Comparative analysis of the outdoor culture of Haematococcus pluvialis in tubular and bubble column photobioreactors

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiotec.2005.11.010Get rights and content

Abstract

The present paper makes a comparative analysis of the outdoor culture of H. pluvialis in a tubular photobioreactor and a bubble column. Both reactors had the same volume and were operated in the same way, thus allowing the influence of the reactor design to be analyzed. Due to the large changes in cell morphology and biochemical composition of H. pluvialis during outdoor culture, a new, faster methodology has been developed for their evaluation. Characterisation of the cultures is carried out on a macroscopic scale using a colorimetric method that allows the simultaneous determination of biomass concentration, and the chlorophyll, carotenoid and astaxanthin content of the biomass. On the microscopic scale, a method was developed based on the computer analysis of digital microscopic images. This method allows the quantification of cell population, average cell size and population homogeneity. The accuracy of the methods was verified during the operation of outdoor photobioreactors on a pilot plant scale. Data from the reactors showed tubular reactors to be more suitable for the production of H. pluvialis biomass and/or astaxanthin, due to their higher light availability. In the tubular photobioreactor biomass concentrations of 7.0 g/L (d.wt.) were reached after 16 days, with an overall biomass productivity of 0.41 g/L day. In the bubble column photobioreactor, on the other hand, the maximum biomass concentration reached was 1.4 g/L, with an overall biomass productivity of 0.06 g/L day. The maximum daily biomass productivity, 0.55 g/L day, was reached in the tubular photobioreactor for an average irradiance inside the culture of 130 μE/m2s. In addition, the carotenoid content of biomass from tubular photobioreactor increased up to 2.0% d.wt., whereas that of the biomass from the bubble column remained roughly constant at values of 0.5% d.wt. It should be noted that in the tubular photobioreactor under conditions of nitrate saturation, there was an accumulation of carotenoids due to the high irradiance in this reactor, their content in the biomass increasing from 0.5 to 1.0% d.wt. However, carotenoid accumulation mainly took place when nitrate concentration in the medium was below 5.0 mM, conditions which were only observed in the tubular photobioreactor. A similar behaviour was observed for astaxanthin, with maximum values of 1.1 and 0.2% d.wt. measured in the tubular and bubble column photobioreactors, respectively. From these data astaxanthin productivities of 4.4 and 0.12 mg/L day were calculated for the tubular and the bubble column photobioreactors. Accumulation of carotenoids was also accompanied by an increase in cell size from 20 to 35 μm, which was only observed in the tubular photobioreactors. Thus it may be concluded that the methodology developed in the present study allows the monitoring of H. pluvialis cultures characterized by fast variations of cell morphology and biochemical composition, especially in outdoor conditions, and that tubular photobioreactors are preferable to bubble columns for the production of biomass and/or astaxanthin.

Introduction

Microalgae are a potential source of biomass or specific products such as lipids, pigments, antioxidants, etc. One of the most recent processes based on microalgae is the production of astaxanthin from Haematococcus pluvialis. Astaxanthin is a high-value carotenoid pigment with important applications in the nutraceutical, cosmetics, food and feed industries (Guerin et al., 2003). The major market for astaxanthin is as a pigmentation source in aquaculture, primarily in salmon and trout (Guerin et al., 2003). In this sense, the microalgae Haematococcus pluvialis is the richest source of natural astaxanthin, and it is now cultivated on an industrial scale (Olaizola and Huntley, 2003).

Astaxanthin sells for US $2500 kg with an annual worldwide market estimated at US $200 million (Lorenz and Cysewski, 2000). Although 95% of this market consumes synthetically derived astaxanthin, consumer demand for natural products makes the synthetic pigments much less desirable and provides an opportunity for the production of natural astaxanthin by H. pluvialis. This strain contains 1.5–3.0% astaxanthin and has gained acceptance in aquaculture and other markets as a “concentrated” form of natural astaxanthin (Lorenz and Cysewski, 2000, Olaizola and Huntley, 2003). In this sense, natural astaxanthin from H. pluvialis is currently produced in a two-step process. In the first step green vegetative cells are produced under controlled culture conditions, frequently indoors, using stirred tank or bubble columns. In the second step, green cells are exposed to stress conditions (high irradiance, nitrate and/or phosphate deprivation, high temperature) to induce accumulation of astaxanthin, using open raceways or tubular photobioreactors. Flat panel, bubble columns and tubular photobioreactors have been extensively proposed as outdoor closed photobioreactors for the industrial production of microalgae (Tredici and Materassi, 1992, Richmond et al., 1993, Molina et al., 1994, Acién et al., 1998, García et al., 1999). However, only bubble columns and tubular photobioreactors have proven capable of scaling up to high volumes. Although the outdoor production of H. pluvialis in tubular photobioreactors has been referenced (Olaizola, 2000, Chaumont and Thepenier, 1995), no data from bubble column has been referenced in spite of the highly adequate light profile inside this type of reactor (García et al., 1999). In addition, Chaumont and Thepenier (1995) have reported the rapid variation of biomass concentration and pigment content in daylight using tubular photobioreactors, with carotenoid content increasing from 0.6 to 1.4% d.wt. in 4 h, from 7:00 to 11:00 h.

