Clavert et al.

    Inflammatory and structural evaluation in spondyloarthritis: magnetic resonance imaging analysis of axial and peripheral involvement

    J Rheumatol

    (2007)
  • J. Braun et al.

    Use of immunohistologic and in situ hybridization techniques in the examination of sacroiliac joint biopsy specimens from patients with ankylosing spondylitis

    Arthritis Rheum

    (1995)
  • M. Bollow et al.

    Quantitative analyses of sacroiliac biopsies in spondyloarthropathies: T cells and macrophages predominate in early and active sacroiliitis- cellularity correlates with the degree of enhancement detected by magnetic resonance imaging

    Ann Rheum Dis

    (2000)
  • A.S. Klauser et al.

    Feasibility of second-generation ultrasound contrast media in the detection of active sacroiliitis

    Arthritis Rheum

    (2009)
  • H.I. Keen et al.

    The development of a preliminary ultrasonographic scoring system for features of hand osteoarthritis

    Ann Rheum Dis

    (2008)
  • H. Marzo-Ortega et al.

    Baseline and one year magnetic resonance imaging of the sacroiliac joint and lumbar spine in very early inflammatory back pain. The relationship between symptoms, HLA-B27, and disease extent and persistence

    Ann Rheum Dis

    (2009)
  • U. Weber et al.

    Frequent detection of sacroiliac joint abnormalities on MRI in healthy subjects and patients with non-specific back pain. [abstract]

    Arthritis Rheum

    (2009)
  • J. Bigot et al.

    Determination of the best diagnostic criteria of sacroiliitis with MRI

    J Radiol

    (1999)
  • A.N. Bennett et al.

    Evaluation of the diagnostic utility of spinal magnetic resonance imaging in axial spondylarthritis

    Arthritis Rheum

    (2009)
  • A.N. Bennett et al.

    The evidence for whole-spine MRI in the assessment of axial spondyloarthropathy

    Rheumatology (Oxford)

    (2010)
  • A.N. Bennett et al.

    The fatty Romanus lesion – A non-inflammatory spinal MRI lesion specific for axial spondyloarthropathy

    Ann Rheum Dis

    (2010)
  • D. McGonagle et al.

    The role of biomechanical factors and HLA-B27 in magnetic resonance imaging-determined bone changes in plantar fascia enthesopathy

    Arthritis Rheum

    (2002)
  • Cited by (36)

    • Fibrosis imaging: Current concepts and future directions

      2017, Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews
      Citation Excerpt :

      However, these MRI pattern also present in degenerative diseases and spinal metastases, therefore such findings need to be examined in closer detail and should be confirmed with another noninvasive imaging modality [74]. Ultrasonography could be such a tool for the diagnosis of ankylosing spondylitis, as it can provide more fibrosis-related information on peripheral joints and entheses [72]. For example, on B-mode US images, tendon thickening is detected as decreased echogenic areas as well as enthesophytic structures [75].

    • Diagnostic value of diffusion weighted magnetic resonance image in early ankylosing spondylitis

      2014, Egyptian Journal of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine
      Citation Excerpt :

      This reflects the lack of specificity of presenting clinical features of the disease, the lack of sensitivity of laboratory markers and the slow rate of radiographic progression in the sacroiliac joints (SIJs) despite ongoing symptoms of inflammatory back pain (IBP) (3). Imaging studies have always played a prominent role in the diagnosis of ankylosing spondylitis (AS), it yield three major benefits: they ensure the early diagnosis of ankylosing spondylitis in the absence of radiographic sacroiliitis, they provide therapeutic guidance at any time during the course of the disease, and they supply objective information on the degree of inflammation and response to treatment (4). As diagnostic imaging techniques continue to develop, advanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) techniques, such as diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) and whole-body MRI (WB-MRI), have been utilized in the evaluation of patients with suspected early AS (5–7).

    • The ossification in axial spondyloarthritis

      2013, Revue du Rhumatisme (Edition Francaise)
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text