Original articleAre Crimes by Online Predators Different From Crimes by Sex Offenders Who Know Youth In-Person?
Section snippets
Methods
We surveyed a stratified national sample of 2,653 law enforcement agencies by mail asking if they had made arrests for Internet-related child sexual exploitation crimes during 2009. Then we conducted detailed telephone interviews with investigators about specific cases reported in the mail surveys.
Results
In 2009, there were an estimated 1,490 arrests for Internet-related sex crimes against minors that included online sexual communications with victims (95% confidence interval (CI): 1,330–1,649). An estimated 672 arrests were for crimes by online-meeting offenders (95% CI: 564–781); an estimated 817 were for crimes by know-in-person/online offenders (95% CI: 710–925).
Acknowledgments
This project was funded by Grant No. 2009-SNB-90001 awarded by the Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention, Office of Justice Programs, U.S. Department of Justice. The total amount of federal funding is $825,704. Points of view or opinions in this document are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position or policies of the U.S. Department of Justice.
We are grateful to the many law enforcement investigators who participated in this research and to the
References (26)
- et al.
A review of online grooming: Characteristics and concerns
Aggression Violent Behav
(2013) - et al.
The process of victimization: The victims' perspective
Child Abuse Negl
(1990) - et al.
Statutory sex crime relationships between juveniles and adults: A review of social scientific research
Aggression Violent Behav
(2007) - et al.
Association of maltreatment with high-risk Internet behaviors and offline encounters
Pediatrics
(2013) - et al.
Characteristics of the Internet for criminal child sexual abuse by online groomers
Criminal Justice Stud
(2011) Compliant child victims: Confronting an uncomfortable reality
APSAC Advisor
(2002)Grooming cybervictims: The psychological effects of online exploitation for youth
J Sch Violence
(2003)- et al.
Safeguarding young people from cyber pornography and cyber sexual predation: A major dilemma of the Internet
Child Abuse Rev
(2007) - Federal Bureau of Investigation. A parent's guide to Internet safety. Available at:...
- et al.
Identifying sexual grooming themes used by Internet sex offenders
Deviant Behav
(2013)
Trends in arrests of “online predators.”
Online “predators” and their victims: Myths, realities and implications for prevention and treatment
Am Psychol
Statutory rape known to law enforcement
Cited by (43)
A scoping review of child grooming strategies: pre- and post-internet
2022, Child Abuse and NeglectCitation Excerpt :In the offline environment, grooming began to take on a technological component. Offline offenders sent explicit messages over email or text and used a series of apps to maintain communication with the victim (Henschel & Grant, 2019; Wolak & Finkelhor, 2013). To varying degrees, technology became a component of most ongoing child sexual abuses (Dowdell et al., 2011; Wolak & Finkelhor, 2013).
Offender strategies for engaging children in online sexual activity
2021, Child Abuse and NeglectProgression, maintenance, and feedback of online child sexual grooming: A qualitative analysis of online predators
2018, Child Abuse and NeglectA systematic review of fantasy driven vs. contact driven internet-initiated sexual offences: Discrete or overlapping typologies?
2018, Child Abuse and NeglectCitation Excerpt :Sixteen percent (n = 18) of contact cases in Wolak et al.’s (2004) study involved coercion, and 9% (n = 9) in Wolak and Finkelhor (2013). It is unclear precisely how many cases in Wolak and Finkelhor (2013) study involved offline contact, however the authors note that a considerable number did not commit an offline offence. Two studies found no evidence of coercion in contact cases (Barber & Bettez, 2014; Grosskopf, 2010).
Persuasion strategies in online grooming of children: A qualitative analysis with sex offenders in prison
2017, Psychosocial Intervention
Conflicts of interest: We know of no potential conflicts of interest. The study sponsor was not involved in the design or implementation of the research or in any aspect of this paper.