International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation
Estimating leaf functional traits by inversion of PROSPECT: Assessing leaf dry matter content and specific leaf area in mixed mountainous forest
Introduction
Components of biodiversity that influence ecosystem dynamics, stability, productivity, nutrient balance and other aspects of ecosystem functioning are collectively referred as functional diversity (e.g., Tilman et al., 1997, Tilman, 2001). Most ecologists now agree that a major determinant of ecosystem functioning is functional diversity, rather than number of species per se (Díaz and Cabido, 2001). By quantifying functional diversity in natural communities, researchers gain additional understanding of the spatial and temporal distribution of biodiversity, ecosystem services and plant community productivity (Cadotte et al., 2009, Lavorel et al., 2011). It is believed that better conservation and restoration decisions can be made by measuring and understanding functional diversity (Cadotte et al., 2011). This realization has underpinned the shift in focus of biodiversity research from species diversity to functional diversity (Tilman, 2001).
Like species diversity, functional diversity is quantified on the basis of trait values of organisms (Petchey and Gaston, 2006, Zhang et al., 2012). A trait is any measurable morphological, physiological or phenological feature of an organism (Violle et al., 2007). In plants, a trait is called a functional trait (e.g., specific leaf area) when it affects plant fitness indirectly via its impacts on plant growth, reproduction, and survival (Violle et al., 2007). It is the combination of plant functional traits that determines how plants respond to environmental factors, affect other trophic levels, and influence ecosystem processes and services (Zhang et al., 2012). For instance, plants growing in a resource-rich environment will have a relatively high specific leaf area and low dry matter content, whereas for plants growing in a resource-poor environment the opposite is true (Wilson et al., 1999). Traits also provide a link between ecosystem functional diversity and species richness (Carlson et al., 2007, Gregory, 2008). The functional traits are increasingly used to investigate community structure and ecosystem functioning, as well as to classify species into functional types (Smith et al., 1997) or for to validate global vegetation models (Albert et al., 2010).
In general, plant traits can be categorized into four groups (Cornelissen et al., 2003): whole-plant traits (e.g., growth form and height), stem and belowground traits (e.g., stem specific density and specific root length), regenerative traits (e.g., seed mass and dispersal mode) and leaf functional traits. Two fundamental leaf functional traits that are of central interest for researchers are Leaf Dry Matter Content (LDMC) and Specific Leaf Area (SLA) (Wilson et al., 1999, Asner et al., 2011). The LDMC, sometimes referred to as tissue density, is the dry mass of a leaf divided by its fresh mass, commonly expressed in mg/g (Cornelissen et al., 2003). It reflects plant growth rate and carbon assimilation and is a better predictor of location on an axis of resource capture, usage and availability (Wilson et al., 1999). The SLA is defined as the leaf area per unit of dry leaf mass usually expressed in m2/kg (Cornelissen et al., 2003). It is referred to as leaf mass per unit area, as specific leaf mass, as well as leaf specific mass. SLA links plant carbon and water cycles, and provides information on the spatial variation of photosynthetic capacity and leaf nitrogen content (Pierce et al., 1994). According to the latter, “SLA is indicative of plant physiological processes such as light capture, growth rates and life strategies of plants”. A worldwide foliar dataset indicates that 82% of all variation in photosynthetic capacity can be explained by SLA and nitrogen (Wright et al., 2004). SLA is species-specific, but significant plasticity exists within and between individual plants of the same species (Pierce et al., 1994, Asner et al., 2011).
Besides their independent role as important ecological indicators, LDMC and SLA could be used to estimate leaf thickness (LT). The estimation of LT from the two traits has been investigated in detail by Vile et al. (2005). This implies SLA is a compound trait which is inversely proportional to the product of LDMC and LT. A study by Hodgson et al. (2011) found that LDMC × LT accounted for nearly three quarters of the observed variation in SLA and that very different combinations of LT and LDMC regularly generate similar values of SLA. However, there are misconceptions in the definition of the stated traits. In many publications, leaf mass per area (LMA or Cm), which is the inverse of SLA, is defined as LDMC.
