Magnetic, electronic and mechanical properties of SeXO3 (X = Mn, Ni) with the LSDA + U framework

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2020.156674Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Depending on the U parameter, some physical properties of SeXO3 were examined.

  • Some physical properties of Se(Mn,Ni)O3 have been predicted for the first time.

  • The elastic parameters reveal that these compounds are mechanical stable.

  • In the G-AFM phase, both compounds have an indirect band gap.

  • Our calculated results can be seen as a prediction for future experimental work.

Abstract

We have investigated the influence of the Hubbard (effective) U correction parameter on the structural, local magnetic moment, electronic, mechanical and elastic anisotropy properties of SeXO3 compounds from the first-principles computations. The equilibrium volumes, total energy, bulk moduli and its pressure derivative of the four different magnetic configurations of the SeXO3 compound are assessed by the Murnaghan equation of state fittings. Comparing the ground state of total energy, we have found that the G-type antiferromagnetic configuration in SeXO3 compounds is more stable than other magnetic configurations. Electronic band structure computations indicate that both compounds exhibit a semiconductor behavior. The elastic, polycrystalline elastic and anisotropic properties of both compounds in G-type antiferromagnetic phase were investigated. With the present research, the prediction of these mechanical properties of SeXO3 compounds will guide the elastic constant measurements of these compounds in the future.

Introduction

The ABO3 compounds mostly crystallize into an ideal perovskite structure which is cubic. The A- and B- site cations may contain different valence combinations and ionic radii. The stability condition of the cubic perovskite structure depends on the average radius of the A, B and O ions controlled by the Goldschmidt tolerance factor. In the perovskite structure, the tolerance factor can also be expressed in terms of the measured bond lengths instead of the ionic radius. For these two cases, the Goldschmidt tolerance factor (t) is defined by the following equation [1]:t=(RA+RO)2(RB+RO)=(AO)2(BO)where RA, RB and RO are the ionic radii corresponding to the constituent atoms. (A - O) and (B–O) are the average of the measured bond lengths between the A cation and the O anions and between the B cation and the O anions, respectively. For the ideal cubic structure, the tolerance factor (t) should be equal to 1. Empirically, the tolerance factor is such that a cubic perovskite structure is a reasonable possibility if t is in the range of about 0.9–1.0. If the deviation of t is slightly less than one, tilting and rotations of the oxygen octahedral will be favored. In the case of a small/smaller deviation in t (i.e., t < 1), the crystal structure undergoes from a cubic phase to an orthorhombic or a rhombohedral phase [2]. The small ion radii of A and B cations give a lower t value and as a result, small value of t leads to structural distortion. The <B–O–B> bond angle is notably reduced from 180° with the increment in lattice distortion, which greatly influences many physical properties of many perovskites. For example, the <B–O–B> bond angle in BO6 octahedra reduces from 180° to 125.48° for SeMnO3 [3]. B ions are octahedrally coordinated by the O ions in the unit cell. This tilting of the octahedron is connected to the size of the A and B cotions. BO6 octahedra tilts about the b- and c-axes for the orthorhombic structure. BO6 octahedral takes an important role in the ferroelectricity and ferromagnetism properties of some ABO3 compounds. Some ferroelectric perovskites are transition metal oxides containing transition metal ions with incompletely filled d-electrons. Some perovskite-type structures are compounds of the type A+4 B+2 O32(e.g. SeMnO3 and SeNiO3). Due to the spins of partially filled 3d cations of transition metals, the ABO3 perovskites have magnetic moments. Magnetic behavior is related to the organization between magnetic moments or spins on these cations.

The SeMnO3 and SeNiO3 have perovskite-type structures. The SeNiO3 and SeMnO3 compounds are described by partly filled 3d orbitals and a related local magnetic structure in which the Mn and Ni atoms are antiferromagnetically aligned [3]. The symmetry of both compounds belongs to Pnma (#62) space group in the orthorhombic structure [3,4] at room temperature. A site in ABO3 perovskites is occupied by voluminous Se+4 cations and B site by Mn+2 or Ni+2 ion. The compounds of the SeXO3 (X = Mn, Ni) perovskite family have the ability to contain the lone-pair electrons in crystal structure, usually occupied by the Se+4 cations. Escamilla et al. [5] recommended that SeMnO3 compound changed its magnetic ground state from a small ferromagnetic to antiferromagnetic phase at 52 K, probably due to strong octahedral distortion. The perovskite SeMnO3 and SeNiO3 are synthesized at elevated pressure and temperature (3.5 GPa and 850 °C) [3,6]. By the neutron powder diffraction and susceptibility measurements [3], the magnetic structure of these compounds are described as antiferromagnetic (AFM) at a Néel temperature 53.3 K (SeMnO3) and 104 K (SeNiO3) with the magnetic moments along the c direction. The moments are antiferromagnetically coupled along the b direction. Also, the AFM states of SeNiO3 was confirmed in a numerical calculation study using the LSDA + U method [7] and first principles method [8]. Similarly, the AFM states of SeMnO3 was proved in a computation study by Perdew, Burke and Ernzerhof (PBE) + U calculation, using hybrid functional [8], and experimentally by Escamilla at al [5]. In addition, SeXO3 includes a violently tilted XO6 octahedron structure, because the average radius of X2+ cation is larger than Se4+. Thus, the SeXO3 compounds have a large X-O-X super-change φ angle which leads to the surprising magnetic properties. These compounds have the same magnetic structure and are given by their basic vectors (0, 0, Az). The four possible spin configurations in the ground state for SeXO3 represent one ferromagnetic (FM) and three antiferromagnetic (AFM) (A-, C-, G-type) ordering. In the case of FM, all magnetic moments of X+2 ions are arranged parallel to the c-crystal axis direction in ab plane. In A-type AFM (A-AFM) ordering, ferromagnetically aligned X ions in ac planes are coupled antiferromagnetically along b-axis. The magnetic moment chain of the C-type (C-AFM) X+2 ions is ferromagnetic in the direction of the b axis, and in the ac plane, the closest neighbors form the antiferromagnetic order. In G-type AFM (G-AFM), the magnetic moments of X+2 ions that are antiferromagnetically double along the b-direction are arranged antifromagnetically along the c axis. Our calculations used the homogeneous and collinear spin arrangements.

