Research report
Prevalence and psychosocial risk factors of PTSD: 18 months after Kashmir earthquake in Pakistan

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2010.10.035Get rights and content

Abstract

Background

On average in a year 939 earthquakes of a magnitude between 5 and 8 on the Richter scale occur around the world. In earthquakes developing countries are prone to large-scale destruction because of poor structural quality of buildings, and preparedness for earthquakes. On 8th October 2005, a major earthquake hit the remote and mountainous region of northern Pakistan and Kashmir. We wanted to find out the rate of PTSD in a randomly selected sample of participants living in earthquake area and the correlates of the PTSD.

Method

The study was conducted 18 months after the earthquake. We selected a sample of men and women living in the houses and tents for interviews. Using well established instruments for PTSD and general psychiatric morbidity we gathered information from over 1200 people in face to face interviews. We gathered information about trauma exposure and loss as well.

Results

55.2% women and 33.4% men suffered from PTSD. Living in a joint family was protective against the symptoms of PTSD. Dose of exposure to trauma was associated with the symptoms of PTSD. Living in a tent was associated with general psychiatric morbidity but not with PTSD.

Limitations

We used questionnaire instead of interviews to detect the symptoms of psychiatric disorders.

Conclusions

The symptoms of PTSD are common 18 months after the earthquake and they are specifically associated with the dose of trauma exposure. This may have implications for rehabilitation of this population.

Introduction

Earthquake is a commonly occurring natural disaster. On average in a year 939 earthquakes of a magnitude between 5 and 8 on the Richter scale occur around the world. If we only consider those earthquakes that killed a minimum of 1000 people, then about 1.8 million people lost their lives in 108 earthquakes during the twentieth century (http://earthquake.usgs.gov).

A systematic review of PTSD after disasters identified 116 studies in the category of natural disasters (Neria et al., 2008). The prevalence of PTSD in the first two years after the disasters ranged between 3.7% (Canino et al., 1990) and 60% (Madakasira and O'Brien, 1987). In samples from areas that were heavily affected by the disaster the prevalence was even higher (Finnsdottir and Elklit, 2002, Najarian et al., 2001). Prevalence of PTSD reported after a natural disaster was often lower than the PTSD reported after human made and technological disasters. PTSD in adults in Armenia 1.5 years after an earthquake was found to be 49.7% (Goenjian et al., 1994), 86.7% (Goenjian et al., 2000) and after 18 months in Turkey 41.9% (Kilic and Ulusoy, 2003).

In the included studies the post earthquake psychological problems were related to exposure to threat of injury or actual injury, closeness to the epicenter, disruption in life, resource loss, female gender, financial loss, past emotional problems, disruption in social network, lack of governmental support, and lower education levels. These findings are difficult to compare with each other as there are differences in sampling, assessment methods, time since the earthquake, intensity of the earthquake, and the scale of devastation.

Ninety one of the 108 major earthquakes (with a death toll over 1000) in the twentieth century occurred in the developing countries, accounting for 83% of 1.8 million deaths worldwide (http://earthquake.usgs.gov). These countries are prone to large-scale destruction because of their geographical location, poor structural quality of buildings, and preparedness for earthquakes. In the studies related with natural disasters reviewed by Neria et al., 34 were from United States of America, 15 from Australia, 2 from Italy, one study each from Norway, 4 from Greece, United Kingdom and New Zealand, 2 from Iceland, 5 from Japan, 9 from Taiwan and 2 from South Korea. Seventy six out of 116 studies were from developed countries and 40 from developing countries. The distribution of studies from the developing world is 2 from Mexico, 2 from Puerto Rica, 3 from China, 6 from Armenia, 4 from India, 13 from Turkey, 3 from Thailand, 2 each from Sri Lanka, Nicaragua and Honduras and 1 from Indonesia (Neria et al., 2008). Considering these facts there is a need for more studies in developing countries.

On 8th October 2005, a major earthquake measuring 7.6 on the Richter scale hit the remote and mountainous region of northern Pakistan and Kashmir. The epicenter was just north of Muzzafarabad the capital city. Altogether 4000 villages were affected, 73,000 people killed, 79,000 injured and 3.3 million rendered homeless. Over 470,000 houses were completely destroyed, nearly 65% of the hospitals in the area were destroyed or badly damaged and an estimated 10,000 school buildings were affected. This caused widespread devastation in major towns of Balakot, Muzzafarabad, Bagh and Rawalakot(www.reliefweb.int).

Section snippets

Methods

The project had appropriate ethical approval and informed written consents were sought from the participants.

Sample characteristics

In total we interviewed 1298 subjects of which 779 (60.3%) were women. Men were significantly older in age. The level of education was higher in men but overall 78.5% of the participants had more than 5 years of schooling. Detailed demographic information is given in Table 1.

Damage caused by the earthquake and exposure to trauma

Among the subjects 1030 (79.3%) reported that the earthquake caused major damage to their property. For 947 (73.0%) subjects survey of damage to the property had been completed and 863 (66.5%) had received some monetary

Discussion

This study was conducted 18 months after a major devastating earthquake. Many families were still displaced and were living in tents, with relatives or in other temporary accommodation. This posed a significant challenge at the time of data collection however we were able to include a large representative sample of population in this remote and difficult to reach area. However this variation added another dimension to our analysis and we identified some interesting predictors of morbidity.