Due to the fast and great variation of Haematococcus cells during outdoor culture, a fast methodology to characterize the cultures at macroscopic and microscopic scale is necessary. Microscopic characterisation, i.e. cell population and size distribution, is usually performed either by direct observation, or using automated devices such as haemocytometers or more sophisticated cell counters (Harker et al., 1996, Tripathi et al., 1999). However, apart from cell counters, the other methods do not quantify cell size and homogeneity, and the use of cell counters for Haematococcus cells is very problematic due to variations in cell size between different cell morphotypes, frequently more than 10-fold. Macroscopic culture characterisation is usually performed as the dry weight measurement of biomass concentration and the determination of pigment content by spectrophotometry–HPLC (Del Campo et al., 2000). Dry weight measurements are tedious and results are not obtained until at least 12 h after sampling. The spectrophotometric measurement of pigment content requires a time-consuming extraction process of the pigments using adequate solvents, which must also ensure effective cell wall breakage. In the case of H. pluvialis, efficient extraction of pigments is only properly achieved using mechanical procedures of disruption (grounding with alumina) or chemical methods (DMS) (Del Campo et al., 2000). In addition, the astaxanthin content of the biomass must finally be quantified by HPLC. In short, the measurement of biomass pigment content is both a time and labour consuming method, taking a minimum of 24 h.

In the present paper a comparative analysis on the performance of H. pluvialis cultures carried out in bubble columns and tubular photobioreactors is performed. The objective is to determine the best reactor to be used for the outdoor production of astaxanthin, as well as to identify the main variables governing the behaviour of the cultures. For this, and due to fast changes in cell morphology and biochemical composition of this strain when accumulation of astaxanthin takes place, two fast methods for the microscopic and macroscopic characterization of H. pluvialis cultures are developed. The microscopic characterization is performed by a computer analysis of digital images of the cultures obtained with a microscope. The macroscopic characterization is carried out by measuring colour changes directly on H. pluvialis cultures, and the method is capable of measuring biomass concentration and pigment content. The development of fast characterization methods as well as determining the most adequate photobioreactor and the main variables governing the behaviour of outdoor cultures of H. pluvialis is the first step towards optimising the outdoor production of astaxanthin from H. pluvialis.

Section snippets

Micro-organism and culture conditions

The microalga Haematococcus pluvialis (strain CCAP 34/8) was from the Culture Collection of Algae and Protozoa of the Centre for Hydrology and Ecology (Ambleside, UK), and was grown in an inorganic medium free of acetate (Garcia-Malea et al., 2005). Cultures for the calibration of fast characterization methods were grown in 2 L photobioreactors in laboratory conditions. The photobioreactors were bubbled with air at 1.0 v/v/min, with the temperature maintained at 20 °C by passing thermostated water

Results

Before carrying out the experiments in outdoor photobioreactors, the development of necessary characterization methods was needed. In this sense, two methods were developed for the microscopic and macroscopic fast characterization of the cultures. For this, eight different batch cultures performed at laboratory scale under different growth conditions were used. Data from these cultures, measured by classical methods, are summarized in Table 1. The biomass concentration of the cultures ranged

Discussion

In order to produce natural astaxanthin from H. pluvialis at competitive cost the production must take place in outdoor conditions and using optimally designed processes. The core of the production process is the photobioreactor to be used, and it is therefore necessary to determine the influence of the reactor geometry on the yield of the process. In addition, outdoor cultures of H. pluvialis are characterised by fast variations of biochemical composition and cell morphology in response to

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by the Ministerio de Ciencia y Tecnología (PPQ 2001-3822-C02-02; PPQ 2001-3822-C02-01) and Junta de Andalucía, Plan Andaluz de Investigación III (CVI 173, CVI 263).

References (41)

  • R. Sarada et al.

    Influence of stress on astaxanthin production in Haematococcus pluvialis grown under different culture conditions

    Process Biochem.

    (2002)
  • U. Tripathi et al.

    Production of astaxanthin in Haematococcus pluvialis cultured in various media

    Biores. Technol.

    (1999)
  • F.G. Acién et al.

    Modelling of biomass productivity in tubular photobioreactors for microalgal cultures: effects of dilution rate, tube diameter and solar irradiance

    Biotech. Bioeng.

    (1998)
  • R. Arias et al.

    Correlation of lycopene measured by HPLC with the L*a*b* color readings of a hydroponic tomato and the relationship of maturity with color and lycopene content

    J. Agric. Food Chem.

    (2000)
  • M.A. Borowitza et al.

    Culture of astaxanthin-producing green alga Haematococcus pluvialis. I. Effects of nutrients on growth and cell type

    J. Appl. Phycol.

    (1991)
  • S. Boussiba

    Carotenogenesis in the green alga Haematococcus pluvialis: cellular physiology and stress response

    Physiol Planta

    (2000)
  • S. Boussiba et al.

    Astaxanthin accumulation in the green alga Haematococcus pluvialis

    Plant Cell Physiol.

    (1991)
  • S. Boussiba et al.

    Changes in pigments profile in the green alga Haematococcus pluvialis exposed to environmental stresses

    Biotechnol. Lett.

    (1999)
  • D. Chaumont et al.

    Carotenoid content in growing cells of Haematococcus pluvialis during a sunlight cycle

    J. Appl. Phycol.

    (1995)
  • CIE Central Bureau, 1986. Colorimetry, second ed. CIE Publication no. 15.2, Wien, Kegelgasse 27 A-1030, CIE Central...
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text