The standard local spin density approach (LSDA) technique can not accurately define the conductor and semiconductor behavior and is well known to give small values for forbidden band gap and magnetic moment of localized d/f electrons in rare earth and transition metal oxide compounds. Various approaches have been developed beyond density functional theory (DFT) to harmonize the forbidden band gap with the experimental values. One of these implemented approaches is the LSDA + U method [9] with two additional parameters. One of these parameters is the Hubbard parameter U, which projects the strength of the on-site electronic interaction. The other parameter J sets the strength of the exchange interaction term. Dudarev et al. [9] combined the U and J parameters as a single effective parameter, Ueff = U - J, using the rotational invariant method. The LSDA + U method describes the strong correlation of the 3d electronic states of the X2+ ion. This method can give electronic band gap that is in very good agreement with the optical band gap for some materials. So far, only a few limited theoretical work have been conducted on the structural, magnetic and electronic properties of the SeMnO3 and SeNiO3 compounds [[4], [5], [6], [7], [8],10]. In the present study, the structure, electronic structure, magnetic properties, elastic constants, elastic moduli, elastic anisotropy factor and Debye temperature properties of SeXO3 have been analyzed in detail within the framework of LSDA and LSDA + U calculations. Until now, neither an experimental study nor a theoretical calculation has been made on the elastic constants of the SeXO3 compounds. The mechanical properties of SeXO3 compounds were determined for the first time in this study.

Section snippets

Computational method

The computations have been performed within the frame work of DFT implemented in VASP (Vienna Ab initio Simulation Package) code [11,12]. The PAW (project-augmented wave) method [13] was used to account for the valence electron-ion interaction. The LSDA and LSDA + U approaches have been employed with Ceperley-Alder (CA) functional [14]. The LSDA + U approach was used to improve the description of the ground state of electronic localization effects. Various Ueff values ranging from 0 to 10 eV

Geometric structure and magnetic properties

SeXO3 occurs with orthorhombic structure (space group Pnma, point group D2h) with four formula units per primitive cell. In the orthorhombic SeXO3 compound, four Se and four X (Mn, Ni) atoms are located at the 4c Wyckoff position (x, 0.25, z) and at the 4b Wyckoff position (0, 0, 0.25), respectively. The O atoms are positioned at two nonequivalent crystallographic sites at the 4c Wyckoff position (x, 0.25, z) and at the 8d Wyckoff position (x, y, z). The crystal structure is similar for both

Conclusion

The main objectives of the present work are to study the structural, magnetic, electronic, elastic constants, and elastic anisotropy properties of SeXO3 compound from the first-principles computations by applying LSDA and LSDA + U methods. Our calculations show that the magnetic moment values formed by d orbital in FM phase of Mn and Ni atoms in similar crystal structure material are greater than other spin configurations. Our computation confirms the G-AFM state to be the ground state of both

CRediT authorship contribution statement

Suleyman Cabuk: Conceptualization, Methodology, Data curation, Writing - original draft, Visualization, Investigation, Writing - review & editing.

Declaration of competing interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Acknowledgments

This work is supported by Çukurova University under Project No. FBA-2017-7899.

References (32)

  • S.L. Dudarev et al.

    Electron-energy-loss spectra and the structural stability of nickel oxide: an LSDA+U study

    Phys. Rev. B

    (1998)
  • C.J. Honer et al.

    Properties of the antiferromegnetic selenite MnSeO3 and its non-magnetic analogue ZnSeO3 from first principles calculations

    J. Phys. Condens. Matter

    (2017)
  • G. Kresse et al.

    Efficient iterative schemes for ab initio total-energy calculations using a plane-wave basis set

    Phys. Rev. B

    (1996)
  • P.E. Blöchl

    Projector augmented-wave method

    Phys. Rev. B

    (1994)
  • D.M. Ceperley et al.

    Ground state of the electron gas by a stochastic method

    Phys. Rev. Lett.

    (1980)
  • F.D. Murnaghan

    The compressibility of media under extreme pressures

    Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.

    (1944)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text