Prior

Role of funding source

Funding for this study was provided by Pakistan Psychiatric Research Centre, Pakistan Psychiatric Research Centre had no further role in study design; in the collection, analysis and interpretation of data; in the writing of the report; and in the decision to submit the paper for publication.

Conflict of interest

None.

Acknowledgement

The authors acknowledge the contribution of these interviewers Romish Masood Khan, Rozeena Raees Khan, Huma Gul, Unse-ur-Rasool, Asma Jabeen, Fatima Jaffer, Sadia Yousaf, Zoobia Khalid, Sobia Khalid, Saima Kafeel and Iram Kauser to the study.

References (25)

  • A. Rahman et al.

    Outcome of prenatal depression and risk factors associated with persistence in the first postnatal year: prospective study from Rawalpindi, Pakistan

    Journal of Affective Disorders

    (2007)
  • F. Naeem et al.

    Angry wives, abusive husbands: relationship between domestic violence and psychosocial variables

    Women's Health Issues

    (2008)
  • Y. Neria et al.

    Post-traumatic stress disorder following disasters: a systematic review

    Psychological Medicine

    (2008)
  • G.J. Canino et al.

    The impact of disaster on mental health: Prospective and retrospective analyses. Spr, 1990

    International Journal of Mental Health

    (1990)
  • S. Madakasira et al.

    Acute posttraumatic stress disorder in victims of a natural disaster. May 1987

    The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease

    (1987)
  • T. Finnsdottir et al.

    Posttraumatic sequelae in a community hit by an avalanche

    Journal of Traumatic Stress

    (2002)
  • L.M. Najarian et al.

    The effect of relocation after a natural disaster

    Journal of Traumatic Stress

    (2001)
  • A.K. Goenjian et al.

    Posttraumatic stress disorder in elderly and younger adults after the 1988 earthquake in Armenia

    The American Journal of Psychiatry

    (1994)
  • A.K. Goenjian et al.

    Prospective study of posttraumatic stress, anxiety, and depressive reactions after earthquake and political violence

    The American Journal of Psychiatry

    (2000)
  • C. Kilic et al.

    Psychological effects of the November 1999 earthquake in Turkey: an epidemiological study

    Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica

    (2003)
  • M. Basoglu et al.

    A study of the validity of a screening instrument for traumatic stress in earthquake survivors in Turkey

    Journal of Traumatic Stress

    (2001)
  • N. Husain et al.

    The validation of personal health questionnaire amongst people of Pakistani family origin living in the United Kingdom

    Journal of Affective Disorders

    (2007)
  • Cited by (62)

    • Responses to natural disasters

      2023, Encyclopedia of Mental Health, Third Edition: Volume 1-3
    • The study of the group intervention containing EMDR therapy for children and mothers in the field of trauma after a mine explosion in Turkey

      2022, European Journal of Trauma and Dissociation
      Citation Excerpt :

      According to mine blast and accident records in Turkey, the country lost a total of 1 399 mineworkers between 2002 and 2015, including the Soma mine disaster (Bayraktar, Uyguçgil & Konuk, 2018). The effect of disasters on the development of PTSD symptoms in individuals has been an area of interest to researchers (Garfin & Silver, 2016; Ghazali, Yaman & Ahmad, 2012; Liang, Li, Zhou & Liu, 2021; McFarlane, Policansky & Irwin, 1987; Naeem et al., 2011). Solomon and Heide (2005) underline that not only survivors, but also families and community members, are at risk as a result of disasters.

    • Symptoms of posttraumatic stress disorder, depression, anxiety and other mental health problems following the 2010 earthquake in Haiti: A systematic review and meta-analysis

      2020, Journal of Affective Disorders
      Citation Excerpt :

      The various studies conducted following major earthquakes have shown the experience of fear, the level of exposure to material and human losses caused by the earthquake (including injury, having been in a place where people died, the death of family members and friends, the loss of home and employment, etc...), gender (i.e., being a female), prior trauma, peritraumatic distress, lack of social support, young and old age, and low education to be risk factors associated with symptoms of PTSD, depression, and anxiety (Armenian et al., 2000; Dai et al., 2016; Dell'Osso et al., 2013; Ehring et al., 2011; Fan et al., 2015; Goenjian et al., 1995; Groome and Soureti, 2004; Naeem et al., 2011; Tang et al., 2017, 2014). Following the 2010 earthquake in Haiti, several published studies assessed the mental health problems experienced by survivors of this major traumatic event (Blanc et al., 2015; Cadichon et al., 2017; Cénat, 2015a; Cénat et al., 2017, 2018; Cénat and Derivois, 2014a, 2015; Cerdá et al., 2013; Derivois et al., 2014a; Grelotti et al., 2018; Jaimes et al., 2019; Rahill et al., 2015).

    • Do remittances alleviate negative impacts of disaster on mental health? A case of the 2015 Nepal earthquake

      2019, Social Science and Medicine
      Citation Excerpt :

      In addition, several previous studies suggest that post-disaster depressive symptoms develop mainly due to the stress of reconstruction and other daily stressors in post-disaster life. Naeem et al. (2011), for example, found that among the victims of the 2005 earthquake in Kashmir, ‘living in a tent’ following the earthquake was associated with general psychiatric disorders but not with PTSD. We found negative associations of Remittance to HH with both PTSD and depression severity scores: two mental health indicators with different causes.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text