Hydro-thermo-mechanical analysis during injection of cold fluid into a geologic formation

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrmms.2015.04.010Get rights and content

Highlights

  • We investigate geomechanical responses when isothermal or cold fluid is injected.

  • We also investigate a hypothetical stepwise injection to explore its advantages.

  • The stepwise injection method alleviates thermal drop in the injection zone.

  • The stepwise injection improves mechanical stability at a site for both stress regimes.

  • We suggest dimensionless parameters to compare poro- and thermo-elastic stresses.

Abstract

We conducted in-depth investigations of pore-pressure buildup, temperature, and stress changes under isothermal or nonisothermal injection scenarios, using numerical simulations. The numerical simulation method combines fluid flow, poroelasticity, thermal diffusion, and thermal stress, and is based on the single-phase fluid flow condition. We also examined temporal evolutions of stress states and mobilized friction angles across base, injection zone, and caprock layers for two different stress regimes, normal-faulting and reverse-faulting. Results show that injecting cold fluid shifts an area in which the mobilized friction angle becomes maximum, which is where induced-seismic events are likely to be triggered first, for both stress regimes. We also tested a hypothetical stepwise injection of cold fluid; results show that this injection helps to improve the stability of the injection zone to some extent. Finally, we suggest using dimensionless parameters to determine a prevalence of the thermal-stress effect in the injection zone, and discuss the impact of the initial stress regime and implications of using the single-phase fluid flow condition.

Introduction

Extracting petroleum and natural gas during the era of fossil-fuel dominance has been a major operation that artificially disturbs stress states in geological formations that are generally deeper than ~500 m. In the meantime, efforts—such as CO2 geologic sequestration, enhanced geothermal system (EGS), and wastewater injection—to diversify the energy portfolio and to alleviate the greenhouse gas effect are rendering fluid injection as important as fluid extraction. Injecting fluid into a geological formation could be more complex than extracting fluid for these primary reasons: first, injected fluid, whether similar to an original formation fluid (single-phase fluid flow such as wastewater injection and EGS) or a different one (two-phase flow such as CO2 geologic sequestration and EGS with CO2), causes pore-pressure buildup and poroelastic effects. Second, injected fluid (nonisothermal fluid flow such as CO2 geologic sequestration, wastewater injection, and EGS) could retain a different temperature. Poroelastic and thermal stress effects can increase or oppose each other, depending on the condition of the injection/extraction and the bottom-hole temperature of fluids. In particular, injecting fluid colder than an original fluid will cause thermal contraction and corresponding decreases in stresses, which yield an effect opposite of what volume expansion and increases in stresses driven by isothermal fluid injection do. This study focuses on this phenomenon as it can occur in various operations deep under the surface.

These hydro-thermo-mechanical effects have drawn a great deal of attention for the last couple of decades, particularly in regard to energy and/or environmental applications. Salient examples include single-phase isothermal fluid flow [1], [2], [3], [4], two-phase isothermal fluid flow [5], [6], single-phase nonisothermal fluid flow [7], [8], [9], two-phase nonisothermal fluid flow [10], [11], [12], and wellbore heat-transfer problems [13].

In this study, we attempt an in-depth investigation of pore-pressure buildup, thermal diffusion, and stress changes for an isothermal and a nonisothermal cold fluid injection, using numerical simulations. We use the single-phase fluid flow condition to simplify a computation model and thus facilitate a focus on mechanical responses [14]. After the simulations, we examine stress states and mobilized friction angles to determine which layer—bottom, injection, or caprock—approaches most closely a failure criterion under different stress regimes. We also explore a stepwise injection of nonisothermal cold fluid as an alternative to nonisothermal fluid injection with a constant rate. Lastly, we provide discussions on the implications for various energy/environmental applications based on observations from this study.

Section snippets

Numerical simulations

Accounting for both poroelastic and thermal effects during fluid flow in a porous medium greatly increases the complexity of the problem. If this type of problem were to be solved analytically, initial and boundary conditions and geometry should be limited to a simple setting. In this regard, we conducted numerical simulations to investigate spatio-temporal evolutions of poroelastic and thermally-induced stresses and corresponding changes in stability when imposing isothermal or nonisothermal

Analyses: mechanical stability

Initial effective stress σ′ can be assessed simply as a function of initial total stress σ0, initial pore pressure pf0, and Biot׳s coefficient α: σ′=σ0αpf0. Vertical and horizontal effective stresses, σv′ and σh′, are updated in response to the poroelastic and thermal-stress effectsσv=σv0+ΔσvP+ΔσvTαpfσh=Kσv0+ΔσhP+ΔσhTαpfwhere K represents the initial total stress ratio K=σh0/σv0, ∆σP denotes contribution from the poroelastic effect, and ∆σT represents thermally induced stress. We recorded (

Results and discussion: thermo-poroelastic behavior

We present numerical simulation results that shed light on geomechanical responses at a site across a base, an injection, and a caprock layer when isothermal or nonisothermal cold fluid is injected. We focus analysis on three lines of interest: the middle line of the injection zone, the interface between the injection zone and the caprock, and the vertical line located 10 m away from the injection well. When presenting results, compression is regarded as positive for stress changes.

Results and discussion: stepwise injection

The fluid injection rate affects the bottom-hole temperature at the injection well. When a cold fluid is injected from the surface, the fluid gets warmer because of the heat exchange with ambient rock before arriving at the bottom hole. Therefore, the slower the injection rate, the more heat the fluid gains from the ambient geothermal [13]. In this regard, we can hypothesize that if the injection rate of cold fluid jumps up stepwise, then the bottom-hole temperature of the fluid would

Discussion

In this section we discuss dimensionless numbers related to poroelastic and thermoelastic stresses, impact of the initial stress regime, and implications when the two-phase flow condition prevails.

Conclusions

We investigated geomechanical responses at an ideally designed site when isothermal or nonisothermal cold fluid is injected into it, using the numerical simulation method that is based on the single-phase fluid flow condition and combines poroelasticity and thermal stress equations. We also attempted a hypothetical stepwise injection method to explore its possible advantages.

The injection of cold fluid causes thermal contraction to be added to the overpressure-driven compression in the lower

Acknowledgments

This work was funded by the Gulf Coast Carbon Center at the Bureau of Economic Geology (BEG) and the U.S. Department of Energy, NETL, under Contract number DE-FE0009301.

References (32)

  • P. Segall et al.

    A note on induced stress changes in hydrocarbon and geothermal reservoirs

    Tectonophysics

    (1998)
  • A.V. Newman et al.

    A four-dimensional viscoelastic deformation model for Long Valley Caldera, California, between 1995 and 2000

    J Volcanol Geotherm Res

    (2006)
  • R.T. Okwen et al.

    Temporal variations in near-wellbore pressures during CO2 injection in saline aquifers

    Int J Greenh Gas Control

    (2011)
  • S. Kim et al.

    Above-zone pressure monitoring and geomechanical analyses for a field-scale CO2 injection project in Cranfield

    MS. Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology

    (2014)
  • M. Schoenball et al.

    Fluid-induced microseismicity in pre-stressed rock masses

    Geophys J Int

    (2010)
  • Goodarzi S, Settari A, Zoback MD, Keith D. Thermal aspects of geomechanics and induced fracturing in CO2 injection with...
  • Cited by (64)

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    1

    Present address: Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Western New England University, 1215 Wilbraham Road, Springfield, MA 01119, USA.

    View full text