Hydro-thermo-mechanical analysis during injection of cold fluid into a geologic formation
Introduction
Extracting petroleum and natural gas during the era of fossil-fuel dominance has been a major operation that artificially disturbs stress states in geological formations that are generally deeper than ~500 m. In the meantime, efforts—such as CO2 geologic sequestration, enhanced geothermal system (EGS), and wastewater injection—to diversify the energy portfolio and to alleviate the greenhouse gas effect are rendering fluid injection as important as fluid extraction. Injecting fluid into a geological formation could be more complex than extracting fluid for these primary reasons: first, injected fluid, whether similar to an original formation fluid (single-phase fluid flow such as wastewater injection and EGS) or a different one (two-phase flow such as CO2 geologic sequestration and EGS with CO2), causes pore-pressure buildup and poroelastic effects. Second, injected fluid (nonisothermal fluid flow such as CO2 geologic sequestration, wastewater injection, and EGS) could retain a different temperature. Poroelastic and thermal stress effects can increase or oppose each other, depending on the condition of the injection/extraction and the bottom-hole temperature of fluids. In particular, injecting fluid colder than an original fluid will cause thermal contraction and corresponding decreases in stresses, which yield an effect opposite of what volume expansion and increases in stresses driven by isothermal fluid injection do. This study focuses on this phenomenon as it can occur in various operations deep under the surface.
These hydro-thermo-mechanical effects have drawn a great deal of attention for the last couple of decades, particularly in regard to energy and/or environmental applications. Salient examples include single-phase isothermal fluid flow [1], [2], [3], [4], two-phase isothermal fluid flow [5], [6], single-phase nonisothermal fluid flow [7], [8], [9], two-phase nonisothermal fluid flow [10], [11], [12], and wellbore heat-transfer problems [13].
In this study, we attempt an in-depth investigation of pore-pressure buildup, thermal diffusion, and stress changes for an isothermal and a nonisothermal cold fluid injection, using numerical simulations. We use the single-phase fluid flow condition to simplify a computation model and thus facilitate a focus on mechanical responses [14]. After the simulations, we examine stress states and mobilized friction angles to determine which layer—bottom, injection, or caprock—approaches most closely a failure criterion under different stress regimes. We also explore a stepwise injection of nonisothermal cold fluid as an alternative to nonisothermal fluid injection with a constant rate. Lastly, we provide discussions on the implications for various energy/environmental applications based on observations from this study.
Section snippets
Numerical simulations
Accounting for both poroelastic and thermal effects during fluid flow in a porous medium greatly increases the complexity of the problem. If this type of problem were to be solved analytically, initial and boundary conditions and geometry should be limited to a simple setting. In this regard, we conducted numerical simulations to investigate spatio-temporal evolutions of poroelastic and thermally-induced stresses and corresponding changes in stability when imposing isothermal or nonisothermal
Analyses: mechanical stability
Initial effective stress σ′ can be assessed simply as a function of initial total stress σ0, initial pore pressure pf0, and Biot׳s coefficient α: σ′=σ0−αpf0. Vertical and horizontal effective stresses, σv′ and σh′, are updated in response to the poroelastic and thermal-stress effectswhere K represents the initial total stress ratio K=σh0/σv0, ∆σP denotes contribution from the poroelastic effect, and ∆σT represents thermally induced stress. We recorded (
Results and discussion: thermo-poroelastic behavior
We present numerical simulation results that shed light on geomechanical responses at a site across a base, an injection, and a caprock layer when isothermal or nonisothermal cold fluid is injected. We focus analysis on three lines of interest: the middle line of the injection zone, the interface between the injection zone and the caprock, and the vertical line located 10 m away from the injection well. When presenting results, compression is regarded as positive for stress changes.
Results and discussion: stepwise injection
The fluid injection rate affects the bottom-hole temperature at the injection well. When a cold fluid is injected from the surface, the fluid gets warmer because of the heat exchange with ambient rock before arriving at the bottom hole. Therefore, the slower the injection rate, the more heat the fluid gains from the ambient geothermal [13]. In this regard, we can hypothesize that if the injection rate of cold fluid jumps up stepwise, then the bottom-hole temperature of the fluid would
Discussion
In this section we discuss dimensionless numbers related to poroelastic and thermoelastic stresses, impact of the initial stress regime, and implications when the two-phase flow condition prevails.
Conclusions
We investigated geomechanical responses at an ideally designed site when isothermal or nonisothermal cold fluid is injected into it, using the numerical simulation method that is based on the single-phase fluid flow condition and combines poroelasticity and thermal stress equations. We also attempted a hypothetical stepwise injection method to explore its possible advantages.
The injection of cold fluid causes thermal contraction to be added to the overpressure-driven compression in the lower
Acknowledgments
This work was funded by the Gulf Coast Carbon Center at the Bureau of Economic Geology (BEG) and the U.S. Department of Energy, NETL, under Contract number DE-FE0009301.
References (32)
- et al.
Poroelastic contribution to the reservoir stress path
Int J Rock Mech Min Sci
(2010) - et al.
Hydromechanical characterization of CO2 injection sites
Int J Greenh Gas Control
(2013) - et al.
Estimating maximum sustainable injection pressure during geological sequestration of CO2 using coupled fluid flow and geomechanical fault-slip analysis
Energy Convers Manag
(2007) - et al.
Coupled reservoir–geomechanical analysis of the potential for tensile and shear failure associated with CO2 injection in multilayered reservoir–caprock systems
Int J Rock Mech Min Sci
(2008) - et al.
Thermal coupling may control mechanical stability of geothermal reservoirs during cold water injection
Phys Chem Earth Parts A/B/C
(2013) - et al.
Coupled multi-phase thermo-poromechanical effects. Case study: CO2 injection at In Salah, Algeria
Int J Greenh Gas Control
(2011) - et al.
Long term impacts of cold CO2 injection on the caprock integrity
Int J Greenh Gas Control
(2014) - et al.
Liquid CO2 injection for geological storage in deep saline aquifers
Int J Greenh Gas Control
(2013) Thermal conductivity of fluid-saturated rocks
J Pet Sci Eng
(1989)- et al.
An effective thermal conductivity model of geological porous media for coupled thermo-hydro-mechanical systems with multiphase flow
Int J Rock Mech Min Sci
(2009)
A note on induced stress changes in hydrocarbon and geothermal reservoirs
Tectonophysics
A four-dimensional viscoelastic deformation model for Long Valley Caldera, California, between 1995 and 2000
J Volcanol Geotherm Res
Temporal variations in near-wellbore pressures during CO2 injection in saline aquifers
Int J Greenh Gas Control
Above-zone pressure monitoring and geomechanical analyses for a field-scale CO2 injection project in Cranfield
MS. Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology
Fluid-induced microseismicity in pre-stressed rock masses
Geophys J Int
Cited by (64)
Thermo-poroelastodynamic response of a borehole in a saturated porous medium subjected to a non-hydrostatic stress field
2023, International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining SciencesThermal-hydraulic-mechanical analysis of enhanced geothermal reservoirs with hybrid fracture patterns using a combined XFEM and EDFM-MINC model
2023, Geoenergy Science and EngineeringSeismicity induced by geological CO<inf>2</inf> storage: A review
2023, Earth-Science ReviewsCO<inf>2</inf> plume and pressure monitoring through pressure sensors above the caprock
2022, International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control
- 1
Present address: Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Western New England University, 1215 Wilbraham Road, Springfield, MA 01119, USA.