Several trait data bases have been established worldwide through field measurements (e.g., Kleyer et al., 2008, Kattge et al., 2011). However, acquiring information on such traits purely on the basis of field measurements is labor-intensive and time-consuming, and thus expensive. Remotely sensed data can play a critical role in acquiring such data at broad spatial scales. Hyperspectral remote sensing has the advantage of providing detailed and continuous spectral information, which can potentially be used for measuring these traits. Previous studies have focused on using hyperspectral data to quantify biochemical and biophysical variables of vegetation, such as chlorophyll content, nitrogen and leaf area index (Darvishzadeh et al., 2008a, Vohland and Jarmer, 2008, Asner and Martin, 2009, Knox et al., 2010, Skidmore et al., 2010, Asner et al., 2011, Laurent et al., 2011, Ramoelo et al., 2011, Asner and Martin, 2012, Ramoelo et al., 2012). Hyperspectral remote sensing has also been used to map canopy functional and species diversity (Carlson et al., 2007, Papeş et al., 2010) and to estimate biodiversity (even simply as the number of species) (Lauver, 1997, Gould, 2000, Saatchi et al., 2008, Papeş et al., 2010, Féret and Asner, 2011, Ruiliang, 2011, Féret and Asner, 2014). However, directly mapping individual species from remote sensing becomes difficult at larger scales and in ecosystems with very high species variability. An alternative approach to mapping species is to estimate plant functional traits, particularly those found in tree crown leaves, and to use these for assessing and monitoring biodiversity (Carlson et al., 2007, Gregory, 2008).
The methods applied to retrieve plant traits from remote sensing data can be grouped into statistical and physical (Darvishzadeh et al., 2008b, le Maire et al., 2008): statistical techniques are used to find a relation between the plant trait measured in situ and its spectral reflectance or some transformation of reflectance. Vegetation indices are widely used in this approach. When hyperspectral data are utilized, it is possible to select the most informative narrow spectrum features from the entire electromagnetic spectrum domain and use them for simple and fast assessment of vegetation properties (Broge and Mortensen, 2002). However, statistical methods are known to be site-specific and lack generalization. An alternative is to use a deductive or physical model approach (Radiative Transfer Model (RTM)) inversion, which is based on physical laws.. Running an RTM enables the creation of a simulated training database covering a wide range of situations and configurations. Such forward RTM simulations allow for sensitivity studies of parameters and development of vegetation indices. This makes RTM inversion approaches more powerful than statistical methods. However, the retrieval of variables through RTMs inversion is ill-posed, since different combination of the input parameters may produce the same spectral signature. To overcome the effect of the ill-posed problem, Combal et al. (2003) recommended the use of prior information. Several studies have reported significant improvement to the accuracy of parameter retrieval after using prior information (e.g., Malenovsky et al., 2006, Dasgupta et al., 2009); others (Feret et al., 2011, Romero et al., 2012) have tried to exclude unrealistic combinations of input parameters by applying a linear regression equation derived from correlating the input parameters.
Leaf RTMs simulate leaf reflectance and transmittance by using certain input parameters derived from leaves. There are a number of leaf RTMs and each one requires a different number of input parameters. One such leaf radiative transfer model is the LIBERTY (Leaf Incorporating Biochemistry Exhibiting Reflectance and Transmittance Yields) model (Dawson et al., 1998) for conifer needles. However, it requires many input parameters which need to be obtained by intensive fieldwork and laboratory analysis (Malenovsky et al., 2006, Morsdorf et al., 2009). Another widely applied leaf radiative transfer model is PROSPECT (Jacquemoud and Baret, 1990). PROSPECT, which stands for PROpriétés SPECTrales (French for Spectral Properties). It simulates leaf reflectance and transmittance and is the most popular leaf optical properties model of all those published since 1990 (Jacquemoud et al., 2009).
Although much work has been done on estimating plant traits from remote sensing, the estimation of LDMC and SLA at all scales (i.e., leaf, canopy and landscape) is rare. To our knowledge, the use of remote sensing techniques to estimate LDMC has not yet been tested at any scale. Compared to other biophysical variables, studies conducted on SLA are also limited and have mainly been conducted using statistical methods at a canopy scale. Lymburner et al. (2000) tested several existing vegetation indices in order to estimate SLA from Landsat TM imagery and found a strong correlation between average canopy SLA and green, red, NIR and MIR reflectance of Landsat TM data. A strong correlation between leaf mass per area and reflectance in the 750–2500 nm wavelength range has been also reported for tropical rainforest leaf samples (Asner and Martin, 2008, Asner et al., 2011). Normalized indices for leaf mass per area at leaf and canopy scales have been developed only recently, by le Maire et al. (2008) and Feret et al. (2011). However, these indices need to be tested on other images, sites and canopies (le Maire et al., 2008). Physical models, which are supposed to be much more robust than statistical approaches, have not been tested for LDMC and SLA estimations. Our study therefore aimed to investigate how accurately and precisely the LDMC and SLA can be estimated in heterogeneous forests at leaf level by using radiative transfer models, so that the application can be extended to canopy and landscape scales.
