Original ArticleMaximizing derivable information from cytologic specimens for pathologic and molecular diagnostics
Introduction
The medical community is in a period of transformation. Rapid advances in biotechnology have put genomics in the forefront of oncologic care. Molecular alterations are now used to guide the treatment of patients with a growing number of malignancies.1 Clinical demand for molecular testing of patient-derived tissue samples has correspondingly increased. In response, the field of pathology has been accommodating without drastically reconstructing traditional modalities of diagnosis and specimen processing. The conventional approach of fixing tissue in formalin and embedding them in paraffin wax results in a template appropriate for morphologic evaluation but with problems associated with molecular analysis. Problems with low recovery of nucleic acids, fragmentation of nucleic acids, allele dropouts, and artifactually induced alterations at the molecular level are perils associated with today’s established fixation paradigm.2, 3, 4, 5, 6 Recently, the value of cytologic specimens as substrates for combined pathologic and molecular diagnostics has been demonstrated to have clinical value.7, 8 Cytologic specimens, although different than traditional biopsies in that architecture is lost in the former, have proven to yield concordant diagnoses when compared with the latter.9 The currently undervalued importance of these specimens relative to biopsy specimens is because they are not processed by formalin fixation. This has proven to result in improved yields of nucleic acids at both the qualitative and quantitative levels.10 In fact, molecular analysis from a variety of cytology formats (fluids, washes, aspirations, and cell blocks) have been documented to be reliable sources for molecular analysis.11, 12, 13, 14, 15 Looking to further increase the value of cytology specimens, we have developed a microfluidic platform from which the cells in a cytologic specimen can be viewed for diagnostic purposes and later recovered for molecular analysis, all in the context of a formalin-free environment. Herein we demonstrate the utility of applying microfluidics to the cytologic evaluation of cells and the recovery of high–molecular weight DNA from those same cells.
Section snippets
Materials and methods
Cytologic specimens were created by dissociating viable cells from recently excised, unfixed surgical resection specimens. Briefly, thin strips of nontransformed human colonic mucosa were excised from excess regions of segmental colonic resection specimens extirpated for medically indicated purposes. Use of excess human tissue was approved by the University at Buffalo Institutional Review Board. Colonic tissue was selected for testing based on the availability at this institution, the columnar
Results
Two cell types from colonic epithelium could be readily identified in the specimens prepared to create cytology-like specimens, absorptive cells, and goblets cells.22 In both the cytosmears and cytospin specimens, the absorptive cells were columnar in shape and either in small cohesive groups or single and partially detached (Fig. 3). The nuclei in these cells was located either in the middle of the cells or toward, but not at, the basal pole. The nuclei were oval to oblong and with smooth
Discussion
The field of oncology treatment is in a period of rapid transition. The current, evolving paradigm of precision medicine emphasizes administration of the right therapeutic agent to the right patient, with identification of the “right” patient based on stratifying patients into responders and nonresponders. Responders can be identified via molecular tests that link targeted therapeutic agents to specific molecular alterations.23 As our knowledge of the dynamics and complexity of malignancy at
Conclusions
We have demonstrated the ability to process a specimen as a cytology sample on a microfluidic device. The microscopic features of cells evaluated in the microfluidic device tested are comparable to those prepared by current methods. The advantage of a microfluidic device for the evaluation of cytologic specimens with malignant cells is in its potential to capture cells for bright-field diagnosis and recover the same cells for molecular analysis. This will be optimal when there are low numbers
Funding sources
Authors Furlani and Oh would like to acknowledge financial support from the U.S. National Science Foundation, through award number CBET-1337860.
Conflict of interest disclosures
The authors made no disclosures.
Acknowledgments
The authors wish to thank John Nyquist, MS, CMI, for the illustration of Fig. 2.
References (32)
- et al.
Effect of fixatives and tissue processing on the content and integrity of nucleic acids
Am J Pathol
(2002) - et al.
Low copy number DNA template can render polymerase chain reaction error prone in a sequence-dependent manner
J Mol Diagnostics
(2005) - et al.
Molecular analysis of peritoneal fluid in ovarian cancer patients
Mod Pathol
(2003) - et al.
Molecular diagnostic testing of cytology specimens: current applications and future considerations
J Am Soc Cytopathol
(2014) - et al.
A new frontier in personalized cancer therapy: mapping molecular changes
Future Oncol
(2012) - et al.
Multiplex picoliter-droplet digital PCR for quantitative assessment of DNA integrity in clinical samples
Clinical Chem
(2013) - et al.
Discovery and characterization of artifactual mutations in deep coverage targeted capture sequencing data due to oxidative DNA damage during sample preparation
Nucleic Acids Res
(2013) - et al.
Sequence artefacts in a prospective series of formalin-fixed tumours tested for mutations in hotspot regions by massively parallel sequencing
BMC Med Genomics
(2014) - et al.
Next-generation sequencing improves the diagnosis of thyroid FNA specimens with indeterminate cytology
Histopathology
(2015) - et al.
Next-generation sequencing of lung cancer EGFR exons 18-21 allows effective molecular diagnosis of small routine samples (cytology and biopsy)
PLoS One
(2013)
Multiplatform comparison of molecular oncology tests performed on cytology specimens and formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue
Cancer Cytopathol
Extraction of high-quality DNA from ethanol-preserved tropical plant tissues
BMC Res Notes
Molecular profiling of tumor cells in cerebrospinal fluid and matched primary tumors from metastatic breast cancer patients with leptomeningeal carcinomatosis
Cancer Res
Molecular detection of tumor cells in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid from patients with early stage lung cancer
J Natl Cancer Inst
High- throughput molecular analysis from leftover of fine needle aspiration cytology of mammographically detected breast cancer
Transl Oncol
A new fabrication process for SU-8 thick photoresist structures by simultaneously removing edge-bead and air bubbles
J Micromechan Microeng
Cited by (3)
Ultrarapid EGFR Mutation Screening Followed by Comprehensive Next-Generation Sequencing: A Feasible, Informative Approach for Lung Carcinoma Cytology Specimens With a High Success Rate
2020, JTO Clinical and Research ReportsCitation Excerpt :Cytology specimens are often the sole source of tumor tissue for molecular profiling in patients with NSCLC, in view of the increased emphasis on minimally invasive procedures to obtain diagnostic material. Although studies have demonstrated the suitability of these samples with limited tissue for molecular testing,21–26 including comprehensive NGS,27 success rates vary widely across institutions and are lower when a sample is subjected to serial single-gene testing instead of an upfront multiplexed assay.21,28–30 Improvement in success rates relies on a careful choice of technology and optimization of tissue handling and testing protocols.
Optimizing workflows and processing of cytologic samples for comprehensive analysis by next-generation sequencing: Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center experience
2016, Archives of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine