International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics
Volume 95, Issue 2, 1 June 2016, Pages 800-801
Physics ContributionClinical Target Volume: The Third Front
Section snippets
Acknowledgment
The authors thank Dr Gregory Kubicek and Dr Simona Shaitelman for helpful suggestions.
References (9)
- et al.
A simulation framework for modeling tumor control probability in breast conserving therapy
Radiother Oncol
(2014) - et al.
Combined recipe for clinical target volume and planning target volume margins
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys
(2014) - et al.
The effect of age in breast conserving therapy: A retrospective analysis on pathology and clinical outcome data
Radiother Oncol
(2015) - et al.
A conceptual model integrating spatial information to assess target volume coverage for IMRT treatment planning
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys
(2003)
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.
Cited by (6)
The role of computational methods for automating and improving clinical target volume definition
2020, Radiotherapy and OncologyComparing local control and distant metastasis in NSCLC patients between CyberKnife and conventional SBRT
2020, Radiotherapy and OncologyResponse to Letter to the Editor: Regarding “The dosimetric impact of image guided radiation therapy by intratumoral fiducial markers”
2017, Practical Radiation OncologyThree discipline collaborative radiation therapy (3DCRT) special debate: Equipment development is stifling innovation in radiation oncology
2019, Journal of Applied Clinical Medical PhysicsPrimary tumor volume delineation in head and neck cancer: Missing the tip of the iceberg?
2017, Radiation Oncology
The work mentioned in this brief opinion is funded by a Cancer Institute of New Jersey IMPACT award (National Institutes of Health Cancer Center Support Grant P30CA072720).
Conflict of interest: none.
© 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.