Section snippets
Study area and field data collection
The area chosen for this study was the mixed mountain forest of the Bavarian Forest National Park, which is more heterogeneous in tree species than similar areas in the region. It is located in south-eastern Germany along the border with the Czech Republic (490 3′19″N, 130 12′9″E). Elevation varies from 600 m to 1473 m above sea level. The climate of the region is temperate, with high annual precipitation (1200 mm to 1800 mm) and low average annual temperature (3° to 6° Celsius). Heavy snow cover
Determination of the structural parameter N and model suitability
The retrieved values of N range from 1 to 2.25. The maximum N value was recorded for the C++ age class of fir tree, while the minimum values were observed in Norway spruce C age class needles and European beech leaves. The average N values were 1.74 for Fir and 1.5 for Norway spruce. Among the broadleaf species, a higher mean value of N (1.7) was observed in Mountain ash (Table 4).
In order to evaluate the suitability of the leaf model, we calculated R2 and the RMSE between measured spectra and
Discussion and conclusions
This study quantifies and estimates two important leaf functional traits: SLA and LDMC. These traits, which are not widely addressed in the field of remote sensing, can be accurately derived from the input parameters of the PROSPECT radiative transfer model. The model's performance was evaluated for samples from mixed forest. The results indicate that the PROSPECT_4 leaf model accurately simulates spectral information of samples from mixed mountain forests and can be used to retrieve the
Acknowledgments
This study was funded by Nuffic-Netherlands fellowship program. We acknowledge the assistance of Dr. Nicole Pinnel in German Remote Sensing Data Center, German Aerospace Center Earth Observation Center (DLR) and Dr. Hooman Latifi in Institute of Geography and Geology, University of Wuerzburg in selecting the test site, and organizing and facilitating the field campaign. Thanks also go to the Bavarian Forest National Parks for approving access to the study area, providing the crossbow with its
References (73)
- et al.
Ecological research needs from multiangle remote sensing data
Remote Sens. Environ.
(1998) - et al.
Spectral and chemical analysis of tropical forests: scaling from leaf to canopy levels
Remote Sens. Environ.
(2008) - et al.
Deriving green crop area index and canopy chlorophyll density of winter wheat from spectral reflectance data
Remote Sens. Environ.
(2002) - et al.
Retrieval of canopy biophysical variables from bidirectional reflectance—Using prior information to solve the ill-posed inverse problem
Remote Sens. Environ.
(2003) - et al.
Inversion of a radiative transfer model for estimating vegetation LAI and chlorophyll in a heterogeneous grassland
Remote Sens. Environ.
(2008) - et al.
LAI and chlorophyll estimation for a heterogeneous grassland using hyperspectral measurements
ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote Sens.
(2008) - et al.
A new technique to measure the spectral properties of conifer needles
Remote Sens. Environ.
(1989) - et al.
LIBERTY—modeling the effects of leaf biochemical concentration on reflectance spectra
Remote Sens. Environ.
(1998) - et al.
Vive la diffírence: plant functional diversity matters to ecosystem processes
Trends Ecol. Evol.
(2001) - et al.
Spectroscopic classification of tropical forest species using radiative transfer modeling
Remote Sens. Environ.
(2011)
PROSPECT-4 and 5: advances in the leaf optical properties model separating photosynthetic pigments
Remote Sens. Environ.
Optimizing spectral indices and chemometric analysis of leaf chemical properties using radiative transfer modeling
Remote Sens. Environ.
Prospect—a model of leaf optical-properties spectra
Remote Sens. Environ.
Estimating leaf biochemistry using the PROSPECT leaf optical properties model
Remote Sens. Environ.
PROSPECT plus SAIL models: a review of use for vegetation characterization
Remote Sens. Environ.
Estimating forest variables from top-of-atmosphere radiance satellite measurements using coupled radiative transfer models
Remote Sens. Environ.
Multitemporal-patch ensemble inversion of coupled surface-atmosphere radiative transfer models for land surface characterization
Remote Sens. Environ.
