Elsevier

Injury

Volume 47, Issue 6, June 2016, Pages 1264-1269
Injury

Injury patterns and the role of tendons in protecting neurovascular structures in wrist injuries

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2016.01.044Get rights and content

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the anatomical features of injured structures, investigate the protection provided by the specific tendon of each corresponding important neurovascular structure (radial artery, median nerve, and ulnar nerve/artery) and to compare the results among the three categories of wrist injuries.

Methods

This study included 114 patients who underwent primary repair for damaged wrist structures; 40 patients sustained accidental damage without intention (group 1), 40 had self-inflicted damage (group 2), and 34 patients had a stab or penetrating wound caused by a sharp instrument during a conflict or violent event involving another person (group 3). The basic demographic factors, distribution pattern, area, and depth of the injured structures were investigated and compared. The barrier roles of the flexor carpi radialis (FCR) for the radial artery, palmaris longus (PL) for the median nerve, and flexor carpi ulnaris (FCU) for the ulnar nerve were estimated.

Results

In group 1, FCU injury was the most common single-structure injury. In group 2, PL ± median nerve injuries were the most common. Multiple-structure injuries involving more than five structures occurred more frequently in group 3 than in the other groups. FCU ± ulnar nerve injuries were more common in group 3 than in the other groups. Radial-side structures were injured most frequently in group 3, and central-side injuries occurred most frequently in groups 1 and 2. Superficial- and middle-layer injuries occurred at similar frequencies among the three groups. Particularly, deep-layer injuries were most weakly related to group 2 injuries. The barrier effects of the FCR, PL, and FCU were confirmed, respectively.

Conclusions

Wrist soft tissue injuries showed particular patterns of injured structures and depths according to the injury mechanism. These patterns included features such as single-structure injuries and the locations and depths of multiple-structure injuries with or without neurovascular injuries. In addition, the roles of FCR, PL, and FCU in protecting important wrist neurovascular structures were confirmed.

Level of evidence

Therapeutic III

Introduction

Wrist injuries are a major clinical concern for hand surgeons. The causes of the injuries and degree of damage to the anatomical structures are varied [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9], [10], [11], [12], [13], [14], [15], [16]. Particularly, self-inflicted lacerations due to psychological problems show additional features associated with repetition and suicide attempts [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9], [11], [13], [14], [15], [16], [17]. The epidemiology, injury patterns, psychological analysis, and method of psychological treatment in self-inflicted wrist injury patients have been reported. Some of these patients develop a “chronic wrist cutter” or “wrist-cutting syndrome” state.

Other than self-inflicted wrist injury, the wrist frequently incurs injuries caused by glass, falls, occupational procedures, traffic accidents, violent behaviour, or grinder/saw injuries. We classified these injury types into the following three categories (Fig. 1): (1) accidental damage without intention to injure (group 1), (2) self-inflicted damage regardless of the intention of a suicide attempt (group 2), and (3) stab or penetrating wounds by a sharp instrument during a conflict or violent event with another person regardless of its legality (group 3).

The purpose of the current study was to evaluate the anatomical features of injured structures and investigate the protection provided by tendons to important neurovascular structures (radial artery, median nerve, and ulnar nerve/artery) and to compare the results among the three categories. Our hypothesis was that statistical analysis of the injury patterns would elucidate features according to the injury mechanism or cause and the role of each tendon in protecting the major neurovascular structures in the wrist against an external slashing force.

Section snippets

Patient selection

Our Institutional Review Board approved the study, and all patients provided informed consent before participation. In total, 114 patients were enrolled from a cohort of 155 patients who had undergone primary repair for damaged wrist structures between March 2011 and July 2014.

The inclusion criteria were (1) normal healthy patients with an acute piercing, (2) penetrating, or stab wrist injury including tendon and neurovascular structures; (3) patients with injured structures in the volar side

Results

Our Institutional Review Board approved the registry, and all of the patients provided informed consent before participation. With the exception of gender, none of the demographic variables differed among the groups. Groups 1 and 3 comprised more men than did group 2 (P = .018). The injured side (right/left) did not differ significantly despite the distinct distribution in group 2 (P = .059). In addition, 94% (30/32) of patients in group 2 with a left-side wound had a right-side dominant hand. The

Discussion

Our study showed a female-dominant pattern only in group 2 (self-inflicted injury), and comparisons of gender distributions among the three groups showed a statistical difference. The predominance of left-side lesions was due to infliction by the dominant arm on the non-dominant wrist, but there was no statistically significant difference among the groups. There have been several reports concerning epidemiologic factors associated with self-inflicted injuries. Male gender, old age, and

Conclusion

The pattern of wrist soft tissue injuries differed according to the injury mechanism. These patterns included features such as the frequency of injury of each structure and the distribution of location or depth of injuries. We identified a role for three tendons (FCR, PL, and FCU) in the protection of important wrist neurovascular structures. In addition, the abilities of these barrier structures to predict neurovascular injuries were estimated.

Conflict of interest

None.

Funding source

None.

References (19)

  • M. Fujioka et al.

    Evaluation of superficial and deep self-inflicted wrist and forearm lacerations

    J Hand Surg Am

    (2012)
  • L.W. Rosen et al.

    Treatment technique for chronic wrist cutters

    J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry

    (1984)
  • N. Weinzweig et al.

    Spaghetti wrist”: management and results

    Plast Reconstr Surg

    (1998)
  • S. Sakai

    Free flap from the flexor aspect of the wrist for resurfacing defects of the hand and fingers

    Plast Reconstr Surg

    (2003)
  • J.H. Gu et al.

    Self-wrist cutting injury: a traumatologic and psychological analysis

    Plast Reconstr Surg

    (2012)
  • T. Matsumoto et al.

    Patterns of self-cutting: a preliminary study on differences in clinical implications between wrist- and arm-cutting using a Japanese juvenile detention center sample

    Psychiatry Clin Neurosci

    (2004)
  • R.G. Chuinard et al.

    The ‘suicide’ wrist: epidemiologic study of the injury

    Orthopedics

    (1979)
  • C.N. Harris et al.

    The self-inflicted wrist slash

    J Trauma

    (1976)
  • R.M. Goldwyn et al.

    Self-inflicted injury to the wrist

    Plast Reconstr Surg

    (1967)
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (0)

View full text