Calibration and validation of hyperspectral indices for the estimation of broadleaved forest leaf chlorophyll content, leaf mass per area, leaf area index and leaf canopy biomass
Remote Sens. Environ.
Influence of woody elements of a Norway spruce canopy on nadir reflectance simulated by the DART model at very high spatial resolution
Remote Sens. Environ.
A revised measurement methodology for conifer needles spectral optical properties: evaluating the influence of gaps between elements
Remote Sens. Environ.
Assessing forest structural and physiological information content of multi-spectral LiDAR waveforms by radiative transfer modelling
Remote Sens. Environ.
Regional estimation of savanna grass nitrogen using the red-edge band of the spaceborne RapidEye sensor
Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinf.
Water-removed spectra increase the retrieval accuracy when estimating savanna grass nitrogen and phosphorus concentrations
ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote Sens.
Modeling distribution of Amazonian tree species and diversity using remote sensing measurements
Remote Sens. Environ.
Forage quality of savannas—simultaneously mapping foliar protein and polyphenols for trees and grass using hyperspectral imagery
Remote Sens. Environ.
Functional Diversity. Encyclopedia of Biodiversity
Retrieval of foliar information about plant pigment systems from high resolution spectroscopy
Remote Sens. Environ.
Estimating forest growth and efficiency in relation to canopy leaf-area
Adv. Ecol. Res.
Intraspecific functional variability: extent, structure and sources of variation
J. Ecol.
Airborne spectranomics: mapping canopy chemical and taxonomic diversity in tropical forests
Front. Ecol. Environ.
Contrasting leaf chemical traits in tropical lianas and trees: implications for future forest composition
Ecol. Lett.
Leaf chemical and spectral diversity in Australian tropical forests
Ecol. Appl.
Taxonomy and remote sensing of leaf mass per area (LMA) in humid tropical forests
Ecol. Appl.
Beyond species: functional diversity and the maintenance of ecological processes and services
J. Appl. Ecol.
Using phylogenetic, functional and trait diversity to understand patterns of plant community productivity
PLoS One
Hyperspectral remote sensing of canopy biodiversity in Hawaiian lowland rainforests
Ecosystems
Cited by (69)
Estimating leaf mass per area with leaf radiative transfer model
2023, Remote Sensing of EnvironmentUsing the SCOPE model for potato growth, productivity and yield monitoring under different levels of nitrogen fertilization
2022, International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and GeoinformationLeaf pigment retrieval using the PROSAIL model: Influence of uncertainty in prior canopy-structure information
2022, Crop JournalCitation Excerpt :Consequently, recognizing their respective contributions and consequently their quantities can be difficult. Considerable endeavors have been made to alleviate the impact of ill-posedness in model inversion, such as limiting the ranges of model parameters [12,27], avoiding unrealistic parameter combinations [18], and inverting one parameter at a time with its specific sensitive spectral range [25,28]. The use of prior information, both temporal and spatial [18,26,29,30], is frequent among these attempts.
Hyperspectral indices developed from the low order fractional derivative spectra can capture leaf dry matter content across a variety of species better
2022, Agricultural and Forest MeteorologyCitation Excerpt :On the other hand, remote sensing has played an increasing role in acquiring plant traits at broad spatial scales. In particular, hyperspectral remote sensing has the advantage of providing detailed and continuous spectral information (Jin and Wang 2018), offering high potential for retrieving LMA (Ali et al., 2016). Retrieving plant traits from remote sensing relies on either statistically or mechanically based approaches (Ali et al., 2016; Wang et al., 2018).
Optimizing LUT-based inversion of leaf chlorophyll from hyperspectral lidar data: Role of cost functions and regulation strategies
2021, International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and GeoinformationCitation Excerpt :Detailed analysis of the inter-relationship between the various regulation strategies in LUT inversion of RTMs is needed in further researches. Comparing with other similar studies, Ali et al. (2016) estimated leaf equivalent water thickness and leaf dry matter of broadleaves and conifers with LUT-based PROSPECT model inversion. By incorporating prior information of the distribution of the traits, their inversion accuracy was improved substantially (leaf dry matter: R2 from 0.36 to 0.60, and RMSE from 0.0037 to 0.0018; leaf equivalent water thickness: R2 from 0.39 to 0.54, and RMSE from 0.0024 to 0.0019).